#21 ·
Jesse Thomas7 said:Pretty solid little flick. It’s got that breezy, charming British vibe—super gentle and relaxing. Honestly, feels like a bit of therapy. 🙂
@eek, look, until that kid is actually born, they’re just some blurry shape on an ultrasound. He isn't going to be able to tell one grainy image from another. It's not like he's already some tiny human being he’s been singing lullabies to, changing diapers for, or getting attached to.
They captured that perfectly in that scene where he heads back home only to be greeted by a child he doesn't even recognize.
But with this one, it doesn't work quite like that.
I definitely agree that keeping the time travel as just a backdrop for the human drama was the right call. If they had leaned too hard into the sci-fi mechanics, they probably would've tripped over their own feet trying to make the logic work.
However, from a technical standpoint regarding the mechanics of time travel, the execution is flawed.
The premise establishes that one can only travel into the past. Yet, here, he is returning to his own present (which serves as the future relative to the point in time he traveled to).
If he had actually altered something in the past, his own memories should have automatically adjusted to reflect this new timeline; he ought to have known he was a man who had just been born.
It would have been much more compelling if he were forced to actually relive those intervening years, rather than simply skipping over them and effectively breaking the established logic of defined time travel.
From a cinematic perspective, they could have easily achieved a better result without sacrificing any of the movie's overall watchability.