CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Proposal for a new (potentially most engaging) PDF layout

Proposal for a new (potentially most engaging) PDF layout

Started by Adam Richardson3 · · 👁 5 views · 54 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Adam Richardson3Aaron Jones87Emily Roberts48Angela Mitchell3Sophia Thomas7rustydrifter10hiddenseal3Raymond Wilson10Kate Walker54Richard Cook9David Sanders4silentmarlin76Matthew ChavezRichard Sanders7northernpilot2
Raymond Wilson10 Raymond Wilson10 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jul 2019
#21 ·
There was an attempt at a thread like this before, and honestly, everyone saw exactly how that went south. The real issue is that people don't seem to know where to draw the line. It’s one thing to argue online, but it becomes a massive problem when things spill off the forum and turn into personal vendettas, looking for fights in real life, or straight-up threats. We really don't need that kind of 🤷
Adam Richardson3 Adam Richardson3 Active MemberOP
58 messages
joined Jun 2015
#22 ·
Raymond Wilson10 said:There was an attempt at this kind of thread before, and everyone saw how it devolved. The issue is that people don't understand boundaries. What happens when things spill over from the forum into real life—seeking out conflicts in person, threats, and so on? We simply don't need that 🤷

Why doesn't this escalate into real-life confrontations on 4chan or Reddit? 🤷 You can write pretty much anything here. Most people—I’d venture to say 99% of this forum—are sane. Can you actually imagine some thug from IBM coming home, turning on his computer, and typing away on a forum...
I certainly can't 🤷
In my view, all the insults and threats made here are harmless and won't escalate into anything significant.
Of course, I'm not suggesting death threats or violence should be permitted. Boundaries are necessary.
But getting banned just because I call someone an idiot in a chat, they call me the same thing back, and then we move on... to me, that’s just unnecessary sterilization of normal human interaction.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#23 ·
hiddenseal3 said:Look, the core issue here is that you have a group of well-meaning community members who generally tolerate a bit of casual, unfiltered language among themselves—it's how they've communicated on countless public and private chats for ages. Then, you have these malicious trolls who just have too much time on their hands; they jump in specifically to insult people, start flame wars, or just be nuisances to the regulars, and the good folks don't exactly have a way to kick them out from wherever they're lurking.

If we started listing names, everyone would just end up pointing at the exact same people. 😉

The OP is asking for an open PDF that anyone can access. You and Aaron Jones87 seem to be talking about one specific clique of users. 🙂
hiddenseal3 hiddenseal3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jun 2015
#24 ·
Matthew Anderson said:The OP wants a public forum open to everyone. Honey and you are talking about a specific clique within this community. 🙂

Fine, let's make it open to everyone. Specifically, everyone with good intentions and a sharp wit. We've had newcomers join us who fit in perfectly. 🙂

These persistent bullies should be banned from any decent forum.
Raymond Wilson10 Raymond Wilson10 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jul 2019
#25 ·
Adam Richardson3 said:why wouldn't this spill over into real life on 4chan or Reddit🤷 when you can basically write whatever you want here? I’d go as far as saying 99% of the people on this forum are just regular folks. Can you honestly imagine some jerk from IBM sitting at home, firing up his computer, and spending his time typing away on a forum?
I really can't. 🤷
In my view, all the insults and threats thrown around here are harmless and won't escalate into anything serious.
Now, obviously, I'm not suggesting we should allow death threats or threats of physical violence. There have to be boundaries.
But getting banned just because I call someone an idiot in a chat, they fire back with something similar, and then everything goes back to normal—to me, that feels like unnecessary sterilization of how humans actually communicate.

I think you missed my point. I get that there are people who can brush off that kind of talk and won't lose their minds if someone calls them stupid. The issue lies with the people who can't handle it; once you push their buttons, they don't care about whether they get sanctioned or not, they just want to find out where you live and settle the score personally.

And yeah, those kinds of people definitely exist on this forum.
Kate Walker54 Kate Walker54 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jun 2013
#26 ·
Furthermore, I should point out something you conveniently neglected to mention: whenever a chat gets shut down, these individuals simply clone themselves and march right back in to claim more victories, which seems to be your standard operating procedure. If you want empirical evidence, just look at the thread author himself; God knows which clone he actually is. Is that how it works, Adam Richardson3, Asparagus, and all your other little duplicates?

It is quite fascinating, really, to watch you demand justice and rights on a forum where you refuse to follow the basic rules, especially when you are being bolstered by those who behave exactly like you. I am specifically referring to Praying Mantis, who is clearly just a duplicate of Tempest Storm, or hiddenseal3, who is an extension of Lovecat—who, if memory serves, had her own thread here complaining about chats being closed, though she used a different clone at the time so you wouldn't recognize her.

Regrettably, I find myself unable to start a formal complaint thread on the grievance board because last night’s constructive debate—during which I was labeled a pathetic, backward, useless bird, and where Richard Cook9, acting as a proxy for Jackal, suggested I ought to be slapped for three days straight—was promptly deleted. I wish to distance myself from one of last night's posts that managed to stay up, as I, L3gu, have done nothing to any moderator or staff member.

All of this tension was sparked simply because I sent a message to Dim to let him know they had reopened the chat, despite the fact that after the last incident in the Off topic section, they were explicitly forbidden from doing so, particularly since they already have their own chat over in the Miscellaneous subforum.

Once Dim finally shut the chat down, they immediately opened a new one. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how "respect" for staff decisions is handled around here. ☕

They already have a dedicated chat where they can talk, and honestly, there are plenty of chat rooms on this forum, but apparently, they don't care for the existing company; they just want a private space all to themselves. ☕

I fail to see anything wrong with exercising my right to report posts or contacting a moderator when I feel it is necessary. Or perhaps I am mistaken—is it better to remain silent because the clones and the trolls are somehow more protected than the regular users who actually bother to follow the rules?

If you choose to let them continue venting their frustrations here instead of at some local dive bar, then so be it; I will step aside so as not to obstruct their path.

Best regards to everyone 👋
Adam Richardson3 Adam Richardson3 Active MemberOP
58 messages
joined Jun 2015
#27 ·
Kate Walker54 said:Furthermore, you neglected to mention that every time a chat is shut down, they just clone themselves and start fresh victories, exactly as they always do. The thread starter is living proof of this, considering who their various clones actually are. Is that the case, Adam Richardson3, Asparagus, and all your other little duplicates?

It is quite fascinating to watch people demand justice and rights on a forum where they refuse to follow the rules, only to be supported by those doing the exact same thing. I am referring specifically to Praying Mantis, who is a mere clone of Tempest Storm, and hiddenseal3, who is a clone of Lovecat—who previously started a thread here complaining about chats being closed, though she used a different persona so you wouldn't recognize her...

I cannot, unfortunately, open a thread in the private section because last night’s constructive debate—during which I was called a loser, backward, and a chicken, and during which Richard Cook9, acting as a clone of Jackal, told me I deserved three days of slapping—was deleted. One of last night's posts remains, and I wish to distance myself from it, as I have done nothing to harm L3gu or any other moderator...

All of this was triggered because I sent a message to Dimiti to inform him that they reopened the chat, even though they were forbidden from doing so after the last incident on the Off topic subforum, especially since they already have a chat on the Miscellaneous subforum...

After Dimiti closed the chat, they simply opened a new one. That is how they respect moderator decisions...☕

They already have a chat available to them, and there are plenty of chats on this forum, but they don't care for the existing community; they just want a chat exclusively for themselves...☕

I see nothing wrong with exercising my right to report posts or contact a moderator when necessary. Or perhaps it is better not to bother, since the clones and the trolls are clearly more protected than the regular users who actually follow the rules...

If you allow them to continue venting their frustrations here instead of in some dive bar, then I will step aside so I do not get in their way...

Best to everyone 👋

🤣 Just breathe, Kate Walker54 🙂 and stop worrying about forum gossip 🙂

I have no idea what anyone is talking about, but I am speaking about a general policy change regarding a PDF that would allow for more intense debate, because judging by this thread, people seem to crave it...👍
Kate Walker54 Kate Walker54 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jun 2013
#28 ·
Adam Richardson3 said:🤣 Just take a deep breath, Kate Walker54, 🙂 and try not to get bogged down in all this forum gossip. 🙂

I honestly have no idea what you're all getting at here, but my point was about implementing a general policy document that would permit more intense debate, because looking at how this thread is going, it seems people are actually hungry for it. 👍

Oh, absolutely. Apparently, a simple chat isn't enough for you all; you need us to hand over an entire PDF manual. 🙏 🙏 🙏
Adam Richardson3 Adam Richardson3 Active MemberOP
58 messages
joined Jun 2015
#29 ·
Kate Walker54 said:Exactly. A simple chat isn't enough for you people... you need the entire PDF handed to you on a silver platter. 🙏 🙏 🙏

You forgot to include the number 🙂
Kate Walker54 Kate Walker54 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jun 2013
#30 ·
Well, I suppose I should get this filed before they decide to scrub the post entirely. ☕
hiddenseal3 hiddenseal3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jun 2015
#31 ·
Kate Walker54 is struggling to grasp how our nicknames work. She assumes we’re hiding behind new identities, when in reality, all changes are handled by L3ga with full approval.

It’s a shame all those posts and chats were deleted—along with her endless insults and harassment. She rarely participates in the chat unless she’s looking to insult someone or report us for "fighting."

A round of applause for Kate Walker54 and her stellar contributions to the community. :klap:
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#32 ·
Kate Walker54, this really has nothing to do with you. You show up to all sorts of different threads just to stir the pot and provoke people, all while acting like some kind of saint over on the offtopic boards. So, do us all a favor and pipe down. 🙂
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#33 ·
hiddenseal3 said:Kate Walker54 seems to be having some trouble wrapping her head around our handles. She’s under the impression that we’re all just hiding behind these new identities, when the reality is much more straightforward: we’re updating them with the full knowledge and approval of L3ga.

It’s a shame that all those posts and chat logs were wiped out, along with that massive pile of her insults and personal attacks. It's particularly grating because she hardly ever actually participates in the chat—unless, of course, she’s popping in just to insult someone or to play the martyr by notifying us that she's reported our mutual bickering.

A quick round of applause for Kate Walker54 and all the hard work she’s put in. Her contributions haven't gone unnoticed.
. 👏

Exactly. She spent countless times acting out and causing chaos without a second thought, and now suddenly she’s looking for justice? Give me a break. It's laughable. 🙂
Richard Cook9 Richard Cook9 Member
29 messages
joined Jun 2015
#34 ·
Kate Walker54 said:Exactly. A simple chat isn't enough for you people; apparently, we need to hand over a full PDF document just to satisfy the requirement. 🙏 🙏 🙏

And where on earth did Richard Cook9 say he needed to saddle you up for three days? If he actually wrote something like that, he was clearly joking. Three days is an absurdly long time. 👋

Full support for Adam Richardson3.

Kate Walker54 has tried to shut down every single chat session. It is truly incredible how much determination one person can possess, even though she has never exchanged more than two posts with any of us.😵
hiddenseal3 hiddenseal3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jun 2015
#35 ·
Maria Johnson said:Exactly. She spent countless times acting out without consequence, and now she’s suddenly looking for justice. Ridiculous. 🙂

Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion here.

Everyone's involved.
Kate Walker54 Kate Walker54 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jun 2013
#36 ·
hiddenseal3 said:Kate Walker54 seems to have some sort of grievance regarding our usernames. She operates under the misguided notion that we are attempting to hide behind aliases, when in reality, any changes made are done with full knowledge and authorization from L3ga.

It is truly a shame that such a vast quantity of her previous posts and chat logs—specifically those containing her various outbursts and insults—have been wiped away. It is quite peculiar how she chooses to insult people in chat rooms where she otherwise remains entirely silent, appearing only when she intends to lash out or to inform us that she has reported our mutual bickering.

A single round of applause for Kate Walker54 and her tireless efforts and contributions. :klap:

I personally only report posts that directly affect me; frankly, I couldn't care less about the nonsense the rest of you decide to write. 😉

Maria Johnson said:Kate, this really has nothing to do with you. You show up in all sorts of different chats just to mock and provoke people, yet you act like some kind of saint on the main forum. So, stop whining. 🙂

It seems nothing concerns anyone else but you, doesn't it? ☕

If someone were to actually review my entire post history across every chat room we've ever had, perhaps then we could determine who is truly doing the provoking.
David Sanders4 David Sanders4 Member
47 messages
joined Feb 2015
#37 ·
Kate Walker54 said:I want to distance myself from one of last night's posts that wasn't deleted. To be clear, I haven't given anything to L3gu or any other moderator.

Come on, don't be such a martyr. You can't even be mentioned without getting defensive. I'm certainly not interested in dragging you through the mud all over the forum, but claiming you can't even be brought up at all seems a bit excessive.

Kate Walker54 said:Exactly. Apparently, the chat isn't enough; you people need the entire PDF handed to you on a silver platter. 🙏 🙏 🙏

I couldn't agree more.👍
If L3go hadn't graciously provided us with the chat, we wouldn't have anything at all. And now, apparently, that's still not sufficient—now there needs to be yet another chat just for the "chosen few."🕺

P.S. As far as I'm concerned, I'd actually prefer if they kept it to themselves. I personally find things much better when the "traffic" is lighter; it always feels higher quality to me.🙂
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#38 ·
Kate Walker54 said:I only report posts that actually concern me. As for the rest of the nonsense you all keep posting, frankly, I couldn't care less. 😉

It’s funny how that works, isn't it? Nothing seems to matter to anyone else, yet somehow, everything finds its way back to you eventually. It always does. ☕

If you actually take the time to comb through my entire post history across all these different threads, we can finally settle this once and for all. We’ll see exactly who’s been throwing the punches and who’s just sitting there taking them.

To be perfectly honest, this hits home for me, considering how much time I spend hanging around this chat as an active member. 🙂 And you’re really just an active stalker looking for a reaction. 🙂
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#39 ·
David Sanders4 said:Look, don't be such a crybaby. You can't even mention your name without getting defensive. I’m not interested in dragging you through the mud here on the forum, but claiming you can't be spoken of at all is a bit much.

I completely agree with that.👍
If L3go hadn't been generous enough to grant us the chat, we wouldn't have anything at all. And yet, apparently, that still isn't enough—now they're demanding another dedicated chat just for the "chosen ones."🕺

P.S. As far as I'm concerned, I'd leave it to them. I actually find it quite refreshing when the traffic dies down; things always feel a bit higher quality when it's less crowded.🙂

Why not just open another chat over in the off-topic section? What's the big deal?
Well, the off-topic section is their territory, but they have every right to wander into ours and stir the pot, don't they? Or is that not allowed?🙂
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#40 ·
Hey everyone, let's please keep the bickering to a minimum here.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads