Home › Sports › Betting Forum ›
NBA Betting: Vol. 2
NBA Betting: Vol. 2
Started by restlessmaker9 · · 👁 6 views · 195 replies
#3 ·
Lawrence Castillo76 said:Looks like Granger isn't getting any minutes tonight.
Man, what a heartbreak—he was honestly our only real hope left.🙂
#5 ·
Dana Baker2 said:Are we going over?😁
If he had any sense at all, he would have made the move to Washington over. 🙂
Well, that’s that—go ahead and lock in the Washington over. It looks like we've already crossed the finish line on this one. ☕
#7 ·
Charlotte -9 after the first 🤣
Turnover kings 🤣
What kind of gifts are they handing out over the last 5-6 games... 🤣
Turnover kings 🤣
What kind of gifts are they handing out over the last 5-6 games... 🤣
#8 ·
Man, what kind of hospital they running in Portland? They’ve gotta have some serious motivation to get payback after getting torched by 40 points. If they show up with their full squad, they need to come out swinging hard. h1
#9 ·
Blazers starting 5: N. Smith, W. Matthews, L. Babbitt, J. Hickson, H. Thabeet man, I’m calling it now—we're about to get absolutely slaughtered.
#11 ·
Dana Baker2 said:The Nets are an absolute disaster.🤣
Absolute disaster—we’re looking at an 18% success rate from inside the arc. Just abysmal. 🙂
#12 ·
Dana Baker2 said:I know I wrote that myself, but I'm a bit confused—what exactly are you referring to when you say 101-100?😕 What exactly are you getting at here?
You’re out here making all these predictions, but once Indiana and Milwaukee end up as heavy underdogs, I’ll just step in and bet that the game in D.C. finishes with a score like 100-101.
I have to admit, I was feeling a little bit of anxiety around the mid-way point of the first quarter when we were sitting at 15 or 16, but I suppose I’m not too worried anymore.
And my other main pick just slipped through my fingers. It was all over.
If I could just play purely for my own high-stakes picks without anyone else getting in the way, that would be ideal.
Well, things have finally settled down in Indiana, I suppose. 😁
#13 ·
graniteotter6 said:You’re talking big now—wait until Indiana and Milwaukee turn into massive underdogs, then I’ll chime in and predict a final score of 100-101 in DC.
Honestly, I was sweating a bit when they were up 15-16 midway through the first quarter, but I'm chilling now.
And my second main pick? Gone. DC over.
If I could just play solo and stick to my own picks, things would be great.
Just look at how Indiana is playing right now 😁
Sorry, I didn't catch that. The Washington Post might say so, but the Nets are going to choke.🤣
#14 ·
Eh, I suppose it doesn't matter much; the stakes aren't particularly high, and given how good the offer was, it probably wouldn't have been a mistake to take it.
#15 ·
Washington seems to be moving through 🙂 I still have some Portland at less than 96.5
Is it worth loading up on San Antonio—either the standard handicap or maybe even the spread—if Portland's lineup is actually as desperate as it looks?
Is it worth loading up on San Antonio—either the standard handicap or maybe even the spread—if Portland's lineup is actually as desperate as it looks?
#16 ·
swiftcrane823 said:The Washington Post line looks okay 🙂 I still have some Portland under 96.5
Is it even worth loading up on San Antonio—either the standard spread or even the big one—if Portland's roster is actually this pathetic?
Maybe the standard spread, but definitely not the big one—those old guys are gonna be looking for a rest.
#17 ·
Dana Baker2 said:Sorry, I didn't catch that. The Washington Post might have their theories, but the Nets are going to choke.🤣
Well, looks like the Nets finally decided to wake up from their slumber. 🤣
#18 ·
Is anyone watching Detroit vs. Indiana? At halftime, they've already put up 106 points—the spread was 201.5 🤷
#19 ·
I can’t find anything about the Spurs getting some rest, but all I managed to dig up was that Duncan is heading back into the lineup this Friday after sitting out against the Mavs.
#20 ·
I feel a little bad for Charlotte here 🤣—honestly, I think some top-tier teams like the Lakers or the Celtics would just run circles around them 🤣
🔗 Similar threads
- The danger of betting on "gut feelings in Betting Forum · Jul 30, 2026
- Does a team's "revenge" narrative actually hold weight in betting? in Betting Forum · Jul 30, 2026
- Betting on "potential" vs. reality in Betting Forum · Jul 29, 2026
- Betting on long-term futures in Betting Forum · Jul 29, 2026
- The "Second Chance" Paradox: Why do we keep betting on the same players? in Off-topic · Jul 29, 2026