CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Chuck allows trolling, lying, and insults on certain political threads

Chuck allows trolling, lying, and insults on certain political threads

Started by casualharbor3 · · 👁 5 views · 13 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants casualharbor3Charles Fox10Olivia Jackson58Justin Harris12Thomas Barrett84velvetskipper19Thomas Davis4
casualharbor3 casualharbor3 MemberOP
19 messages
joined Sep 2013
#1 ·
1.User Godiva is spreading blatant falsehoods by claiming a medical degree from Washington, D.C. needs to be notarized.

There is zero evidence provided. It’s just pure trolling with zero consequences.
Here was my response:

Then she changes her story:

2. Once again, user Godiva:

She’s making sweeping generalizations that all patients are dissatisfied with doctors' services. Again, no repercussions.
That’s why my reply got flagged.

How is that a violation of the board rules???

Moving on:
Adelheid:

Regarding doctors intentionally harming patients, those cases have happened. For instance, there was once an OBGYN in the USA who was so satisfied with a C-section he performed—viewing it as a masterpiece—that he decided to sign it by carving his initials into the woman's abdomen. In America, things often go suboptimally during surgery because of the "we don't have time" excuse. For example, incisions are often closed with too much spacing just to speed things up, which leaves worse scarring. In the USA, surgeons often use staples to close incisions; it's also suboptimal for scarring, but it's fast. Happy?

Adelheid is peddling a series of slanders and lies without any proof:
My response:
You've presented a string of slanders and lies without any supporting evidence. The final layer is actually sewn by residents who go out of their way to ensure the stitches are perfect.

Then she switches tactics:
We aren't in a courtroom where we have to present evidence. I've simply cited several anecdotal examples relevant to the topic that I picked up online or through third-party sources.


I want to know how long Charles Fox10 is going to allow trolling, lying, and insults directed at doctors on this board.??
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
So you’ve gone ahead and crowned yourself the champion of the entire medical community—especially doctors—while labeling anyone who disagrees with you a troll and accusing them of blatant lying.

That isn't how this works, and it never will.
casualharbor3 casualharbor3 MemberOP
19 messages
joined Sep 2013
#3 ·
Charles Fox10 said:So you’ve gone ahead and crowned yourself the champion of the entire medical community—especially doctors—while labeling anyone who disagrees with you a troll and accusing them of blatant lying.

That isn't how this works, and it never will.

I’ve already proven they're lying. Just Google the definition of "trolling" and see what comes up.
1. Godiva claims the US doesn't recognize medical degrees here.
2. They claim every single patient is dissatisfied with their doctors.
If that isn't trolling (and I've already established that it is), then I don't know what is.
Another user is claiming wounds are being stitched with staples, leaving wide scars, and that some gynecologist actually signed off on a woman's botched C-section.
No link provided. That's just classic Charles Fox10 trolling.
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#4 ·
casualharbor3 said:I’ve already proven they're lying. Just Google the definition of "trolling" and see what comes up.
1. Godiva claims the US doesn't recognize medical degrees here.
2. They claim every single patient is dissatisfied with their doctors.
If that isn't trolling (and I've already established that it is), then I don't know what is.
Another user is claiming wounds are being stitched with staples, leaving wide scars, and that some gynecologist actually signed off on a woman's botched C-section.
No link provided. That's just classic Charles Fox10 trolling.

I've stated my piece; now it's up to the admins.
Olivia Jackson58 Olivia Jackson58 Newcomer
1 message
joined Sep 2013
#5 ·
It seems Godiva and her little band of followers can get away with anything—trolling, insults, you name it. Meanwhile, those of us actually standing up for the doctors find our posts getting wiped and ourselves handed digital penalty cards. Just wonderful...
casualharbor3 casualharbor3 MemberOP
19 messages
joined Sep 2013
#6 ·
I’m requesting admin intervention here.
Making baseless claims without providing links or evidence is just trolling.
1. User Godiva claimed that the US doesn't recognize our medical degrees. (No link, no proof:

2. Godiva also asserted that all patients are dissatisfied with medical services. (How many patients? Where is the data or the link?

3. Adelheid claims that doctors are intentionally harming patients. Defamation is a crime. (Again, zero evidence or links provided)

Charles Fox10 just sits there and allows all of this to happen.
Why was my post deleted after I proved Godiva was lying and showed that the US does indeed recognize medical degrees?
Charles Fox10 keeps doing this. He deletes any posts that don't align with his or his group's agenda.
It's a matter of certification—passing an exam—not some massive retraining process.
casualharbor3 casualharbor3 MemberOP
19 messages
joined Sep 2013
#7 ·
[B]When am I actually going to be protected from these insults[/B]
because if this keeps up, you're nothing more than a common butcher compared to a Swedish doctor.

The post has been formally reported, yet Charles Fox10, as per usual, hasn't bothered to respond.🙄
Justin Harris12 Justin Harris12 Member
33 messages
joined Feb 2013
#8 ·
I think you’re just cherry-picking facts here with some seriously malicious intent. I read your post, and it’s obvious you interpreted it in the worst possible way on purpose.

Look, if you can't actually win an argument using logic and solid points, it’s honestly pathetic to resort to this kind of manipulation—just crying foul under every single post.

There’s a report button right there; use it to flag what you find controversial instead of making a scene every time someone posts something. If it were up to me, I’d personally see to it that you were banned from the political subreddits and blocked from ever starting a thread here again.
But hey, I’ll let the admins make the call.
Thomas Barrett84 Thomas Barrett84 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2010
#9 ·
Based on what I’ve just read, and honestly everything I’ve read here before, I have to say: I’ve got nothing but respect for the Politics mods. Seriously. They’re killing it.
casualharbor3 casualharbor3 MemberOP
19 messages
joined Sep 2013
#10 ·
Justin Harris12 said:I think you’re just cherry-picking facts here with some seriously malicious intent. I read your post, and it’s obvious you interpreted it in the worst possible way on purpose.

Look, if you can't actually win an argument using logic and solid points, it’s honestly pathetic to resort to this kind of manipulation—just crying foul under every single post.

There’s a report button right there; use it to flag what you find controversial instead of making a scene every time someone posts something. If it were up to me, I’d personally see to it that you were banned from the political subreddits and blocked from ever starting a thread here again.
But hey, I’ll let the admins make the call.

I've given my answer, so I'll just sit back and wait for my inevitable ban.

Justin Harris12 said:I think you’re just cherry-picking facts here with some seriously malicious intent. I read your post, and it’s obvious you interpreted it in the worst possible way on purpose.

Look, if you can't actually win an argument using logic and solid points, it’s honestly pathetic to resort to this kind of manipulation—just crying foul under every single post.

There’s a report button right there; use it to flag what you find controversial instead of making a scene every time someone posts something. If it were up to me, I’d personally see to it that you were banned from the political subreddits and blocked from ever starting a thread here again.
But hey, I’ll let the admins make the call.

Reported. But Charles Fox10 isn't responding, which is the real issue here.
Justin Harris12 Justin Harris12 Member
33 messages
joined Feb 2013
#11 ·
Just because you file a report doesn't mean they’re going to get sanctioned; all you’re really doing is flagging the post for review.
They can see exactly who submitted the report, too, and you’re supposed to specify which rules were actually broken in your report.
If nothing happens, it simply means the moderators decided no action was necessary, and that’s where the matter ends. If there is an incredibly obvious violation and they haven't stepped in after a while, then you can always send a DM to the mods or just bring it up here.

From what I can tell, the user didn't necessarily set out to insult you, but the way you've phrased that specific sentence makes it look like you're intentionally trying to provoke them, which isn't a great look on your part.
casualharbor3 casualharbor3 MemberOP
19 messages
joined Sep 2013
#12 ·
If a user like Godiva claims the US doesn't recognize our medical school degrees without providing a single link or shred of evidence, it’s clearly just trolling.

Even though I already debunked her.
It’s funny how my post gets deleted while hers stays up.
☕
Or take when Adelheid writes those blatant lies about doctors mutilating patients. That post wasn't censored either.
velvetskipper19 velvetskipper19 Newcomer
8 messages
joined May 2014
#13 ·
The moderators staying silent? Honestly, that silence speaks louder than a thousand words!
Thomas Davis4 Thomas Davis4 Member
12 messages
joined Mar 2013
#14 ·
Since I’ve been called out, I’ll give you a quick response (CionistUSA).

Throughout this entire thread, you’ve acted like you’re some kind of untouchable deity. You’re a doctor with a PhD from a top-tier medical school, and in your mind, you're beyond reproach—everyone in the European Union respects you, while doctors from India, China, or an Arab country are dismissed as "unskilled."

The whole time, you’ve been busy belittling anyone outside your field. You dismiss Godiva because she’s a professor, and you look down on me because I work in aviation as an air traffic controller. Yet, the second someone challenges your own expertise, you try to start new threads just to get us banned.

If you feel entitled to label an Indian doctor incompetent simply because of where they were trained, then a Swede could easily call you a butcher. Don't kid yourself into thinking you're some global authority. To people in Northern Europe, regardless of your schooling or your job, you're still just another outsider. They hold the exact same opinion of your profession and your supposed "expertise" as you do toward other countries.

Do you see how ridiculous and hollow your prejudices actually are now? Besides, I don't need anyone's protection. If anyone truly believes I've broken the forum rules, they can report me themselves.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads