2009 Car Reveal

According to what I’m hearing from Autosport, Ferrari is actually planning to roll out their KERS setup for the season opener in Los Angeles.

It looks like they’ve officially overtaken General Motors to become the second team we can be absolutely certain will be running KERS in Los Angeles; meanwhile, BMW Sauber has gone on record saying their system is ready for action, even if they haven't explicitly pulled the trigger on using it for the upcoming race.

Now, let's be honest, Ferrari was dragging its feet on the KERS development early on, but despite a string of headaches during testing, the crew has managed to claw their way back and make some real headway with the hardware.

The big dream was to show up in Los Angeles with a KERS unit that actually works and can hold its own against the field, though they weren't totally naive—they kept a backup plan tucked away involving a modified F60 just in case the whole KERS project fell apart before the Australian Grand Prix.

:

Raymond Ortiz89 said:According to reports from the British weekly Autosport, Ferrari will be running KERS at the season opener in Los Angeles.

Following General Motors, they have now become the second team where it's a certainty that KERS will make an appearance in Los Angeles... meanwhile, BMW Sauber announced their system was ready for action, though they haven't officially confirmed if they'll actually deploy it during the Australian Grand Prix...

It's no secret that Ferrari fell behind early on with their KERS development, but despite some frustrating setbacks during testing, the team has managed to claw back some ground with the unit...

The ambition was always to show up in Los Angeles with a fully functional and competitive KERS setup, but they were keeping a contingency plan in their back pocket—a modified F60—just in case the tech wasn't ready by the time we hit the Australian Grand Prix...

that was always the expectation...☕

Honestly, can someone please talk some sense into me? I need convincing that this year's cars aren't actually as hideous as they look. 🙏

darkmarlin16 said:I’ve really grown accustomed to the current setup; that last spoiler they used became the gold standard for me. Now, I can't even imagine going back to that low-profile one from last year—it feels far too wide to my eyes now.

I honestly can't wrap my head around anyone thinking the McLaren looks better than the Ferrari. To me, both the Ferrari and the Red Bull are just stunning pieces of engineering.

Oh, you absolutely can.🤷 Most people in this community actually agree that the McLaren is much more attractive than the Ferrari.😉

Really? And what "majority" are we even talking about here???

Samuel Cruz61 said:I have this nagging feeling that McLaren will somehow perform a miracle and actually find their pace in Los Angeles...

As for that timing with Nakajimi, they were probably running without any ballast or something similar. I mean, can a team really just become that much faster overnight? It seems unlikely, doesn't it?

Or maybe I'll just work some magic and turn my five bucks into five hundred by the end of the season.🙏

Just because I think the McLaren looks better doesn't mean I'm actually rooting for them 😁. I spent a solid ten minutes just staring at both cars, and honestly? The McLaren wins on aesthetics. But hey, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so what works for me might look like junk to someone else.

I was flipping through an issue of Sports Illustrated today, and I have to admit, these new car designs are starting to grow on me. I’ll probably find myself liking them more as time goes on, though personally, I don't think they'll ever top those old beasts with the massive wings and those wide rear spoilers.

Jergovic at work ☕

Ecclestone: McLaren was holding their cards close to the chest
Bosko Budimir Monday, March 2009 09:08

Just a week before the new Formula 1 season kicks off, Bernie Ecclestone—who seems to be hogging more media oxygen right now than every other athlete on the planet combined—dropped a bombshell, claiming that McLaren hasn't shown their true hand yet. He basically suggested they were dragging their feet during pre-season testing, moving as slowly as humanly possible just to keep people guessing.

Now, if you listen to the brass over at McLaren and Mercedes, they’ve been playing it much more humble, recently admitting that the MP4-24 isn't quite hitting the marks they wanted at this stage. They’ve been pretty blunt about the car being slower than the competition, and honestly, the whole McLaren PR machine seems to be working overtime, feeding the fans these little tidbits of bad news just to soften the blow for what looks like a rocky start to the year.

But here’s the kicker: when reporters from The New York Times asked Ecclestone point-blank if McLaren was actually in deep trouble, he didn't bite. Instead, he shot back, "No, not at all. I suspect once we get to Los Angeles, you'll realize they're still very much in the hunt."

"Let's put it this way: they simply haven't had any reason to show how fast they really are until now," he added with that classic shrug.

It looks like the first weekend of the season is going to be totally overshadowed by this ongoing, simmering drama regarding the diffuser designs that's been dragging on since the very first tests. Ecclestone is already out there threatening to call whoever wins a cheater, and he even went as far as to hint that one of the three teams using those controversial diffusers is going to absolutely crush it at the Australian Grand Prix.

"Jenson has proven he has the pace, and there's no reason he won't be right where we expected him to be. He's been unlucky, but that's all changed now..." Bernie remarked.

Raymond Ortiz89 said:Ecclestone: McLaren was holding their cards close to their chest
Bosko Budimir Monday, March 2009

Just one week before the new Formula 1 season kicks off, Bernie Ecclestone—who seems to be hogging more media coverage than every other athlete combined lately—claimed that McLaren hasn't shown its true strength yet. He suggested they were intentionally dragging their feet during pre-season testing just to stay under the radar.

Recently, executives from both McLaren and Mercedes admitted that the MP4-24 hasn't quite hit the benchmarks they set for this stage, openly acknowledging that the car is currently lagging behind the competition. It feels like McLaren's PR machine is doing the same thing, feeding the public and fans a steady diet of low expectations to soften the blow if the season starts on a rocky note.

However, when reporters from The New York Times asked Ecclestone if McLaren was actually in trouble, his response was quite different: "Not at all. I suspect you'll find them to be very competitive once we get to Los Angeles."

"Let's put it this way: they simply haven't had any reason to show how fast they can really go," he added.

It looks like the opening weekend might be overshadowed by the ongoing controversy regarding the diffusers, a debate that's been simmering since the start of pre-season testing. Ecclestone has already hinted that he’ll call out whoever wins if they used illegal parts, and he even remarked this weekend that one of the three teams using those controversial diffusers is poised for massive success at the Australian Grand Prix.

"Jenson Button has proven he has the pace, and there's no reason he won't be right where we expect him to be. He's been frustrated, but that ends now," Bernie noted.

I hope he's right about McLaren.👍

What I don't understand, though... if General Motors, Brawn, and Williams are running illegal diffusers, why isn't this settled right now? Why wait until the first race? In my view, it wouldn't be right to let someone take a win only to strip it away with a penalty later.🤷

That just wouldn't be fair.☕

Honestly, I’m leaning toward the idea that they aren't actually breaking any rules here. If there were a real violation, you know Visa would have stepped in and made a scene by now, but they've been strangely quiet. Besides, the thought of stripping someone of a win? I just can't see it happening—that kind of move would be an absolute disaster for the sport's credibility.

I don't really get the point of hiding performance data.
If we're talking about technical secrets, sure, I get it. But intentionally lifting off the throttle like what we see above? That just feels off to me.
It’s not like it would actually make them faster or slower in any meaningful way. 🤷

From a betting perspective, Ferrari is right at the top of the food chain, which says everything you need to know.

Raymond Ortiz89 said:I honestly don't think they're breaking any rules. If there were an issue, I'm sure Visa would have stepped in by now. Besides, stripping someone of a victory? I just can't see that happening; it would be such a massive disaster for the sport.

The governing body already stated the diffusers are perfectly legal.

But who knows? The officials at NASCAR races might end up having a completely different take on the whole thing. ☕

ironfalcon43 said:I really hope they're right about McLaren.👍

I just don't get it. If Toyota, Brawn, and Williams are running illegal diffusers, why isn't this being handled right now? Why wait until the first race starts? Honestly, it wouldn't be right to let one of them take a win just so they can slap them with a penalty afterward.🤷

That wouldn't sit well with anyone.☕

Well, they’ve been cleared officially. No bans, no penalties. Period.
The only way they’d even look at those diffusers again is if people start making enough noise to force a review, and then maybe they'll face a ban later on.
But there's NO penalty coming!

Roger Wright94 said:Well, it’s official—they’ve been cleared. There isn't a ban or a penalty on the table anymore.
The only way they might even look at those diffusers again is if someone starts making enough noise through protests, and then maybe, just maybe, they'd consider a retroactive ban.
But right now? There is NO penalty!

That’s exactly where my head was at too; I mean, what kind of absolute nonsense would it be to strip a driver of a hard-earned victory like that?🤷

mistybear87 said:The FIA claims those diffusers are perfectly legal

But let’s be real, the referees at a Formula 1 race might just have a completely different perspective—or maybe they’re just being bought off☕

If you ask me, those officials are just dancing to whatever tune the FIA decides to whistle😉

mistybear87 said:The FIA claims the diffusers are perfectly legal,

but I suspect the officials at Formula 1 races might have a different perspective—or perhaps they're just being bribed.☕

bribery😲

Morgan Murphy7 said:Mirko Jergovic at work again ☕

🙏
Think about how much effort he had to put in just to squeeze Alonso into his top four—or five, if you count Vettel, according to him.

Roger Wright94 said:I honestly don't see the logic in sandbagging performance.
If we're talking about fine-tuning technical specs under the hood, sure, I get it—that makes sense. But intentionally lifting off the throttle when you clearly have the pace, which is what it looks like from the data above? That just feels bizarre to me.
It’s almost as if they think being slower now will somehow make them faster later, which sounds like total nonsense. 🤷

From a betting perspective, McLaren is sitting right at the top of the food chain, and that speaks volumes.

When you really step back and look at how much this era of Formula 1 has evolved, it wouldn't even be a shock if McLaren or Ferrari started falling behind; there are plenty of other outfits out there with enough talent to build something that leaves Ferrari in the rearview mirror.

ironfalcon43 said:manipulation😲

Look, let’s be real here—that’s just not how the game works. It feels like they’ll do just about anything to keep the season from becoming a total snooze-fest, but honestly? Some people are out here crying foul over the penalties handed to McLaren, when if you actually look at the facts, those guys practically begged for it. They deserved the hammer coming down, maybe even more than what they actually got.☕