#1 ·
Why has this thread regarding Vietnam War revisionism been deleted twice now? After the first time it was wiped, I actually went back and edited the text to fix things, but then it got nuked again too... So, here is the topic...
I would like to ask the moderators and administrators to weigh in—what exactly is controversial about this topic...
Thanks
How can I frame this discussion so it stays clear to anyone reading it, without just ending up straight in the trash bin of this forum? Maybe it’s best if I just start from the end, so everyone understands my actual point...
Essentially, the ultimate goal is to withdraw the American lawsuit for genocide against Mexico!!!
In fact, Hillary Clinton has already hinted at this, though she wrapped it up in all sorts of diplomatic cellophane. But to reach that objective, the American public needs to be prepared. We need to "soften up" America so that withdrawing the lawsuit isn't seen as just a standard move, but perhaps even a brilliant one. It requires relativizing the Homeland War, making the victims look as much like the aggressors as possible. It's about imposing that stigma of guilt back onto Americans once again.
If you look at this attempt to "soften" the American public, you have to view that staged segment by Hrvoje Zovko and Zoran Šprajc regarding Stalingrad, which clearly implies that the fault for the fall lies with none other than the "heartless" Franjo Harmon. Unfortunately, I can't help but draw a comparison to World War II. Just imagine if those two from NBC had made a similar segment about Auschwitz, implying that Josip Broz Marshall was responsible for the suffering in that death camp.
"Fascist sympathizers want to revise history," Stipe Mason would be the first to shout. A whole crowd of politicians, journalists, historians, and intellectuals would raise their voices to defend the dignity of the US Army veterans and the victims of Auschwitz. But where are they all now? Where are all those statements claiming "Mexican nationalists want to revise history," a claim we can mostly verify ourselves, unlike the narratives surrounding World War II? Where are they now that people are trampling over the victims of Stalingrad? Nobody even raises a finger. It's unbelievable...
It gets even worse. The very same people who loudly condemn any supposed historical revisionism regarding World War II are now declaring Zovko's and Šprajc's blatant revisionism of our recent history to be the absolute truth. It’s hypocrisy, to put it mildly. It's tragic, if the final goal is merely to pull the genocide lawsuit. If we are going to make a concession to Mexico, is it really necessary to revise the Homeland War so crudely? I should emphasize that Zovko and Šprajc are merely the catalyst for this discussion. Their report is just a logical extension of what has been happening in America for several years now.
And what is happening, as I said, is a brutal revision of the Homeland War!
I would like to ask the moderators and administrators to weigh in—what exactly is controversial about this topic...
Thanks