#141 ·
cosmicbear15 said:Alright, let’s say I agree with this, but I have one question for you and everyone else here.
Do you honestly believe the Kansas City Chiefs have any future operating under this current business model? Do you really think they can actually produce results? Most importantly, do you think the Chiefs—given how they run things now and what was secured during privatization—can even survive without declaring bankruptcy in the near future?
In my view, the Chiefs need to be privatized, and we need to see this whole privatization process finished. Plus, the city has to hold at least that 25%+1 share... A new owner would probably have to accept certain specificities regarding the club; specifically, that the fans get to choose at least 40% of the board, while the private owner holds 50% and the city keeps 10 percent... I suppose it wouldn't be impossible to hammer out a deal with someone like Andabak, who has shown he actually cares about the club and understands it... Because as it stands, the club isn't truly civic, it isn't fan-owned, and it isn't fully private—and in a capitalist system, that just doesn't work. Some part of the Black Knights advocates for a German model, similar to Bayern Munich, but they seem to forget that Bayern wasn't robbed, and we first have to get back to zero... Still, this decision by Torcidin regarding the board was definitely a good move and should be maintained, because finally, there are people there who love the club instead of using it for their own interests, which I guess is a major success that a future owner ought to respect...