CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Started by vividsailor7 · · 👁 40 views · 3.9K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants vividsailor7redcrane22Sandra Rivera37swiftbear86melloworca6Dana Martin87ironskipper80mellowgardener15goldenmarlin6analogbison13Nicholas Myersstormygardener34Roger RodriguezDonna Mitchell3Kenneth Vaughn2Laura Ward98briskseal32Susan Vaughn46Zachary Lewis4driftingmason52rustyheron55Laura Chavez47vividstag24lonecanyon8 …
velvetmoose9 velvetmoose9 Active Member
163 messages
joined Apr 2020
#381 ·
I can't believe I'm even bringing this up again, but honestly, some things just never change no matter how much we all pretend they do. I was sitting there at a local diner over in Chicago the other day—just nursing a lukewarm coffee and watching the rain hit the window—and it hit me all over again how much we tend to ignore the obvious stuff right under our noses. It’s like that one friend who always insists on taking the scenic route when you’re already running twenty minutes late for dinner; you know they’re going to get lost, you see the GPS screaming at them, but you just sit there and let it happen because arguing feels like too much work. We do that with so many things in life, don't we? Just nodding along while everything goes slightly off the rails because questioning the status quo feels exhausting. Anyway, I was thinking about what was said earlier, and it really just underscores that feeling of being stuck in a loop. It's funny, in a dark sort of way, how we keep expecting different results from the exact same set of circumstances. kaže:
Hey there! Just popping in to say hi since this is my first time hanging out on the forum.
So, I was thinking about that whole ordeal with the lumbar puncture—it’s such a nerve-wracking experience, isn't it? You’re just lying there, waiting for everything to settle down, and then the big question hits: how long am I actually going to be stuck in limbo waiting for those CSF results to come back? Honestly, it really depends on what the doctors are looking for, which is always the frustrating part. If they're just doing a routine check for basic stuff like glucose or protein levels, you might get an answer pretty quickly, maybe even within a few hours if you're lucky and at a major hospital like Mayo Clinic or Johns Hopkins. But if things get more complicated—like if they need to run cultures to check for infections or look for specific proteins—you could be staring at the ceiling for a couple of days while the lab does its thing. It’s a total waiting game, and the uncertainty is easily the worst part of the whole process. Just try to find some way to distract yourself; sitting there counting the minutes doesn't exactly help the anxiety.

It really just depends on what you're looking for, honestly. If you’re stuck in the ER or hanging out in the ICU, some of those quick tests can be turned around in an hour or two. But then again, other results can take a few days to trickle through—sometimes even longer if things get backed up. A lot of it comes down to the specific lab you're dealing with, too, like how much high-tech gear they actually have on hand. Honestly, your best bet is probably just asking the technician or whoever is running the test directly; they'll give you the real scoop on the turnaround time.
Thomas Kelly2 Thomas Kelly2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2013
#382 ·
Jessica Roberts19 said:I went in for some blood work today and I’m sitting here staring at my results... Does anyone happen to know what "Morph. chg." actually stands for? I’m assuming it means "morphological changes," but then there's this "aniso micro" listed as a result, which is just lovely.
Thanks.

😕 😕

You'll probably get an answer much faster if you just type those terms into a Google search and read through whatever comes up.
Chloe Gray5 Chloe Gray5 Active Member
81 messages
joined Aug 2012
#383 ·
velvetmoose9 said:If you’re feeling fine, then things are probably looking up. 😉
Could just be some bacteria—maybe even a contamination issue during the test (you know how tricky those samples can be).
It’d still be a good move to give your doctor a quick ring just to run the results by her—she cares about you too, after all. 😉

Thanks 🙂. I’m pretty sure I did the sample right, so maybe there’s just a tiny bit of bacteria left—I'll just chug a ton of water and call it a day. I really don't want to mess with antibiotics if I'm not actually feeling sick.

My doctor told me to reach out if anything feels off; she has my labs on file at the clinic, but since it's always slammed there, she hasn't had a second to look. I figured I'd just check in if I start feeling crappy. Since I feel totally fine, I'll just flush that bacteria out with plenty of fluids.
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#384 ·
Chloe Gray5 said:About 10 days ago, I dealt with a bladder infection. I didn't have any pain when peeing or any blood, just that constant, nagging urge to hit the restroom. I went for a urinalysis and found quite a bit of bacteria, mucus, leukocytes, erythrocytes, squamous epithelial cells, and some calcium oxalate. My leukocyte esterase was also positive.
I was prescribed Macrobid and took it for seven days along with some cranberry supplements. After a three-day break, I went back for another test.
The constant trips to the bathroom have stopped, and I feel totally fine—like the infection is gone. But I just picked up my results today and they show:
some bacteria, mucus, squamous epithelial cells, and 1-3 small epithelial cells. Leukocytes are 0-2, which means they are within the normal range.

Basically, the red blood cells, crystals, and squamous epithelium are all gone. All that's left is a tiny trace of bacteria, mucus, and those few epithelial cells, but everything has significantly decreased and I'm feeling zero symptoms.
Do I need to go back on antibiotics, or can I just expect this to clear up if I drink plenty of fluids? Even though I don't actually have any issues, the lab report still shows these traces.

Edit: I honestly do not have the patience to spend my life trekking to doctors' offices and lugging urine samples around. If I start feeling sick again, obviously I'll go, but I'm asking just for peace of mind so I don't waste my time sitting in a waiting room for nothing. Last time, I sat there for two hours just for the doctor to tell me my culture was technically "normal" even though some bacteria showed up, saying it was nothing to worry about anyway.

Hopefully someone can find a moment to get back to me 🙂.

Those results look clean to me.
Hannah Kelly Hannah Kelly Member
18 messages
joined Jan 2013
#385 ·
Can someone please explain these cytology results from my scalp lump biopsy?

The macroscopic description shows very little material was collected. The smear reveals some pink extracellular matter, droplets of extracellular fat, and just a few thin strands of connective tissue.

Thanks
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#386 ·
rowdylynx17 said:I didn't follow up with my doctor because when I went to pick up my results, they told me everything looked fine ("according to them" 🙂). That’s why I came to this forum—to get a more detailed breakdown of what these numbers actually mean. In the meantime, the symptoms have eased up, though I still have this slight stinging sensation. Should I go ahead and get a urine culture done?

If you're still experiencing discomfort, then yes, getting a urine culture makes sense.

Best regards. 🙂
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#387 ·
Strawberry Boba, I’ve moved your inquiry today over to the brain CT scan thread (just click the link).
Hannah Kelly Hannah Kelly Member
18 messages
joined Jan 2013
#388 ·
Hannah Kelly said:Can someone please explain these biopsy results from my scalp nodule?

The sample collected was extremely minimal. The smear shows some pink extracellular material, droplets of extracellular fat, and just a few thin strands of connective tissue.

Thanks

Does this mean everything is fine? I guess maybe?
Jeffrey Jones77 Jeffrey Jones77 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2013
#389 ·
I recently ended up in the ER because I was dealing with some pretty intense kidney area pain. After that, they sent me over to a clinic to get my blood and urine tested. My blood work came back totally fine, but when it comes to the urinalysis, they weren't exactly clear about what everything meant—not that I expected much, I guess. Here’s what my urine results looked like:

Appearance: cloudy
Color: yellow
pH: 6.0
Specific Gravity: 1.020
Protein: 2.0
Glucose: negative
Bilirubin: negative
Urobilinogen: 16
Nitrites: negative

Leukocytes: 2-3
Erythrocytes: 1-2
Epithelial cells: squamous
Bacteria: many

Given that I deal with frequent pelvic infections—specifically uterine issues—and I actually had some kidney stones about two years ago, I'm a bit concerned.
My Pap smear results were:

Specimen adequacy: sufficient for interpretation
- obscured by leukocytes
Abnormal cells:
Squamous cells: atypical squamous cells
- significance not determined

V
C+
E+

General classification:
Abnormal cells

Microorganisms
Bacillus vaginalis: positive
Fungi/spores: positive
Other: something listed as u.er

Note: small number of atypical squamous epithelial cells

P.S.—just to clarify, this Pap smear was from a year ago, but the urine test was done just 10 days ago. Please, I really need some help here!!!
Frank Wright13 Frank Wright13 Newcomer
3 messages
joined May 2012
#390 ·
Is this looking alright? CEA at 0.5, with a range up to 5.

CA 19-9 is 8.33, against a limit of 37...?
Scott Hernandez8 Scott Hernandez8 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Feb 2009
#391 ·
What should I make of these lab results:

IgG 20.9 (Ref: 7-16)
IgA and IgM are within normal range
Total kappa light chains: 1.37 (Ref: 1.7-3.7)
Total lambda light chains: 4.67 (Ref: 0.9-2.1)
Kappa/lambda ratio: 0.29 (Ref: 1.35-2.65)
M-protein confirmed: IgG heavy chain and lambda light chain
Albumin 54.5 (Ref: 59.8-72.4)
Alpha-1, alpha-2, and beta levels are fine
Gamma 23.8 (Ref: 8-15.8)
M-spike present in the gamma globulin fraction
Total protein 80 (Ref: 66-81)
A/G ratio 1.25 (0.80-2.00)
Eosinophils 7.8 (Ref: 0-7)
MPV 10.8 (Ref: 6.8-10.4)
ALP 45 (Ref: 54-119)
Urinary leukocytes 1-3
Blood sugar is normal
HIV negative
Pap smear and swabs came back clear

I've been dealing with constant Candida issues... I just can't seem to shake it no matter what I do. I have an appointment with an immunologist coming up soon.
slysurfer14 slysurfer14 Active Member
100 messages
joined Jul 2014
#392 ·
Can someone please explain what these results mean?

Insulin 117.3

IA-2 autoantibodies 22.3 positive
GAD autoantibodies negative
ICA autoantibodies 0.5 borderline positive
velvetmoose9 velvetmoose9 Active Member
163 messages
joined Apr 2020
#393 ·
slysurfer14 said:Can someone help me make sense of these lab results?

Insulin 117.3

IA-2 autoantibodies 22.3 positive
GAD autoantibodies negative
ICA autoantibodies 0.5 borderline positive

It would definitely be easier to weigh in if we had a bit more context about the person behind these numbers—like, what actually prompted the blood work in the first place (any specific symptoms or old reports?), their age, or if they’ve been dealing with anything else lately, like diabetes, an autoimmune issue, or even PCOS...

Basically, these results could point toward the body mounting an autoimmune response against the insulin-producing cells in the pancreas, though it could also just be a sign of significant insulin resistance...
slysurfer14 slysurfer14 Active Member
100 messages
joined Jul 2014
#394 ·
velvetmoose9 said:It’d be way more helpful if we actually knew anything about the person being tested—like why they need these specific results, their age, or medical history (diabetes, autoimmune stuff, PCOS, etc.)...

A lab report could potentially point toward an autoimmune reaction against insulin-producing cells, or maybe just high insulin resistance...

The girl is 16 and dealing with thyroid issues (Hashimoto's or whatever you call it)....
velvetmoose9 velvetmoose9 Active Member
163 messages
joined Apr 2020
#395 ·
slysurfer14 said:So, there's this 16-year-old girl dealing with thyroid issues—Hashimoto's, if I remember correctly...

The thing is, these autoimmune stuff can be a bit of a package deal; you might see attacks on both the pancreas and the thyroid at the same time, which is just a tough hand to play.
I'm wondering, though, what were her fasting blood sugar levels looking like? Has she had a glucose tolerance test done yet? And is she showing any other signs of diabetes, or maybe struggling with obesity?
slysurfer14 slysurfer14 Active Member
100 messages
joined Jul 2014
#396 ·
velvetmoose9 said:Unfortunately, autoimmune issues tend to travel together—attacks on both the pancreas and the thyroid happen all the time.
So, what were her fasting blood sugar levels? Did she do a glucose tolerance test? Any actual diabetes symptoms? Or maybe just obesity?

She hasn't done those specific tests lately, but she did them before and everything was totally fine regarding her sugar levels.

As for weight, she’s a little on the heavier side, but nothing crazy (my wife and I are both pretty big-boned too).
Thanks for the info...
velvetmoose9 velvetmoose9 Active Member
163 messages
joined Apr 2020
#397 ·
slysurfer14 said:She hasn't been doing those specific tests lately, but back when she was, her blood sugar levels were totally fine.

As for the weight situation, she’s a little on the heavier side, but honestly, nothing to lose sleep over—my wife and I both have pretty solid builds ourselves.
Thanks for getting back to me...

It really feels like she’s being looked after by an incredibly thorough and conscientious doctor.
slysurfer14 slysurfer14 Active Member
100 messages
joined Jul 2014
#398 ·
velvetmoose9 said:It looks like she’s being treated by an incredibly thorough and conscientious doctor.

Just some nonsense about ribs and whatever...
The truth is, her MS specialist really knows what they're doing—they've already run the MRI and genetic tests. It's not the doctors that are the issue here; I guess the wife is just spiraling into unnecessary panic...
Linda Perez50 Linda Perez50 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2013
#399 ·
Could someone please help me make sense of my mom's lab results? CK 323 H U/l (ref L (ref She’s dealing with dilated cardiomyopathy and has a device implanted—I think it's a CRT, but I'm not entirely sure—basically something like a pacemaker.
I'm a bit lost on what these abbreviations actually mean, and I was wondering what such a high CK level might suggest in her case.
Thanks!
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#400 ·
Kate Reed63 said:Is this okay? CEA is 0.5, with a reference range up to 5.

CA 19-9 is 8.33, with a reference up to 37...?

The results are perfectly clear.

Sandra Morris47 said:What would these results mean:

IgG 20.9 (range 7-16)
IgA and IgM are fine
Total kappa light chains 1.37 (ref 1.7-3.7)
Total lambda light chains 4.67 (ref 0.9-2.1)
Kappa/lambda ratio 0.29 (ref 1.35-2.65)
Confirmed M protein of IgG heavy chain and lambda light chain class
Albumin 54.5 (ref 59.8-72.4)
alpha1, alpha2, beta are all fine
Gamma 23.8 (ref 8-15.8)
M-spike in the gammaglobulin fraction
Total protein 80 (ref 66-81)
A/G 1.25 (0.80-2.00)
Eosinophils 7.8 (ref 0-7)
MPV 10.8 (ref 6.8-10.4)
ALP 45 (ref 54-119)
Urine leukocytes 1-3
Blood sugar is normal
HIV negative
Pap smear and swabs are normal

I'm having issues with Candida... I just can't get rid of it no matter what... I'm seeing an immunologist soon.

Meene is incredibly interested to know who you are and under what specific diagnostic referral or working diagnosis you were sent for such intense testing.

Linda Perez50 said:Could someone please explain my mom's lab results? CK 323 H U/L (ref L (ref She suffers from dilated cardiomyopathy and has a device implanted (I think it's CRT, but I'm not 100% sure)—something like a pacemaker!
I don't understand these abbreviations and I'm wondering what such an elevated CK level could roughly indicate!
Thanks!

It doesn't work that way. First off, a lab report isn't for the patient—it’s for the doctor who ordered it, ideally.
Furthermore, you need to provide your mother's age, EVERY single medication she is taking, ALL her diagnoses, and her specific symptoms.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads