mistyjackal842
Active Member
206 messages
joined May 2012
Does anyone here have any experience regarding dialysis being used during sepsis? I’m looking for insight—feel free to DM me if that's easier. I guess I'm wondering when it actually makes sense to attempt dialysis and when it's just... futile. Specifically, does it get used in cases of septic shock, especially if the patient is unconscious and unable to communicate? My mother (who was 68) went through this, so I'm trying to make sense of it all. She wasn't conscious or able to talk, though, on her very last day, she actually managed to lift her hand when I visited her at the hospital. She wasn't even in the ICU, even though I've read everywhere that sepsis should be treated in intensive care. Her breathing was really labored because of the infection. Her CRP levels started dropping once she got the antibiotics; it went from an initial 400 down to 200. In my opinion, maybe she would still be here if they had started dialysis. On her final day, there was a blood clot in her catheter line, which was something she had never dealt with before. Also, her urine output was minimal because her kidneys were failing due to the sepsis. I honestly don't understand why they didn't just remove the urinary catheter once she developed the infection from it. From what I've read since, removing the catheter is such a basic step, and usually, a catheter doesn't lead to life-threatening sepsis in the first place. Not to mention, the sepsis shouldn't have happened at all. She was hospitalized the whole time, and they knew she had a UTI from the catheter, but they seemingly waited to start antibiotics because it was a Sunday—maybe they just weren't in a rush. All of this happened following a below-the-knee amputation, where the wound itself had actually healed fine. She woke up from general anesthesia, was communicating, eating a little bit, and could even sit up in bed. Then, suddenly, she developed sepsis, which I feel was due to inadequate care during a hospital strike.