CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Diaspora Subforum

Diaspora Subforum

Started by Laura Rivera3 · · 👁 2 views · 44 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Laura Rivera3Peter Doyle2Henry Moore2driftingcanyon16brightpumaTimothy Reyes12stormylynx4electriccobra17bluesailor22ruggedgull11rustydrifter10
Laura Rivera3 Laura Rivera3 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Mar 2009
#1 ·
So, hey everyone,

I wanted to take a second to talk about the moderation over in the Diaspora subforum. To be fair, I haven't been super active there—I’ve mostly just been lurking and reading rather than actually posting. Which brings me to my point about the moderation.

I’ve always assumed that a moderator's job was to guide discussions and actually participate in them in a way that builds something up. Apparently, that’s not how things work here. The moderator there seems to participate almost exclusively in the role of a beat cop. Her version of "moderating" basically boils down to constant warnings and penalties, stuff like:

Keep the chat civil, please!
If you don't stop this, I'm going to issue a ban.
Last warning!
This isn't the place to discuss this topic.
This isn't the spot for technical questions.
This isn't the thread for debating the referendum.
This isn't the place to voice opinions on ethnic groups, and so on...

In the thread titled "What annoys you about the country you live in," someone mentioned being annoyed by cheese culture, and she responded with this condescending attitude. She didn't engage in any constructive conversation; she just shut it down with a vibe of, "Ugh, what are you even talking about? How could that possibly bother you? You clearly have no clue about this or that specific culture."

My overall impression is that the atmosphere in that subforum feels a bit like living under a regime. Every joke, every bit of sarcasm, even the little mistakes we all make as humans—like generalizing things—is strictly punished. Everything has to be phrased with surgical precision, as if you're writing a PhD dissertation instead of just posting on an internet forum. The penalties follow instantly; there's this rigid stiffness where every single word is scrutinized.

The moderator gives off this impression of being incredibly stiff, just trying to drill discipline into people through constant warnings or bans. There's no room for nuance or actual discussion. When people were talking about trivial stuff, like who prefers which brand of coffee, it was fine. She let people run wild, almost like she was letting kids play in a sandbox. But the second a differing opinion comes up, she wipes it out and shuts down any further conversation.

I actually got a warning myself because of the language I used. It's true, it wasn't appropriate, but it's also true that sometimes you have to speak to people in a way they actually understand. But hey, that's fine. I'm not complaining about that. What bothers me is the whole Inquisition vibe—the systematic punishments, the constant warnings, the climate of fear, and her total dictatorship.

I don't know. If other members feel the same way, maybe something might change. If not, oh well. I just wanted to voice my thoughts as a member—someone who would love to write about life in the diaspora while respecting the rules, but without the dictatorship of a moderator who treats her role like she's a prison warden, a judge, and an executioner all rolled into one.

Thanks for reading.
Peter Doyle2 Peter Doyle2 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2012
#2 ·
I haven't been around much lately—just some personal stuff I had to deal with. Skatte edit was basically flying solo here, which wasn't fair of me. Technically speaking—keeping threads organized, cleaning up duplicates, all that administrative work—she’s probably the best moderator this community could ask for. If she weren't here, we'd probably be drowning in a hundred different threads every single day asking things like, "How do I get to here-or-there?"
I've been deep in some emigration research recently, so jumping back into my role here feels a little bit selfish—not that I'm complaining, I guess, but it is a bit opportunistic of me 😬 🤣
Anyway, I promise I'll catch up on everything that's happened lately. I'm planning to sit down with my colleague to figure out where things went sideways and how we can fix it 😉
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#3 ·
So, just to recap the warnings I've been giving out:

Keep it down, please!
If you don't stop this right now, I'm going to start handing out warnings.
Last warning!
This isn't some casual conversation topic for a hangout.
This isn't a place for technical questions.
This isn't a thread for debating referendums.
And this definitely isn't a space where you can go off on tangents about ethnic groups and stuff like that...

Look, obviously I’m going to give you a heads-up before I start handing out warnings or bans. I'm not some dictator just walking around tossing out penalties for fun.
There is a specific chat thread for that, yet people keep chatting away right here in a thread that explicitly says "no chatting allowed."

If a thread isn't meant for discussing a referendum and you start doing just that, consider this your warning.

And things like that.

Furthermore, you have every right to talk about local folks, but if you start generalizing—like in your example, calling Native Americans drunk chiefs living off welfare—that's hate speech. It's not allowed, and you'll get a warning.

Also, I have every right to comment on the fact that one user hates cheese, especially when that same user is the one who replied asking why and kept the whole thing going. I didn't realize she was looking for a lawyer to defend her at the IRS.

Honestly, I think I'm being way too lenient, considering how many users are basically cloning themselves and spamming every corner of the subforum.

And look, you know perfectly well that criticizing moderator work is banned across the entire forum except over at the IRS, yet you still went ahead and posted a link to that Canada thread right here.
If you'd actually prefer me to just skip the warnings and hit you with a penalty immediately, honestly, that would make my life even easier.
driftingcanyon16 driftingcanyon16 Member
40 messages
joined Oct 2012
#4 ·
Emily Fowler52 said:I haven't been around much lately because of some personal stuff... life just got in the way. Honestly, the Skatte edit team was left flying solo on the diaspora boards, which wasn't fair of me. Strictly from a technical standpoint—keeping topics in the right sections, cleaning up duplicates, that whole bit—she’s probably the best moderator this diaspora could ask for. If she weren't here, we’d be drowning in a hundred different threads every single day asking things like "How do I move to New York or Chicago?"
I've been pretty caught up in some emigration research myself, so I guess you could say I'm being a bit selfish by focusing on my own stuff instead of helping out here, which is kind of low of me 😬 🤣
But hey, I promise I'll catch up on everything that's happened recently. I'm going to sit down with my colleague and figure out where things went sideways so we can fix it... 😉

Technically, she's not bad at her job—nobody is saying that. I'm sure there are a thousand threads popping up every day with the exact same questions. But being good at the technical side isn't the only thing that makes a great moderator.

Grace Diaz76 said:So, looking back at those warnings:

Please, less chatter!
If this doesn't stop, I'm handing out warnings.
Last warning!
This isn't the place for casual socializing.
This isn't the section for technical questions.
This isn't the place to debate the referendum.
This isn't a thread where you can vent about ethnic groups and such...

Of course, I'm going to give people a heads-up before I start issuing formal warnings or bans; I'm not some dictator walking around handing out penalties for fun.
There's a dedicated chat thread for a reason, yet people keep treating specific topics like a social lounge, even when the rules clearly say not to.

If a thread isn't meant for debating the referendum and you start doing it anyway, consider yourself warned.

And so on.

Furthermore, you're allowed to talk about local people, but if you start generalizing—like in your example, calling Native Americans drunk chiefs living off welfare—that's hate speech. It's not allowed, and you'll get a warning.

Also, I have every right to comment on a user saying they hate cheese, especially when that same user replies telling me why and keeps the conversation going. I don't recall them hiring a lawyer to defend their culinary tastes at the IRS.

Honestly, I think I'm being quite lenient, considering how many users keep making clone accounts to spam the subforums.

Besides, you know perfectly well that criticizing moderator actions is banned everywhere except on the IRS thread, yet you still went ahead and linked a discussion about Canada over here.
If you'd rather I just skip the warning and go straight to the penalty, fine by me.

Personally, it really bothers me how much you delete. Why do you do that?
We can play this game however you want. You aren't being "lenient" at all—if anything, your moderation style feels pretty heavy-handed, and the problem is you apply that same rigid logic to everyone. Whether it's people going off-topic, or a thread naturally expanding into a new direction with decent users, or even the actual trolls and spammers... you treat everyone with the same blunt instrument.

Also, sorry, but you’re acting a bit irrational by feeling like you have to be "correct" about absolutely everything—to the point where you're just handing out warnings for the sake of it. Yeah, I’m talking specifically about that last yellow card you gave me. The diaspora is just so incredibly sterile... it’s honestly exhausting. Look, I don't condone prejudices or generalizations, but you really take things way too far sometimes.

You barely even participate in the actual discussions, and hey, you don't have to, but your moderation style feels like nothing more than a pile of orders... 😕
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#5 ·
It’s funny how things work. Back when we had a dedicated thread for, say, Canada—full of all the chats and info—everyone was constantly complaining that it was way too cluttered and they couldn't find a single thing. But now that I’m trying to clean things up to make life easier for everyone, both the regulars and the new folks joining the fray, suddenly it’s not good enough again.

I've been clearing out off-topic posts because there's already a specific chat thread for them, but people just seem to ignore the signs and keep posting where they don't belong. I honestly don't get it... why is it such a struggle to just move over to the designated thread and keep the conversation going there?

For threads that don't have a specific chat area, I won't go deleting messages unless things spiral into heavy politics or intense personal drama, which happens more than you'd think. It’s like looking at what goes on in Germany; one minute they’re debating tax laws and the next they're talking about where to buy a decent pair of shoes.
Why am I being so reasonable about this? Because it seems like everyone loses their minds the second someone insults Americans, but then people feel like they can talk down to an Irishman or a Native American without a second thought. It's like, who actually cares, right?
brightpuma brightpuma Active Member
128 messages
joined Jun 2024
#6 ·
I don't know, sometimes these kinds of threads just feel totally confusing to me.

The thing is, people clearly don't get that—on one hand (the side dealing specifically with the diaspora)—we're talking about folks who came from all sorts of different backgrounds and live in all sorts of different places. Often, they carry these condescending attitudes toward their new homes, and toward Americans too. And honestly, that’s exactly why people end up clashing in these threads so often.
Just recently, you had people jumping from the Australian thread over to the Canadian one and vice versa, leading to massive trolling and insults. What is a moderator even supposed to do then? 🤷 I mean, the damage is already done.
So you end up with the moderator stuck in the middle, which isn't easy. Prevention is always better than trying to fix things after the fact.
Would you guys really prefer it if people were constantly picking fights across different threads just to make the atmosphere feel more "homey"? 🤷

On the flip side, the section tied to emigration should function more like a service and less like a chat room. That's because people go there for information that actually matters to them; we're talking serious stuff. Naturally, there's much less leeway for nonsense there. You only have to look at how much chatting goes on in the Legal forum, which is the subforum closest to what Emigration should probably be (a source of accurate, useful info). Not to mention the mountain of threads opened with stupid questions or people jumping into topics asking, "What do you think, what are the chances someone gets a job at XXX here or there..."

The Diaspora moderators already have a tough enough job managing two subforums with completely different moderation policies, all without being dragged for stupidity or because someone gave them a dirty look on a thread. I mean, a yellow card? Come on... 🙄
Laura Rivera3 Laura Rivera3 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Mar 2009
#7 ·
brightpuma said:, which is basically the only subforum that actually functions close to what the Emigration section ought to be—you know, an actual source for reliable, useful info. Not to mention the endless stream of threads filled with mindless questions or people jumping into existing topics just to ask stuff like, "Hey, what are the odds someone with XXX background gets hired at this specific place?"...

If you’re looking for a source of "accurate and useful information"—if that’s really how you view things—then I guess you don't even need a subforum. You could just use a curated list of links or just hit up Google.

People aren't machines, after all. A forum is meant to be a place for exchanging ideas and having discussions. Even if those questions seem incredibly stupid sometimes—which they do—people are different. Some are smart, some are clueless, some can write, others can barely string a sentence together... it's just how it is.

The moderator is probably a decent, intelligent person. I'd bet she's trying her best and acting in good faith. But, look, moderating isn't just about the technical side of running a forum. If you focus too much on that, you might end up with a perfectly organized structure but absolutely zero substance left inside. Just something to think about. I'm certainly not the only one who's noticed that something is fundamentally off here.
And, honestly, if people start losing their cool and go on the offensive—like I did, just lashing out at everyone in sight—a good leader should have ways to steer the conversation back on track and de-escalate the tension.
I mean, I truly believe the moderator is a good person, but maybe she just isn't a very good moderator.
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#8 ·
I definitely agree that there are ways to steer a conversation back on track. I used to try the softer approach—just not handing out cards or pleading with people to just chill out—but honestly, everyone just ignored me. Now? I just delete the nonsense and drop a yellow card, and suddenly everybody starts behaving. You really have to lean on those yellow cards when people start attacking others based on their ethnicity or where they’re from. It gets ugly. I've seen situations where people were digging up private info, like who was sleeping with how many hookers during a trip to Dubai and stuff like that. Imagine if I started handing out red cards and multi-day bans for everything? Total chaos.

Why can't people just read a post twice before hitting "send" and actually ask themselves if what they wrote is okay? It's so easy to sit there, go wild on your keyboard, and then turn around and accuse a moderator of being unfair just because they deleted your post and gave you a yellow card.
brightpuma brightpuma Active Member
128 messages
joined Jun 2024
#9 ·
Laura Rivera3 said:If you're just looking for hard facts and useful data—if that's really all you care about—then why even bother with a subforum? You can just find a bunch of links collected in one spot or just use Google.

Great idea.

Why don't you tell that to the people running the Legal subforum? 🤷 Tell them everything they post could just be found on Google instead. 🙄
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#10 ·
brightpuma said:Spot on.

Someone should probably tell those folks over in the Legal subforum... 🤷 that pretty much everything they talk about can be found with a quick search on Google.. 🙄

I mean, if we’re really going by the "just use Google" logic, we might as well just shut down this whole Diaspora PDF section entirely—since everything is already out there online anyway.
driftingcanyon16 driftingcanyon16 Member
40 messages
joined Oct 2012
#11 ·
Grace Diaz76 said:I definitely agree that there are ways to steer a conversation back on track. Before, I used to try just ignoring the trolls or begging everyone to just chill out—but honestly, nobody listened to that. Now? I just delete the comments and hand out a yellow card, and suddenly everyone starts behaving... It’s funny how that works. You really have to lean on those warnings when people start attacking others based on where they're from or their background. I've even seen situations where people were digging up private details—like who was sleeping with how many hookers during a trip to Dubai and all that nonsense. If I started handing out red cards and multi-day bans right away, the whole place would just fall apart...

Why don't people just take a second to read over their own posts before hitting send? You really ought to ask yourself if what you wrote is actually okay... It’s way too easy to just sit there, go wild on the keyboard, and then turn around and blame the moderator—accusing them of being unfair just because they deleted my post and gave me a warning...

Am I complaining about posts like this getting flagged? No, not at all... 🙂
I honestly can't help but feel like there's a bit of a double standard happening here—it feels like you're treating someone who leaks private info exactly the same way you treat someone just complaining about being pregnant... it doesn't quite sit right with me... 🤣

brightpuma said:So, it basically boils down to the fact that a moderator needs to strike this perfect middle ground—which, let's be honest, is no easy feat—but being proactive is always better than just trying to clean up the mess after it happens...
I mean, wouldn't it be nice if everyone just chipped in and chatted about different topics more often? It would definitely make the whole atmosphere feel a bit more... I don't know, like we're actually hanging out in someone's living room... 🤷

Where on earth did you get that from...?
Prevention is always the better part of valor—it really is...🙏

brightpuma said:The moderators over at this diaspora forum already have their hands full enough just managing two subforums that basically run on completely different sets of rules—all without getting bogged down by petty nonsense or people acting out because someone gave them a dirty look in a thread. I mean, a warning? Seriously... give me a break... 🙄 )

I guess this one's coming for me... 🤣
Yeah, it honestly bugs me how they hand out warnings and slap people with cards—even just yellow ones—for every little thing. That isn't actually moderating... it’s just being a pain in the ass...
The diaspora subforum is honestly so incredibly sterile and stiff... It’s almost unnatural. Every now and then people start bickering and hurling insults at each other, and instead of Henry Moore2 just stepping in and handing out actual bans to those trolls, he tends to just preemptively smother every single topic before it even gets going...
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#12 ·
Look, you don't need to lecture me on how I handle users who are just dropping helpful info. That’s my job, and if anyone has a problem with it, they can take it up with me. It isn't true that people providing actual data get treated the same way as spammers or people just posting random off-topic nonsense.

The PDF isn't "clean" only when it comes to threads that are constant troll zones—kind of like those threads about Australia or Canada, which somehow always end up having two separate topics.
At the very start of the thread, it clearly states that this isn't a place for casual chatting, yet people still push against the rules. Then, when you actually get penalized for it, you act like it's some huge injustice.
To me, the real injustice is how people systematically ignore the fact that we have two distinct threads: one for chatting and one strictly for information.

I regularly hand out warnings to people being rude, but I don't touch posts from people making intelligent points. Honestly, I love it when other smart people jump in to keep a real discussion going. Not off-topic, just expanding the conversation.
It's just... it's rare to find people who actually want to talk about something meaningful. Most folks just seem to enjoy venting about how much they hate their new neighbors because they moved to a country filled with complete losers.

As far as I'm concerned, I'm not changing how I issue warnings. It would be nice if individuals just started following the rules so we could all just get along in the more controversial threads, much like how things work in other diaspora discussions.

EDIT: Just a reminder that these are the rules agreed upon with the rest of the forum leadership. Nobody complained when they were first laid out. In fact, people complained because the same questions kept popping up over and over, turning the threads into total chaos.

This thread is specifically for immigration questions where you CANNOT find answers in previous threads or the master FAQ thread with the links.
If your question hasn't been answered yet, please don't just ask it again, or you're going to get a warning.
If you ask something that could easily be found using the search bar, you're going to get a warning.
This is NOT a chat thread.

The social thread for Australia is NOT for technical questions.
You can post technical questions here ONLY if there are NO existing answers elsewhere.

Enjoy yourselves.


And now, the rules for the chat thread:

Hey there, my fellow Canadians,

Since most of you are complaining about repetitive questions, all the trolling, and the sheer size of the topic, here is the solution.

This thread is exclusively for socializing.
Any trolling will be strictly punished, and if you have questions about moving here, please look for that information over here.

(A big thanks to our resident gentleman for gathering all those links!)

Any immigration-related questions posted in this specific thread will be deleted and/or result in a warning.

Have fun!

Henry Moore2

EDIT: Just to clarify—questions are allowed here if you absolutely cannot find an answer in previous threads, on Google, or by calling the Embassy.
Laura Rivera3 Laura Rivera3 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Mar 2009
#13 ·
brightpuma said:Great.

Maybe you should take that advice over to the Law subforum... 🤷 tell them all their info is basically just sitting there on Google anyway... 🙄

What are you even talking about in a thread about moderating the diaspora?!

I mean, seriously, just go tell Sam yourself. Why are you dragging me into this? In case you haven't quite grasped the situation—if people just want raw information, they have Google. If they actually want to talk about things, they have this forum. But I guess you're just not interested in actual discussion. That seems to be the issue here.
And yeah. If you don't have anything specific or useful to say about the diaspora, maybe just leave me out of it.
Laura Rivera3 Laura Rivera3 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Mar 2009
#14 ·
Grace Diaz76 said:If we’re following the Google logic, we might as well just shut down this entire diaspora forum—I mean, you can find pretty much everything online through a quick search anyway.

I guess it makes you wonder what people actually want from a community like this. If every single bit of info is sitting right there on Google, then what's the point?
I suppose there isn't much left to talk about, unless you view the old-timers basically acting as a sort of concierge service for the newcomers.
driftingcanyon16 driftingcanyon16 Member
40 messages
joined Oct 2012
#15 ·
Grace Diaz76 said:The PDF isn't exactly clean everywhere, except maybe in threads where people just troll nonstop—like the ones about Australia and Canada, which somehow have two separate threads each.
At the very start of the thread, it clearly states that casual chatting isn't allowed, yet you guys keep breaking the rules anyway. Then, when you get penalized, you act like it's some huge injustice.
To me, the real injustice is how you all systematically ignore the fact that we have two distinct threads—one specifically for chatting and one for serious discussion.

I regularly hand out warnings to people who are being disrespectful, but I don't touch posts from people making intelligent arguments... actually, I love seeing other smart people jump in to keep a good conversation going. It’s not off-topic; it's expanding the subject.
It’s just... it's rare to find those smart people. Most of them are just folks who love complaining about how much they hate their neighbors because they moved to a country they think is total garbage.

As far as I'm concerned, I don't plan on changing how I issue warnings. It would be nice if certain individuals started following the rules so we could all just get along in the controversial threads, much like what happens in the other diaspora discussions.

**Bolded** 🤣
Honestly, I didn't think you'd actually listen to the other side or maybe consider a different perspective. The reason people aren't hanging out in the diaspora section is because of your moderation style. The problem is that you flag everything as off-topic, and that's exactly how you kill the thread and the conversation. How many times has it happened where people start talking about something indirectly related to the main point? Why is that such a massive issue for you? That's how topics evolve... if everyone strictly stuck to the prompt and nothing else, the whole thing would die out in two days. One thought leads to another, and that's it. I really don't get why that's a violation in your eyes, and that's what I mean when I say you're overdoing it.
I'm tired of arguing and explaining that I have absolutely nothing against you punishing rude posts, so please, let's just move past that. 🤷
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#16 ·
Chat discussions tend to drift, just like they do on any other forum topic. It gets messy when people start debating in threads where we specifically asked everyone to keep the chatter to a minimum.

Look, if someone starts a thread about eggs, and then a newcomer joins the party looking for info on eggs, they should be able to find it right there. They shouldn't have to dig through fifteen pages of random talk about salads or old printed books just to find what they need.
If you want to talk about eggs, or those antique books, or even just salad, let's keep that stuff in the main chat room instead. Just stick to the specific thread meant for that subject.

I’m really not in the mood to play referee here, so please, just take a second to read the rules and follow them when you post. If we all do our part, things will run much smoother for everyone. That's all I wanted to say about this.
driftingcanyon16 driftingcanyon16 Member
40 messages
joined Oct 2012
#17 ·
Grace Diaz76 said:Chat topics tend to drift, just like anywhere else. It’s usually those controversial threads where chatting isn't allowed that cause the most friction.

I really don't have the energy for an argument here—can we all just please learn how to use the quote function and stick to the rules? It would make things much smoother for everyone... That's all I've got to say about it.

So, which specific topics are we talking about?
From the looks of it, you think every single thread is an issue. 🤷
Timothy Reyes12 Timothy Reyes12 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Dec 2013
#18 ·
Grace Diaz76 said:The PDF isn't clean unless we're talking about threads that just exist for trolling, like the ones for Australia and Canada, which somehow have two separate threads each.
At the top of the thread, it clearly states no chatting allowed, yet you guys keep breaking the rules anyway. Then, when you get penalized, you act like it's some huge injustice.
To me, the real injustice is how you people systematically ignore the fact that there are two distinct threads— one for chatting and one without.

Which one is even the chat thread? On both of them, you're just posting: "Less chatter, please!"
I regularly hand out bans to people who disrespect the order here, but if someone makes an intelligent point, I don't touch their posts. Honestly, I love it when other smart people jump in to keep the conversation going. It’s not off-topic; it’s just continuing the discussion.
It's just rare to actually run into anyone intelligent. Most people just want to whine about how much they hate the people they live with because they moved to a country full of absolute garbage.

So, are you gonna go ahead and ban yourself now?

Yeah, sure, someone saying they hate cheese might not be looking for a lawyer, but I have to mention it because you decided to judge them.
Look, people have a right to hate cheese! I hate it too! It's gross and stinks.
Go ahead, spit on me for saying that.
You can trash anyone who disagrees with you, but maybe ask yourself if that's actually okay.
Why shouldn't someone living next to Native Americans be allowed to say what they see?
Because they have to be politically correct?
They're just saying what most people already know.
We aren't in North Korea where we have to have whatever opinion we're told to have.
Or are we?
As soon as someone gets a tiny bit of power—even if it's just being a moderator on a forum—their true colors come out.
You've managed to drive away all the old-timers, and now you're claiming everyone else is just a bunch of idiots...
Pathetic.
Henry Moore2 Henry Moore2 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2009
#19 ·
Timothy Reyes12 said:What kind of chat topic is even that? On both posts you just go: "Less chatter, please!"

Would you give yourself some kind of disciplinary card right now?

Yeah, okay, maybe someone saying they hate cheese isn't necessarily looking for a lawyer, but I have to mention it specifically because you jumped straight to judging them.
Look, people are allowed to hate cheese! I hate it too! Ugh, gross, smelly stuff!
Feel free to spit on me for saying that.
You can bash someone just for being "pro-cheese" simply because they don't think like you, but honestly, just ask yourself if that's really okay.
Why shouldn't someone living near a Native American reservation be able to say what they see?
Because they have to be politically correct?
I'm just stating what most people already know anyway.
We aren't living in North Korea where we have to have whatever opinion we're ordered to have.
Or are we?
It’s funny how when someone gets even a tiny bit of power—even if it's just moderating a forum—their true colors really start to show!
You've managed to scare off all the old-timers, and then you claim everyone else is just a bunch of idiots...
It's sad, really.

I never judged that girl for not liking cheese; I just said I didn't get how someone could dislike it and not be open to trying new things. I never called her a bad person or said I couldn't stand her just because she hates cheese. She was the one who said she hates being in a country where everyone loves cheese, which, in my opinion, feels a bit discriminatory. Everyone is entitled to their own view, and users here judge each other every single day, yet nobody starts massive debates about it over at the IRS.
Please stop putting words in my mouth.

It's the same thing with Native Americans—sure, some have struggles and rely on social services, but you can't say that EVERYONE is like that, or that they're all drunks or lazy, because that's hate speech and, yeah, "politically incorrect." I highly doubt anyone in North Korea cares about political correctness.
Since that kind of talk isn't allowed on this subforum, I try my best to follow the rules laid out here; basically, I moderate according to the guidelines.

If the admins decide to change the rules, I'm more than ready to follow them.

So far, all I see is you guys whining about my posts and making personal attacks against me as a person, rather than addressing me as a moderator.
Peter Doyle2 Peter Doyle2 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2012
#20 ·
Dammit!!!!!!

Well, here you go—straight from one guy🤣

speaking in pure, classic American vernacular🤣

Alright everyone, let's all pause for a second. Just a few minutes, guys...😁

I'm heading out to Panera to grab some pasta, and if she likes the idea, I'll give you all an update😁 maybe?

I'm getting ready to redesign Oftopić :modnimačak: 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads