CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Is it allowed for moderators to insult users?

Is it allowed for moderators to insult users?

Started by Peter Stewart6 · · 👁 8 views · 73 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Peter Stewart6Nicholas KingAlex Barnes8Chris Peterson53hiddenmoose20rowdyhawk10Brian Edwards6mistyseal11swiftorca57
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#21 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:I’m not lying. As a Catholic, I make it a point to steer clear of sin—and lying? That’s just not who I am. ☕
Everything written here is my official objection to your post—specifically regarding those sections you conveniently left out that I already mentioned.
I remember them writing quite clearly—it’s etched in my mind. And as for me, I’ve got long legs, thank God. 😁 Look, Chris Peterson53, this isn't an accusation—it’s just the facts. I'm looking for actual, substantive answers here, not your constant attempts to drag me into some debate about banning people.
Why on earth should I apologize to you? 🤷 My intentions are pure—plain and simple—and I mean exactly what I wrote.

Look, as a moderator, I have the authority to edit text—or whatever else falls under my jurisdiction. I know how this works, don't I?
You missed a sentence in your second post. Are you actually obsessed?Why on earth did I even bother posting this here?
I’m filing a formal book complaint. Furthermore, you had the nerve to sit there and "explain" my supposed obsession in your text. 🙄 Look, this is a blatant insult—one that you haven't even been sanctioned for—yet you just keep going, dragging my name through the mud by accusing me of lying. Is that how we're playing this? ☕

It seems like you might have cut off your message mid-sentence! What were you trying to say? I'm ready when you are—just lay it out for me. Are you seriously making a public demand? So, what am I supposed to do here—offer up an apology and take a penalty? 😁 Are you even in a position to be talking? To demand. No, I won't.
You can't even handle an admin? Please. To demand.I’m going to ask you to come back down to earth for a second and actually look at this from a realistic perspective.
I’m asking everyone to mind their own business when it comes to my posts—keep your opinions to yourselves—but I am officially calling on the admins to step in. I need them to address the outright accusations and insults being thrown my way by the moderator Chris Peterson53. Look, you don't have to agree with what I write—honestly, nobody does—but there really needs to be a baseline level of decency here. Is a little bit of basic respect too much to ask?
As a moderator, you’re supposed to lead by example—not by belittling people or bullying the users on this forum. Isn't that the whole point? To demand.
I’m satisfied.

I’ve been banned for three days—all because I had the audacity to submit two entries to the Religion book complaint pdf. Seriously? Since when did expressing an opinion become a punishable offense?
And I could have just answered once. Following the forum rules. And yet, it’s being characterized as— This is a blatant violation.
The forum rules.
No, honestly, just saying it was a comment from "rowdyhawk10's colleague" tells me everything I need to know—even if nobody actually bothered to give me a real explanation.
I've been banned—that option is completely disabled for me. Honestly, I haven't the slightest clue why, even after all this time.

Is this really what we're doing now—banning someone over this? I still can't wrap my head around how some people manage to be this dense—it’s actually impressive, in a tragic sort of way. Are we really still debating this? Does anyone actually believe that kind of logic holds any water in the real world? It’s just pure, unadulterated nonsense. And then you have certain users—looking at you, rowdyhawk10—who seem to think they’ve cracked the code, when in reality, they’re just shouting into the void. It’s exhausting. Seriously, does anyone else feel like we’re just spinning our wheels here? We could be having a productive conversation, but instead, we’re stuck in this loop of circular reasoning and ego. It’s honestly pathetic. If you can’t grasp the basic premise of what’s being discussed, maybe it’s time to step away from the keyboard for a bit. Just a thought.

🤔 It’s funny how quickly you jumped to respond to my post here—almost as if you were just waiting for me to finish my little "harassment" rant about you. 😁


You're going to end up in tears, Peter Stewart6!🙂
It’s perfectly clear that the server's automated entries—the ones completely out of the moderators' control—are set in stone.
It’s blindingly obvious that the post you're accusing me of editing with some "moderator magic wand" was written at 12:47 AM—and the link was added at 12:57 AM. That timestamp remains completely untouched and visible for anyone to see. After that specific entry, there isn't a single trace of any edits—because no edits happened. The server automatically logs every single person's input into a post. There is absolutely no way to sneak an edit in without the system automatically flagging the exact time of the change.
You posted your comment—your little "complaint"—at 3:37 PM. Nowhere in that text do you actually mention anything missing, nor do you point out any discrepancies found during that ten-minute window. And honestly—if you were even actually present and reading during those ten minutes—who exactly are you trying to persecute here?
Three days later, you’re suddenly "discovering" that the post was retroactively edited. You’re forcefully inventing a motive and a specific interpretation—claiming there was some insult—that simply isn't there. Nowhere.
You’re trying to imply that I, as a moderator, along with the entire moderation team here, have the power to just tweak posts whenever we feel like it. As if we actually do that!
Your claim that you aren't prone to lying because of your faith—well, looking at the facts, it points directly back to what I said in two previous posts: you are obsessed with a persecution complex regarding the moderators. At this point, you're just deceiving yourself.

As for everything else you keep repeating, and repeating, and repeating... there's honestly no point in even responding.

I said what I said, yet somehow you twisted it into whatever version suits your narrative.
Go ahead, keep writing. As long as you stay within the forum rules and don't derail threads with things that don't belong, you'll be treated exactly like everyone else. That’s how it works.
But let’s be clear: you owe me an apology. You really do!
And frankly, it would be the Christian thing to do to offer one.
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#22 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:So, basically... the word. I suppose we should probably talk about the concept of a presidential pardon—though, given how things tend to spiral lately, I find myself questioning whether such an act even serves its intended purpose anymore. It’s a heavy thing, really—the power to essentially wipe the slate clean—but when it feels like it's being used as a tool for political maneuvering rather than true justice, it leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. I guess it’s just one of those instances where the system feels less like a mechanism for fairness and more like a series of calculated moves by whoever happens to be holding the pen at the moment. It's messy, it's complicated, and frankly, it's exhausting to watch. And a word. Love—it’s such an abstract, messy concept, isn't it? I’ve been sitting here thinking about it—really digging into what people actually mean when they use that word—and I guess it’s more complicated than the Hallmark cards would have us believe. It isn't just some fleeting feeling or a rush of dopamine; it’s something much deeper, perhaps even more deliberate. Or maybe I'm overthinking it—that's probably a habit of mine—but there seems to be a distinction between simple affection and true, soul-deep devotion. It’s that quiet, steady kind of care that persists even when things get difficult—not just the easy, sunny days, but the grit and the struggle too. I suppose we often mistake the excitement for the actual substance, which is a bit of a tragedy, if you ask me. They actually carry two distinct meanings. ☕

I was the one who actually "introduced" this whole concept of being "caressed/loved"—and that was only after you dropped that line, "Well, why don't you be the one to caress me, then?"

Of course I understood what you were getting at—my response was really just a play on words, if you want to call it that. It was a joke. A bit of Scherzo.

I don't really follow those book complaint pdf religion files being discussed here—I mostly just drop in from time to time for my own reasons—but even so, let me offer you one unsolicited piece of advice: just relax a little. Try looking at the world through a slightly brighter lens and learn to distinguish what actually matters from what doesn't. Your posts on this forum are just so saturated with bitterness, dissatisfaction, and anger... honestly. Life is filled with far more significant and beautiful things than chasing down "justice" and rigid principles within some entirely virtual community. Even if you feel this deep-seated urge to "fix the world"—and I’m not being sarcastic when I say that—there are much better, much more productive ways and places to go about it.

It honestly breaks my heart a little bit to see someone carrying that much bitterness—it’s just... I don't know, it's heavy. When someone is that consumed by resentment, it eventually has to spill over into their actual, everyday life, right? It's inevitable.
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#23 ·
Chris Peterson53 said:You'll end up in tears, Peter Stewart6!🙂
The automatic server entries—the ones that moderators can't touch or influence—are pretty straightforward.

I don't have anything else to add. My point is clear. What I read...
That’s exactly what I was getting at. It was written plain as day: "you're obsessed."
What exactly counts as an "automatic server enrollment" and what doesn't? Honestly, I don't really care.
Don't change my nickname. My avatar is clearly visible right there. 🙂

It’s pretty obvious that the post you're claiming I wrote is actually just moderator stuff. If I had a magic wand, I’d use it to change things. Posted at 12:47 AM, link added at 12:57 AM. That entry hasn't been touched; it’s still exactly as it was. There aren't any other logs regarding edits because, well, nothing happened. The server automatically timestamps every single entry. There's just no way to input anything without the system logging the exact time it went in.

Where did I mention a "magic wand"? 🤷 If that’s really how it all works out...
If you're the one writing, then where exactly is that sentence I read? I think I just made that up.
So? And now you’ve come here to complain? It's like being back in kindergarten. 🤦

You posted your comment at 3:37 PM. You didn't mention anything was missing or point out any discrepancies within that ten-minute window after the post went up. And honestly, if you were actually hanging around reading during those ten minutes, who exactly are you persecuting?

Chris Peterson53, stop playing detective. I just wrote my comment and hit submit.
Send over what I wrote and how I read it, just so I can make sure it matches what you put in your post.
Of course I didn't mention that something was missing. I wasn't even looking for it.
In my second post. You're calling me out for changing your words and messing with your content.
It suits me just fine.
After you called me out like that, I went back to the book complaint.
I’m going to go back and read that post of yours again. I need to see exactly what I’m supposedly "missing." You called me out for "dropping words," after all.
Only then did I actually see what we’re talking about. It looks like some words are missing from your post. Or am I just imagining things?

Three days later, you "discover" that the post was edited after the fact. You're basically forcing a specific cause and an interpretation of some supposed insult onto it—even though there's absolutely nothing to back that up.

It wasn't three days later. It was actually right after your second post here. That's what I just...
I wrote that. I couldn't get a response in at the time because I was banned immediately right after.
Is that clearer? I also added some thoughts regarding the book complaint posted by your colleague rowdyhawk10.
Whose power is this? Who exactly is calling the shots? I guess that's just for everyone on the forum to figure out and see for themselves.
The way you two moderate the Religion sub-forum is pretty obvious. There’s more than one thread here on the PŽK that points to how biased and poor your moderation really is.
Of course, you aren't insulting me—you’re being very cultured in your speech. And don't even get me started on your "gentleness." ;rolleyes:

You're implying that I, as a mod—and by extension, all the moderators on this Forum—have the power to edit posts however we please! And that we actually do it!
Your claim that you aren't prone to lying because you're Catholic... in light of the facts, it just shows what I said in my last two posts: you're obsessed with moderator persecution. You're just deceiving yourself.

Chris Peterson53 is acting like she owns the place, constantly playing the mod card. We are talking about *your* moderation style.
"Oh, but" I'm totally obsessed with you; I can't even sleep if I don't see you on the Religion sub-forum, or see rowdyhawk10. 😂
My days are empty and filled with sorrow without your posts. ;rofl:
Hmm, I guess maybe some of these other users are also obsessed with persecution too.
They haven't figured out rowdyhawk10 yet, so they're still being fooled. But fine, let me be the first
to admit I'm deceiving myself. ;cool:

Regarding everything else you keep repeating, over and over... there isn't even any point in responding.

Right, because you're clearly so full of fresh ideas. Why respond then, if there's no point?
Just so you can prove that I'm always right, while you're the one lying, twisting things, deceiving, and planting ideas,
that I'm obsessed with moderator persecution (especially yours), and who knows what else. ;rolleyes:

I said what I said, but you interpreted it in whatever way suited you best.
Keep writing, then. As long as you're a forum user, you can write as long as you don't break the forum rules or post things where they don't belong, you'll be treated exactly like everyone else.
But you owe me an apology: you really do.
And honestly, it would be the Christian thing to do to apologize.

I understood it exactly as it was written: humiliating and rude.
And what exactly was I posting? 🤷 Bombs and explosives? Drugs? 🤣
Sure, you could say that, since the Catholic Church is unbearable to you—it's a total bombshell. Just like
it is to another moderator, haha.
Actually, *you* owe me decent behavior toward a user and respect
for my faith and the Church I belong to. You do. 😁 Because it's because of those same posts about
my faith that you started this war, acting as a mod. Before you got your mod status, you were
polite and kind, aside from one little outburst regarding my post—and that was before you had even
read what it was actually about. We cleared that up in the thread after you admitted
you hadn't read it.
All my posts have been about similar topics since you became a mod. About being a Roman Catholic.
So I don't get why you have such intense animosity now that you're a moderator.
Or maybe I do get it. :lampica:

It would be very Christian of you to apologize if you claim to be a believer. And you say you are.
So why should I apologize to you? I never insulted you with the same words you use against me; I only
cited them as "examples" of insults. Here it is again, over and over, just you repeating yourself and trying to prove a point.
I became what you decided I was. And honestly, I still feel like that's how you see me.

For the same reason, I have no idea where you stand regarding faith or religion. Not that I'm particularly interested in knowing.
That doesn't give you a free pass to smear the Church, insult me as a believer and a member of the Church, or attack me as a person and a user on this forum. Because, as nicole2007 put it: "The biggest crime on this forum is being an
Catholic believer." ☕ Following that logic, I find myself agreeing with Matt, Wild East, and Bast
when they talk about the unfair moderation here—not to mention everyone else who left the Religion PDF because of it.
It isn't lobbying; it’s just a sad reality, as Wild East mentioned over on the PŽK thread. The book complaint pdf religion
Religion says enough, and these few threads right here say plenty too.
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#24 ·
Nicholas King said:I was just playing around with that idea of "showing affection," following up on your comment, "Well, why don't you show me some affection then?"
Of course I knew what you meant. My reply was just a play on words. A joke. A bit of Scherzo.

And I took it exactly as intended. But clearly, someone else didn't. 🙄

I don't really follow the book complaint pdf religion stuff mentioned here; I just drop by occasionally for my own reasons. Regardless, here's a little unsolicited advice: try to relax a bit. Try to look at the brighter side of things and learn to separate the essentials from the trivialities in life. Your posts here seem so heavy with bitterness, dissatisfaction, and anger... Life is full of much more important and beautiful things than trying to enforce "justice" and principles within some completely virtual community. Even if you feel a drive to "fix the world"—and I'm not being sarcastic when I say that—there are many better and more productive ways to go about it.

This is a thread where people can file a book complaint, isn't it, lord? And that's exactly what
I do whenever there's a reason to. Since you don't follow the PDFs, as you put it,
you wouldn't even be able to see the reason. As for "fixing the world" and your unsolicited advice,
maybe you could share those with everyone who comes to the PŽK to complain—at least with those involved in the book complaint pdf religion. Apparently,
we're all overdoing it and chasing "justice." 🙂

It makes me sad to see someone so incredibly bitter—that kind of resentment just has to "spill over" into real life.

Bitterness? Resentment? I have no reason to "spill over," nor any thoughts
about anything "overflowing" into my actual life. 🤣 But thanks for the "concern" regarding how it
"just has to happen." If you say so. 😉 😂 🙂
rowdyhawk10 rowdyhawk10 Active Member
123 messages
joined Oct 2009
#25 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:The sentence you quoted refers specifically to amnesty, rather than what you seem to be implying is a "justification." 🙄
Essentially, the term amnesty and the term clemency carry two distinct meanings. ☕

Well, I suppose you were mostly referring to amnesty rather than clemency.
But I took the joke as well, just like everyone else did. I guess that doesn't mean I'm the only one allowed to make a joke, right? 🤷
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#26 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:cut
Chris Peterson53, stop playing detective. I wrote my comment and hit
send—exactly what I wrote and exactly how I read your post.
Of course I wasn't claiming anything was missing; I wasn't even looking for it. In your
second post, you accused me of twisting your words and content
just to suit my own narrative.
After that accusation, I went back to the book complaint
to reread your post and see exactly what I was supposedly "missing." Since you called me out for "omitting words,"
that's when I finally saw what we're actually debating. There are words missing from your post. Or am I just imagining things?

It didn't happen three days later; it happened right after your second post here. That’s exactly what I
wrote. I couldn't respond then because I was banned immediately afterward.
Is that clear enough? Especially with the added comment on the book complaint from your colleague rowdyhawk10.

cut

My days are empty and filled with sorrow without your posts. ;rofl:

🙂

Well, look at you, still weeping!
You *did* respond to my post (check thread 8), so go ahead—look at your own post (thread 10) where you ended with "...no comment" regarding the previous one!
Factually speaking, this was all before you were banned!
And then, three days later, you suddenly "discover" new facts and "missing parts" of my post...🤣
Do you ever actually bother to review what you've written?
Are you forgetting?
Or does staying chronologically accurate not matter to you—since, in your little crusade, actual facts are apparently irrelevant?
And I can see it bothers you that we even bother responding to your accusations (not your repetitive claims of "insults," since those are clearly baseless).
Clearly, it suits you better if we don't engage (and by "the duo in the canoe," I mean the two of us whom you incessantly harass—you can't seem to mention one of us without mentioning both, which is why I'm using the plural...), so you can continue maintaining this image of yourself as the infinitely "persecuted forum user." 😉

When you run out of real facts, you resort to repeating the same nonsense you've already blathered about in countless posts, circling back to the administration—identifying yourself with this organization that you claim is untouchable and that any critic is simply "smearing."

Just go, for God's sake, and enter the new year with a Christian spirit: love, peace, and tolerance!

And you do owe me an apology!🙂
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#27 ·
Chris Peterson53 said:🙂
And you're still sitting there crying about it!
Did you answer?
Regarding my post (thread 8), please go back and look at your own post (thread 10). I ended that one with "...no comment" in response to your last message.
Factually speaking. Before you get banned!

I might just get myself all tangled up; lol. Honestly, she’d probably love that—to have me completely wound up and caught in her web—but it’s just not going to happen. Hehe.
Yeah, I did answer. No comment on your post. Just stating the facts before I get banned.And I didn't really want to get bogged down in all your "proofs." You gave me instructions. I'm posting this on the book complaint forum, which is exactly why I'm writing. No comment.You can see when I joined. But, I'm not going to comment on your old post here.
(I’m just commenting because I was the one who actually wrote it, haha) After a little while, "colleague rowdyhawk10" decides how things should be.
I probably should have been banned for a serious violation of the Book Complaint rules. And honestly, that’s exactly what happened—someone posted a comment on the same Book at 8:26 PM on December 23rd. But the thing is, I had already been banned at 8:00 PM that same day. Even before that...
I spent some time reading through your post on the Book Complaint page—the one that actually caused you to call me out here for "leaking" info...
I guess I just interpret things however works best for me. Honestly, that little jab is exactly why I went back to check—I saw both his post and yours.
And I ended up getting banned. So, you two basically played a little game of chess on my computer and checkmated me. That’s why I haven't been able to write anything for three days—because of the ban, you know?

And then, three days later, you suddenly decide to "discover" some new facts or parts of my post that you supposedly missed...🤣
Don't you ever actually go back and look at what you wrote?
Are you forgetting?
It’s not even necessary for you to stay chronologically consistent. In your little crusade, actual facts just don't seem to matter much to you anyway.

😉
Based on everything I’ve laid out above, I finally understand why it took me so long to realize this—and why my response was delayed. Honestly, Chris Peterson53, there is just so much more going on in my life right now that I have to manage.
I used to spend my time looking back at everything you wrote, or what "colleague rowdyhawk10" had to say. But fine, if you're really going to insist on this.
Just in time to weigh in. Here’s my take on this.
Regarding all that spam... usually, the people behind it are doing it with actual malice. Ahaa.

And I see it actually bothers you that we’re even responding to your accusations. To be clear, I'm not talking about you just repeating the word "insult" over and over—because those claims are obviously baseless.
It’s clear you’d rather we just don't do this. That pair in the canoe? That’s basically us—the two of us you can't seem to stop chasing. You just can't help mentioning us as a duo, which is why I keep speaking in the plural...😉🙂So, you’re still going to keep up this whole act, acting like you’re some endlessly "persecuted forum user."

Whatever you think you "see," just keep typing, whether you're acting alone or as a duo. 😂
The fact that you two operate as a "complementary pair dedicated to harassing forum users"
really says a lot about how "prepared" you are for a moderator role.
I only saw this on the thread today—it’s a very "fine" way to handle selection. Honestly, I don't feel like
digging through old posts to find specific examples of who said what, especially when things get ugly
and a lot of time has passed. But this is truly a "wonderful example" of the degradation
of both a person and a believer, especially when mentioning "viral infections." Therefore,
you are essentially acting against those who are "infected." , hmm, yeah.

http://www.forum.com/showpost.php?p=2...&postcount=157

So, thanks to No Nick for this link; he was right about certain
things regarding unfair moderation on the Religion book complaint pdf religion. It applied to
rowdyhawk10's moderation, and by choosing you as a moderator, you've quickly
started "delivering results" in the persecution of Catholics on this board. Even if it's just one person, that's enough "for someone."
By admitting that No Nick was right, as I stated, I am not saying that I support him or that
this was any kind of lobbying that rowdyhawk10 will immediately pull out of his "memory drawer." I write what I want, when I want, and as much as I want, without "consulting" anyone—which is just one of the favorite phrases of "colleague" rowdyhawk10.

Because making forum users look like fools, one by one, through the "moderation" you two perform,
will eventually come back to haunt you.
It might have seemed to some at the time that a user was just a "religious fanatic" or an idiot,
which is how you want to portray us. The proof is in the posts you brag about as being "loved" by Barmener,
Wild East, Baste, Matt, myself, etc. No, people are simply reacting to injustice; maybe that will become clearer to you. And it's good that it is this way, otherwise everyone would be too lukewarm, haha.

Since you've run out of actual facts, you resort to repeating what you've already written in countless long posts where you go on and on, constantly identifying yourself with the Catholic Church—that untouchable organization that any critic, regardless of their views, finds hard to "smear."

Just go with God, then enter the AD year with a Christian spirit: love, peace, tolerance!

And you owe me an apology!

Yeah, everything you say is spot on: the Catholic Church and my "identification with it." It sounds exhausting for you. Especially that bolded part, which you clearly lack. Listen, talk about tolerance. Just like "our colleague." 😂
Since when is God dear to you? If He is, then I should be dear to you too, so you can show me "love, peace, and tolerance"
without the exclamation point. Because I'm showing it to you, and to "our colleague" as well. 😁

Oh sure, I'm just trembling with excitement here, wondering how to apologize to you. Should I write it out in calligraphy on parchment? lol
Have a looooovely day, Chris Peterson53. 🙂
rowdyhawk10 rowdyhawk10 Active Member
123 messages
joined Oct 2009
#28 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:Hey there, Chris Peterson53. 🙂



I don't think I've ever received such high praise... 🙂

Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#29 ·
rowdyhawk10 said:


you guys have never really humbled me like this before... 🙂


Well, you’ll be humbled eventually, from Above, by the Cross of Jesus.
🙂
Until then, just lean into the arrogance and the laziness. Provoke as many people as possible,
insult them, spit on everything they hold sacred—basically, just revel in the mess of spiritual decay
while pretending to be all honest and upright.

And when that time comes, it’s going to be a real disaster. Just total misery. ☕
rowdyhawk10 rowdyhawk10 Active Member
123 messages
joined Oct 2009
#30 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:One day you will be "immersed," from Above, by the Crucifix of Jesus. 🙂

Even if I am somewhat stubborn, I hope it won't weigh more than about six pounds? From that height... it might be a bit fatal, I guess. 😍
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#31 ·
rowdyhawk10 said:

No? Are you guys actually going to stand up for me so things aren't so heavy up there? 🙂

Not likely, 😳 I'm just going to keep adding to your "advocacy" here, fueled by a craving for God's Truth. 🥳
You have a "colleague" there—maybe she can advocate for you just as much as you've been doing for her here. You know, like you're both complementing each other's prayers,
🙂 style.

👋

Edit: It’s going to be fatal for you, and that "weight" isn't measured in pounds. ☕
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#32 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:Not even close—😳 I’m just going to add my two cents regarding your supposed "commitment" here, especially since you claim such a passion for God's Truth. 🥳
Why don't you find a "colleague" to advocate for you the same way you supposedly do for her here? You know, so you can both support each other's little cause,
🙂 much like that style.

👋

Edit: It might just end up being fatal for you, and let me tell you—that kind of "weight" isn't measured in pounds. ☕

No chance in hell...🙄

He's already a big boy!

I’m rooting for you—it would be a damn shame if you lost the entire purpose of your virtual existence...👍

👋
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#33 ·
Chris Peterson53 said:Not a chance....🙄

He's a big boy now!

I'm rooting for you; it would be terrible if you lost the whole point of your virtual existence....👍

👋


Yeah, a big boy. 😂

Terrible, truly. But how exactly do you know the purpose of my "virtual existence"? 😁
That would make me, I guess, some kind of "advocate for virtuality." Like I'm on a holodeck. 🤣
Too bad you aren't on the bridge, instead of the holodeck. 😍

Please, be polite. You and your "colleague" shouldn't derail the topic. I want to see the response
from administration, so my complaint is filed with the Vatican. Both of you have made your stances clear in the PDF grievance file and here,
so thanks. 🙂

👋 (I see you like Wayfarer, so let me say it again. Don't plagiarize. 😉).
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#34 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:Exactly, kids. 😂

It’s terrifying, truly—but do you actually understand the whole point of my "virtual existence" here? 😁
I suppose I should be the "advocate for virtuality." Living in a Holodeck. 🤣
Too bad you aren't up on the bridge, outside the Holodeck. 😍

👋 (I see you're into wavy stuff, so let me say it again. Don't transcribe. 😉).


So, if you could translate this for me: you like, wavy...🙂
That language is completely foreign to me!😉

So, my good little angel, does that mean I don't need to worry about walking through the cathedral...
where some tower might collapse on me because of your well-wishes... or maybe an angel statue falls... 🙂 or the entire cathedral itself... 🙄
it would probably be wise to take cover, wouldn't it?
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#35 ·
Look... this isn't the place for casual chatter among friends...🙄 while you're sitting there waiting on a response from the admins...
...and besides, this thread isn't exactly your private property...😍
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#36 ·
Chris Peterson53 said:So you're just gonna like it, weirdo...🙂
I don't recognize this language!😉

Is it really? 😲 Alright, fine. If there's something you don't know. 😉

Look, Peter Stewart6, I really shouldn't be afraid of walking past the cathedral...
I don't know... maybe some tower would collapse on me, if you're wishing it so. Or maybe an angel statue falls... or even an entire cathedral.🙄
It would probably be a good idea to stay cautious, wouldn't it?

Listen, lady, I don't really go around planting those kinds of "good wishes." 🙂 That’s just your imagination running wild.
Reading this... honestly, it’s just a mess of random thoughts. My heart can barely take it. Well, as they say, it is what it is. No rhyme or reason left to find. 🤣

Well, man... what can you say? 🤣
Not really, and honestly, things are just like that too. 😂 It doesn't look like those PDF topics belong to you or some "colleague," but they certainly act like they do. 😍
Brian Edwards6 Brian Edwards6 Active Member
112 messages
joined Nov 2015
#37 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:One day, you will be "immersed," from Above, by the Crucifix of Jesus.
🙂
Until then, go ahead and indulge in your arrogance and complacency: provoke as many people as possible,
belittle them, spit on their sacred things—in short, enjoy wallowing in the mud of spiritual misery
while simultaneously pretending to be all about honesty and integrity.

And the consequence will be exactly what you'd expect: woe, woe, woe, oh no, oh boy, help me. ☕

A true Catholic woman...👍
You might want to remove the Good Pope from your signature. It doesn't quite align with the sentiment expressed above it.🤷
Chris Peterson53 Chris Peterson53 Active Member
114 messages
joined Dec 2010
#38 ·
Susan Brooks83 said:Oh, really? 😲 'Sure, let's just assume you know everything then. 😉

Listen, lady—I don't cultivate those kinds of "good intentions." 🙂 It’s nothing more than your own imagination,
as I read with regret, spinning all sorts of fantasies. And heartaches. Well, if it rhymes, it rhymes; I'm not a poet. 🤣

Edit: Oh, come on now, friend! 🤣
No, seriously—look, 😂 the topics in this PDF aren't your private property nor does anyone "colleague" own them, though you seem to act like they do. 😍


A silent night's sleep I wish you, Peter Stewart6!

To the moderators of this space
who seek mindful deliberation here,
may you choose to rest and retire
until the sun rises for all to admire....

...like a fox in the Shire...

.....your devoted Fuchsin!

👋
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#39 ·
Brian Edwards6 said:A true Catholic...👍
Maybe you should take "Good Pope" out of your signature. It doesn't really fit with what you wrote above it.🤷

Well, this is just who I am. I'm far from perfect.
But apparently, you're the expert on how to categorize Catholics,😁 into the right ones and the wrong ones.
🙄 👍
First you give me advice about changing my signature, and then you aren't even sure if it actually matches
the text or not. 😬 Not exactly convinced by your judgment on what works and what doesn't. 🙂
Peter Stewart6 Peter Stewart6 MemberOP
18 messages
joined May 2010
#40 ·
Chris Peterson53 said:Wishing you a quiet night's sleep, Peter Stewart6!

To the moderators acting here
in this space of thoughtful reflection
I'll choose to rest and step away
until the morning light begins to play....

...like a fox in the Shire...

.....yours sincerely, Fuchsin!

👋

Yeah man, zero zero seven 🤣 Meine nicht 😱 oh well 😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads