CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Moderation on PDF: Alternatives to the Darwinian Edge III

Moderation on PDF: Alternatives to the Darwinian Edge III

Started by Roger Cooper91 · · 👁 11 views · 64 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Roger Cooper91rustydrifter10neoneagle93Noah DiazMichelle Evansbriskbison55Christian Howard2Brenda Gonzalez12Peter PetersonElizabeth JacksonGregory Ramirez2Matthew Castillo5Linda Moore51Donna Miller4Matthew Harris5Rachel Price6
Roger Cooper91 Roger Cooper91 MemberOP
24 messages
joined Jun 2014
#1 ·
Is this kind of communication actually allowed on the alternative subforum? Because if it is, why on earth should I hold back when I'm dealing with a bunch of bullies?

Nobody’s stopping you from buying some Vaseline if that's what you need. But seriously, keep those suicidal thoughts to yourself.
Mišić is just nothing but a bunch of noise. Ciju ciju ciju!

Get lost with that Grubinić nonsense and quit pushing those weak-ass sermons on me. Just beat it.

Honestly, looking at all this, it feels like 97% of the guys in here are just part of the crowd. It’s only now that all these denials actually start making sense.

There was a time when people actually said: "The world belongs to the bold." Or maybe it was simpler than that. Maybe it was just about raw, unapologetic power. Times have certainly changed.

Dammit, now it’s official: "Pakaš is running the world."

You can practically scream in the faces of eight different people and it won't make a damn bit of difference. If you want to play the game and stay on top, you have to kiss the ring of those Masonic Mamić types. That's just how the system works.

Goddammit, it’s unbelievable. Even the politicians are working overtime today, greasing their palms with stacks of cash just to stay ahead.

You really have a knack for swapping roles and shifting goalposts, don't you?
So, your buddy actually told you: "They're just a bunch of losers."
So you’re out here acting all tough, claiming he's as hard as a piece of timber? You're talking absolute nonsense, just stuffing your mouth with sawdust. And yet, despite all that posturing, you told me he was salty. Pick a side, will you?

Maybe try numbing your brain with some Darwinian jelly beans before you start spewing your absolute nonsense.

Look, let’s call a spade a spade. There was a time when people used direct language to describe what they were seeing. Nowadays, everything is being sanitized with these watered-down euphemisms like "gay guy," or we’re forced to use vague terms like "partner" just so nobody can tell if someone actually got married or not. It feels like we're losing clarity in favor of political correctness.
They’re nothing but a bunch of lowlifes.

And so on. And so forth.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#2 ·
Hey everyone, please just drop the actual links instead of doing this.
neoneagle93 neoneagle93 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Nov 2010
#3 ·
It’s clearly working just like it always has—dropping links keeps things moving...
Honestly, the fact that this is being allowed is a total disgrace.
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active Member
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#4 ·
I can confirm it myself: there isn't a single moderator in sight over there.

Stop looking for links. It’s become painfully obvious at this point.
Roger Cooper91 Roger Cooper91 MemberOP
24 messages
joined Jun 2014
#5 ·
Links or formal reports? I’ve already filed a few complaints myself, but honestly, it feels like shouting into a void. But let me tell you something: those users here who keep insisting there’s zero moderation happening? They’re usually the same people sitting on opposite sides of almost every other controversial topic. So, just use your head to figure out exactly what kind of bias we’re dealing with here.
Michelle Evans Michelle Evans Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2013
#6 ·
Links. The moderators are asking for links because without them, it’s impossible to tell which threads these posts belong to, making it hard to find the actual discussions once things get sorted out...
briskbison55 briskbison55 Active Member
135 messages
joined Jun 2009
#7 ·
so
it feels like at least half of his recent intake has been people like this, so maybe it would be a good idea to just send someone over to an alternative program for a bit... I mean, looking at him, it honestly seems like he's just totally lost in his own head.
Roger Cooper91 Roger Cooper91 MemberOP
24 messages
joined Jun 2014
#8 ·
I’ve pulled these exclusively from one specific thread regarding the Flat Earth theory. Setting aside our own personal takes on the subject itself, there actually used to be some coherent, logical debate happening here. Now? It has completely devolved into this mess:
neoneagle93 neoneagle93 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Nov 2010
#9 ·
Michelle Evans said:Links. The moderators of this forum ask you to provide links because without them, there’s no way to tell which threads these posts belong to. If we don't have those direct paths, we can't actually locate the specific topics or posts when it comes time to deal with them.

If that's the case, then what on earth is the point of the "report inappropriate post" button?!
Christian Howard2 Christian Howard2 Member
19 messages
joined Nov 2011
#10 ·
The moderators over here don't actually get notified about reports coming in from other subforums, so we have a rule that you need to include direct links if you're filing an appeal here.
Brenda Gonzalez12 Brenda Gonzalez12 Member
45 messages
joined Mar 2017
#11 ·
Honestly, since two threads on this have already been shut down, I am officially out of energy, time, and patience to keep dumping piles of links here, reporting posts one after another, and jumping through all those hoops that are supposedly "required."

So, here it is—the man and his mission... if anyone actually wants to dive in, the Science Magazine PDF is right here and ready to go. You can read through it post by post and follow this totally nonsensical debate where, every single time things start moving, the exact same guy jumps in and just tears everything apart...

I haven't bothered to include broader links to the various threads yet because, honestly, it feels a bit redundant! If you just take a quick look at the post numbers, you'll see that it's basically one post after another within just two main topics...😵
Roger Cooper91 Roger Cooper91 MemberOP
24 messages
joined Jun 2014
#12 ·
Looking at this latest post, I honestly have to wonder what kind of links this person thinks they're throwing at their opponents.

Let's be clear here: there are a handful of other users pushing back against this guy who are also behaving completely unprofessionally, but this entire sub-forum has lost its way. It’s a mess. There is work to be done.
Brenda Gonzalez12 Brenda Gonzalez12 Member
45 messages
joined Mar 2017
#13 ·
Look, I’ve finally reached my breaking point. I’m officially done staying quiet and just taking these personal insults lying down. I tried being the bigger person—I tried opening threads to address things properly—but nothing worked. No one even blinked. So, fine. If ignoring them doesn't work, then I guess it's time to pull out the heavy artillery and give them a taste of their own medicine. If they want to report me, let them; maybe then someone will actually step in and do something. That's just how it is. In the real world, people would have dealt with this much more aggressively by now, but since this is just an online forum, we’re stuck playing by certain rules.
His complete lack of class defines him. But honestly, if you and I are having a decent conversation and he suddenly jumps in along with two or three of his usual troll buddies just to interrupt and derail everything, the whole point of the discussion just vanishes. It becomes impossible to follow.
And don't even get me started on the other stuff that keeps getting a pass. People are constantly dropping links to YouTube videos over and over again without any context. There’s never an explanation of why we should even care or what we’re supposed to take away from it. Instead, you’ll see some guy drop five different YouTube videos that are each an hour or two long, and then what? Are we all supposed to sit there for hours watching the exact same footage in five different versions? It leads absolutely nowhere because there’s no conclusion—just a endless loop of the same million questions.
The bottom line is this: we desperately need some actual moderation around here. ☕
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#14 ·
Look, I’m asking you guys nicely—if you see someone breaking the rules, just report them instead of jumping in and starting your own fight. Just because you didn't throw the first punch doesn't mean you're innocent here. Most of what was flagged in this thread has already been wiped away by the mods; if anything is still standing, it’s either because it’s too old to bother with or it actually adds something useful to the conversation. But seriously, most of the junk is gone. I’ve gone through and cleaned up pretty much everything I felt needed deleting, though I did try to be reasonable and leave the really old stuff or minor slip-ups alone unless they were becoming a recurring problem.
Roger Cooper91 Roger Cooper91 MemberOP
24 messages
joined Jun 2014
#15 ·
Thanks, though I really think we need to see some actual moderation steps taken soon to prevent things from spiraling out of control again.
briskbison55 briskbison55 Active Member
135 messages
joined Jun 2009
#16 ·
I think this one kind of slipped under the radar, so basically, the guy just picks these people who don't really fit the bill, but they end up reacting to some totally random nonsense.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#17 ·
briskbison55 said:he totally missed the mark here, honestly. It feels like he's just cherry-picking people who don't even fit his point just because they happened to react to some random nonsense.

Well, this was actually posted today, and since I was the one handling moderation yesterday, I can tell you for a fact it didn't "get missed."
briskbison55 briskbison55 Active Member
135 messages
joined Jun 2009
#18 ·
I think I phrased that poorly, he totally slipped my mind—he drops one of these little 'summaries' every couple of weeks or so. I mean, it feels kind of pointless to go around deleting posts and handing out penalties before actually explaining the basic rules of engagement to people... if they can't grasp those fundamentals, then maybe they just aren't cut out for interacting with others online anyway, I guess.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#19 ·
briskbison55 said:I think I phrased that poorly—he actually missed it. He drops one of these little 'summaries' every couple of weeks. Honestly, there’s really no point in jumping straight to deleting posts or handing out penalties before we've even taken a second to explain the basic ground rules of how we talk to each other here. If people can't grasp the basics of communication after that, then maybe they just aren't cut out for interacting with others online anyway.

Look, this thread shouldn't be used as a dumping ground for complaints about moderation. We have specific reporting tools, private messages, and the official handbook for a reason. Please, let's all try to stick to those channels. 🙂
briskbison55 briskbison55 Active Member
135 messages
joined Jun 2009
#20 ·
Well, that’s exactly why I added that 'summary' part... I mean, he doesn't dare to complain because, honestly, the guy is smart enough to know what he's doing, so he just uses it as another little spot for his own private calculations.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads