Moderators' responses make no sense

I have to say, I am absolutely floored by the responses I’ve been getting after I complained about a whole string of forum rule violations.

The thread was shut down so fast I didn't even get a chance to reply, so I'm forced to write this out here, which probably just lands me in an even deeper hole, doesn't it?

I’ve kept a neat little paper trail of the harassment, the trolling (hey, they actually admitted to trolling!), and the blatant double standards regarding who gets banned and who doesn't.

So, there really isn't any room for debate here. My Colleague is responding exclusively to me—that's straight-up harassment. Then my Colleague admits his whole goal was to derail the topic—so that's trolling. On top of that, I posted links to my own posts that got flagged, while others get a free pass for doing the exact same thing.

It is indisputable that a series of forum rules were broken. And yet, it’s being totally tolerated!

Then there's John Doe’s response, claiming that because I’m only posting in the Bridge thread, I don't have any right to complain about being targeted. Isn't that just wild? Sure, I'm participating in the thread, but I'm not hunting down one specific person or only replying to their comments. To try and equate those two things is just mixing apples and oranges. It's honestly pretty sad.

I also went ahead and offered to have the alleged bribery investigated—offering money to ALL forum members—but I made it crystal clear that I was being sarcastic. Everyone knows that, including you, Chuck. But instead of acknowledging the irony, Chuck just cynically repeated my sarcastic remark back to me as if it were some kind of confession of guilt.

Was it really such a big deal to ask my Colleague—since we have conflicting stories regarding a very serious accusation—to prove who is lying and who is telling the truth? rapidfox26, why don't you go ahead and show us those PPE items that granitetinker6 supposedly sent you? If you can't, then maybe stop slandering people.

Is that really too much to ask!? Of course not, not if someone actually wants to be objective and clear the air.

The other option—doing nothing to clear anything up—is exactly what Chuck did. He just leaned back on that "confession" that was clearly meant as irony! 🤦

I’m asking for someone above Chuck to weigh in on this, if such a possibility even exists.

If it doesn't, or if you consider this matter closed, then I’ll just say goodbye to you all. This is a private forum; the rules and editorial policy belong to the owners, and I'm not disputing that. But it is my right to refuse to be subject to someone else's whims, double standards, and obvious bias.

I mean, we could all just play dumb now and say the classic line, "Oh, there's no bias here, all moderators are equal and nobody gets special treatment," blah, blah, blah... Unfortunately, some people have shown they operate at the same low, sneaky levels they use to lecture politicians, the media, or other public figures.

It's just like when the Democratic Party clearly favors one specific club while relentlessly punishing another, only to have the nerve to issue statements claiming everything is perfectly clean, the rules are applied equally to everyone, and the only real problem is the people who keep complaining.

It's the same dirty, slimy story every time.

This case is as clear as day. We all know that if anyone else showed up on this forum and started acting this way (harassing people and all that), they’d be gone in the blink of an eye, and any question as to why would be laughed off as totally insane.

Kudos to everyone else, but I'm not crazy, I'm not a fool, and I'm certainly not letting anyone treat me like one.

Anyway, I’m asking for a response and a ruling from someone other than the moderators, given the conflict of interest here (since they happen to be on the same side as the Colleague in question, and besides, admitting to these lapses would mean admitting their own fault, which they clearly aren't able to do).

Of course, I realize I shouldn't expect a dramatic turnaround; this thread will probably just end up in the trash, but hey, sometimes you just have to speak your truth.

So, what exactly isn't allowed on the Forum?

1. Breaking any US laws
2. Violating generally accepted standards of civilization
3. Harassment based on anything—race, nationality, religion, age, gender, you name it...
4. Swearing, flaming, or spamming (repeatedly posting the same or similar stuff)
5. Copyright infringement
6. Posting pornographic or erotic content, disguised nudity, violent material, or linking to any of that stuff
7. Advertising (unless it’s been officially cleared by the Marketing Forum)
8. Chatting (outside of the designated chat topics)
9. Creating clone accounts
10. Doxing or revealing other users' private info
11. Being a troll (writing mocking, rude, or offensive messages just to annoy people, stir up fights, and mess with the flow of discussion)
12. Going off-topic
13. Harassing other users
14. SHOUTING (using CAPS LOCK)
15. Playing dumb

I've only highlighted the specific rules here that I have indisputably and undeniably proven—with documentation—are being constantly broken over in Politics.

Chuck's argument about how we should all report everything and then just sit around waiting for them to react doesn't really hold water to me, does it? I mean, with all these things happening so frequently, isn't it basically impossible for a moderator not to notice it themselves or for it to just slip through the cracks?

I'll say it again, my Colleague rapidfox26 already explained perfectly why it's absolutely necessary to react to every single one of my posts if the goal is to achieve maximum disruption to the conversation.

The amount of spam, trolling, and stalking going on here is visible from outer space, so claiming that everyone needs to report it just so the moderators don't miss it feels like a pretty weak excuse, don't you think?

Article 2.

Cultured, well-reasoned debate, behaving like a civilized human being, treating everyone on the forum as equals, showing tolerance, fairness, solidarity, keeping discussions efficient, respecting personalities, and actually listening to arguments from all sides—these are the core values and the absolute highest priorities here on the Politics subforum.

😁

I mean, seriously, watching how rapidfox26 carries himself while reading this fundamental rule from the "Politics" subforum feels like some kind of bizarre joke, right? It’s almost embarrassing to even be part of this community when you see stuff like that.

Look, it’s pretty straightforward, and honestly, the ball is in the administration's court now.

If the rules are actually meant to be followed, we can clear up any issues or dilemmas as early as today.

But hey, if the rules aren't really there to be enforced—or if they're just applied whenever someone feels like it, allowing certain people to spam, troll, stir up fights, mess with the flow of conversation, harass other users, shout over everyone, engage in baseless arguing, and just make everything inefficient... well, then I guess that's just how it is.

No bad feelings. 👍

If by some miracle this whole thing ends up being re-examined, I’d really appreciate it if you guys could give me a little breathing room (I mean, I can't exactly sit glued to my computer screen all day, right?) so I have the chance to address any questions or requests from the admin team, because honestly, I’ve got nothing to hide and absolutely zero reason to be shady about anything here.

But if that doesn't happen, then thanks in advance for the "attention" and take it easy.

Getting called out again, so I guess I gotta defend myself... 👍

11. being a troll (posting snarky, rude, or offensive stuff just to annoy people, start fights, and mess up the discussion)

I haven't insulted you once—not a single dirty word said toward you.

In most of my posts, I give 👍 and 🙂

How many times have people in this thread told you that you're annoying, spamming, or being a troll?

Should we run a poll here and see what the results look like?

Nah, we won't, because you know the results would be embarrassing for you ☕

4. swearing, flaming, spamming (repeating the same or similar posts)

Are you kidding me?
You’re basically the textbook definition of this 🤣

13. harassing other users

Man, seriously, what's your problem?

Who's harassing you?

If someone's bothering you, just put them on ignore—what's the big deal?

Does it bother you that I reply to every single one of your posts?

Look, little guy, don't be so sensitive... this is still your forum, right? 😁

I haven't changed a single letter in the posts I quote, nor have I twisted your words to turn ten words into a sentence you never actually said.
It's all your own words and your own way of talking.

I just interpret them my way...

Just like how you admitted to offering money and then tried to play it off as irony.

See how two different people can interpret a post differently and react accordingly? That's what I'm doing with you.

Your entire history in the Bridge thread is nothing but massive trolling and spamming, yet you're accusing everyone else of it.

Why didn't you brag about how many regular visitors to the thread called YOU a troll and gave up on arguing because of your posts?

You hold the record for most posts there, but let's be real, most of them are about who?
The Republican Party and the Democratic Party.

Man, they have their own threads.

How many posts did you write in those specific threads?

Why don't you just go to the Republican or Democratic threads and trash them there?

Because you aren't actually interested in them.

That's not your goal. Your goal is to spam the Bridge thread by constantly dragging the dirty laundry of the Republicans and Democrats into it, just so you can wrap up every post with some "BUT BRIDGE ISN'T LIKE THAT AND THAT'S WHY BRIDGE."

If it weren't for the Republicans and Democrats, you'd be posting maybe "three posts" a week in that thread.

That's how much your party is worth now that they aren't in power and the center of attention.

You troll, you spam, you wreck the thread, you get shut down a hundred times, and then you just keep going because you think you're on some mission... you've got your own delusions, your own little movie playing in your head about your "calling"—both here on the forum and for Bridge in the country. You're Rocky, man... and then you get kicked out just because you have a fan who responds to every single thing you say. Unbelievable.🙏

P.S. oh yeah—how many times have you actually used the multiquote tool? while everyone else is being organized about it, you’re just spamming posts like a conveyor belt... even when there’s no reason to—one post per answer—and then you have the nerve to lecture people about spamming and trolling 🤣

Let me jump the gun here, because I can already see you obsessively nitpicking the Forum rules—copying piles of links to my posts and yours, just to twist them and inflate 🤣

Look, it’s simple: I’m not refusing to answer you just because you want me to stay quiet.

And I’m definitely not going to give you the sugar-coated answers you’re clearly fishing for.
👍Korea is north of

If I’m breaking a rule, fine—let them punish me. Give me a permanent ban if that's what it takes, no big deal. It's out of my hands anyway... you'll just end up having a monopoly on this thread, pushing your propaganda and acting as free advertising for your political party, all five of you

Let the mods have the final word—either it's you or it's me.
🙂

Honestly, I don't even see the point in trying to outsmart you or getting into a debate.

You’re just completely irrelevant, totally insignificant, and honestly so powerless that you’ve spent your whole time jumping down one single person's throat on this Forum, all while throwing around some stupid fabrication without a shred of proof to back it up.

I mean, seriously, how desperate does a person have to be to spend their entire day glued to a computer screen, obsessively tracking one specific individual across every single thread?

At the end of the day, we’re talking about the rules here.

Rule 13 of our general guidelines is crystal clear about how harassment of other users is strictly prohibited. When someone responds almost exclusively to one user's posts, or starts asking what they're going to do while that person is offline, that is the textbook definition of stalking or harassment. Seriously, if that doesn't count as stalking, then I’d love to see a concrete example of what actually constitutes stalking, or what "harassing a fellow user" means if it isn't exactly this situation.

Then there's Rule 11, which explicitly states that "intentionally annoying other participants, provoking arguments, and disrupting the flow of discussion" is banned. It’s so obvious from an airplane that this is exactly what you're doing, and you even admitted it yourself when you tried to egg others on to act the same way just so the thread would become a total mess, impossible to read, and drive everyone else away .

And on top of all that, none of it was enough for you, so you had to resort to the most basic slander and spreading mindless lies? Man, do you even have a shred of decency left, being able to lie so crudely and easily? What kind of motivation does a person need to allow themselves to act like this?

As a human being, I’m asking you—think about your own spouse or your parents for a second. Can you imagine if someone took your daughter, your mother, or a member of your family to task and relentlessly spread lies about them? Hey, just hold on a second and think about it, okay? It’s just shameful, pathetic, and slimy... what kind of person are you to let yourself do this?

Look, you have the opportunity right now, so go ahead and prove your claim. Post that DM where you supposedly offered me anything, and I will personally agree to a permanent ban immediately. Stop with the nonsense and the repetitive claims without any evidence—you said you offered it! Go ahead, show the proof and let's put this whole thing to rest.

Stop hiding behind my use of irony, because anyone has the right to be ironic. Just show the proof!

But of course, you won't. Because you can't. Because this is just bottom-of-the-barrel slander that someone with even a tiny bit of honor, character, or integrity wouldn't dream of engaging in. Only the absolute worst people don't care about anything, not even using such filth and nastiness.

I've wasted way too many words and far too much time on you. I'm not interested in you; this is between me and the administration because it's about the rules of the Forum. You’re only being mentioned because you're the one breaking them.

rapidfox26 said:Let me just get ahead of you here, because I can already see you obsessively combing through the general Forum rules, copying a mountain of links to my posts and yours, and basically nitpicking everything 🤣

The thing is actually super simple—it’s not that I don’t want to reply to you just because you’re making it difficult.

And I’m also not interested in answering in a way that just tells you exactly what you want to hear.

Korea is even more northern than 👍

If I’m breaking any rules, fine, let them punish me, even if it means a permanent ban, I really don't care since there's nothing I can do about it anyway; you'll just end up having a monopoly on this thread and keep pushing your propaganda and free advertising for whatever political party you belong to, all five of them

Let the mods give the final verdict, whether it's you or me

🙂

Colleague, it would be plenty if you just stuck to the Forum rules when you respond.

No stalking, no messing with the flow of the debate, and please, stop repeating those nasty, fake accusations.

If you do that, then you and I can go toe-to-toe with arguments for as long as you want.

But just stick to the rules and don't be that loser whose entire life purpose is chasing someone else around.

P.S. Also, just for the record, I don't belong to any political party; I'm strictly just a sympathizer.

granitetinker6 said:Rule 13 of the general guidelines makes it pretty clear—harassing other members on this Forum is strictly off-limits... When someone spends their entire time replying to just one person—constantly asking what they’re going to do once that person goes offline—that’s textbook stalking or harassment. Seriously. If that isn't stalking, then I’d love to see a real example of what constitutes stalking... or what exactly people mean when they talk about "harassing a forum member" if this isn't it.

You've seriously got no shame—you're basically the textbook definition of harassment... 🤣
So it's not a coalition, it's an agreement? You and Boza Quote are both terrible at interpreting things... seriously. 🙏

granitetinker6 said:Rule 11 clearly states that you can't go around intentionally bugging other people, starting fights, or messing with the flow of the conversation... It's not even like you can hide it—it’s visible from miles away—but you actually went ahead and admitted to doing exactly that too... He was basically telling everyone else to act exactly like that—just to make the whole thread a complete mess, totally unreadable... basically just trying to drive people away from it..

But... I was being sarcastic... 👍

What, now you're telling me it doesn't work for you—you really think you can convince me I wasn't being sarcastic?...

You?

What exactly did you mean by being "ironic" when you said I’d be paying around...

🤣

You want to bring in a dictatorship like they have in North Korea—but here, the mods decide if you get to play along or not...

granitetinker6 said:Alright, here's your chance—step up and prove it. Show me that PPE you claim you offered me, and I’ll take the perma-ban right now without a fight. Stop with the nonsense and the constant repeating without any actual proof... you said you offered it! So, go ahead—show the evidence and let's just end this whole thing...

Look, stop calling me out for being ironic—everyone’s entitled to their own sense of humor... Just show me some actual proof!

Of course you won't. You just can't. It’s nothing but low-life slander—the kind of thing someone with even a shred of decency, character, or integrity wouldn't dream of touching. Only the absolute worst people sink to that level... they don't care about being dirty or playing in the gutter.

Anyone can Photoshop a profile pic—no biggie. But you’re gonna have to actually call my original photo a fake before I buy into that... just chill out until there's an official word on it.

Plus, it’s like we need actual proof—like everything needs to be in black and white...
Ahaaaa, you were being sarcastic, but wait—wasn't I the one saying I was trolling in that last post?

I guess your truth is the only truth that matters.

Ah, classic Bridge move.

granitetinker6 said:Colleague, just stick to following the Forum rules and you'll be fine.

No stalking, no derailing the thread, and no repeating those sick, fake accusations.

If you do that, you and I can go back and forth with arguments all day long.

But just follow the rules and don't be some loser who makes chasing people their whole personality.

P.S. Also, I'm not part of any party—I'm just a sympathizer, strictly.

Like I said, it’s either you or me—I’m not backing down from what I wrote because I’m not insulting you, editing your posts, or twisting your sentences regarding the Republican-Democratic situation just to say Bridge is the same thing.

Maybe I'll misinterpret you sometimes and think you're attacking Bridge, but look—it happens, this is a Forum after all...☕

Let Some kind of verdict decide.

🙂

rapidfox26 said:...

Look, the whole debate surrounding the Libertarian Party has never actually been about anything resembling logic or coherent thought, but this recent stunt you’re pulling—slashing granitetinker6's posts and straight-up fabricating what was actually said—is honestly bottom-tier behavior. It's middle school stuff, seriously. If this were happening on any other subforum or even just under a different thread here, you’d have been banned instantly for being such a hack.

Gregory Ward said:The whole debate about the Libertarian Party hasn't exactly been a masterclass in logic or coherent thought, but this recent move of yours—snipping pieces out of granitetinker6's posts and twisting what he actually said... honestly, it’s middle school behavior. On any other subforum, or even just a different thread here, you'd be banned for that kind of stuff.

What adults think, kids say ☕

You and one other person seem to think things improved once granitetinker6 showed up.

Everyone else already made it clear—the guy is just an epic-level troll...

Gregory Ward said:Discussions about the Libertarian Party have never really been about solid arguments or actual logic—but this recent habit of yours? Cutting out parts of granitetinker6's posts and twisting what they actually meant... honestly, it’s middle school behavior. On any other board—or even just different threads here—that kind of stuff would get you banned immediately.

I'm with you on this one. rapidfox26 is writing like a kid—thinking it's funny when it's really just exhausting, boring, and totally predictable. Not constructive at all...

Sandra Brown18 said:I’m with you on this one. rapidfox26 is just being childish—acting like they're actually being funny when, honestly, it's just exhausting, boring, and totally predictable... plus, it adds zero value to the conversation.

boldano - Wait, was I even arguing against that? 🤣

And somehow that's breaking the forum rules? 🙏

Who gave you the idea I was trying to be funny?

Just some random rambling on the fly? 🤣

It's pretty wild how people gather here—just out here doing Democratic Party stuff on a massive scale 🤣

Anyway, everyone's basically glued to the local news feeds 24/7 🙏

You guys are about as transparent as Jane Doe with her public ledger 🤣

So, there's just zero proof, right? Even after starting a whole separate thread to address those ridiculous accusations, our friend over here still can't manage to show a single shred of evidence for what they claim actually happened.

Is it even worth wasting any more breath on this?

rapidfox26 said:The Democratic Party can be photoshopped easily enough, I just need you to declare the actual Democratic Party a fake first; maybe take a breather and wait for an official ruling.

Hey, why don't you go ahead and Photoshop something then, if you're so obsessed with your own little lie? Just dive right in!

If I were actually someone trying to expose something as shady and crooked as offering money on a forum, I’d probably just hand my password over to the admins so they could log in themselves and check my inbox to see for themselves, wouldn't I?

Actually, forget just the admins—I'd post my password publicly, wipe every other message, leave that one "undeniable" piece of evidence sitting there, change my password again, and then triumphantly carry on with my life on this forum.

But hey, that's only possible if such a Democratic Party situation even existed in the first place...

rapidfox26 said:It's pretty interesting how people are grouping up here to run a massive Democratic Party operation.🤣

Nope, there is absolutely no Democratic Party operation happening here.

I have seriously never encouraged, motivated, coordinated, or done anything remotely like that just to drive some kind of forum debate.

Never. It's just not my thing. I'm just a regular guy on an internet forum standing up for the views and values I believe in. There's no behind-the-scenes maneuvering, no networks, no secret deals, no special interests—nothing at all...

And now I'm wrapping this conversation up with you because it's super obvious you're just trying to spam this thread and troll it so the mods will shut the whole thing down as some silly, unproductive argument, which lets them close the case without any real resolution—which, honestly, sounds like exactly what you want, just like you mentioned earlier regarding your role in this.

So, I'm calling on the staff here to please not do that.

We're talking about rules being broken here, and whether or not those rules actually apply to everyone equally.

granitetinker6 said:So, there’s zero proof. Even after starting a whole other thread just to address that stupid accusation, the guy still can't actually prove a single thing he claims happened...

Is there even any point in wasting our breath anymore...?

Go ahead and Photoshop it then—if you're really that obsessed with your own lie, might as well lean into it...

If I actually wanted to expose something as shady and crooked as people offering cash on this forum, I’d just hand my password over to the admins—let them dive into my inbox themselves and see what's really going on...

I wouldn't just tell the admins—I’d go full rogue. I’d post the password publicly, wipe every other message, leave that one undeniable piece of proof behind, change the password again, and then just... carry on with my forum life like nothing happened...

But that only works if a Democratic Party like that actually existed...

Nah, the Democratic Party just isn't doing anything at all...

Look, I've never once tried to egg anyone on, motivate people, or coordinate anything just to stir up some debate on here... honestly, that's just not my thing...

Never happened. I don't even deal with that stuff. Just some regular guy on an online forum defending the views and values I actually believe in. There’s no backroom deals, no networks, no secret agendas, or anything like that... nothing at all...

Look, I’m cutting this conversation short right here—it’s pretty obvious you’re just trying to derail the whole thing. You're basically trolling to make this look like some pointless, unproductive back-and-forth... all so the mods will step in, call it "unfruitful," and shut the whole thread down without actually fixing anything. And honestly? That's exactly what you want... just like you admitted earlier was your plan for this topic.

So, I'm basically just calling on them to not go through with it... seriously.

Look, this is really just about rules being broken—and whether they actually apply to everyone equally...

If I insisted on sticking to a lie—which isn't even a lie, by the way—you’d probably just slap a "fake Democratic Party" label on me and toss me aside... then I'd be stuck trying to prove whether it's fake or not. But I'm not about that life...

Look, like I told you in that Democratic Party thread—and I’ve mentioned it a few times in this topic too—you didn't break any rules or do anything illegal... so I really don't get why you're expecting me to keep that post archived for months. If I had mod privileges or something, maybe I would... but yeah...

Look, I get why you're expecting that—honestly, coming from someone with such a massive persecution complex, I wouldn't expect anything less... especially when it comes to archiving every single useless Democratic Party post that doesn't even break any laws or forum rules...

Just look at your posts—they're nothing but links to other people's stuff or your own threads that sit there gathering dust for months...
Since you aren't a mod and don't have a search function—and don't even try telling me to just Google it, because that's useless for digging through specific threads like this—it’s pretty obvious what you're doing. You're obsessively hoarding thousands of links to people's posts... archiving them by username and topic just so when someone says something random, you can drop a link and go, "Oh, look what you said four months ago"... simple as that...

So much about the stalking, the harassment, and the constant surveillance...

Of course you’ve got a whole dedicated page in your archive just for your own name—featuring your favorite photo, naturally—filled with a massive pile of links to your old posts where you basically just drag us back in by saying, "I talked about this right here"...

So, let's wrap this up—you basically only post in one thread about the Libertarian Party, yet most of your stuff is actually about the Republican-Democratic rivalry—which totally breaks the forum rules. You’ve got this massive archive of links containing everyone else's comments plus your own, just waiting to fire them off whenever you feel like it. Then there are those endless essays you drop—total propaganda pieces designed to drown out any actual debate. And honestly? You act like you don't even know how the multi-quote feature works just so you can flood the board with volume... you know what, I'm not even gonna bother arguing with you anymore. It's too early for that...

Let the mods just quit already.

🙂

rapidfox26 said:1) If I insisted on sticking to a lie (which isn't even a lie), you'd probably just slap a fake Democratic Party label on me and kick me off the board right then and there, leaving me to prove whether it's fake or not, but I'm just not that kind of guy.

2) Like I told you back in that Democratic Party post, and I've mentioned it a few times in this thread since, you didn't do anything illegal or break any forum rules, so I honestly don't know why you're expecting me to archive that post for months on end (if I had unlimited space like the mods, maybe I would).

Then again, I totally get why you'd expect that; coming from someone with such a massive persecution complex, I shouldn't be surprised that you want every single trivial post archived, even if they don't violate any laws or site rules.

Well, now everything is crystal clear.

You are a pathological liar—just a shockingly malicious and twisted individual who doesn't hold anything sacred, which is how you can shamelessly double down on such blatant slander against someone else.

After spending all your time stalking me, after you added that whole "bribery scandal" nonsense to your signature, and now you're suggesting that you don't archive "meaningless" posts? Really?

🤦

I honestly get the feeling you don't even care about how this whole thing ends. Maybe this is just some burner account of yours, so losing it won't even hurt, or maybe you just think the moderators will always stay on your side and look the other way.

But none of that changes the bottom line—you're a liar, a slanderer, and a stalker.

It’s pathetic.

I don't follow the Libertarian Party thread, but I feel compelled to say that based on what has been written here and in the private appeals, both Forum Members deserve a lifetime ban from the internet. Why aren't there life moderators? 😁

granitetinker6 said:It’s crystal clear now.

You’re just a pathological liar—a genuinely malicious, twisted person who clearly has zero morals if you can shamelessly double down on slander like this.

After spending all your time stalking me, and after putting that whole bribery "scandal" right in your signature, now you're acting like you don't even archive "insignificant" Democratic Party posts.

🤦

I get it, you don't actually care how this ends. This might just be a burner account for you, so losing it doesn't matter... or maybe you just think the moderators will stay soft on you forever.

But none of that changes the bottom line—you're a liar, a slanderer, and a stalker.

Pathetic.

The only pathetic thing here is you throwing insults without a shred of proof—not that I even need proof, since you basically admitted everything I'm saying is true.

It's also pretty ridiculous how you claimed you were done talking to me in an earlier post, yet here you are, replying again.

Typical behavior for the Libertarian Party and Jane Doe. 👍

cosmicgull52 said:I don't even follow the Libertarian Party threads, but I just gotta say—based on what’s been written here and in that closed appeal, both those users basically deserve a lifetime ban from the internet. Seriously... why isn't there a moderator for real life? 😁

I'm with you on that.
Total permanent ban for both of them, if you ask me.

The thing is, he won't shut up about it because he's actually getting paid to be here—unlike me... 👍

Sandra Brown18 said:I’m with you on this one. rapidfox26 is just acting like a child, thinking they're being funny when really it's just exhausting, boring, and totally predictable. Zero substance here.

Yeah, it's just like those pro-Libertarian Party activists who flood every single thread with spam the second their party is mentioned. But hey, let's not talk about that—I guess they're "funny," "unpredictable," and "mature" instead of just being annoying.