CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Diet changes: Will they actually change my weight?

Diet changes: Will they actually change my weight?

Started by Peter Morris58 · · 👁 7 views · 122 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Peter Morris58mistybear4nimbledriver81Ashley Nguyen5Keith Doyle18northernfalcon30Donna Hernandez10Frank Alvarez8Anthony Harris14David Davis26electriclynx20Kenneth Price8fadedtrucker19Steven Kelly152Brandon Booth6Jose Miller3rustymoose54darkbison81Kenneth Hernandez67Megan Morales5Hannah Davis18Douglas Hernandez4
rustymoose54 rustymoose54 Active Member
182 messages
joined Jun 2006
#101 ·
It was two days of pure hell—just enough time to sit around and rot in the lecture hall—but then out of nowhere, Wednesday actually turned out sunny

Chemical Inquisition 🤣

Smells like straight-up sulfur over here (shoutout to darkbison81 who’s convinced he can smell it through the screen 🙂 )

And apparently, it's carbon emissions because the professor happens to be from the South 😂
Peter Morris58 Peter Morris58 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Mar 2003
#102 ·
fadedtrucker19 said:😢

My bad.

So what, you want the mods to split this thread in two—one for the actual topic and one just for the bickering?

Or maybe you want us all kicked out en masse? Or at least some of the 😉

Nah, no biggie. It's fine. I was just joking. 🙂
Peter Morris58 Peter Morris58 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Mar 2003
#103 ·
Rachel Brooks63 said:Chloe Morris12, why don't you go ahead and restate your question for us one more time.

From what I can gather, you're saying you've been cutting calories big time and ramping up the workouts, yet the scale isn't moving and none of your measurements have changed. Is that the issue, or did I miss something while arguing with this amateur?

Spot on. My daily diet is pretty much exactly what I laid out, though, gotta admit, I've been sneaking in chocolate 😢

I'm working out way more than before—walking at least half an hour almost every single day. Still haven't lost a damn thing.

For Lent, I went 40 days without any chocolate.

Nothing.

Look, my weight isn't some massive crisis; I'm just trying to drop maybe 10 to 15 pounds. But still, I figured after four months of being active and eating right, something would actually happen.

I've heard there are people with thyroid issues where their hormones are all messed up, making it impossible to lose weight—or even causing them to gain it?
nimbledriver81 nimbledriver81 Active Member
96 messages
joined Aug 2007
#104 ·
Chloe Morris12 said: though—and I have to be honest here—I’m usually pairing that with a massive bar of chocolate 😢

Look, let's talk numbers—a standard 3.5-ounce bar of chocolate is roughly 500 calories, and we're mostly talking about fats and carbs there. Honestly? If you look at it from a pure energy standpoint, that's basically a full-on lunch!
Peter Morris58 Peter Morris58 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Mar 2003
#105 ·
I know. But then how do you explain the fact that I haven't lost a single pound in 40 days? I didn't even swap out my chocolate intake for anything else.
nimbledriver81 nimbledriver81 Active Member
96 messages
joined Aug 2007
#106 ·
Chloe Morris12 said:I hear you—but then how do you explain the fact that I haven't lost a single pound in 40 days? It’s not like I swapped out my chocolate intake for anything else.

See, here's the thing—when you slash your calories like that, your body basically flips a switch into "safe mode"—which is just a fancy way of saying your metabolism slows down to a crawl.
That’s exactly why these diets fail! You really have to eat properly *and* get some exercise in. If even that isn't moving the needle, well... then I'm honestly stumped. Based on what you've told me, it sounds like you aren't getting the right nutrients. Just my two cents, of course!
Check your inbox, by the way.
fadedtrucker19 fadedtrucker19 Member
31 messages
joined Dec 2002
#107 ·
rustymoose54 said:it's nitrogen-based because the teacher was an American from the South😂

If he were teaching with a Southern accent, nitrogen would probably be rebranded as carbon just out of spite.

And then you have people like that trying to lecture us on biological processes...

But hey, tell me, McProfit, how do we actually pronounce it correctly: Iraq or Iran?

Now, if I really want to get under everyone's skin... "that term is Southern; in the North, we call it carbon."🤣
rustymoose54 rustymoose54 Active Member
182 messages
joined Jun 2006
#108 ·
fadedtrucker19 said:If he’d been taught by those guys, the first thing they would've called it is nitrogen.

Not necessarily...

They taught me "nitrogen." Those people can be so stubborn sometimes! 🙂

Nitrogen, carbon—Iraq, Iran—it's all the same stuff in the end. You'll figure that out in five or ten years, trust me... 😁 🤣
Frank Alvarez8 Frank Alvarez8 Member
43 messages
joined Jun 2005
#109 ·
Chloe Morris12 said:Exactly. My daily diet is pretty much what I described, though I have to admit, I still snack on chocolate quite a bit. 😢

I’m exercising way more than I used to, too—walking at least half an hour almost every day. Still, the scale hasn't budged at all.

I even cut out chocolate entirely for those 40 days leading up to Easter.

Nothing.

Look, I don't have major weight issues; I'm just trying to lose maybe 10 to 15 pounds. But still, I expected to see some progress after four months of staying active and eating better.

I've heard there are people dealing with thyroid issues where their hormones are off, making it impossible to lose weight or even causing them to gain it?

If you're eating less and working out more, you're burning fat and building muscle. Muscle is denser, so the scale might not show any change, but you should definitely notice a difference in how your clothes fit.

Thyroid issues can definitely be a factor. If you're worried, go get your hormone levels checked—just ask your primary care doctor for a referral to a local lab.
Jose Miller3 Jose Miller3 Regular
446 messages
joined Mar 2024
#110 ·
Chloe Morris12, I’ve got a little story for you from back in the late eighties in Chicago.
A lady I used to know ended up putting on, well, maybe 30 pounds or so. She actually checked into a hospital to try and drop the weight because she could barely even walk anymore. They had her on the strictest diet imaginable—everything was weighed out to the gram (back then, our hospitals actually still had some standards)—but during those first two weeks, she somehow gained four pounds 😲!!!

The doctors were practically rubbing their hands together thinking they had a massive breakthrough for a medical journal—a total sensation! Someone who "isn't eating" but keeps gaining weight... can you believe it? But here's the thing—she was encouraged to go for walks every single day. And while she was out walking, she ran into a friend from a different ward, whose family kept dropping off these thick, heavy fruit juices. Now, this lady—just my luck, right?—absolutely hates thick juices. So, the other woman—our "dieting" patient—would step in and drink them. Just a liter or two of that concentrated juice every day, and suddenly... the scale starts climbing...

The point of this whole thing is: even if you feel like you're eating less than you used to, you're probably sneaking in empty calories without even realizing it. Chocolate is definitely a huge culprit. And those 40 days you mentioned? 🤔 Who knows what you were using to make up those calories...

PS: I’m with nimbledriver81 on this one. Your diet isn't exactly hitting the mark, and it's incredibly tough to lose weight when things are that unbalanced (?!?!?!). If you varied your food a bit more, maybe you wouldn't be craving chocolate quite so much—just a guess, though, since we already established that I don't touch Coke!
Kenneth Hernandez67 Kenneth Hernandez67 Regular
351 messages
joined May 2005
#111 ·
I’ve already asked her a few times in the weight loss thread exactly when she plans to start eating something again, and more importantly, what she’s actually drinking. 😉😁
Brandon Booth6 Brandon Booth6 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Oct 2007
#112 ·
MacGregor said:Look, she’s been asking for an answer more times than I can count...
so maybe try being a little decent for once and actually write back instead of just pointing out that she needs one, you know what I mean?

👋


Not everyone on this board is some kind of walking encyclopedia or a high-priced expert.
Some of us actually come here to LEARN SOMETHING FROM OTHERS, rather than just sitting around acting like we're smarter than everyone else.
Megan Morales5 Megan Morales5 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2004
#113 ·
Come on, try to remember what Albert said...

If only he had actually bothered to read Einstein 😁

on the topic - indigo, those girls are right—if you’re working out but still eating too much, those calories are sneaking up on you somewhere. Maybe it's the juices. Or that pastry you grabbed on the way home and completely forgot about because by the time you walked through the door, you were starving again, as if you hadn't eaten a thing 😉 It might actually help if you spent a month tracking EVERYTHING you swallow—liquid or solid—and kept a little notebook in your bag so you could log things on the go...
Jose Miller3 Jose Miller3 Regular
446 messages
joined Mar 2024
#114 ·
Matthew Sullivan32 said:Man, if he’d ever actually read Einstein... 😁

on the topic - indigo, those girls are right—if you're working out but still eating less, calories might just be sneaking in somewhere else. Like, maybe in juices? Or even that pastry you grabbed on the way home and totally forgot about because by the time you walked through the door, you were starving again like you hadn't eaten a thing 😉 It might actually help if you spent a month tracking EVERYTHING you swallow—liquids, solids, whatever—and kept a little notebook in your bag at all times so you could jot things down while you're out and about.

But honestly, that sounds like total obsession. You really just need to stay mindful of everything you eat and realize that calories don't just show up when you're sitting down at the table with a fork and knife. If it were that easy, we'd all be supermodels, since most of our calories sneak in through the side like that...
Megan Morales5 Megan Morales5 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2004
#115 ·
Rachel Brooks63 said:Alright, let's call it what it is—an obsession. You just need to be mindful of everything you consume. Calories don't just show up when you're sitting down at the table with a fork and knife. If it were that simple, we'd all be supermodels, since most of those extra calories sneak in through the side channels...

I wouldn't go as far as calling it an obsession, especially if it's just a temporary thing. Honestly, this is exactly what I’d suggest to people who can't figure out why they aren't losing weight despite claiming they barely eat anything. It isn't an obsession—it's just realizing HOW much you're actually eating on the fly without noticing. I don't need a list, and you probably don't either, but for some people, it might actually help.

It’s easy to say "just be mindful," but some people intentionally stay oblivious to that part. Not everyone is sneaking calories in from the sidelines. Personally, I'm not big on mindless snacking or junk food, but when it comes to a real meal, one serving is never enough. I can eat a lot of actual food. My partner is the same way. The point is, you eat it, and then you have to burn it off... all five servings of it...
Peter Morris58 Peter Morris58 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Mar 2003
#116 ·
magic said:I've actually wondered a few times over on the weight loss thread when she's finally gonna eat something, given how little she touches food. What about drinks? 😉😁

Just water for me. If I'm having juice, it's Col light. Alcohol? Maybe once a month.
mistybear4 mistybear4 Active Member
58 messages
joined Nov 2007
#117 ·
Vivianne said:Not everyone here thinks they’re an expert or have all the answers. Some of us just scroll through these threads to actually learn something from others, rather than just spending our time trying to lecture everyone else.

I’ve always seen this forum a bit differently; from what I can gather, everyone here acts like an absolute expert on everything, yet the moment someone actually shows up who makes a living managing weight control and knows their stuff, they get labeled as just another person trying to flex their intellect over everyone else.

Look, if you actually want to learn something here, I might as well just reiterate the basic principles of healthy weight loss—though that applies to pretty much everyone else, too.

I’ve always found that sticking to a schedule helps, so I try to hit at least three solid meals a day, ideally tossing in two pieces of fruit as snacks in between to keep things steady.
Technically, anything north of 200 calories barely qualifies as a meal, so that single yogurt someone thinks counts as lunch is really just a snack in my book.

I’ve spent enough years watching people crash and burn after skipping meals just to feel productive, so I tend to think there's more to it than just hunger. It really comes down to keeping your blood sugar from swinging like a pendulum, which saves you from that inevitable mid-afternoon slump where you can barely function.
Rachel Brooks63 already touched on this—how the body refuses to drop into safe mode, essentially refusing to slow down your metabolism when you cut calories too drastically. It’s just a built-in survival mechanism designed to keep you going when food is scarce, where the system tries to stash away whatever little energy it can get for later. I suppose that explains why Chloe Morris12 isn't seeing any progress on the scale despite her efforts.
If you stick to a regular meal schedule, your body doesn't feel the need to brace itself for some sudden famine, so it just stops worrying about storing everything; instead, your metabolism naturally picks up speed—without needing any of those ridiculous metabolic boosters or overpriced supplement nonsense—and you end up burning through calories much more efficiently.

I’ve learned the hard way that if I don't force myself to hit at least two liters of water a day, my head starts pounding like a drum by noon, so I try to stay on top of it.
I could go on forever about why water matters, but I'll try to keep this brief.
I’ve always felt that water is essential for rinsing the system from the inside out—much like taking a long shower to wash away the day—to ensure all those nasty toxins and various poisons actually get flushed out of our bodies.
If you aren't drinking enough water, your body basically just starts hoarding whatever it can find, meaning those old toxins just keep circulating through your system instead of being flushed out. It’s a recipe for trouble, really; I’ve noticed that about 80% of my own headaches usually stem from just being chronically dehydrated and letting all that stagnant fluid sit there.
Water plays another vital role by acting as the delivery system for all those nutrients we process from our food; essentially, clean water serves as the transport mechanism that carries those essentials directly to our cells. If you neglect this link in the chain, your cells end up starving, which leaves you feeling perpetually hungry and constantly reaching for more food—it’s a simple cycle, really, but the consequences are pretty much self-explanatory.
It’s the third thing we see happening lately—this tendency to mistake a lack of water for actual hunger, so instead of just hydrating, we find ourselves reaching for food when what we really need is just a glass of water. It reminds me of those long summer afternoons back in Phoenix when the heat was so oppressive you felt like you were starving, but you were really just bone-dry and confused by your own body.

It’s common knowledge that you've got to burn more calories than you actually consume if you want to see any real change.
But that’s exactly where the biggest blunders happen and the most fundamental questions get raised.
Honestly, does anyone actually have a clue what their real caloric intake looks like? I remember sitting there staring at my fitness tracker after a grueling session at Equinox, convinced I’d burned through a whole steak dinner, only to realize the math was basically pure fiction. It feels like we're all just guessing in the dark.
I’ve always found it a bit absurd how they try to sell us these "one-size-fits-all" diet plans, acting as if our bodies aren't all wildly different biological machines. It reminds me of those generic corporate wellness seminars I had to sit through back in Chicago, where they'd preach the exact same nutritional advice to everyone from marathon runners to desk clerks, completely ignoring the reality of individual metabolism.

Everyone’s got their own specific set of needs—we're talking different body proportions, heights, weights, and basal metabolic rates—not to mention how they actually live their lives, whether they're just chilling at home, hitting the gym regularly, or training like pro athletes, so calorie consumption isn't some universal number you can just pull off a shelf. It really requires an individual approach, which, as it turns out, happens to be exactly what I do for a living. 😎

The real danger with most modern diets is that people obsessively track nothing but calories, completely ignoring the actual nutritional density—you know, the vitamins, minerals, and fiber that actually keep you functioning. They totally overlook protein, too, which is arguably the single most critical macro in our diet, though I suppose anyone who’s ever tried to survive on just lettuce and willpower can attest to how quickly that fails. It's proven that protein is the cornerstone of what we eat, but most people are too busy counting numbers to realize why that matters.
Since our vital organs are essentially just complex structures made of protein, everything from the heart to the liver and kidneys relies entirely on those building blocks to function. It’s a bit exhausting thinking about how much we depend on such basic biological components just to keep the lights on.
I wonder what actually happens to us when we decide to go on one of those diets. I remember back in Chicago, I tried that whole juice cleanse thing for a week, thinking it would change my life, but mostly I just felt like a walking zombie staring at the office vending machine. It always feels like such a massive undertaking, yet most of the time, it's just a temporary detour from reality.
When you aren't hitting your protein targets, your body starts scavenging for the amino acids it needs to keep vital organs like your heart functioning, which means it starts breaking down your own muscle tissue to get the job done. It’s a bit of a downward spiral; as those muscles atrophy, you lose the very metabolic engine required to burn off fat, leading to more adipose tissue buildup. I remember struggling through a crash diet years ago where I thought I was making progress, only to realize I had just traded my muscle mass for stubborn fat, losing weight in all the wrong places while the belly stayed exactly the same. 😛

4.) Getting moving... just a thirty-minute walk goes a long way if you've already checked off those first three requirements—since diet really drives about 70-80% of your final results anyway 🙂
(for a lot of people, high-intensity workouts are a non-starter due to weight or joint issues, which basically leaves them stuck when they're trying to drop pounds)

Once you finish exercising, your body feels empty and starts hunting for fuel, so you have to be incredibly careful about what you actually put in your mouth...
Your muscles are being taxed and they need protein to recover; in fact, it’s specifically the lack of protein that triggers that intense hunger pang
Just remember, during a run you were essentially converting fats into sugars (carbohydrates) and burning them off, so you actually had enough carbs on hand; the hunger isn't coming from a carb deficit, it's coming because you need PROTEIN

If you look at this logically, you'll see why protein shakes—especially ones packed with all the vitamins and minerals an American body needs—are such a game changer for healthy, easy weight loss. You feed the muscles so they don't atrophy; in fact, they can even grow, which increases the surface area where fat gets burned. Plus, you're keeping calories low (a shake is roughly 220 kcal) while still counting it as a full meal since it's over 200 kcal. It speeds up your metabolism too—more small 220 kcal meals equals a faster metabolic rate—and you aren't starving, so you actually have energy... and your body does exactly what everyone is looking for: the fat melts away rather than muscle, right where you want it, and your whole physique takes on a better shape 🙂 (simply the best)

I know some people here will probably roll their eyes or tear this apart, but I trust there are enough sensible, level-headed people here who will find this explanation helpful for understanding the actual process of "weight loss." You'll see the benefit of this INDIVIDUAL approach, where every single person's body analysis is calculated separately. After all, the weather is finally turning nice and summer is right around the corner, and I know far too many people who suddenly panic a month before hitting the beach in Florida trying to get fit overnight 😛

So, it's not too late. Losing 6 to 11 pounds a month is actually a realistic and healthy goal 🙂

👋
northernfalcon30 northernfalcon30 Active Member
90 messages
joined Sep 2003
#118 ·
You wouldn’t believe how many people think they can just ignore "liquid calories"... like, they're chugging sodas and sugary drinks all day thinking it doesn't count toward their total...
I swear, I've lost count of how many huge people I've met who gained all that weight basically from drinking nothing but Coke...🙄

Indigo, look, every body is its own weird little universe, and honestly, everyone's biology is kinda nonsensical sometimes.
Just stick to your plan. The results will show up whenever your body decides to cooperate—maybe yours just needs a little more time to catch up.
Whatever you do, don't cave.🙂
There are plenty of cases where you see zero progress for months, and then—bam—suddenly everything changes.

I have no clue why it works that way, but hey, it’s just what happens in the real world.
Hannah Davis18 Hannah Davis18 Active Member
170 messages
joined Sep 2008
#119 ·
Rachel Brooks63 said:indigo, I've got a story for you from back in the late '80s in Chicago.
A lady I know had put on, well, maybe 65 pounds too many. She ended up at some hospital to finally get rid of it because she couldn't even walk anymore. They had her on the strictest diet imaginable—everything was weighed out perfectly (back then, hospitals like Mayo Clinic actually meant business)—but somehow, in those first two weeks, she actually gained 9 pounds 😲!!!

I know a similar one, but it was way back in the '70s. Same kind of hospital setup. This woman was supposed to be on this super strict diet, but her family kept sneaking her steak and pork chops under the radar.😁
Jose Miller3 Jose Miller3 Regular
446 messages
joined Mar 2024
#120 ·
Hannah Davis18 said:I actually know a story just like that, but it was back in the 70s—at a hospital in Chicago. There was this woman on a super strict diet, but her family would sneak her steak and pork chops under the radar...😁

Okay, look, doing that is just plain stupid and kind of malicious—you’re literally there to get better, so why cheat the system?...
But you know, this lady didn't even realize she was doing anything wrong! It's exactly those "empty calories" I'm always talking about...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads