Frank Harrigan said:Duh, obviously there's a difference. The only guy here who spoke out against FF—while casually dropping names like U2, Oasis, or Queen—is basically the last person you could call an indie snob. You might as well have said he was a heavy metal snob, so sure, let's just say our definitions of "the same thing" vary.
just for you;
"wiredfalcon2's definition of an indie snob"
- carbon-based, mostly 70% water, usually sporting some non-committal hairstyle, rarely bald, and convinced that anything worth listening to happened decades ago or involves a band that sold fewer than 62 albums—or, in the absolute worst-case scenario, Nirvana. 😁 They love acting all high-and-mighty and well-versed in everything, especially that niche, low-selling scene where they pull out obscure band names just to mask their own frustrations about not fitting into some imaginary mainstream. Then this specimen runs away from reality without ever actually facing it, while the non-indie, non-snobs are out there just living their lives, feeling the heat, and enjoying themselves.
* half the time, indie snobs and owners of failed garage bands can barely play their instruments.
🙂
😁