CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › American Honey (2016)

American Honey (2016)

Started by Rachel Young3 · · 👁 3 views · 42 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rachel Young3Paul Rogers94stormytinker40Jack Murphy5Edward Ortiz77Jamie Turner80Ashley Grant66hollowowl15Rebecca Peterson3Jeremy Kim57Gary Ross3gentlepuma02Peter Perez75Peter Allen30frozenskipper12David Lopez97Patrick Chavez60frozengull94Amanda Robinson4Christian White10
Rachel Young3 Rachel Young3 Active MemberOP
111 messages
joined Dec 2014
#1 ·
image

IMDb

American Honey is this high-energy, lyrical odyssey about a pack of wild teenagers drifting through the American Midwest selling magazines. Burnt out by a rough home life, young Star escapes her dysfunctional family to join a crew of traveling vendors. She falls for Jake—played by the eccentric Shia LaBeouf—and quickly gets sucked into their outlaw lifestyle of constant partying, breaking the law, and endless wandering. This fourth feature from the award-winning director Andrea Arnold offers a gutsy look at the subculture of American youth outcasts, all based on real-life experiences.


I honestly cannot believe I sat through three hours of a movie where absolutely nothing happens. That "couple" is easily one of the most irritating pairings I've seen on screen lately. The actress playing the lead looks like she’s sporting a mustache and has no teeth, which makes her a total distraction in every single scene. And the guy Shia plays... good grief, what an insufferable creature.
Just a bunch of messed up, annoying punks. I don't get how she just sits in that truck with him when he tells her he has a delivery to make, and then she hops out and finds those losers again like he just drove around the block instead of miles away to god knows where.
A pleasant surprise seeing Elvis's granddaughter acting as their boss. Truly the only character who didn't drive me insane.
Paul Rogers94 Paul Rogers94 Active Member
235 messages
joined Apr 2022
#2 ·
I don't even have the energy or the desire to write about this movie—so I’m just reposting what I already said in another thread. I’ll take the first chance I get when I'm in a better headspace to actually elaborate on my thoughts, but until then;

Watching a handful of shallow idiots who think they're having a blast—amidst all that pathetic, infantile sentimentality and cheap sex—is exhausting for nearly three hours. This film is only "cool" if you consider these morons cool. The soundtrack just highlights how brainwashed everyone is... the whole thing is nothing more than abuse, and frankly, it pissed me off—a total hack job of a "masterpiece."
stormytinker40 stormytinker40 Member
31 messages
joined Feb 2018
#3 ·
Looks like you totally missed the point of this movie.

Here’s my take from FilmPress;

stormytinker40 said:American Honey

I didn't even know who Andrea Arnold was until I looked her up. This movie is incredible. Honestly, the title itself feels like a little jab at a commercial masterpiece like American Beauty. It’s just raw—shot with perfect cinematography using mostly amateur actors. It's honest, romantic, messy, simple, and brilliant. It makes all the right mistakes. It's imaginative, intriguing, smart, debatable, and destructive. Basically? It's just life.

Good flick.

A Star has been made.
Paul Rogers94 Paul Rogers94 Active Member
235 messages
joined Apr 2022
#4 ·
stormytinker40 said:It looks like you completely missed the point of the movie.

You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to see this film is nothing more than mindless filler for small-town YouTube brains.
Jack Murphy5 Jack Murphy5 Active Member
59 messages
joined Feb 2014
#5 ·
It’s actually a bit of a shame you mentioned who this movie was dedicated to; it almost makes me like it even more. ☕
Rachel Young3 Rachel Young3 Active MemberOP
111 messages
joined Dec 2014
#6 ·
stormytinker40 said:It’s pretty clear you just didn't get the movie.

Here’s my take, based on some reviews from Rotten Tomatoes;

Is there an adjective left in the English language that you haven't already exhausted? 🤣
Paul Rogers94 Paul Rogers94 Active Member
235 messages
joined Apr 2022
#7 ·
Jack Murphy5 said:Honestly, now that you've pointed out who this movie was actually made for, I actually like it even more. ☕

Just boil the whole message of the film down to one single, blunt sentence and everything will be crystal clear...
Edward Ortiz77 Edward Ortiz77 Member
37 messages
joined Aug 2015
#8 ·
Great movie. It’s completely immersive and keeps you hooked from start to finish. As I mentioned previously regarding the performances, the chemistry between the two leads is palpable—you could practically cut it with a knife. What really stands out to me, though, is the characterization. There isn't a single person on screen that doesn't feel fleshed out. Even the brief interactions with minor characters feel like complete, miniature portraits. The whole thing feels incredibly authentic and human. 5+/5! 👍
Jamie Turner80 Jamie Turner80 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2009
#9 ·
This is easily one of the best films of the year. It isn't even really about nihilism—well, perhaps not any more than the world we live in already is—but rather a razor-sharp observation of a hollowed-out generation living in a place devoid of hope. As a staunch atheist, I can only say: may God help us all.
Ashley Grant66 Ashley Grant66 Member
25 messages
joined Nov 2015
#10 ·
I’ll be honest—this movie didn't hit me quite as hard as it did everyone else here, and I'm not about to go calling it a masterpiece. But, given the headspace I was in when I watched it, it actually caught me totally off guard—that whole vibe of fake YOLO freedom, subtle tension, and just this laid-back energy mixed with how much those kids can genuinely irritate you. I ended up really enjoying the ride; it just "clicked" for me, which I think is everything—either you're sucked in from the jump or every little thing the characters do just grates on your nerves (which, let's face it, isn't exactly difficult here).

Even though I liked it overall—and man, the chemistry between the leads was top-tier—I still think her earlier stuff, Red Road and Fish Tank, feels a bit more solid and "complete" to me.
Rachel Young3 Rachel Young3 Active MemberOP
111 messages
joined Dec 2014
#11 ·
I’m just not seeing any of that supposed "spark" between them...
honestly, I was practically counting down the minutes until they weren't sharing the screen anymore.

that guy who paid her $1,000 just to jerk off is way too much for me to handle... 🙏

plus, the whole cowboy thing? makes zero sense to me.
that Shiite guy totally ruined the vibe when he barged in right when I was getting invested in what they were actually going to do to her after she got drunk.
hollowowl15 hollowowl15 Member
24 messages
joined Jan 2019
#12 ·
Honestly, I’m just not feeling any chemistry there. She’s definitely more interesting—if anything, I would’ve rather spent more time watching the boss instead. They both play their roles almost too perfectly, like something out of a fairy tale. You’ve got the lead character feeding and rescuing animals everywhere she goes—it’s a miracle she didn't go out of her way to liberate those cows, too—while the boss is portrayed as this pure corporate predator.
And I really don't get why people are mourning, saying things like, "Oh, poor America, what have we become?" because of this brainless group. If you actually compare them to today's socially conscious, politically active youth, both groups come across as equally powerless.
Rebecca Peterson3 Rebecca Peterson3 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2015
#13 ·
Edward Ortiz77 said:I found the character development to be particularly impressive. It seems there isn't a single soul on screen that we don't learn something about... Every little interaction with the minor characters, or even those who feel more like background extras, feels like a fully realized miniature study in itself.

Meanwhile, we get an exhaustive biography of the people reading magazines, yet when it comes to the crew in the van, we’re left in total darkness until the credits roll—other than knowing they’re numerous and exist primarily to provide atmosphere while the main trio works through their drama. Given that we've been sitting through nearly three hours of this, I can't help but wish we actually knew a thing or two about them...
Jeremy Kim57 Jeremy Kim57 Member
33 messages
joined May 2019
#14 ·
I’ve only caught the trailer so far—though honestly, nothing really seems to happen in it, and it comes off as a bit pretentious. I won't be too quick to judge, though—not until I actually sit down to watch it. If I even find the time—three hours is quite a commitment, isn't it?
Rebecca Peterson3 Rebecca Peterson3 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2015
#15 ·
Rachel Fowler61, you’d be much better off watching Red Road by that director; it’s actually a masterpiece...
Gary Ross3 Gary Ross3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2014
#16 ·
Lawrence Edwards58 said:With those people who actually bother buying magazines, we find out almost everything. With this crew in the van, we don't learn a damn thing until the very end—aside from the fact that there are way too many of them and they spend the whole time stalling while three main characters play out their little soap opera. I’d actually love to know a few things, considering this thing drags on for nearly three hours.

Exactly.

I didn't even realize how long it was; about an hour in, I started wondering if the plot was ever going to actually kick in. Then I realized—oh, it's three hours long? Well, maybe now. Nope, still nothing.
Three hours of repetitive scenes.
Gary Ross3 Gary Ross3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2014
#17 ·
I have to admit, I found myself quite fond of my fish tank for a while there.
Gary Ross3 Gary Ross3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2014
#18 ·
If nothing "particularly interesting" is actually happening, then give me characters with some real substance—I want a story with some actual grit and flavor.
Rebecca Peterson3 Rebecca Peterson3 Member
26 messages
joined Jan 2015
#19 ·
Red Road is easily Arnold's finest work, though I’d say Fish Tank gives it a run for its money.

I actually sat through eight straight days of American media just because I have such high regard for the director... but honestly, the lead actress—that girl with the uniquely shaped lips playing the old hero—really just coasts through the role without any real substance. There is zero character development; things start one way and end exactly the same, which makes you wonder why the thing even needed to be three hours long...

*There was one decent scene involving a thousand-dollar handjob, but that hardly compensates for a three-hour runtime.
Gary Ross3 Gary Ross3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2014
#20 ·
I watched Red Road incorrectly; I actually put it on mute just to see, because now I'm genuinely curious.

Since you brought it up, I spent the entire time staring at her mouth and her smile. It was so incredibly unattractive that it actually distracted me from enjoying the movie itself. I don't think I've ever been bothered by an actor's mouth before—I’m pretty certain of that.

*Well, obviously, a little bit of self-pleasure isn't worth a thousand dollars :G

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads