darkjackal70 said:Everything is fine, but the level of competition and how much harder it is to succeed in tennis compared to handball—mainly due to the sheer volume of players and competition... and just how many things have to align perfectly for you to win a Grand Slam, for example...
What kind of numbers or competition are we talking about?
It’s a simple fact: there are significantly more professional handball players than there are professional tennis players.
On the ATP rankings, you see 1,000 players listed. However, at least 600-700 of them aren't making a living solely from tennis; they might play a few Challenger events here and there, but you can't truly call them full-time professionals.
Tennis really boils down to about a hundred players, plus maybe five or six elites, and that's the whole game.
Handball is only disadvantaged because it isn't a staple in the US or the United Kingdom. That's why people often assume it sits below ice hockey in status, even though way more people play it and it has a much broader global reach.
Handball doesn't have its own NHL, so it gets pushed to the sidelines immediately, despite the reality being quite the opposite.
Today, handball is a team sport where, after soccer, you find the highest level of competition globally or across Europe. It stands shoulder-to-shoulder with basketball. There are at least 15 national teams out there that can beat anyone.
The EHF recently organized qualifying groups that proved even teams that previously struggled to qualify for major tournaments can now take down the heavyweights.
This clearly shows that the sport is experiencing massive expansion.