CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Proposal for a new (potentially most engaging) PDF layout

Proposal for a new (potentially most engaging) PDF layout

Started by Adam Richardson3 · · 👁 6 views · 54 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Adam Richardson3Aaron Jones87Emily Roberts48Angela Mitchell3Sophia Thomas7rustydrifter10hiddenseal3Raymond Wilson10Kate Walker54Richard Cook9David Sanders4silentmarlin76Matthew ChavezRichard Sanders7northernpilot2
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#41 ·
Sophia Thomas7 was asking where the line is drawn. It’s right here. 🙂

And honestly, it’s a shame we don't pay more attention to what this user actually puts out there.

It makes sense that the chat gets shut down after one person snaps like that; management assumes the whole conversation is veering off course. Ideally, people like this should be dealt with immediately. This individual is a total Jackal who refuses to back down, and they even operated under a different handle when their main account was suspended—completely flying under the radar despite multiple reports. Because of people like this, an innocent bystander ended up getting penalized while the actual provocateur didn't face a single consequence.

Does that seem fair to you?
silentmarlin76 silentmarlin76 Member
29 messages
joined Apr 2015
#42 ·
Raymond Wilson10 said:Well, someone tried starting a thread like this before, and we all saw exactly how much of a disaster it turned into. The real issue isn't just the drama itself, it's that people don't seem to know where to draw the line. It starts with arguing online, and then suddenly things escalate from digital spats to people actually trying to track each other down in real life, making threats, and all sorts of nasty stuff. And honestly, we really don't need that kind of 🤷

yeah, there are definitely folks on this forum who lean into that vibe

I'm totally with you on this one... It hasn't been made clear enough that under US law, making physical threats is a serious criminal offense, and having some random username or an alt account isn't going to protect you. If you call the police, they’re going to show up at your door, and then everyone involved is stuck dealing with the legal system for a long time... let alone if someone decides to take matters into their own hands. Once things go past the screen, it's way beyond anything happening on a forum.

If we're talking about the whole "problem" here, I think the solution is already right in front of us: just hit the ignore button. We don't need a massive new rulebook or a formal policy for that. As for people being rude or insulting one another? Well, they're going to do it regardless of the rules, and since there aren't any real consequences anyway, it's basically a non-issue. If it's not a real problem, there's no point in trying to engineer a fix for it...
Adam Richardson3 Adam Richardson3 Active MemberOP
58 messages
joined Jun 2015
#43 ·
silentmarlin76 said:I agree with this. It isn't emphasized enough that under American law, physical threats are also criminal offenses. No username or clone is going to protect you. You call the police, they show up at your house, and then the participants can deal with the court system... let alone someone else taking matters into their own hands. Whatever happens after that is beyond the scope of this forum.

For this entire "issue," a solution already exists: the ignore option. There is no need for a new PDF for that. As for mutual insults; people insult each other without any consequences anyway—so the problem doesn't exist, and therefore seeking a solution is unnecessary...

The solution was fine. L3go handled it properly. But then you showed up, along with Kate Walker54 and the rest of the trolls from Off topic who reacted to our specific discussions by whining, reporting, and sulking (you even sent me PMs whining and begging me not to mess with Kate Walker54)...
So please...
When I decided to ignore you, you actually increased your activity because you thrive on chaos. Then, when someone hits back, suddenly you're innocent and clueless.

The solution for you and the other trolls is to open a PDF where I can explain a few things clearly without being reported or banned. Then you'll see how quickly you leave.

This thread is proof that such a PDF is necessary for the forum.
Matthew Chavez Matthew Chavez Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2012
#44 ·
First off, I want to give credit to L3ga, who has done a solid job managing the chat so far. 🙂

On a different note, having a sub-forum or a specific thread where moderation isn't enforced and insults are allowed would only make sense if the debate was actually about a specific topic. For instance, over on the main board, there’s that one thread dedicated to Richard Cook9 where people move their arguments there if they start picking fights elsewhere. The whole point is to let heated debates play out without holding back, using whatever language feels right to them...
Personally, I don't think that could work for the "Random Stuff" chat because it isn't focused on any particular subject. About 90% of the fighting and intense arguing there just boils down to people not liking each other personally...

🤷

I don't see an easy fix, and honestly, I'd be pretty sad if the chat got shut down because I actually enjoy the drama. 🍿
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#45 ·
Sophia Smith29 said:First off, I’d give credit to L3ga for how well he’s managed the chat up to this point. 🙂

Generally speaking, having a subforum or even just a thread where moderation isn't enforced and insults are permitted only makes sense if the debate is actually centered on a specific topic. For instance, over at Reddit, they have those "venting" threads where people move posts if someone starts picking fights elsewhere; the whole point there is to allow heated arguments without holding back, using whatever language fits the mood...
Personally, I don't see how that would work in the "Random Stuff" chat because it lacks any topical focus. About 90% of the fighting and aggressive debates there just boil down to personal animosity...

🤷

I don't see a solution, and honestly, I'd be pretty bummed if the chat got shut down because I do enjoy a little drama. 🍿

Wait, who ever mentioned closing the chat?

We're talking about opening a new one.☕
Matthew Chavez Matthew Chavez Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2012
#46 ·
Maria Johnson said:And who was the one bringing up closing the unit?

We're looking at the opening of something new.☕

I don't want anyone to feel targeted here, but honestly, there’s zero chance that subforum will actually happen based on how it was laid out in the intro post. Looking at how people are already signing up for this thread, I get the feeling the mods are just waiting for us to start bickering so they have written proof that this whole chat is becoming too much to handle. 🙂
hiddenseal3 hiddenseal3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jun 2015
#47 ·
Sophia Smith29 said:there is far too much nonsense going on right now... 🙂

It certainly is.

As long as Jackal, also known as Richard Cook9, gets away with swearing under the guise of irony, Lord Flashheart insults women just because he won't meet them in person—even after traveling all the way from New York City to Los Angeles with a bottle of wine—and various people like Kate Walker54, silentmarlin76, and others from Offtopic show up just to troll the users who aren't even allowed to post there (someone should note the blatant injustice and the massive space provided for trolling by these Offtopic users)... managing this chat is a nightmare.

Fixing a few flaws and restoring the normal state of the chat from a few weeks ago isn't difficult.
Richard Cook9 Richard Cook9 Member
29 messages
joined Jun 2015
#48 ·
hiddenseal3 said:It certainly is.

As long as Jackal—otherwise known as Richard Cook9—gets away with swearing like a sailor under the guise of "just joking," and Lord Flashheart gets to insult women just because they won't meet him in person after he drove all the way from New York City to Los Angeles with a bottle of wine in hand... well, it’s a mess. Then you have various people like Kate Walker54, silentmarlin76, and others from the Offtopic section crawling out of the woodwork to troll and provoke the folks who actually AREN'T allowed to post in Offtopic (I sincerely hope someone notices the blatant injustice and the massive amount of trolling coming from those Offovac types)... it's a complete disaster.

Yet, fixing these few glaring issues and restoring the chat to how it was just a couple of weeks ago wouldn't be an impossible task.

🤣 🤣

Where on earth are you people headed? 🙏 🙏

Lego is hands down the most fair moderator I've encountered here. Let him step in and make a call, since he knows us all. This whole situation is frankly disgusting and laughable; I suspect even he will get a good chuckle out of this, especially at the expense of you troublemakers and Aaron Jones87. 🤣
Richard Sanders7 Richard Sanders7 Member
22 messages
joined Aug 2022
#49 ·
Looks like a new PDF for checking out is on the horizon ☕
hiddenseal3 hiddenseal3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jun 2015
#50 ·
Richard Cook9 said:Lego is easily the most decent mod I've encountered on this board.

Not long ago, that was just a popularity contest. People sucked up to him because he held all the power. Now L3go is actually the best, and 👋
Richard Cook9 Richard Cook9 Member
29 messages
joined Jun 2015
#51 ·
hiddenseal3 said:Not long ago, that was his territory. He had to play the part because he was running the show. Now L3go is at the top, so 👋

I don't know about all this; frankly, I couldn't care less about bans. Your little friend practically melts the moment he enters the chat, which looks absolutely pathetic from an outsider's perspective. As for pobs, he’s an old legend, though it seems he doesn't moderate nearly as much as he used to. And you, Katuso—just go to sleep already. You've probably bored everyone to tears by now. 🙂

Do you people honestly think the mods are idiots or just completely incompetent? They see right through you.

Especially you, with your 30,000 posts on this forum. For heaven's sake, try being serious for once. I might joke around, and yes, I swear, but what you all are typing here is 🤦 😵
Aaron Jones87 Aaron Jones87 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Feb 2015
#52 ·
I’m just asking that someone finally takes action regarding these completely baseless personal attacks.🙂 I personally have zero tolerance for this kind of behavior, yet this individual has been getting away with it for months now. He’s been targeting me constantly without me even engaging him—it’s all right there in the chat logs if anyone actually bothers to look.
Matthew Chavez Matthew Chavez Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2012
#53 ·
hiddenseal3 said:That’s for sure.

As long as Jackal, also known as Richard Cook9, gets away with swearing under the guise of "just joking," and Lord Flashheart insults women just because they won't meet him in person—even after he brought her wine all the way from New York City to Los Angeles—while various people like Kate Walker54, silentmarlin76, and others from Offtopic show up just to troll the group that isn't even allowed to post in the Offtopic section (I really hope someone notices how unfair it is that the Offtopic crowd has such a huge space to troll us)... it's a total mess.

But fixing those few issues and getting the chat back to how it was a few weeks ago shouldn't be that hard.

Okay, if you think some people are troublemakers who deserve a partial ban, that’s doable. But I honestly don't get how you plan to stop random people from dropping into the chat. 😕

I'm not fully caught up on this recent fallout with those Offtopic folks, but it could have just as easily been a group coming over from, say, the Ford subforum, and you'd be calling them provocateurs too... 🤷

This utopian idea of a subforum where moderation is handled loosely reminds me of when early American message boards were still young and everyone basically knew each other. Times have changed. Sure, there were periods when the chat worked perfectly, but the only way to keep newcomers from taking over is for us to stick together, rather than having five new petty arguments pop up every week that never actually get resolved. Honestly, we need an official mediator, not just a moderator!😬
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#54 ·
You can actually still get a hold of L3go even if the thread has been locked down. It doesn't matter if they've deleted posts, handed out warnings, or issued bans—they’ll still find a way to reach out.
northernpilot2 northernpilot2 Active Member
201 messages
joined Oct 2013
#55 ·
Regarding the Offtopic section, I wouldn't say you haven't had plenty of chances to just... you know, have a "normal" chat and actually hang out. After I shut down that first thread—mostly because my inbox was absolutely slammed with reports about everyone insulting one another and breaking the site rules—my takeaway was basically that none of you have any self-control.

So, after all that chaos, someone decided to kick off yet another thread in Offtopic, probably thinking they could just pick up right where they left off since I might not notice where things were heading. Anyway, I figured I’d give you a pass and let you chat again, but of course, you immediately went right back to your old ways. You guys just can't help yourselves, and honestly, I don't think there's a moderator out there willing to cut you some slack and give you a space to socialize if you're constantly going to insist on breaking the rules.

As for the Offtopic area, you had your shot. Not just once, either, but several times. There just isn't room here for those kinds of "chat" threads.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads