#2821 ·
Kate Wells44 said:The primary tumor is in the large intestine. A colonoscopy needs to be performed for two reasons: to take a biopsy for histological and molecular analysis, and to ensure the bowel is clear enough for the scope to pass through. If it is, surgery isn't necessary right now; the first line of treatment will be chemotherapy combined with biological therapy, depending on what the molecular testing shows. If it isn't clear, he'll need surgery because there's a risk of a bowel obstruction (ileus), which is an emergency.
I would also consider radiosurgery for those osteolytic changes in the pelvic bones.
Music spoke with Surgeon Glavan at the Cancer Clinic. She told him exactly what the forum user Ethan Roberts23 wrote: they won't perform surgery at this moment unless he develops a bowel obstruction, which is life-threatening—in that case, they would operate.
So, the plan is chemotherapy following the standard protocol, which is the same across all hospitals, including here in San Francisco. The doctor feels there’s no need to send him to Chicago right now to do the chemo; he'll receive the exact same treatment here as he would at their oncology department, and besides, being local is easier. Plus, doctors at smaller hospitals can sometimes get defensive when you try to transfer patients, acting like they don't want to examine someone just because they're planning to move them elsewhere. 🙄
The doctor also mentioned that he *can* go to Chicago if we want; they would guarantee him a hospital bed on short notice. It's just that she doesn't see the necessity of doing that right this second.
So, what's our next move?