Is this a decent signature?

stormyrider28 said:Pure hate speech. The absolute worst kind.
You could have responded with some actual decency instead of being this pathetic and hateful.
If you think it’s okay to tell an older female member of this forum to go screw themselves, then I don't see the issue with Ibrahim's signature—he isn't even mentioning anyone or addressing anyone specifically..
It's ridiculous. If his signature was such a huge deal, then your behavior is more than enough reason for a permanent ban.

An "older female member"? Are we talking about that specific user who writes exclusively in the masculine gender, uses this cryptic style that avoids saying anything clearly, and then goes around labeling other users as fascists and chauvinists (while claiming they actually identify that way)?

Look, let's not play the victim card for this person. 😉

By the way, wasn't it that same person who brought up American veterans in a negative light? I can't quite recall the specifics.

So, Ethan Brooks59 is straight up breaking Rule 3 here—you know, the one about personal attacks—by targeting the user Pravi Život.

Ethan Brooks59 said:Basically, you're just some pathetic guy who can't decide if he's got a crushed-up Kit Kat or a vagina between his legs. Just figure it out and deal with the sadness already.
🤦🤦🙄

Anyway, I won't ramble too much, let's stick to the point.
Quoting our mod Nick:

The usual rules apply: no insults, no doxxing, no trolling, no spamming...

Ethan Brooks59’s signature calls other users ignorant and malicious, which is basically just a giant middle finger designed to bait people into an argument.
Is that kind of signature actually allowed under the rules?

Linda Harris44 said:...

Ethan Brooks59’s signature is straight-up insulting other users by calling them ignorant and malicious, which is clearly just a way to bait people into an argument.
Is a signature like that even allowed, let alone appropriate?

And you think this isn't working? How exactly are you supposed to describe someone who actually claims the human body synthesizes Vitamin C from nothing but water and carbohydrates? Or how do you label a guy asserting that, at a molecular level, human blood is basically identical to carrot juice? There isn't any other way to put it than calling him an idiot.

If you can't see what's happening here, we can just look at those infamous signatures. The first one was posted by some self-proclaimed medical guru and "expert." Ethan Brooks59’s signature was nothing more than a direct response to that guy's nonsense.

If you honestly believe—and I say this with total confidence—that this "medical guru" isn't a complete hack, then why does he have his own ignore list? Why doesn't he defend his ridiculous claims with actual facts or logic?
Personally, I would love nothing more than to hear this "guru" explain the biological mechanism of how Vitamin C is produced in the human body. Since he seems to be stumped, maybe you could step in and explain the actual science behind Vitamin C synthesis in humans?

The situation is perfectly clear to anyone paying attention. That signature used by the "expert" served no purpose other than to insult the people who had already exposed him as a charlatan, a fraud, and a dangerous hack who spreads lies that pose a genuine risk to public health.

Linda Harris44 said:Hey there.
I was just wondering, is it actually allowed to put a sentence in your signature that basically insults other members of the forum?

Nope, thanks.