CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › After Earth (2013)

After Earth (2013)

Started by Frank Moore4 · · 👁 4 views · 153 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Frank Moore4Bryan Hill4John Peterson3James Perez3briskhound2Karen Smith9jadeharbor9casualravenAndrew Roberts3Bryan Perez50Megan Gray6Drew Sanchez82Jerry Sanders96Tyler Clark86David Brown19Kevin Ward3Sophia Thomas7Dennis Hayes39goldengardener51briskeagle3Robin MillerJoshua Hall4Jerry Martinez50Emily Lee66 …
cosmicharbor49 cosmicharbor49 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2013
#121 ·
Rachel Ortiz33 said:Such a snooze
Will Smith needs to stop pushing his untalented son, the kid is just awful
Will Smith doesn't change his expression once the whole movie, zero personality... such a charismatic and cool actor playing some serious bore, the casting is worse than Samuel L. Jackson as a wise Jedi
It's bad, but not total trash... there's just no ambition here, kind of like a predictable video game

electric rabbit's post is pure gold!

Honestly, both kids. I just saw her latest video being pushed all over my YouTube home page today... man, they are both painfully untalented. It’s a shame, really. No matter how much money Will Smith throws at the production, you just can't buy actual talent.
Brandon Fox2 Brandon Fox2 Member
32 messages
joined Sep 2008
#122 ·
Ugh, I need to write this down just so I don't end up shouting out my window: what an absolute disaster of a movie! Honestly, given that Smith is usually such a staple for big blockbusters and M. Night is someone you'd actually expect to see something watchable from, this was a massive letdown. It felt like the whole thing was just: Will Smith: "Hey M., I've got this idea and some cash to make it happen, you want to direct?" and then basically just using his kid to act while he sits in a chair for most of the runtime. It turned out terribly—from the awkward facial expressions of the kids and the sloppy script to a messy plot, and even the CGI was so bad it was almost funny. It honestly reminded me of some old Discovery Channel or National Geographic documentaries from over a decade ago. My advice? Just sleep on it and forget it ever happened!
Lawrence Booth2 Lawrence Booth2 Regular
297 messages
joined Sep 2022
#123 ·
The movie isn't actually all that bad
it's just that he was so incredibly unattractive and lacked any real talent
honestly, if a decent actress had been cast in his role instead, you might have actually seen a decent film here 😁
and Will Smith is completely unrecognizable
Jonathan Howard Jonathan Howard Member
14 messages
joined May 2013
#124 ·
Christian Torres3 said:Maybe they should’ve just glued some volcanic eruptions onto Will Smith's ears since he’s clearly trying way too hard with that fake "I've got everything under control" facial expression.

The world would honestly be doing us all a massive favor if someone invented a smart bomb designed to wipe out 95% of Hollywood screenwriters. It's pathetic.

🤣

The movie is basically background noise for when you're falling asleep. It doesn't really meet any other expectations.
The only thing I actually liked was the color-changing suit idea. That part was pretty cool.
Taylor Cook96 Taylor Cook96 Member
29 messages
joined Apr 2014
#125 ·
What did I just watch 😕 Calling this movie "garbage" is honestly being too generous🙂 The entire plot is basically just someone walking through the woods and... that's it. Nothing happens. 🙂
And don't even get me started on the lead actor, I won't even go there👎
2/10
Susan Morgan2 Susan Morgan2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2013
#126 ·
I don't think Smith's acting is actually the biggest issue here—it's those eyebrows of his. They give him this permanent "sad puppy" look no matter how hard he tries to commit to a scene. The concept behind the movie is actually pretty decent, but the execution? Total disaster. And what was even happening with that eagle?? Like, "Oh, I caught an eagle for my kids' lunch, but everyone else died while you survived, so now I guess I'll just save you"?? Give me a break.
Watch it once if you absolutely have to, then never again.
James Perez3 James Perez3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2012
#127 ·
If it’s really that bad, I guess I’ll have to clear two hours out of my schedule just to sit through it. Now I'm actually curious. 😁
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#128 ·
"It's so bad, you just have to see it for yourself"
The New York Times
James Perez3 James Perez3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2012
#129 ·
Grace Edwards said:"It's so bad, you just have to see it for yourself"
The New York Times

I mean, yeah. When basically everyone (and I mean *everyone* on this thread) is calling it trash, you kind of have to sit down and witness the disaster firsthand just to see what the fuss is about. Curiosity is a dangerous thing.
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#130 ·
James Perez3 said:I mean, yeah. When basically everyone (and I mean *everyone* on this thread) is calling it trash, you kind of have to sit down and witness the disaster firsthand just to see what the fuss is about. Curiosity is a dangerous thing.

Oh, totally, I’m right there with you—Netflix is a massive headache. Honestly, I’ve sat through so much absolute garbage on there, or at least tried to give it a fair shot, but I usually end up turning it off halfway through because the quality is just so bottom-of-the-barrel and the whole vibe is just plain gross.
frozenheron7 frozenheron7 Member
26 messages
joined Nov 2020
#131 ·
James Perez3 said:If it’s really that bad, I guess I’ll have to clear two hours out of my schedule just to sit through it. Now I'm actually curious. 😁

Honestly, I started watching it for that exact same reason. 😁
But I ended up turning it off after five minutes flat. 😁
James Perez3 James Perez3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2012
#132 ·
I’m going in tonight, so I’ll let you guys know how much I actually lasted 😁
George Robinson43 George Robinson43 Regular
472 messages
joined Oct 2017
#133 ·
🤮 for Smith
I'm doing a total facepalm for Knight.

It honestly feels like it's high time they hired a professional screenwriter, because the current direction just doesn't hold water.
What’s even more frustrating is that his last few films have felt like half-baked, unfinished products. It's like *The Last Airbender* was just thrown together in a single afternoon without a second thought.
Ashley Bailey6 Ashley Bailey6 Active Member
208 messages
joined Jun 2013
#134 ·
The story shows real potential. I liked how they built the setting, the atmosphere was solid, and the CGI was decent enough. That’s about all the good stuff I can say.

The negatives have already been mentioned, but here are my personal favorites:

Spoiler alert

*

-That massive wild bird wandering around outside, spotting a guy, dragging him into cover, covering him up, and then ending his life.
I think a typical ten-year-old would just roll their eyes at that scene.

-That almost telepathic connection between the father and son near the end of the movie.🙄

-The second part of the plane is located at 62 miles 🤷. You’d expect it to be maybe a mile or two away, but on 62 miles? Seriously? At least it wasn't on the other side of the country.

-Young Smith's acting is genuinely terrible. It’s the wrong role for a fourteen-year-old.

-A total cliché scene where he just stops feeling fear. Nobody ever expects a twist like that.

-The weapons and technology used don't make sense, among other things. I still need to process that.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#135 ·
Lawrence Booth2 said:The movie isn't actually all that bad
it's just that he was so incredibly unattractive and lacked any real talent
honestly, if a decent actress had been cast in his role instead, you might have actually seen a decent film here 😁
and Will Smith is completely unrecognizable

What do you mean "not that bad"? It makes zero sense. You could summarize the entire plot as 'save the giant bird.'😬
silentpilot8 silentpilot8 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2012
#136 ·
Terrible 🙄

This little Smith guy is a total disaster, to say the least... One of his facial expressions 🙂

The only thing I actually liked—well, as much as one can like anything here—was the visual effects & landscape 🤷
Mark Vaughn4 Mark Vaughn4 Newcomer
1 message
joined Sep 2013
#137 ·
Honestly, it’s just a pretty terrible movie...
bluepuma9 bluepuma9 Active Member
69 messages
joined Jun 2018
#138 ·
If they’d just flipped the script—you know, kept the kid stuck in the ship while Will took over his role instead... honestly, it probably would've worked way better.

The core idea isn't half bad, and the production value holds up. It didn't even bore me too much, which is saying something since I live for post-apocalyptic stories 😁.
steelcrane3 steelcrane3 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jan 2012
#139 ·
Personally, I found the movie to be a total slog—just incredibly tedious. 😢
James Perez3 James Perez3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2012
#140 ·
The movie is a total mess. The ship looks like some cheap roadside diner instead of advanced tech for a civilization this far along... it’s honestly embarrassing. And don't even get me started on that foil covering the hull; it looks exactly like the plastic wrap you'd find in a grocery store aisle at a Walmart. Smith is playing "polished" so hard it’s painful, and frankly, he's terrible here. I get that it's just the role he was cast in, but when I think about his better work, this is just a disaster. As for the son? An absolute hack. That’s being generous. This could have been so much more than this. It basically boils down to some tiny birds and a bird dying just to save Kitai (that's it). 3/10

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads