CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Feedback regarding the thread closure on the recreation subforum

Feedback regarding the thread closure on the recreation subforum

Started by Keith Doyle18 · · 👁 6 views · 74 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Keith Doyle18Ethan Reyes2David Anderson56Jason Richardson5Megan Moore2Jack Ward82Daniel Gomez10brightpumaBetty Jones32briskjackal5Aaron Jones87shadowviper24dustypilot11Nathan Turner3Drew Ross2nimblecrane6Noah Fowler3Thomas Cruz15loneskipper77Ethan Bailey18Richard Sanders7rustydrifter10Andrew Wells58Thomas Campbell5 …
Rachel Turner2 Rachel Turner2 Active Member
53 messages
joined Sep 2022
#61 ·
Honey, you aren't even part of this thread or any other thread, despite how much you keep pushing it. Honestly, nobody really cares what you're up to in other parts of the forum, even if you've gone out of your way to make a whole thing out of it and act like some random guy is picking on you. Wow, I'm just so heartbroken for you. No one is bothering you, and I think most people here are fine with you, even if you keep attacking us for no reason. We're all just off-topic rambling now and the whole point of the thread is getting lost because of it. You say Daniel Gomez10 is definitely going to be a better moderator now? Well, great, then we won't have to deal with individuals ruining the thread (and I don't mean you). Threads usually just fix themselves; if someone's being an idiot, others just stop talking to them, so there's no need to call the cops.
Thomas Campbell5 Thomas Campbell5 Member
10 messages
joined Aug 2018
#62 ·
It isn’t just about simply failing to communicate with someone; it’s a deliberate, coordinated effort to shut them out, at least from what I can see.

Regarding the whole business with profile pictures: you can't just dictate to people that they have to upload an image or stay silent in the thread. Using ultimatums like that isn't how decent, civilized communication works.

There is a palpable intolerance toward anyone who is perceived as different here, and certain individuals never miss a chance to make that obvious. The goal is clearly to hurt the person and "force" them to leave the chat by making them feel unwelcome.

When it comes to these low blows against those deemed undesirable, Jack Ward82 is leading the charge, though he's being followed pretty closely by the rest of the group.
Jason Richardson5 Jason Richardson5 Member
11 messages
joined Jul 2022
#63 ·
Just a quick little request: can we stick to lowercase october instead of capitalizing it?

Thanks.
nimblecrane6 nimblecrane6 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2015
#64 ·
Hannah Gomez75 said:What is she even doing here? 🤔 (considering her presence in this thread, which apparently is some kind of grievance against Daniel Gomez10(?!?))

I'm honestly not sure I follow your logic there.

In this current thread, I have 54 times more posts than Daniel Gomez10 (162 compared to just 3).
Ethan Bailey18 Ethan Bailey18 Active Member
80 messages
joined Oct 2015
#65 ·
Hannah Gomez75 said:From what I've seen, Steve is consistently wrong. 😁

It’s actually interesting watching his debates; he manages to build a logical case only to land on the wrong side of the fence every single time.

That’s just my subjective take, obviously. 😁

Another subjective opinion:

If Hannah keeps insisting she's right, Steve might as well go buy a high-end saw with plenty of premium lumber to practice on. 🤣

@nimblecrane6, look at us—Thomas Campbell5 and I are the textbook definition of ganging up on everyone else. 🤣
Thomas Campbell5 Thomas Campbell5 Member
10 messages
joined Aug 2018
#66 ·
nimblecrane6 said:I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.

In this current thread, I've actually posted 54 times more than Daniel Gomez10 (162 posts compared to his 3).

You clearly aren't up to speed here.😁

Daniel Gomez10 has been a regular in this thread for years; he's just taking a break from posting for a while.

Chloe Cooper10 said:If Hannah keeps doing things her own way, Steve could just open his own sawmill with a massive selection of high-quality lumber for processing and reuse. 🤣

Why shouldn't Hannah just speak her mind?

"Sawing" or "woodworking" aren't really the right verbs to use here, regardless of the actual subject matter. 😁

We don't know each other personally, and I have no intention of getting sidetracked from the topic at hand.😁
nimblecrane6 nimblecrane6 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2015
#67 ·
Chloe Cooper10 said:@nimblecrane6/">@@nimblecrane6, look at us—Thomas Campbell5 and I are the textbook definition of people ganging up on everyone else. 🤣

Look, I wasn't looking for examples like that, and I certainly haven't been calling either of you out on this thread or anywhere else. Honestly, this is the first time I've even noticed you hanging around this forum. 😉
Hannah Gomez75 said:You're clearly out of the loop. 😁

Daniel Gomez10 has been a long-time regular in this thread, she just hasn't posted in a while.

I'm "out of the loop" on that one, sure, but I still have absolutely no idea why you think me showing up to this thread is somehow controversial.
Thomas Campbell5 Thomas Campbell5 Member
10 messages
joined Aug 2018
#68 ·
nimblecrane6 said:In this current thread, I have 54 times more posts than Daniel Gomez10 (162 compared to 3).

nimblecrane6 said:I'm aware of what's going on, yet I still don't see why you think my participation in this topic is controversial.

So, are you actually aware of the situation or not?

If you are, then what was the point of your very first post?
If you aren't, then you already know the answer to the second question.
😁
nimblecrane6 nimblecrane6 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2015
#69 ·
Hannah Gomez75 said:So, are you actually in the loop or not?

If you are, then what's the point of the first registration?
If you aren't, well, then you already know the answer to my second question. 😁

I’m completely lost here because Honey was posting in the chat relatively recently—during my active hours, while Daniel Gomez10 was totally MIA.

What you're doing right here is a textbook example of your whole modus operandi. 😉 👋
Thomas Campbell5 Thomas Campbell5 Member
10 messages
joined Aug 2018
#70 ·
nimblecrane6 said:What you're doing right here is just a textbook example of their whole modus operandi.😉 👋

Really? 😬

I have zero interest in wasting my time on trivial nonsense. I already gave you my answer.
brightpuma brightpuma Active Member
128 messages
joined Jun 2024
#71 ·
It’s not all bad. She might be on the ignore list for most people in that chat, but at least she found someone here to actually talk to, unlike back there where everyone just ignores her.

As for Honey, I don't get the impression anyone has really taken her seriously, except maybe Jason Richardson5 for his own reasons. Everyone messes around here; it's not an exception. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just wrong. 🤷

And I’ve never seen Ethan Bailey18 before. First time seeing that handle. Maybe she used a different name before or was posting from a burner account.
Keith Doyle18 Keith Doyle18 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Aug 2006
#72 ·
Maria Johnson said:Look, I've been around this forum for ten years now—a true veteran of the scene.😳I’ve been posting on way too many threads lately—it's becoming a bit much—but I feel compelled to say this: the vibe on your forum just isn't right. It's uncomfortable. There is this constant, sneaky undercurrent of sarcasm and snark that I can't even fully put into words, but it's there. I've learned the hard way that life is too short for that kind of toxic communication. Honestly, the tension here is palpable—you could practically cut it with a knife. It’s like walking into a room where an elephant is standing right in the middle of everything.🤷

Well, I went ahead and provided some answers myself.
You’ve been at this for ten years—which means you've reached that sweet spot where you can finally choose to write wherever you actually feel comfortable and where, in your opinion, the vibe is genuinely positive.
"You're posting in too many threads," they say—as if there's some unwritten rule about how much one should contribute. Honestly, if you feel the need to narrow it down, just pick one or two favorites. For instance, I decided to stick exclusively to the recreation thread—it’s my one and only spot here. I don't really see the point in limiting myself, but hey, whatever works for you.
3) Claiming that someone is "constantly making fun of you" is just your own skewed interpretation of humor—humor that you probably don't even grasp—given that you're jumping between a hundred different threads at once and clearly missing all the nuance hidden between the lines. Because you can't catch the subtext, you end up twisting it into something ugly.
"I learned communication the hard way"—well, there you have it. You basically answered your own question. It seems like you aren't picking up on irony or sarcasm; instead, you're looking for that blunt, "straight to the point" kind of communication—the kind of directness you just don't see often in those polished British TV dramas.
"The tension is thick enough to cut with a knife"—honestly, there’s no actual tension here. It's just your own perception, likely stemming from a bit of a misunderstanding of the humor.
Thomas Campbell5 Thomas Campbell5 Member
10 messages
joined Aug 2018
#73 ·
brightpuma said:It’s not all bad that she's on most members' ignore lists in that chat. At least here she found someone to actually talk to, unlike that chat where everyone just shuts her out.

I don't have a problem with being ignored, especially when it's
spontaneous.

But I can see you're following 😬

Bullying is happening in that chat, and there is absolutely no excuse for it.
Thomas Campbell5 Thomas Campbell5 Member
10 messages
joined Aug 2018
#74 ·
Maria Johnson said:Look, where am I supposed to go? You don't really have a choice here—you’re either going to accept me or you aren't.😬

People kept insisting that I should post pictures—and mind you, I was talking about my outfits.😁They went over to the MK thread and started digging up my old posts from completely different discussions just to drop links there, simply because they didn't have any actual arguments to counter mine. I wasn't being "wicked" enough, apparently—it felt like they were just looking for an excuse to bury me.😬

So, I was feeling pretty bold, so I decided to drop the link to that thread where I actually won the cooking competition.☕ Of course, nobody saw that coming. They had absolutely no clue they were dealing with a female Gordon Ramsay.☕

It’s not that you were actually unwanted; it’s just that they love nothing more than picking on the new kids to make themselves feel important.
Posting on MK is a massive plus. 🙂
At least, I don't think anyone finds it particularly bothersome.
stormytiger4 stormytiger4 Active Member
148 messages
joined Feb 2020
#75 ·
I remember seeing somewhere in a guide that when everything gets interconnected through better transit and highways, every single place starts looking identical.
To be fair, I have no idea what the vibe is like over at Rekra, but I can't help noticing that this complaint thread feels a lot like those ones that used to flood in from Off.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads