CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Jean-Claude Van Damme in America!

Jean-Claude Van Damme in America!

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 8 views · 51 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4coastalcrane76Samuel Ortiz3Jamie Wood5Kimberly Thomas89wearyraven41nimblemarlin17Jerry Bishop10Andrew Diaz7slyrider342Brandon Ortiz88Mark Bennett64Thomas Davis13Brian Moore67vividharbor77Jamie Ruiz5Ethan Perez97Roger Allen3velvetmarlin24Eric Jackson43Bradley Nelson2
Roger Allen3 Roger Allen3 Regular
337 messages
joined Oct 2003
#41 ·
velvetmarlin24 said:Seriously, you guys are obsessed with Jean-Claude Van Damme's ballet routine. Such peasants. The man has a physique most of you can only dream of at his age, he's got five times more money than the average American guy his age, and he's still got massive star power.

🤣 🤣 🤣

this isn't happening 🙏 🙏
velvetmarlin24 velvetmarlin24 Member
37 messages
joined Apr 2007
#42 ·
Roger Allen3 said:🤣 🤣 🤣

this just isn't happening 🙏 🙏

Are we really going to tease Brad Pitt, or are you going to tell me you've never even seen a Jean-Claude Van Damme movie?
If we're talking about acting, then we might as well talk about Arnold Schwarzenegger or the Terminator. I've honestly never seen worse acting in my life.
Ethan Perez97 Ethan Perez97 Active Member
114 messages
joined Aug 2005
#43 ·
Roger Allen3 said:I’ll just say this... Chuck Norris pulls off better action sequences... ☕ I’ve already told you once before that it's all a matter of perspective... ☕

Look, I’m not going to sit here and bash Chuck Norris, but honestly, how many of his movies have you actually sat through... he's got maybe two or three decent pieces of trash that are really just blatant rip-offs of better work, like how Lone Wolf McQuade is just a Leone imitation, while Missing in Action is nothing more than a cheap Rambo clone...

If nothing else, Jean-Claude Van Damme’s movies aren't exactly known for being unoriginal...
Ethan Perez97 Ethan Perez97 Active Member
114 messages
joined Aug 2005
#44 ·
velvetmarlin24 said:If we’re going to critique acting, then we might as well bring up The Terminator or Arnold... I don't think I've ever seen anyone struggle quite as desperately with a role in my entire life.

wife draws 😠

you’re comparing apples to oranges 😁
Jamie Ruiz5 Jamie Ruiz5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Mar 2007
#45 ·
velvetmarlin24 said:The guy possesses the kind of physique most of you could only dream of achieving at his age.

I’m not quite at his age yet, but honestly, I can only hope I don't find myself dreaming about having a physique like that once I actually get there. 😁

velvetmarlin24 said:If we’re going to sit here and talk about acting, then we might as well bring up Jean-Claude Van Damme or Arnold. I haven't seen anyone struggle quite as desperately to deliver a performance in my entire life.

Arnold is. Great. He played The Terminator.
Brandon Ortiz88 Brandon Ortiz88 Member
23 messages
joined Mar 2007
#46 ·
If we’re going to follow that line of reasoning, then neither Chuck Norris nor Jean-Claude Van Damme even count as real actors; I mean, just because one guy happened to land some successful movies doesn't mean he's anything more than a product of those specific roles—plus, let's be honest, he looks pretty rough with that beard of his.
And regarding that whole thing about the influence he used to have, you might want to actually listen to what this guy is saying; your buddy mentioned that Van Damme has absolutely nothing to do with actual fighting, whereas nobody would ever say that about Chuck Norris.
Now, here’s another thing: Chuck Norris actually commented on that split move Van Damme does that everyone seems to love so much; he basically said it’s a total cinematic joke that he’d never dream of attempting, because if he were foolish enough to spread his legs like that, he’d lose all his speed, power, and precision in his strikes... and he maintained that he simply wouldn't do it out of principle, whereas for Van Damme, jumping through the air with his legs wide open just seemed to come naturally to him.
Brian Moore67 Brian Moore67 Active Member
241 messages
joined Apr 2007
#47 ·
velvetmarlin24 said:Man, you guys are really stuck on Jean-Claude Van Damme's ballet moves. Total peasants! The guy has a physique most of you can only dream about at his age—plus he’s got way more cash than your average American dude his age, and he's still got plenty of swagger too.

Look, I wasn't even bringing that up to be negative or anything—it was just a fun little trivia nugget! If Jean-Claude Van Damme likes guys, hey, it's a free country, he's got every right to be his quirky self. That's his business, totally private.
Eric Jackson43 Eric Jackson43 Active Member
73 messages
joined Dec 2006
#48 ·
Olivia Alvarez28 said:Man, here’s another thing—Chuck Norris was actually talking about those split kicks Jean-Claude Van Damme does that everyone thinks look so cool; he basically said it’s just some cinematic nonsense he’d never bother with himself because he’s too much of an idiot to risk losing his balance, speed, or striking power by spreading his legs like that... and apparently, he refuses to do it out of pure principle rather than trying to show off, whereas for Van Damme, jumping into the air with his legs wide open just seems to come naturally.

Honestly, Chuck Norris is just salty because Van Damme has glutes made of granite while Chuck is lacking in that department.
Ethan Perez97 Ethan Perez97 Active Member
114 messages
joined Aug 2005
#49 ·
Olivia Alvarez28 said:If we’re following that logic, then neither Chuck Norris nor Jean-Claude Van Damme are actually actors; the only reason one of them landed more successful hits is simply because they were cast in those specific roles, and honestly, he looks pretty rough with that beard of his...
And regarding the reputation that guy used to have, maybe listen to what he's saying now; your buddy mentioned that Van Damme has nothing to do with actual fighting, whereas nobody would ever say that about Chuck...
Now, here is another thing, Chuck Norris was talking about that split move Van Damme does that everyone thinks looks so cool; he said it's a cinematic joke that he would never perform, because he's too smart to spread his legs like that—you lose speed, power, and precision on the strike... and he refuses to do it out of principle, while for Van Damme, jumping in the air with his legs wide open just seems to come naturally...

Look, I don't really care, Van Damme has better movies and that's that, I can't bring myself to sit through Norris's movies or shows... 🙂

As for who's the tougher fighter, frankly, I couldn't care less...
Brandon Ortiz88 Brandon Ortiz88 Member
23 messages
joined Mar 2007
#50 ·
To be perfectly honest with you, I find myself rolling my eyes at Jean-Claude Van Damme just as much as I do at Chuck Norris's movies, mostly because neither of them actually possesses any real acting chops. What I’m trying to get at is that at least Chuck Norris seems to know what he’s doing while he’s on screen, whereas Jean-Claude Van Damme is really just a total poseur who can't act to save his life.
If you honestly believe Jean-Claude Van Damme is a talented actor, then please, go ahead and name a single movie where the only reason it isn't great is because of the plot or some personal preference of yours—I want to see one where he actually delivers a high-quality, convincing performance.
Ethan Perez97 Ethan Perez97 Active Member
114 messages
joined Aug 2005
#51 ·
Olivia Alvarez28 said:To be perfectly honest, I couldn't care less about Jean-Claude Van Damme or Chuck Norris movies... neither of them can actually act, but what I'm getting at is that at least Chuck Norris seems to know what he's doing on screen, whereas Jean-Claude Van Damme is just a total poser who lacks any real talent,
if you're claiming Jean-Claude Van Damme is actually a good actor, then please, show me a movie where the plot isn't terrible or just some random thing you like, but one where he actually delivers a high-quality performance.

Look, if I want real acting, I'll go with Nicholson, De Niro, or Depp... if I want a decent action flick, I'll pick up something by Jean-Claude Van Damme, it's as simple as that...
Bradley Nelson2 Bradley Nelson2 Active Member
175 messages
joined Nov 2009
#52 ·
I can't tell good acting from bad, so it's all the same to me😁
the only thing I care about is whether a movie is boring or entertaining.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads