CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Locke (2014)

Locke (2014)

Started by James White11 · · 👁 4 views · 33 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants James White11Jason Diaz5Rachel Ortiz33James Garcia50Jamie Turner80Terry Scott34cosmiclynx57Paul Anderson7analogbear40Brandon Fox2Rachel Doyle3Jack Murphy5boldeagle3Bryan Taylor9copperdriver40Jesse Watson37Amanda Robinson4Jason Wood6
James White11 James White11 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Aug 2014
#1 ·
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdaofZfgV_Q

Anyone catch this yet? I didn't see a thread for it here. I watched it a few days ago and was actually pleasantly surprised. Honestly, I was pretty skeptical about the whole "real-time, single-shot" gimmick. But it worked. It was fascinating to see how much tension you can actually pull from a setup like that, and I think Steven Knight really squeezed every bit of potential out of it.

All in all, I highly recommend it. A tight, intense little thriller. 🙂

image
Jason Diaz5 Jason Diaz5 Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2024
#2 ·
It’s not bad, but it just seems to go on forever..
Rachel Ortiz33 Rachel Ortiz33 Active Member
84 messages
joined Jul 2012
#3 ·
James White11 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdaofZfgV_Q

Anyone catch this yet? I didn't see a thread for it here. I watched it a few days ago and was actually pleasantly surprised. Honestly, I was pretty skeptical about the whole "real-time, single-shot" gimmick. But it worked. It was fascinating to see how much tension you can actually pull from a setup like that, and I think Steven Knight really squeezed every bit of potential out of it.

All in all, I highly recommend it. A tight, intense little thriller. 🙂

image

thriller definitely isn't
James White11 James White11 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Aug 2014
#4 ·
I’m honestly not sure how to categorize this one. Is it some kind of "live drama"? 😁 🤷
To be honest, I was holding out for a much more definitive ending. I kept waiting for things to actually escalate, you know? Like, I thought there would be some big payoff or a massive climax... but nothing happened.
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#5 ·
It’s a drama, not a thriller, and honestly, it doesn't pretend to be anything else. From the opening shots, you can tell it's just an actor telling his life story while driving.

Hardy is a great actor and I've always been a fan, so the story is what it is. My only gripe is how often he keeps addressing his late father. If they cut that out, this little Hardy monologue would be much tighter, smoother, and easier to sit through.

James White11 said:I’m honestly not sure how to categorize this one. Is it some kind of "live drama"? 😁 🤷
To be honest, I was holding out for a much more definitive ending. I kept waiting for things to actually escalate, you know? Like, I thought there would be some big payoff or a massive climax... but nothing happened.

Nothing happens. That's just life.
Jamie Turner80 Jamie Turner80 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2009
#6 ·
James Garcia50 said:It’s a drama, not a thriller, and honestly, it doesn't pretend to be anything else. From the opening shots, you can tell it's just an actor telling his life story while driving.

Hardy is a great actor and I've always been a fan, so the story is what it is. My only gripe is how often he keeps addressing his late father. If they cut that out, this little Hardy monologue would be much tighter, smoother, and easier to sit through.

Nothing happens. That's just life.

The whole specter of the deceased father bit is a fine concept, yet it feels like a rather tired trope for establishing internal monologue. A single conversation with his wife would have provided more than enough background context.
It is true that the conclusion could have taken a different path; as it stands, it feels somewhat anticlimactic, though I suppose that remains a legitimate creative choice.
Those are the only two flaws worth noting. I find it quite fascinating how such a claustrophobic film manages to remain so remarkably dynamic.
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#7 ·
Honestly, for an American flick, the ending actually lands. The anticlimax hits right where it should, perfectly timed.

But the whole movie left me feeling a bit annoyed. Even though Locke comes across as this decent, responsible guy, it feels like he’s only that way because his uncle was such a scumbag. Half of American cinema (and literature, really) is just built on the sins of the father, isn't it? 🙄
Rachel Ortiz33 Rachel Ortiz33 Active Member
84 messages
joined Jul 2012
#8 ·
Honestly, the ending was just pure nonsense. Plus, I didn't really click with the lead, which was a huge letdown. It felt like a total waste of time since I got nothing out of it besides the usual solid performance from Hardy.
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#9 ·
How would you even wrap this up, Rachel Ortiz33? That’s the only ending that actually works. Unless you’re planning on having a car full of drunk teenagers plow into him for a fatal crash.
Terry Scott34 Terry Scott34 Member
13 messages
joined Jun 2013
#10 ·
James Garcia50 said:How would you even wrap this up, Rachel Ortiz33? That’s the only ending that actually works. Unless you’re planning on having a car full of drunk teenagers plow into him for a fatal crash.

SPOILERWell, this might be a bit out of place for a movie thread—but hey, here goes nothing...

So, when that last call came through and there was just that brief silence—man, I almost had a heart attack! Just please don't let me jump to the dumb conclusion that the baby was stillborn... 🤦 Luckily, everything turned out okay!
The ending is definitely a bit weird—but honestly, I’d say it’s pretty much the only way it could have worked...
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#11 ·
I think spoilers are totally fine in a thread about this movie 😉

That’s what I thought too, but let’s be real—they wouldn't have spent so much time obsessing over that umbilical cord detail if they weren't planning on using it to trap her.
I don't know, personally I thought the ending worked for a film like this; it was actually pretty calculated. He ties up all his loose ends, gets that guy back together with her, saves his damn construction business and all his concrete... and then suddenly he's ready to tackle the unsolvable? Come on.

And yeah, my favorite part is when his wife keeps nagging him about those concrete stains he has to scrub away.
Both literally and symbolically, that’s easily the most powerful moment in the whole thing.
Terry Scott34 Terry Scott34 Member
13 messages
joined Jun 2013
#12 ·
No need to play nice—of course it’s allowed! That’s why I think it's silly to even bring it up, but somehow people still find a way to complain...

I don't see how mentioning the umbilical cord has anything to do with whether the baby is born alive or not. Obviously, it’s going to come up—it’s actually totally unrealistic if neither the mother nor the doctor mentions it. It would be downright idiotic to ignore that during all those calls, you know? Though, honestly, we wouldn't even have a clue unless things ended badly... and then it's just a total "WTF" moment, like where did that come from? But hey, whatever, it is what it is...
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#13 ·
My bad for the sarcasm, I'll back off, but when every single movie follows the exact same beat-for-beat formula, you can't blame someone for losing their cool. It's a personal issue at that point.

It matters to me because, obviously, we aren't seeing the same thing. The way this was shot makes it clear: any director with an ounce of self-respect wouldn't make the death of a baby acceptable.
Jamie Turner80 Jamie Turner80 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2009
#14 ·
James Garcia50 said:Honestly, for an American flick, the ending actually lands. The anticlimax hits right where it should, perfectly timed.

But the whole movie left me feeling a bit annoyed. Even though Locke comes across as this decent, responsible guy, it feels like he’s only that way because his uncle was such a scumbag. Half of American cinema (and literature, really) is just built on the sins of the father, isn't it? 🙄

The only caveat is that Locke is actually a British film, albeit one bolstered by a modest amount of American funding. It isn't a massive point, but let's be accurate.
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#15 ·
Jamie Turner80 said:The only caveat is that Locke is actually a British film, albeit one bolstered by a modest amount of American funding. It isn't a massive point, but let's be accurate.

Looking at the IMDb data, there's definitely an American influence here. Plus, that whole weeping, confessional tone directed at a dead parent is a classic American cinema trope. Maybe the Brits will pick it up in a year or two.


By the way, why does every guy named John have to sport those massive, socialist-looking mustaches?
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#16 ·
I am definitely adding this to my watchlist, mostly because I’m a huge fan of Tom Hardy, but also just because the premise sounds right up my alley based on the synopsis.

James Garcia50 said:How would you even wrap this up, Rachel Ortiz33? That’s the only ending that actually works. Unless you’re planning on having a car full of drunk teenagers plow into him for a fatal crash.

Honestly, just by being myself, though I know some girls might not be into that vibe. 😁
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#17 ·
It’s not some visual masterpiece you watch just for the eye candy; it’s more of a heavy drama with a moral at the end. Still, the lead actor carries the whole thing pretty well..
Paul Anderson7 Paul Anderson7 Active Member
97 messages
joined Jun 2010
#18 ·
It’s a good film. Tom Hardy has been one of my favorite actors to watch lately, and he really knocked it out of the park here.
The movie itself is quite well-constructed; I’ve always had a soft spot for films driven by heavy dialogue. It manages to pack so much into such a tight timeframe without feeling overly cryptic or hidden. That ending was perfect—honestly, any other conclusion wouldn't have made sense. It’s just a raw slice of life about a man who made one massive mistake and, while trying to untangle himself from the shadow of a father he never really knew, ends up dismantling everything he worked so hard to build. It serves as a reminder that sometimes you just can't do everything right and please everyone, and also that the better you are at what you do, the harder people work to forgive your slip-ups.

I thought it was great, though I suspect it won't be everyone's cup of tea.
analogbear40 analogbear40 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2013
#19 ·
The screenplay, cinematography, and direction are all top-tier. As for Tom Hardy, he puts in a really solid performance—though, if I’m being honest, I think this kind of role would have been perfect for an actor with a more striking, expressive look, someone like Tom Hiddleston or Mark Strong.
Terry Scott34 Terry Scott34 Member
13 messages
joined Jun 2013
#20 ·
James Garcia50 said:My bad for the sarcasm, I'll back off, but when every single movie follows the exact same beat-for-beat formula, you can't blame someone for losing their cool. It's a personal issue at that point.

It matters to me because, obviously, we aren't seeing the same thing. The way this was shot makes it clear: any director with an ounce of self-respect wouldn't make the death of a baby acceptable.

Whatever. I wasn't offended, I just thought it was funny...

No. Again—what does that even have to do with anything? It’s not like you haven't seen a director totally butcher a great idea before, right? 😁

analogbear40 said:The screenplay, cinematography, and direction are all top-tier. As for Tom Hardy, he puts in a really solid performance—though, if I’m being honest, I think this kind of role would have been perfect for an actor with a more striking, expressive look, someone like Tom Hiddleston or Mark Strong.

daaa, Mark Strong! 👋 I honestly can't picture Hiddleston in that role at all...
Hardy is fine, but he just didn't quite click for me...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads