True Crime: The Boston Massacre

So, if we're assuming being a bankruptcy judge or a trustee is some kind of massive money maker, then does that mean anyone who actually loses out is just a freak occurrence?!

Melissa Garcia70 said:If we are to entertain the notion that being a bankruptcy judge or a trustee is an exceptionally lucrative career, then one is forced to conclude that the individual who gets caught is merely a statistical anomaly?!

That isn't just a theory; it is a legal reality....

Along with the primary suspect, his wife, son, brother, nephew, and brother-in-law were all arrested...

But let’s be honest: none of this could have happened without the active complicity of local notariesa and various lawm firms.

Melissa Garcia70 said:So, if we’re assuming being a bankruptcy judge or some corporate liquidator is basically a gold mine, does that mean the guy who actually gets caught is just some freak statistical outlier?!

I mean, that logic kind of explains stuff like those massive corporate scandals you see in the news.

Basically, these crooks spend years looting everything in sight—everyone knows what's happening, but nobody wants to deal with the headache. Until they finally run into a federal prosecutor who actually decides to make a move, and then suddenly, it's all over for them.

Jerry Robinson56 said:It’s an actual court ruling, not just some theory....

Along with him, they picked up his wife, son, brother, nephew, brother-in-law...

but none of this happens without the help of notary publicsand entire law firmsm

So, it's not an exception—it's basically the rule. That judge is just one guy in a massive network of crooks—all connected and working together to stack illegal cash through private interests.

The judge is the blueprint.
And Koloper? He's just the reverse version of that.

Situation is crystal clear.
With a fatal conclusion.
When the justice system fails to do its job, an AK-47 steps in.
Pretty bad news for a small country like the US..
Not good at all.

Alexander Thompson said:That theory kind of explains why things like the massacres in San Diego happen.

Thugs can pull robberies for years—everyone knows what's going on, but nobody does a damn thing about it. Until they run into someone who actually fights back and piles them up.

Yeah.
Exactly-.
The fallout is pretty obvious..

They can steal all they want, but there’s always a limit..

Melissa Garcia70 said:Precisely.
Exactly so.
The consequences are plain to see.

They can steal as much as they please, but there is always a limit to their audacity..

Unfortunately, that final point is entirely incorrect... their descendants and relatives continue to act as if absolutely nothing ever happened. There ought to be a full audit of their assets—but of course, such investigations are swiftly shut down by the whims of some weak-willed bureaucrat—and we all know how that ends. It leads to the same kind of outcry you’d see in San Francisco, where people demand punishment for those who so brazenly planted pests beneath the surface.

The real issue is when some guy in San Francisco gets all flustered and ends up firing two "right" shots and one "wrong" shot... I mean, they’re basically the same caliber, for crying out loud...

But honestly, if half of these strikers need to be behind bars, then they damn well should be.

Jerry Robinson56 said:Unfortunately, the latest take is dead wrong... their descendants and relatives just keep acting like nothing ever happened. They need to audit the assets—but oops, those investigations were shut down by some weak-willed bureaucrats... we all know how that goes. And then comes the whining, just like back in San Francisco, where they argue you should punish anyone who actually does the right thing and puts pests underground where they belong.

You really think the theft and land grabs are still happening?
The illegal schemes are still running?
That crime just doesn't have an end?
That we're way too deep in this?

Melissa Garcia70 said:Do you think the theft and looting will continue?
Are the illicit dealings ongoing?
Is there no end to the criminality?
Are we already too far gone?

Do you think the theft and looting will continue? I know .. don't exhaust yourself with the speculation; wherever you dig, you'll find it all right there.
Are the illicit dealings ongoing? They still are, mostly just performative exercises by law enforcement to maintain appearances.
Is there no end to the criminality? It’s endless ... just look at our presidents for the ultimate proof.
Are we already too far gone? Oh, heavens no, we haven't even hit rock bottom yet—not until some weak-willed rabbit manages to become the President of the European Union, for example.

Roger Castillo9 said:The issue arises when an officer in San Francisco loses his footing and fires two "correct" shots and hits one "wrong" person instead... they look similar enough, damn it...

But if half of those people on strike belong in prison, then they belong there.

Are you quite certain he was "wrong"...

Father of victim: 'My son was killed by mistake. Shot in the back, like a dog.'

https://www.nytimes.com/news/crime/incident-report-9846274

To recap, the individual known as Pajser was killed on Radmilović Street, and out of the three young men taken out, he was the only one with a prior record for dealing. A few months ago, about 200 grams of heroin were found in his apartment, a quantity suggesting he was merely a novice dealer, according to reports from the local news.

I suppose one had to wait a year or two for him to graduate to being a "real" veteran like those retired mentors, rather than remaining a novice. It is evident that even in the old man's case, there was an error... it is all well and good to lament, but it would have been wiser to actually raise him right. How many lives have been ruined by such supposed "benefactors"? I know plenty of sympathetic, polite individuals who engage in crime very, very professionally... the question is simply where one draws the line.

Of course I didn't, but didn't he literally say himself that wasn't even the meta back then?

My apologies, I may have misread the situation... 🙂
Regrettably, he was compelled to act—whether by design or through sheer impulse—in the manner we witnessed.
He was clearly acting as a "different" kind of entity altogether... a man of conviction. A truly fitting retribution would be to see him enrolled in a police academy.

Jerry Robinson56 said:You think the theft and the grabbing is still going on? Look, I know... don't even bother thinking about it—wherever you dig, there it is.
Is the illegal stuff continuing? Still going on—mostly just law enforcement putting on a show for appearances.
Is crime endless? Exactly ... just look at the presidents for proof.
Are we too far gone? Oh hell no, we haven't hit bottom yet—not until some weakling rabbit becomes the head of the European Union, for example.

So, based on that—are you not shocked by public liquidations like this Koloper's one?
Or are you predicting more of the same?

If the system is totally corrupt and gutted by special interests, what's left for the citizens who foot the bill for a system that doesn't even respect their rights?

Melissa Garcia70 said:So, given your logic, you aren't surprised by public liquidations like this Koloper's case?
Or are you actually predicting more of the same?

If the system is fundamentally corrupt and dismantled by special interest groups, what is left for the citizens who foot the bill for a system that refuses to recognize their basic rights?

all of that said ... instead of repeating the same lines

you're mistaken; that wasn't a liquidation, it was pest control ... a true liquidation would be if the Department of Justice launched an investigation and recovered everything that criminal gang stole—not just from the deceased, but from other victims too—before they were finally swept away by the righteous. It would involve putting behind bars those who claim ignorance... (the families and partners) and, most importantly, turning a critical eye toward the judge presiding over this trial, who was misled into believing everything was being done strictly by the book...

That would be an adequate preventative measure against such tragic events. My only sympathy lies with Mr. Koloper.
What remains is to do a service to society and the establishment by ensuring these predatory robberies and brazen thefts cease to occur, in full accordance with the Law, Section 7, Subsection 6, Paragraph 2.
The "system" hasn't done anything; in fact, it has actively resisted potential solutions... but wait—who exactly is "the system"?

It isn't deeply corrupt per se, but rather, those in strategic positions have set "traps" for the honest. I believe many judges are decent people, yet they find themselves powerless because the rot starts at the top. But one cleans the tail to fix the head, does one not? That is the crux of the matter... mass negative selection among those chosen for office.

Jerry Robinson56 said: basically everything said here... just different words for the same thing

but you're wrong—this wasn't a liquidation, it was pest control ... actual liquidation would be if the Department of Justice actually opened an investigation and recovered what that criminal gang looted—not just from the deceased, but from all the other cases—before they got wiped out by the righteous. And throwing everyone behind bars who "didn't know anything"... (families, partners) and especially paying attention to the judge presiding over this trial who was misled into thinking everything was being done by the book...

That’s how you'd actually prevent these kinds of tragedies. I just feel for Mr. Koloper's situation.
All that's left is to do society and the system a favor by making sure these bandit robberies and brazen thefts stop happening in accordance with the Law, Title 7, Section 6, Clause 2.
The "system" didn't do a damn thing—in fact, it actively fought against any possible solutions... but wait—who exactly is "the system"?

It's not deeply corrupt, but they've set "traps" by putting crooked enthusiasts in strategic positions. I believe plenty of judges are honest, but they're powerless because the rot starts at the top. But you clean the tail to get to the head, right? That's the real issue... mass negative selection of those chosen for power.

Anger, rage, fury, frustration, hopelessness, bitterness, resentment, apathy... all of it is just a byproduct of that looting and privatization—all those guys like Burilović, Vidošević, Horvatinčić, Sanders, and many others within the system who are still sucking us dry today, bleeding us white, and poisoning our future.
We agree there—no doubt about it.

They are the ones who created people like Koloper and Zavadlav.
The parents of Koloper and Zavadlav are the American justice system.
That's the diagnosis.

And then in court, acting on instructions from attorney Šerić, young Zavadlav has to plead insanity and lack of intent...

If you have money and influence, you have legal protection.
If you don't, you're on your own.

It's almost like a law that protects the rights of the burglar... imagine a guy breaks into your house in the middle of the night, you intercept him, you disable him during the struggle, he accidentally dies, and suddenly *you're* the one going to prison for murder...
Isn't that insane?!

Melissa Garcia70 said:Anger, rage, fury, frustration, hopelessness, bitterness, resentment, apathy... it is all just a byproduct of that era of looting and privatization. It stems from figures like Burilović, Vidošević, Horvatinčić, Sanders, and the countless others embedded in the system who continue to drain our resources, bleed us dry, and poison our future.
On this point, there is absolutely no room for debate. We are in total agreement.

Those individuals are the ones who birthed people like Koloper and Zavadlav.
The true parents of Koloper and Zavadlav are the American judicial system.
That is the core diagnosis.

And then, in a courtroom, acting under the direction of attorney Šerić, young Zavadlav is forced to plead insanity and impulsiveness.

If you possess wealth and influence, you have legal protection.
If you do not, you are left defenseless.

It is almost as if there were a law protecting the rights of the burglar. Imagine this: a thief breaks into your home in the middle of the night, you intercept him, you subdue him during the struggle, and he dies accidentally—only for you to end up behind bars for murder.
Is that not pure madness?!

You are entirely correct... it has been this way for decades. Everyone knows about the corruption, but the recent political shifts have only served to cement the status quo.
Now, once again, they are manufacturing a sensation out of thin air.