Raymond Anderson4 said:Sure, Red Bull had better race pace than Ferrari in the last third of the season, but Ferrari was faster until then. I honestly have no idea where you got the idea that Red Bull is usually faster in race pace.
Friday's race sim clearly showed Charles Leclerc was the fastest, so again, why are you bringing Red Bull into this?
You seem to think Red Bull was somehow way ahead of Mercedes in Australia. Like Valtteri Bottas was the benchmark proving how much Mercedes was getting smoked by Red Bull during the race.
Plus, Friday's race sims show Red Bull is slower than Ferrari on average lap time. I don't know where you're getting that "one second faster on the third lap" thing from.
God, media nonsense...
These geniuses take race sim averages using laps where the driver obviously gets stuck behind some incredibly slow 🤦
Max was consistently hitting the 1:34.8-1:35.4 range for about 14 laps straight, and that was on 6-lap old tires right at the start of the sim... though he did have one random 1:37.xxx lap in there, and miraculously, the race sim counted all of it...
So by the end, he looks worse than Charles Leclerc, who was running:
1:34.5, 1:35.0, 1:35.5... followed by a 1:36.1 and a 1:37.4 (which were outliers) before the pit stop...
And yeah, if Charles Leclerc had those kinds of sim numbers, Sebastian Vettel would have had them too on softs, and then they'd both have them on mediums...
The comparisons used in these "analyses" are just ridiculous.
Comparing a Charles Leclerc/Sebastian Vettel race sim based on maybe 2 or 3 fastest laps against a Red Bull/Mercedes sim that accounts for all 10+ laps 😵