CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Music › Talking Heads

Talking Heads

Started by Casey Ramos78 · · 👁 6 views · 34 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Casey Ramos78Timothy Cox2Grace Flores49Raymond Palmer8George Barnes98Eric Newman2Samuel Morgan40Jesse Sanchez60Robin Hayes2casualranger2John Hill2Noah Roberts46velvetmarlin472Kevin Chavez3Lisa Davis46granitecyclistDennis Hall41Scott Hall5Ashley Grant66feralpilot0
Lisa Davis46 Lisa Davis46 Member
20 messages
joined Aug 2010
#21 ·
Nice post! First time seeing your thread / collection (I'll check it out)...

It's a shame this isn't also in their main thread, because this was put so perfectly:

granitecyclist said:They started off pretty mild, sort of like a quirky pop band—paranoid, postmodern, goofy, with David Byrne’s high-strung vocals and ultra-modern stream-of-consciousness lyrics, all woven together by a powerful, playful, and precise rhythm section and that infectious, impressive polyrhythmic guitar interplay between Byrne and Harrison.

Later they started adding those ethnic elements (they were pioneers of World beat alongside Peter Gabriel) and they definitely introduced that postmodern sound that influenced thousands of bands.
(...)
Their postmodernism really blossomed when they met Brian Eno, because his modernist production gave them something they never had—emotional resonance. Plus, Eno managed to tame, restrain, and channel Byrne’s personality. He brought humanity to those robotic rhythms and Byrne’s sarcastic, paranoid lyrics. That's why "Fear of Music" and "Remain in Light" are absolute classics.
+
Besides, they weren't just interested in music; they cared about art (from the perspective that music isn't just a subcategory of art).

The bolded part is exactly what they are, and I guess Eno "just" recognized everything TH already had inside them—he just had this unstoppable creative urge to pull the absolute best out of them. And you need serious talent for that (which is actually pretty rare). I'm fascinated by his unobtrusive, flexible personality, both as a musician and a human, throughout his whole career. Maybe I'm wrong, but he doesn't seem like someone driven by ego, but something else... that's what I value most. He just hears something quality, feels it, recognizes it, and then gives it everything to make it even better (even if it isn't his own work), just because he can. Obviously, there were clashes with co-authors along the way, which is natural.

But on many albums, including "Remain in Light," his role isn't just technical (producing and mixing); it's much more than that. And honestly, how many people know that Brian Eno is behind three TH albums, versus how many actually know about Talking Heads? I mean, I don't think it even mattered to him. We tend to focus way too much on the primary authors or songwriters (or directors and screenwriters), but behind the music (or film), there’s a whole bunch of vital gears turning constantly. They are often indispensable to the final product.

/// Brian Eno on why he can't slow down ///


One more thing, from his early days. I heard somewhere that Eno and Ferry couldn't agree on anything during Roxy Music's second album, and there were already tons of conflicts and irreconcilable creative and personality differences. Eno left and went solo, but I remember reading somewhere that years later he said their first album after the split, "Stranded," was actually the best work from Roxy Music and Ferry. It's a nice, selfless thing for him to say, but I still prefer "For Your Pleasure"...

granitecyclist said:Talking Heads' fourth album... maybe?Remain in LightRecorded back in 1980 in Nassau, this came out about a year after what might actually be their best record, Fear of Music. Even though they stuck with their core quartet for the sessions, they had some absolute heavy hitters jumping in to help out. You’ve got Brian Eno handling production while chipping in on bass and keys, plus Adrian Belew absolutely shredding on solo guitar—honestly, he probably blows Byrne or Harrison out of the water. Then there's Jon Hassell on trumpet, along with Robert Palmer and Jose Rossy on percussion, and of course, the one and only Nona Hendryx providing those backing vocals.
(...)
Critics absolutely loved this 8-track album, but sales were pretty mediocre—I guess that single "Once in a Lifetime" just didn't take off. The audience seemed caught off guard by these new, complex sounds. Maybe those lyrics about finding yourself in a beautiful house with a beautiful wife and wondering how you even got there threw people off? Personally, I think the first three tracks—"Born Under Punches (The Heat Goes On)," "Crosseyed And Painless," and "The Great Curve"—are probably the best and most exciting songs in their entire catalog. That whole urban jungle allegory, with all the polyrhythmic guitars and layered vocals, feels strictly controlled and disciplined. Above everything else, though, you’ve just got Byrne's singing and screaming driving it all home. "The Great Curve" is all about that brilliant call-and-response between the ringing guitar and the bass, but honestly, the layered vocal melodies are what really stand out. And then, tucked in there, you’ve got that wild Adrian Belew solo. It's pretty intense.

I’m actually pretty curious about this one, and maybe you know the actual timeline better than I do... It's obvious how Talking Heads ended up working with Adrian Belew around the *Remain in Light* era back in 1980, especially since they were all running in those same New York music circles. But since Robert Fripp was only involved on the previous record—and they wouldn't have even crossed paths then—how did his recruitment actually happen? I guess it’s worth asking: did Fripp basically just pull Belew into the fold during King Crimson's *Discipline* era in 1981?
Maybe Brian Eno had a hand in that too? I guess he might have been pulling the strings behind the scenes. 😁

Yeah, that last one—it’s great. And honestly, that solo is beautiful.
Dennis Hall41 Dennis Hall41 Active Member
55 messages
joined Jan 2018
#22 ·
Just jumping in here—if you truly love Heads, you’ve gotta be into Fear of Music.
Look, saying you love Remain in Light but don't care for Fear of Music—that’s just a way to signal good taste, or maybe even just being trendy—it doesn't actually make you a real Talking Heads fan. It's like claiming you love Sgt. Pepper but haven't really gotten into Rubber Soul, which is basically the most Beatles-sounding record they ever made.

Fear of Music is the absolute essence of Talking Heads—it's basically everything that defines them as a band.
Lisa Davis46 Lisa Davis46 Member
20 messages
joined Aug 2010
#23 ·
And who was it that said they didn't like Fear of Music?

Dennis Hall41 said:Look, it’s fine if you love *Remain in Light*, but if you don't also dig *Fear of Music*, I guess you aren't really a Talking Heads fan. To me, liking only one is more about having good taste—or maybe just following a trend—than actually being a true fan.

I don't really get this part. Can you explain it to me, please? 😵

I feel like there’s still so much more to be said about the essence of Talking Heads... maybe.
It would be easy enough to just move this over to their thread, so I guess I’d actually love for you to expand on that part—why do you think that is?
Dennis Hall41 Dennis Hall41 Active Member
55 messages
joined Jan 2018
#24 ·
Lisa Davis46 said:And who was it that said they didn't like Fear of Music?

I don't get this part—can you explain it to me? 😵

Honestly, you could say so much more about the essence of Talking Heads...
I could easily move this over to their thread—but honestly, I’d love for you to expand on that part first... why do you think that?

I was just bringing that up because of this right here.

I know plenty of people who swear by RiL—but they either haven't actually sat down with FoM, or they just assume it’s somehow worse—probably because critics basically told them they had to love RiL to be considered "real" fans.

Why essence? Because it’s a transitional record—just like how Rubber Soul was a turning point. It’s that sweet spot where you can see the early stuff and the later era colliding.
Honestly, if you ask me, it’s their absolute best—no filler at all. Though, I gotta be in just the right mood to listen to RiL—otherwise, it feels a little suffocating.
Lisa Davis46 Lisa Davis46 Member
20 messages
joined Aug 2010
#25 ·
Dennis Hall41 Asks:
If you ask me, it’s their best work—totally exhaustive. But honestly, I have to be in just the right mood to listen to RiL, otherwise it feels like it's suffocating you.

Huh, interesting. I actually feel the exact opposite—I think Fear of Music is an absolute masterpiece.
I haven't even bothered reading what the critics are saying about either one, to be honest.

Dennis Hall41 said:Why call it an essence? Because it’s a transitional record, just like Rubber Soul was. It’s that specific sweet spot where you can see the early stuff clashing with the later influences.

I love Rubber Soul, but I guess it still isn't the true essence of The Beatles to me. 😁
That's exactly because it's a transitional album.
Dennis Hall41 Dennis Hall41 Active Member
55 messages
joined Jan 2018
#26 ·
Isn't the whole point here about blending elements from both worlds? Sgt. Pepper feels like this total break from the system—it’s like the logical step after Revolver before you even get to the White Album. That Afrobeat vibe on Remain in Light is basically just music hall energy applied to Sgt. Pepper, and honestly, that album feels more like a stylistic excursion too. I don't really get the sense that it's a peak
with RiL, in any way that matters. Basically, if both bands had called it quits right after Fear of Music or maybe after Rubber Soul/Revolver—let's throw in something like Blonde on Blond, Exile on Main St., or London Calling for good measure—you'd still walk away feeling like their artistic journey was complete.
I don't get that same feeling with Nick Drake, though—to my mind, he never actually managed to nail his absolute best record.

And just to be clear, when I mentioned the critics, I wasn't aiming that at you.
Dennis Hall41 Dennis Hall41 Active Member
55 messages
joined Jan 2018
#27 ·
And yeah, one thing's for sure—Speaking in Tongues wouldn't even exist without Remain in Light, though I’ve got some seriously mixed feelings about that record.
Lisa Davis46 Lisa Davis46 Member
20 messages
joined Aug 2010
#28 ·
Dennis Hall41 said:Isn't the whole essence here about blending elements from both worlds? I guess you could say Sgt. Pepper was this break from the system, and maybe the White Album was the logical next step after Revolver. Then you have the Afrobeat influence on Remain in Light, which feels almost like the music hall vibe on Sgt. Pepper—it’s more of an excursion, too. I don't really get a sense of a peak with RiL, in any way that matters.
Basically, if both bands had broken up around Fear of Music or Rubber Soul/Revolver—let's throw in Blonde on Blond, Exile on Main St., or London Calling for good measure—you'd still feel like their artistic journey reached a complete, finished state.

I get it now. That makes sense, I hadn't looked at it that way. But like I said before, for me, Dylan's peak is Desire, and for the Beatles, the peak is just the end—Abbey Road. So now I'm hitting that big question where we probably won't agree, since you mentioned something about this on 'that forum' recently:

Dennis Hall41 said:If we're talking Bootleg Series, I'd recommend this one isn't necessarily my best, but it's definitely the one I hold closest to my heart—the sixth volume. Even though it's still strictly acoustic, you can really see that transformation from—maybe Brlek would dig this—from the linear meaning and structure of the first phase into the spiral nature of the second.😁

(Doesn't matter that this is about the Bootleg releases)

How do you separate those two things—what's the best versus what's your favorite?
Sometimes it's easy for me, but other times it's incredibly hard.

I'll include the rest of the quote because it's great, why not... 😁

Dennis Hall41 said:I don't get that feeling with Nick Drake; in my opinion, he never actually managed to record his absolute best album.

No, Nick Drake recorded three of his best albums.
They all just sound like him, and there's nothing else like them...

Dennis Hall41 said:And yeah, one thing is for sure—Speaking in Tongues wouldn't have happened without Remain in Light, but I guess I’m pretty split on that album.

Same here...
There are a few great tracks, but I feel like the magic just isn't there anymore.
Dennis Hall41 Dennis Hall41 Active Member
55 messages
joined Jan 2018
#29 ·
Most of those massive icons dropped their absolute best stuff right after hitting their initial peak—it always felt to me like they’d reached their full evolutionary potential with those records. Sure, there was more searching later, more experimenting, or even revisiting old sounds—maybe even better albums—but in terms of reaching that ultimate summit relative to their journey up to that point? That was it. They stayed on that mountain—sometimes finding a little valley or hidden treasure, sometimes just stumbling through the woods, or occasionally taking a hard fall.
So, honestly, arguing about quality feels pretty pointless. I know a guy who swears > is the best of The Rolling Stones, and it’s tough to argue with him—I mean, it isn't my pick, obviously, but every single track on there is killer. Same goes for >, >, and a bunch of others.

(Oh, forgot the ultimate example—> with >.)

We totally misread each other on >—those three albums are legendary, for sure, but I actually think his best work came before them. Or at least something along the lines of >—for me, nothing really tops that.
Lisa Davis46 Lisa Davis46 Member
20 messages
joined Aug 2010
#30 ·
Scott Hall5 Scott Hall5 Member
22 messages
joined May 2023
#31 ·
Nice work, everyone! You all wrote such great points and backed them up with perfect links...
Personally, though, "Little Creatures" is my absolute favorite album...
Ashley Grant66 Ashley Grant66 Member
25 messages
joined Nov 2015
#32 ·
I think that one's great too—not my absolute favorite, though. It’s maybe a little "sweet," if that makes sense? Just really melodic and easy-listening pop without that extra edge, but there are a few gems in there that always bring me back, like

Some things can never be spoken
Some things cannot be pronounced
That word does not exist in any language
It will never be uttered by a human mouth

I have an irrational love for Sax and violins 🙄
And this version of The book I read always just knocks me off my feet.
Once in the Future...I feel wonderful!

To pick my all-time favorites, I’d need at least a top 20 list—there's just no other way to do it! For me, > has such a unique vibe and atmosphere, even if I can't pin down one single favorite album. Honestly, I feel like I could put together a little book of lyrics; every time I listen to any of their albums, I stumble upon some new line that totally blows me away.

I'm not sure if you guys have seen >'s > >—I actually wrote about it recently over on the > board. That particular album is maybe the only one I wouldn't say I'm obsessed with... but you really have to see the >; it's such an absurdly funny take from >. 😁
feralpilot0 feralpilot0 Active Member
142 messages
joined Jul 2018
#33 ·
Ashley Grant66 said:I'm not sure if anyone here has actually sat through Byrne's film True Stories—I was just posting about it over in the Film section recently. Honestly? That album might be the only one of his where I can't quite say I'm a huge fan... but the movie is a must-watch—think of it as a sort of absurdly comedic take on a Wenders film. 😁

I missed this one—definitely going to have to check it out.

I’ve always had a soft spot for David—it was love at first listen, specifically through the lens of Windows like Humans do. 😁
There’s just something about that offbeat vocal delivery of his—it really hits the spot.
Is there anything more exhausting than watching people try to dissect art that was clearly meant to be felt rather than analyzed? It’s just another endless loop of overthinking—can we please just listen to the music for once?
granitecyclist granitecyclist Member
27 messages
joined Mar 2023
#34 ·
Lisa Davis46

It seems pretty clear how Talking Heads eventually ended up working with Adrian Belew during the Remain in Light era.

Adrian Belew: Frank Zappa, David Bowie, Brian Eno, Robert Fripp, and David Byrne... there’s such an interesting story there that really helps explain a lot of things about how everything connected.
It’s quite a long story, actually.So, I’d probably suggest giving this a bit more careful reading when you have a moment to just sit quietly and focus...☕
Lisa Davis46 Lisa Davis46 Member
20 messages
joined Aug 2010
#35 ·
granitecyclist said:@Lisa Davis46/">@@Lisa Davis46

It's a long story, I guess.

😎

That’s exactly what I was looking for, thanks.
(Making some tea here... ☕)

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads