CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Hardware › Desktops › Best CPU cooler for Intel Core i7?

Best CPU cooler for Intel Core i7?

Started by cosmicridge212 · · 👁 4 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants cosmicridge212William Richardson12darkowl72Adam Moore3Kimberly Gomez34David Sanders4Drew Torres3
cosmicridge212 cosmicridge212 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Jan 2015
#1 ·
I'm looking for some advice on a cooler for this specific processor because I really need something that can actually handle the heat without sounding like a jet engine taking off right next to my desk, and honestly, I’d prefer not to blow more than $250$100 on it—though if I could find something even cheaper, that would be even better. Thanks.
William Richardson12 William Richardson12 Regular
301 messages
joined Aug 2014
#2 ·
http://www.nabava.net/search.php?tp=0&q=hyper+212+evo

Check this one out... I've got the heavy "brick" version of the Plus, swapped in a Corsair, and it's basically silent now.
cosmicridge212 cosmicridge212 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Jan 2015
#3 ·
Do you have any clue what this one is actually like? Since it’s a bit cheaper, I can't help but wonder just how much worse it's going to be compared to the first one
William Richardson12 William Richardson12 Regular
301 messages
joined Aug 2014
#4 ·
The brick looks solid, and honestly, just swapping out the fan might do the trick—especially if you upgrade to a Corsair, which packs about 25% more punch.
darkowl72 darkowl72 Regular
311 messages
joined Oct 2015
#5 ·
The whole point is how much cooling you actually need. Are we talking everyday use or pushing an overclock? What are you running right now, and what’s the actual motivation for swapping it out?

If you just grab some mid-tier cooler, you might drop your temps by a couple of degrees, which is basically throwing money down the drain for zero real gain. Yeah, the T4 isn't as strong as the 212 EVO. Honestly, even the 212 EVO isn't anything special; their best bet is really the 212 PRO.

This one weighs less than 500g and moves just under 70 cfm (cubic feet per minute). It's... modest, to say the least.

If you want something with actual teeth, the entry-level high-performance stuff starts a bit over $100. We're talking heavy hitters—coolers weighing a pound or more that can push well over 100 cfm, like the Scythe Ninja 3 or the Scythe Asura. Those are considered "budget" performance coolers because they usually start at $167 and go up from there.

You could do decent work with a cooler under $100 using a Cooler Master Hyper 212, which isn't the top-tier Model X in their lineup, but it's a massive step up from a stock cooler. In my opinion, it's worth the spend if it's around $83.

http://www.frostytech.com/articlevie...id=2658&page=4

Obviously, you have to watch your clearance inside the case and make sure you aren't blocking your RAM slots, but we can worry about that once you actually pick something out.
cosmicridge212 cosmicridge212 NewcomerOP
4 messages
joined Jan 2015
#6 ·
I was wondering which one is actually going to do a better job, the Cooler Master or the 212 EVO, especially since I have zero intention of overclocking my rig. I’m looking to swap out my current cooler because the stock one is honestly driving me insane with how loud it is, and if I'm being real, it doesn't even seem to be doing much for the temps.
darkowl72 darkowl72 Regular
311 messages
joined Oct 2015
#7 ·
Go with the Cooler Master.

Just make sure you check the dimensions first. You need to be certain it actually fits in your case and won't hang over your RAM sticks:

http://www.zalman.com/global/product/Product_Read.php
Adam Moore3 Adam Moore3 Regular
322 messages
joined Jun 2014
#8 ·
Wait, what? Why would you even consider the Optimus over a Cooler Master? You're barely more efficient than the Optimus, which isn't even a great buy anyway CLICK
darkowl72 darkowl72 Regular
311 messages
joined Oct 2015
#9 ·
I linked that table too, but honestly, it looks like a total glitch to me. There's definitely some inconsistency there. You've got the Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus and the Optimus sitting right next to each other, yet the EVO is somehow listed as superior? Based on most sources, the Plus should be winning here, which actually makes sense given the price point.

Here's a direct comparison between those two—the Plus and the EVO—where things actually make sense and show the Plus is better:

http://www.overclock.net/t/1172418/c...12-plus-vs-evo

So, following that logic (and leaning toward the larger sample size of the Optimus, which is the metric I actually trust), I went with the Optimus...

Who knows, I guess...
Kimberly Gomez34 Kimberly Gomez34 Regular
686 messages
joined Jul 2009
#10 ·
If you check that link, you’ll see results based on high fan speeds without including the "high" (or sometimes "low") settings—the 212 EVO comes out stronger and quieter. Honestly, I think that's accurate because for years, the 212 EVO was the consensus "best buy" across every tech site in the country. It hit that sweet spot of performance versus price, noise levels, and slim enough dimensions to ensure zero RAM clearance issues. That might have changed recently, but half of these top-tier coolers aren't even stocked in local US retailers (like that small Cryorig H7, for instance), or as Timothy Kim60 mentioned, you've got those beefier options priced north of $60, such as the Corator DS (which saw a price hike for $20), the Scythe Ninja 3, Mugen Max, or the Thermalright Macho Rev A.

There’s also a persistent issue I find myself bringing up constantly: cooler reviews are incredibly frustrating because every single one tells a different story. For example, when they compare two specific models—or if those two aren't even in the same review and they just use some third model as a universal baseline—the data is all over the place. I’ve sat through four or five different reviews for the same cooler, and if the models are closely matched, you can almost never reach a definitive conclusion. In one review, they’re neck and neck; in another, one pulls slightly ahead; in yet another, the other takes the lead; and occasionally, one absolutely destroys the other.
David Sanders4 David Sanders4 Member
47 messages
joined Feb 2015
#11 ·
Timothy Kim60 said:There’s another issue I find myself bringing up constantly—I can't stand how inconsistent cooler reviews are. Every reviewer seems to be singing from a different sheet. For instance, if you compare two specific coolers, or if one isn't even included in the main comparison but gets used as a benchmark in every single review, the results are all over the place. I’ve sat through four or five different reviews, and even when the coolers are closely matched, you still can't reach a definitive conclusion. One review shows them neck and neck, another gives a slight edge to one, a third favors the other, and a fourth claims one absolutely crushes the competition. It's maddening.

I actually went out and tested this myself, and honestly, it's a thankless job. It feels like a lot of these tests are done half-heartedly. When a review claims to have tested ten or more coolers, it’s pretty obvious they aren't running live tests on every single unit; they're likely just pulling data from other sources. Ideally, everything should be tested in real-time under identical ambient temperatures. Relying solely on temperature deltas is misleading, because heat dissipation behaves differently at 70 versus 85 degrees.

The IBM has vanished from store shelves, which is a shame because, given its price and performance, it was an absolute steal. From what I've read, it was easily in the same league as the Cooler Master Hyper 212.🕺
Drew Torres3 Drew Torres3 Member
14 messages
joined Jun 2015
#12 ·
I’m running a Katana III, and man, with this heatwave hitting, my temps are just hovering around 115 to 120 degrees right now.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads