#61 ·
Harold Reed4 said:Look, I’m fully aware that’s an option—just like doctors are aware of it. I have a friend over in the Netherlands dealing with the exact same issues; he went through a biopsy and it came back negative. He sent me a photo of the results, and it explicitly states that a negative finding doesn't mean you don't have neuropathy—instead, that result serves as the baseline for all future comparisons. That was last August... now, this August, he’s heading back in to redo the biopsy. If the nerve count shows a decrease compared to that first baseline, then yeah, there's neuropathy. If not, then there isn't. In the end, his doctors basically told him they can't help much because this whole field is still so new to them. SFN isn't actually a disease itself, it's just a symptom... and it wasn't even officially recognized until 2010. Since there's no underlying cause in over 70% of cases, there’s really no shot at a "cure." You just have to learn how to live with it...
Look at it this way: if a skin biopsy shows no visible damage, and other tests pass as well, it means the nerve function might just be off—it could be diminished or even hyperactive. Honestly, that's better than having actual physical damage... maybe things could shift down the road. At least that's my take on it.