#1341 ·
What games are you playing lately, and what resolution are you running at?
What power supply are you using right now?
What power supply are you using right now?
Started by wiredmarlin5 · · 👁 21 views · 1.4K replies
fadedorca66 said:What are you actually using this rig for? Any specific stuttering issues? If you're gaming, just slap in a better GPU first—then worry about whether you need a CPU upgrade or if you're set. More RAM isn't gonna be a game-changer right now.
Jacob Kelly32 said:Hey everyone,
I've got a pretty old rig that I use for playing older games every now and then. Now my friends have started getting really into Warzone, so I'm wondering how much I can actually upgrade this setup to keep up with them. I'm used to older games with crappy graphics so I don't care about visual fidelity; I just need enough FPS to stay competitive..
Current specs:
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460 CPU @ 3.20GHz
Installed RAM 16.0 GB
Nvidia Geforce GTX 960
So, I'm thinking about maybe grabbing a better CPU and a GPU, assuming I don't have to swap out the motherboard
eto, I'm looking for the most painless and cheapest solution possible 😁 thx
Alexander Moore67 said:The best bang for your buck is an RX 6600 for about $270. Your CPU should hold up fine with that setup.
Jacob Kelly32 said:Hey everyone,
I’m running a pretty ancient bucket of a PC that I mostly use for older titles. Lately, my buddies have been nagging me to jump into Warzone, so I'm wondering how much of an upgrade I can actually pull off this rig to keep up with them. I've spent most of my life playing games with potato graphics, so I don't really care about visual fidelity—I just need enough FPS to stay alive.
Current specs:
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460 CPU @ 3.20GHz
Installed RAM 16.0 GB
Nvidia Geforce GTX 960
So, I'm thinking maybe swap in a better CPU and a GPU, ideally without having to ditch the motherboard entirely.
eto, looking for the least painful and cheapest way to do this 😁 thx
Alexander Moore67 said:Saying an i5 4460 can handle either an RX 580 or a GTX 960 is just wrong. There's a massive bottleneck with the GTX 960, and if you go with a new RX 6600, that CPU is going to choke it completely. For $250, you get a modern GPU with GDDR6 on a 7nm process that’s nearly twice as fast as a 580 while pulling less power. Everything else is just nonsense.
Alexander Moore67 said:The idea that an i5 4460 is enough for either an RX 580 or a GTX 960 is just wrong. That GTX 960 is hitting a massive bottleneck, and if you step up to a new RX 6600, that CPU is going to choke it out completely. For about $250, you can grab a brand new GPU with GDDR6 on a 7nm process that’s basically twice as powerful as a 580 while pulling hardly any power. Everything else people are saying is just nonsense.
goldenranger6 said:Don't talk nonsense. Every game utilizes CPU and GPU resources differently. With Call of Duty, it’s 100% the graphics card and maybe 50-60% the CPU. This means if you have a solid GPU, you can run it even with a basic Pentium; Warzone might require more, but it doesn't need a top-tier processor. On the other hand, with something like Need for Speed, it's the exact opposite. Just throw a stronger graphics card in there and that i5 will handle everything just fine. It really just comes down to the power supply.
If they're going to obsess over bottlenecks, they might as well just go out and buy a whole new PC right now.
Jacob Kelly32 said:Hey everyone,
I’ve been sitting on this aging bucket of bolts for a while now, mostly just using it to scratch that itch for older titles. But lately, my crew has been obsessing over Warzone, and suddenly I’m feeling left out of the loop. It’s got me wondering just how much I can actually squeeze out of this old rig before it gives up the ghost. I need to know if there's a viable upgrade path here that'll let me keep pace with them. To be honest, I’ve spent so much time playing games with graphics that look like they were rendered on a calculator that I couldn't care less about visual fidelity or "ultra" settings. If it looks a little rough around the edges, fine by me—as long as I’m getting enough frames per second to stay competitive. Is it worth trying to revive this thing, or am I just throwing good money after bad?
Here’s what I'm currently running:
I'm currently running an Intel Core i5-4460 clocked at 3.20GHz. To be honest, looking at these specs feels a bit like staring at a relic from a bygone era—it’s functional, sure, but you can definitely feel the years catching up to it. It gets the job done for basic tasks, but whenever I try to push it, I can almost hear the hardware sighing in exhaustion. It’s that classic middle-of-the-road processor that served its purpose well back in the day, but in today's landscape, it feels like driving a reliable old sedan on a highway built for supercars. It's steady, but you aren't winning any races.
I’ve got 16.0 GB of RAM installed.
I’ve been looking back at some old hardware benchmarks lately, and it really puts things into perspective how much the landscape has shifted. I was recently digging through some legacy specs and found myself thinking about the Nvidia Geforce GTX 960. It’s one of those cards that occupies a very specific, almost nostalgic niche in the history of PC gaming. Back when it first hit the shelves, it wasn't exactly a powerhouse meant to crush everything you threw at it, but it served a purpose. It was that reliable middle-ground option—not quite high-end, but enough to get you through most titles if you weren't being too greedy with the settings. I remember having a similar situation years ago with an older build; I wasn't trying to run a flight simulator on ultra settings, I just wanted something stable that wouldn't choke during a heavy session. It’s funny how we judge hardware now. We live in an era where we demand ray tracing and massive VRAM buffers just to play a basic indie title, but there was a certain honesty to the era of the GTX 960. You knew exactly what you were getting. You knew your limits. You didn't go in expecting miracles, so you rarely felt disappointed. It was a workhorse, plain and simple. Looking at it now, compared to the sheer brute force of modern GPUs, it feels like looking at a vintage muscle car—it might not win a drag race against a modern electric hypercar, but it still has plenty of soul.
So, I’ve been sitting here staring at my current rig, weighing the pros and cons of a potential overhaul. I'm seriously considering pulling the trigger on a beefier processor and a more capable graphics card, but I have one specific condition: I really don't want to deal with the headache of swapping out my motherboard. It feels like such a massive, messy project just to get a bit more frames per second, you know? I'd much rather just plug in some higher-end parts and call it a day if possible.
ETO, I’m just looking for the path of least resistance here—something that won't break the bank and won't be a massive headache to set up. 😁 Thanks.
Alexander Moore67 said:I basically just slapped myself in the face...
Jacob Kelly32 said:Where are you guys even finding these used mining cards? And do they actually have CPUs available too, or is it just GPUs? 😁
Thanks. 🙏
goldenranger6 said:DECEC, go read the bug report and spare us the teenage tantrums. You clearly have no clue what you're talking about. It’s always easier to tell someone to just buy a whole new computer when nothing else seems to work for you.
I was running code on a Pentium just the other day.
Check Craigslist. If you see listings claiming they have 100-200 units, those are likely mining rigs. They might not look pretty, but the point is that they work. Since electricity costs have skyrocketed lately, a lot of people are offloading their old hardware. If you've already got a solid foundation and can snag a decent price, you could even look into an AMD Radeon RX 6600 Challenger D.
You can find plenty of good used gear on eBay too.
Alexander Moore67 said:You’re tripping. I never said anyone should go out and buy a whole new rig; I meant getting a new RX 6600. It absolutely smokes a 580, doesn't have warranty issues, runs cooler, uses GDDR6, and sits on a much better 7nm process. You were born in 1958, DECEC....
goldenranger6 said:What's the point of 60 compared to 250 bucks?