CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Day of the Dead (2008)

Day of the Dead (2008)

Started by Brian Foster2 · · 👁 5 views · 62 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Brian Foster2Joshua Johnson67quietdriver3Charles White16darksurfer26crimsonmoose3cosmicraven2Rachel Cooper7AChloe Palmer2rowdybadger41bluesealRoger Allen3Jason Chavez32redwalker6Sarah Lopez6
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active MemberOP
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#21 ·
It’s a solid film, honestly! I enjoyed it, though I can't help but feel like it's missing just a few key ingredients to truly earn that "cult classic" status. Don't you think? It almost gets there, but it just needs that extra bit of magic to become an all-time legend!
crimsonmoose3 crimsonmoose3 Regular
310 messages
joined Jun 2006
#22 ·
darksurfer26 said:Is it because the zombies actually run in this one?

😂 😂
No, it’s just boring. It starts off strong—especially when that dog tears her friend apart—but by the end, it feels more like a cheap soap opera than a horror movie...
darksurfer26 darksurfer26 Member
12 messages
joined Jul 2006
#23 ·
Heh, 100 people...
I have to admit, the second half of the movie feels like a bit of a letdown in terms of momentum, but as a complete package, it holds its own beautifully. There’s this palpable sense of unease, a tension and a feeling of uncertainty that just radiates right off the screen. I first caught this one on a grainy late-night broadcast, and every subsequent viewing has only reinforced my belief that it’s a solid piece of filmmaking from every angle. From what I can gather, it’s one of those rare films—it isn't even technically a zombie flick—that doesn't just pay lip service to Romer, but actually draws inspiration from another classic: Day of the Triffids; you know, that story about an invasion by, get this, poisonous plants.
crimsonmoose3 crimsonmoose3 Regular
310 messages
joined Jun 2006
#24 ·
darksurfer26 said:Heh, 100 people....
I have to admit the second half is a bit of an anticlimax, but as a whole, the movie holds up remarkably well. The uncomfortable atmosphere, the tension, and that sense of insecurity practically bleed through the screen. I first saw it on Blu-ray, and every subsequent viewing has confirmed it’s a solid piece of filmmaking. From what I can tell, it’s one of those rare "zombie" movies (that isn't actually a zombie movie) that doesn't just pay homage to Romer, but also references another work: Day of the Triffids; a story about an invasion by—get this—deadly plants.

Exactly. That’s why I love zombie flicks—it's all about that tension and atmosphere. Being surrounded by hundreds of the living dead who want to eat you while wondering if your hideout is even safe... But having grown up on Romer's zombie
classics, 28 Days Later feels somewhat lukewarm to me. 😁 Still, Boyle is a talented director: Trainspotting and Shallow Grave are great. 👍

Hmm... I am genuinely curious about this film, but it feels like the concept was lifted from Stephen King. In Creepshow, there is a segment involving a meteorite hitting Earth that causes plants to sprout everywhere, especially when they hit water. Or did Stephen lift the idea?...🤔
darksurfer26 darksurfer26 Member
12 messages
joined Jul 2006
#25 ·
I haven't actually sat down to watch the movie, but I did dive into the book. In the novel, there’s this massive meteor shower streaking across the sky, and people are just standing there, staring up in total awe, only to wake up the next morning completely blinded by whatever radiation or light show was happening. But that wasn't even the worst part—those meteors also carried the seeds of these nasty, lethal alien plants, the Triffids. At the time the story kicks off, the protagonist happens to be in the hospital, which makes him one of the lucky few who didn't lose his sight. These plants move pretty slowly, but they are everywhere, and trying to manage or wipe them out when you're effectively blind is a nightmare. In the book, our survivors end up searching for some kind of sanctuary out on a farm...
That book is fantastic; it has that same nail-biting tension you get from zombie stories, just with a totally different kind of antagonist. Now, I can't quite recall who took inspiration from whom or who borrowed what from whom, but in my opinion, both works (both King and the Triffids) feel completely original.
crimsonmoose3 crimsonmoose3 Regular
310 messages
joined Jun 2006
#26 ·
darksurfer26 said:I haven't seen the movie, but I read the book. In the novel, there’s actually a meteor shower in the sky, and people just standing there staring in awe, only to go blind the next day from radiation or light or whatever. But that’s not even the main issue—the meteors bring down spores from these lethal alien plants (the Triffids). The protagonist happens to be in the hospital at the time, making him one of the few people who kept his sight. The plants themselves move slowly, but their numbers are overwhelming, and trying to contain or destroy them when you're blind is a nightmare. In the book, the survivors seek refuge on a farm...
That book is excellent. It's as tense as a zombie flick, just with a different kind of antagonist.

Naturally, much like the original Assault on Precinct 13.🙏 🙏 🙏
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active MemberOP
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#27 ·
So, word on the street is that the "remake" of Creepshow isn't actually going to be a remake at all! If that's true, we might be looking at a release around 2008, right? What do you guys think?
crimsonmoose3 crimsonmoose3 Regular
310 messages
joined Jun 2006
#28 ·
Quote: "remake" isn't actually a remake, and it should be out around 2008, right?
Brian Foster2 says:
He's saying the
Creepshow
Exactly, he says so right there. So if it isn't a remake, what is it? It can't be a sequel if they're already filming a third installment...🤔
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active MemberOP
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#29 ·
crimsonmoose3 said:Yeah, they're telling you. But what happens if they decide against a remake? And how can there be a sequel if they're already filming a third installment? 🤔

Oh, I see 😬!

It’s a full-on remake, but word on the street is it might be more like how the original Dawn and its remake turned out—meaning it probably won't stick to the original script one bit.

But hey, that's just speculation from some forums I was browsing. At the end of the day, they should just do whatever they want, as long as the final product turns out great, right?

Same goes for D-Day.
darksurfer26 darksurfer26 Member
12 messages
joined Jul 2006
#30 ·
Man, it’s getting ridiculous how complicated everything has become—sequels, prequels, remakes... It used to be simple: you had a movie title, and then maybe a 2 or a 3 after it, but now it's just a total mess. 😁 😁 😁
cosmicraven2 cosmicraven2 Active Member
96 messages
joined Apr 2008
#31 ·
I realize this isn't Day of the Dead, but we are actually talking about 28 Weeks Later. The plot details have been released, along with information regarding the director, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo:

28 Weeks Later picks up six Months after the virus has decimated New York City. The US Army Has restored order and is repopulating The quarantined City , When a carrier of The rage virus enters New York and unknowingly re-ignites The spread of The deadly infection, wreaking havoc on the entire population.

Link
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active MemberOP
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#32 ·
I honestly think this whole thing turned out to be a total disaster, mostly because the director isn't even American!
Rachel Cooper7 Rachel Cooper7 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Apr 2015
#33 ·
There isn't just one version of Halloween out there. I've got my own copy of Halloween, and now I'm downloading the sequel, plus there's Night of the Living Dead 3D out there too.
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active MemberOP
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#34 ·
There’s actually an original Romerov version out there—this one we’re discussing is just a remake—and then you have Day of the Dead 2. Personally? I think that movie is a total disaster. I’ve got it on my hard drive, and while it’s certainly worth a watch if you're bored, I wouldn't recommend sitting through it more than once! 🙂

Don't forget, there is also Candyman 3: Day of the Dead. There isn't any actual 3D involved in that one, though I know they did film Night of the Living Dead 3D
Joshua Johnson67 Joshua Johnson67 Member
49 messages
joined Jul 2006
#35 ·
Man, I didn't even make it through the sequel... what an absolute dumpster fire.
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active MemberOP
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#36 ·
Haha, look, there are definitely some decent scenes in there, but man, the acting is just painful... absolute coma territory! They were actually supposed to follow it up with a third installment, but they pulled the plug entirely because the ratings for the second one were such a total disaster. 😬
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#37 ·
I can't seem to get this one to download. I managed to grab the first two parts just fine, but this one is being stubborn, so oh well!
It would be a huge lifesaver if anyone had it—ideally in AVI or MPG format—and wouldn't mind sending it my way!
Thanks in advance!
crimsonmoose3 crimsonmoose3 Regular
310 messages
joined Jun 2006
#38 ·
tanja258 said:I can't get the download to work. I managed to grab the first two, but this one just won't budge, so forget it!
It would be a huge help if someone actually had a copy (in AVI or MPG format) and wouldn't mind sending it over...
Thanks in advance!

What does this have to do with the topic at hand? 🙄
Chloe Palmer2 Chloe Palmer2 Regular
266 messages
joined May 2009
#39 ·
I'm actually liking the plot. It looks like they're heading into a military bunker, so I assume there will be plenty of weapons to find and they'll just tear through the zombies.
Now I'm wondering, which zombies are considered the "original" ones? Are we talking about the fast ones or the slow ones? 😬
Just trying to prepare myself for if I ever run into them; if they're fast, then damn... but if they're slow, maybe it's fine. 😈
rowdybadger41 rowdybadger41 Active Member
72 messages
joined Jan 2008
#40 ·
The trailer just dropped...

I suppose I should say something... but I'm not quite sure where to start.
I don't know...
That would be quite nice...
Something falls somewhere between the remake and Resident Evil...
Plus, we have men playing female soldiers. 🤮
Too many teenagers and preachy messages in this movie... ☕
I'll watch it regardless... 🥳

Paul Lopez49 said:I find myself wondering... which zombies are considered the "original" ones? The fast ones, or the slow ones? 😬

What kind of foolish question is that? 🙄

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads