CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Started by Sam Hall15 · · 👁 57 views · 1.8K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Sam Hall15Laura Lopez29Alexander Hughes2Ashley RamirezSandra Reyes7George Clark19Harold Ramirez49Gerald Lewis36Hannah Phillips50John Parker6darkmakerwearysailor3Kimberly Hughes23Walter Myers4coastaljackal8Elizabeth Ross48Susan Ruiz76darkraven10Frank Wright7Chloe Lee72Morgan Miller7Justin Parker4hiddensurfer17feralfox12 …
Kate Newman2 Kate Newman2 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Mar 2011
#1261 ·
Kate Newman2 said:I had my hormone levels checked on day 3 of my cycle since I've been trying to get pregnant for a while now. Here are the results:

LH 8.0
FSH 28.8
PROGESTERONE 0.4
PROLACTIN 223
TESTOSTERONE 0.28
ESTRADIOL 35.4
CORTISOL 155

Thyroid hormones

TSH 1.56
T3 1.6
T4 320

Can anyone help me make sense of this? Could any of this be why I'm having trouble conceiving?

Sample taken at 11:57 AM
Follicular phase reference ranges:
LH (2.4-12.6)
FSH (3.5-12.5)
PROGESTERONE (0.2-1.5)
PROLACTIN (102-496)
TESTOSTERONE (0.06-0.82)
ESTRADIOL (12.5 -166)

CORTISOL
8 - 10 AM (175-536)
4 - 8 PM (64-327)

TSH (0.27-4.20)
T3 (1.3 - 3.1)
T4 (66-181)

I am 32 years old.
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#1262 ·
Kate Newman2 said:I had my hormone levels checked on day 3 of my cycle because I've been trying to conceive for a while now. Here are the results:

LH 8.0
FSH 28.8
PROGESTERONE 0.4
PROLACTIN 223
TESTOSTERONE 0.28
ESTRADIOL 35.4
CORTISOL 155

Thyroid hormones

TSH 1.56
T3 1.6
T4 320

Can anyone interpret this for me? Could any of this be a potential reason for infertility?

Dear Kate Newman2,

It’s difficult to provide a definitive answer based on a single set of hormone levels alone. If fertility issues are suspected, it will clearly require a thorough medical evaluation of both partners.

What stands out in these results is that the baseline FSH is somewhat elevated. Testing FSH on day 3 of the cycle is typically used to assess ovarian reserve—essentially one way to gauge how the ovaries respond to hormonal stimulation.

However, this single data point doesn't tell the whole story. FSH levels can fluctuate significantly from one cycle to the next, so drawing any firm conclusions based solely on one measurement would be premature.

Regarding the thyroid function, there appears to be a discrepancy between the TSH and the total T4. Normally, standard TSH levels suggest healthy thyroid function, but an elevated total T4 might suggest overactivity. In a situation like this, determining fT4 (free thyroxine) is necessary, as total T4 isn't always a reliable indicator of thyroid function; various factors can cause it to appear falsely high.

All signs point toward thyroid function likely being normal, but checking fT4 is still a necessary step.

In short, these specific numbers aren't enough to pinpoint a cause for infertility or decreased fertility.

Further investigation is required.

I wish you the very best in your journey toward starting a family.

Best regards. 🙂
silentwolf53 silentwolf53 Member
45 messages
joined May 2011
#1263 ·
ECG results after a minor car accident.
Is this just from the shock, or is it something more serious? They really spooked me—told me once I recover from the concussion and the shock, they need to run more tests just to double-check everything...
😳
Sorry if the quality is bad—I had to take a photo using a webcam because none of the doctors will tell me anything. Apparently, they don't want me worrying or "overreacting."
Part one
Part two

One part also says sinus tachycardia, rightward Axis.

Is that actually normal given what happened?
wearybison35 wearybison35 Member
11 messages
joined Feb 2010
#1264 ·
silentwolf53 said:ECG results after a minor car accident.
Is this just because of the shock, or is it something more serious? Because they really spooked me, saying once I recover from the concussion and the shock and all that, they want to run more tests just to double-check everything...
😳
Sorry if the quality isn't great, but I had to take a photo with my webcam since none of the doctors will tell me anything—they say they don't want me worrying too much or being an anxious mess.
Part one
Part two

One part also mentions sinus tachycardia and a rightward axis.

Is that actually considered normal given everything that happened?

Look, considering the whole car wreck situation, this isn't exactly a shocking finding... tachycardia isn't all that weird, even for people who haven't gone through a massive stress spike like this, simply because deep down your subconscious is basically screaming "stay on alert." Besides, we're talking about a heart rate just slightly over 100, which is pretty much right on the edge anyway.

As for that rightward axis thing, it's totally possible in, say, tall, thin people... and looking at this, I don't see any signs of hypertrophy, bundle branch blocks, or a myocardial infarction, so that shouldn't be anything to sweat over either.
🙂
silentwolf53 silentwolf53 Member
45 messages
joined May 2011
#1265 ·
ok, thank you so much. 🙂
Kimberly Edwards2 Kimberly Edwards2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2008
#1266 ·
Neutrophil % 42
Eosinophil % 26
MCV 81.3

Bilirubin 26
Cholesterol 1.3
LDL cholesterol 4.0

Everything else looks normal.

I could really use some help interpreting these blood work results...
I'm mostly worried about the eosinophils at 26%—the reference range is usually 0-7%. From what I've read, this is linked to parasites or bacteria. Does anyone know how to get this back to normal?
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#1267 ·
Kimberly Edwards2 said:Neutrophils 42
Eosinophils 26
MCV 81.3

Bilirubin 26
Cholesterol 1.3
LDL cholesterol 4.0

Everything else is within range.

I need help interpreting these blood and chemistry results...
The eosinophil count (26, when the normal range is 0-7) is what worries me most. From what I've read, it relates to parasites or bacteria. How can I get this back to normal?

Dear Joe Rogan,

Looking at your CBC, the primary issue is eosinophilia—essentially an elevated eosinophil count. There isn't just one cause; it’s often tied to allergic conditions (think asthma, hives, or drug sensitivities) or parasitic infections. Skin issues like atopic dermatitis are also common culprits. Once those possibilities are ruled out, other causes can be explored.

Essentially, you need to identify why the count is high first. Once the underlying issue is treated, the levels should normalize.

Pinpointing the cause depends heavily on your actual symptoms—things like changes in bowel movements, abdominal pain, respiratory issues, or skin irritation. Follow-up tests, such as total IgE or stool samples for parasites, will be necessary.

Regarding your other numbers, take note of the elevated LDL cholesterol. You'll likely want to address that through regular exercise and diet, following whatever guidance your primary care physician provides.

Please discuss these findings directly with your doctor.

Best regards. 🙂
driftingtrucker4 driftingtrucker4 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2009
#1268 ·
Seeking some guidance... My recent blood work came back showing elevated triglycerides. I recall hearing years ago about certain natural remedies—like fresh beet juice mixed with lemon or similar concoctions—that might help lower these levels. If anyone has experience with this, please share your insights. Much appreciated! 🙂)))))))))))))
Kimberly Edwards2 Kimberly Edwards2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2008
#1269 ·
Thanks to Felix the Cat for the response. Regarding the urinary system—it definitely isn't that since I'm not feeling any symptoms there, and the same goes for allergies; it seems to be that other thing mentioned.
Today I saw my doctor and picked up some referrals—so now I'm heading to see an infectious disease specialist.
Thanks again, truly.
Kate Newman2 Kate Newman2 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Mar 2011
#1270 ·
Maria Fisher46 said:Dear Kate Newman2,

It’s a bit tough to give you a definitive answer based on just one set of hormone levels. If we’re looking at fertility concerns or decreased fertility, both partners really need a thorough medical evaluation to get the full picture.

Looking at these results, the baseline FSH value seems slightly elevated. We usually check FSH on day 3 of the cycle to gauge ovarian reserve—basically, it's one way doctors see how the ovaries respond to hormonal stimulation.

That said, this single data point doesn't tell us everything. FSH levels can fluctuate quite a bit from one cycle to the next, so jumping to any conclusions based on just one measurement would be premature.

Regarding the thyroid markers, there's a slight discrepancy between the TSH and the total T4. Normally, if TSH is within range, it suggests the thyroid is functioning fine—but since the total T4 was high, it could suggest overactivity. In cases like this, we really need to check the fT4 (free thyroxine), because total T4 isn't always the most reliable indicator; plenty of different factors can cause it to spike falsely.

All signs point to the thyroid likely functioning normally, but checking that fT4 is still the best next step.

To wrap things up, these specific numbers don't provide enough information to pinpoint the underlying cause of any fertility issues.

There’s more investigation to be done.

Wishing you all the very best in your journey toward starting a family.

Best regards. 🙂

Thank you so much for this response.
It turns out that initial reading really was a false positive! I'd love to know why that happens, but regardless, I went back for more testing. They included the fT4 this time, and here are the results:
TSH 1.64 (0.27-4.20)
T3 1.7 (1.3 - 3.1)
T4 88 (66-181)
FT4 15 (12-22)

Now I'm hoping it's the same story with the FSH—I'll be re-checking that as well.
Carol White18 Carol White18 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2011
#1271 ·
I was wondering if anyone could help me understand what the ANCA and AFL test results actually show.
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#1272 ·
Carol White18 said:Need some advice. My lab results just came back showing elevated triglycerides. I remember hearing a long time ago about natural remedies—things like fresh beet juice mixed with lemon or similar concoctions—that can help bring those numbers down. If anyone here knows anything about this, please share your knowledge. Thanks in advance! 🙂)))))))))))))

In response to your question, I think it’s best to quote a portion of Oscar Wilde's post.

Carol White18 said:(...)
Recommendations for hypertriglyceridemia:
http://i53.tinypic.com/euettc.jpg
http://i51.tinypic.com/zmy55h.jpg

The full post can be found over in the thyroid discussion thread:

As you can see, both beets and lemons made the list of recommended foods. You've clearly done your homework.

Don't forget that if you want to see real results, you need more than just one fix. It’s about the whole chain: eating right, staying active—I mean at least 30 minutes of movement every single day—keeping your weight in check, and finally, kicking the smoking habit. Everything is connected.

Greetings. 🙂

Carol White18 said:Thank you all from the bottom of my heart for this response.
It was definitely a false positive. Regardless, I went back for more testing. They included my fT4 this time, and here are the results:
TSH 1.64 (0.27-4.20). Within the normal range.
T3 1.7 (1.3 - 3.1)
T4 88 (66-181)
FT4 15 (12-22)

I'm hoping the FSH levels follow the same pattern. I'll be checking that as well.

Immune function is normal, just as I suspected.

T4 levels can sometimes be falsely elevated for several reasons. It’s not always a direct reflection of thyroid function. For instance, taking oral contraceptives or estrogen supplements can skew the results. Pregnancy, certain liver diseases, or even just genetic factors can play a role too.

However, looking at your follow-up measurements, your T4 levels came back perfectly normal. It’s unlikely that the factors mentioned above played a role here. It seems more probable that there was a hiccup during the lab process itself—essentially just a technical error in the testing procedure.

Greetings. 🙂

Carol White18 said:I was hoping for some clarification regarding the ANCA and NFL lab results.

ANCA stands for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. These markers are primarily used to help diagnose vascular diseases (vasculitis), kidney issues (certain types of glomerulonephritis), and various other conditions like inflammatory bowel disease or certain liver and bile duct disorders.

NFL (aPL) refers to antiphospholipid antibodies. These can be detected in the blood of patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome, a condition characterized by frequent blood clots (thrombosis) in both veins and arteries, recurrent miscarriages, and pregnancy complications.

A few points to keep in mind: interpreting these antibody tests is highly complex. It isn’t something for a general practitioner to handle alone; it falls squarely within the expertise of subspecialists like immunologists or rheumatologists. Simply having a positive result for one of these—especially since there are many different subtypes—isn't enough to confirm a diagnosis. You really need to consult with a specialist to make sense of these findings.

Best regards. 🙂
Carol White18 Carol White18 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2011
#1273 ·
Thanks, much appreciated, Felix.
electricpanther55 electricpanther55 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#1274 ·
Hey there!
I was wondering if anyone could give me a layman's breakdown of what this report actually means:

The joint surfaces of the joints shown in the right foot images are congruent.
No signs of periosteal reaction.
No definite osteolytic changes in the skeleton are noted.
Mineralization is appropriate for age.

Thanks so much in advance!
wanderingcobra76 wanderingcobra76 Member
44 messages
joined Nov 2010
#1275 ·
electricpanther55 said:Hi there!
I'm looking for a layman's interpretation of this report:

The joint structures shown in the right foot X-rays are congruent.
There are no signs of periosteal reaction.
No definitive osteolytic skeletal changes are identified.
Mineralization is appropriate for age.

Thanks in advance!

It looks like a perfectly normal X-ray of the right foot.
Maria Perez46 Maria Perez46 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jan 2014
#1276 ·
Moderators, my apologies if I’m reopening this thread; I just couldn't seem to find it again. 🤷

To get straight to the point, I'm feeling "a little" anxious because my recent immunology results just came back, and they aren't exactly reassuring.

It all started with intense stress—I recently started a new job that hasn't been a great fit—and some blurred vision in my right eye back in February. I had some ophthalmology tests done which didn't show anything unusual, and things seemed to settle down for a while.

About a month ago, the symptoms returned, accompanied by severe headaches. This coincided with more stress at work and a death in the family, so I kept sweeping it under the rug, hoping it would pass on its own.

But, as it turns out... I recently saw a neurologist who, given the severity of the headaches, ordered several tests, including an EEG, an MRI (to rule out the worst-case scenarios), and immunology panels.

The EEG and MRI were perfectly fine (🙂🙂, but the immunology results show the following:

ENZYMES: CK 47 (reference value) U/L 50-153
CRP 0.4 (reference value) mg/L <5
RF <20.0 (reference value) IU/ml 0-30

ds DNA 22.70 (reference value) U/ml <20
ENA NEGATIVE
anti SS-A/Ro 0.80 (reference value) U/ml 0-15
anti Jo-1 0.20 (reference value) U/ml 1-15
ANA - ELISA 140.90 (reference value) U/ml 0-55

Now, I realize none of us are doctors here (mostly 🙂), but I'm wondering if anyone has dealt with something similar or what these numbers actually mean. Just looking for some layman's perspective, as my digging through the internet hasn't left me any smarter. I am particularly concerned about the elevated ANA - ELISA; those antinuclear antibodies are more than triple the normal limit. 🤷🤷😕

I fully intend to follow up with my doctor, but I think I'll be eating myself alive with worry until Monday. If anyone has any advice, thoughts, or even just a comment... I'd appreciate it.

Thank you!
wiredcanyon2 wiredcanyon2 Member
32 messages
joined Apr 2011
#1277 ·
Maria Perez46 said:Mods, sorry if I’m reopening this thread, just couldn't find the old one. 🤷

Anyway, I’m "a little" freaking out because my immunology markers just came back and, honestly, they don't look great.

It all kicked off with a massive amount of stress (new job that I just can't get into the groove of) and some blurry vision in my right eye back in February. I went for eye exams, which turned up nothing, and things settled down for a bit.

Then about a month ago, everything flared up again, along with killer headaches. It hit right when work got crazy and we had a death in the family, so I just swept it all under the rug thinking it would pass on its own.

But, apparently not... I saw a neurologist recently, and because the headaches were so bad, they ordered a bunch of tests—EEG, an MRI (to rule out the scary stuff), and some immunology panels.

The EEG and MRI were totally fine (🙂🙂, but the immunology results show this:

ENZYMES: CK 47 (ref value) U/L 50-153
CRP 0.4 (ref value) mg/L RF ml 0-30

ds DNA 22.70 (ref value) U/ml ENA NEGATIVE
anti SS-A/Ro 0.80 (ref value) U/ml 0-15
anti Jo-1 0.20 (ref value) U/ml 1-15
ANA - ELISA 140.90 (ref value) U/ml 0-55

Look, I know none of us here are doctors (mostly 🙂), but I’m wondering if anyone has dealt with something similar or what these numbers actually mean? Just looking for a layman's perspective, because I tried digging online and it didn't help much. I'm especially worried about the high ANA - ELISA; those antinuclear antibodies are triple what they should be. 🤷 🤷 😕

Obviously, I’m going to see my doctor, but I think I’m going to eat myself alive waiting until Monday. If anyone has any advice, thoughts, or even just a "hang in there," I'm all ears.

Thanks!

Your dsDNA antibodies are slightly elevated and your ANA (antinuclear antibodies) are high too. It's impossible to say exactly what's going on without knowing your full medical history, your specific symptoms, or if there's anything similar running in your family. Broadly speaking, this could point toward an autoimmune disorder, but you can't diagnose those based on lab work alone—you need a clinical exam and further testing. Just keep in mind that ANA and dsDNA aren't super specific markers; they can pop up in various autoimmune conditions (like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis), but they can also show up due to certain infections or even just being on oral contraceptives...
Maria Perez46 Maria Perez46 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jan 2014
#1278 ·
wiredcanyon2 said:Your dsDNA antibodies and ANA (antinuclear antibodies) levels are both elevated. It's difficult to pinpoint exactly what this means without knowing your full medical history, your specific symptoms, or if there's a family history of similar issues. Generally speaking, this could point toward an autoimmune disorder, though lab results alone aren't enough for a diagnosis—you'd need a clinical exam and further testing. Keep in mind that ANA and dsDNA can be non-specific markers found in various conditions like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis, but they can also pop up due to certain infections or even medications like oral contraceptives...

Yes, I read that too, and now I'm honestly terrified. I know how serious autoimmune diseases can be.

There is a history of rheumatoid arthritis in my family, though my rheumatoid factor came back normal.

I don't take birth control, but it's true that right before the blood draw, I took quite a few painkillers and some anxiety medication... I wonder if that could have had any impact.
wiredcanyon2 wiredcanyon2 Member
32 messages
joined Apr 2011
#1279 ·
Maria Perez46 said:Yeah, I read that too, and now I'm honestly freaking out because I know how heavy autoimmune stuff can be.

I have rheumatoid arthritis in my family, though my rheumatoid factor came back normal.

I'm not on birth control, but to be fair, right before my blood work, I had taken quite a few painkillers, some anxiety meds, and things like that, so I don't know if that could have messed with the results.

Look, having rheumatoid arthritis in the family is just one predisposition. You have to realize that not everyone with RA will test positive for the R-factor. Also, having a family history of RA just means a close relative has a higher chance of developing *some* kind of autoimmune disorder, not necessarily RA specifically. Some anticonvulsants can definitely mess with ANA levels, but I'm not sure about those anti-anxiety meds—I'm guessing you mean something like Xanax—I haven't heard of them causing this specific effect, but for heaven's sake, don't hide that from your doctor. Even if you just took them on your own, tell them so they can interpret the findings correctly. Sometimes people even test positive for these antibodies without actually being sick, so... it’s not automatically a disaster. Just wait and see. The main thing is how you feel. Are you actually dealing with any symptoms or weird signs right now?
Maria Perez46 Maria Perez46 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jan 2014
#1280 ·
wiredcanyon2 said:Well, rheumatoid arthritis is just one possibility. It’s important to note that not everyone with RA will test positive for R-factor. Also, having a family history of rheumatoid arthritis simply means a close relative has a higher chance of developing some kind of autoimmune disorder, not necessarily RA specifically. Certain anticonvulsants can impact ANA levels, but I'm not sure about sedatives—I assume you mean Normabel or Xanax. I haven't heard of those causing such an effect, but definitely don't withhold that information from your doctor. Even if you took them on your own, they need to know so the results can be interpreted correctly. Sometimes antibodies show up positive even when the person isn't actually ill, so... it’s not necessarily dire. Just wait. The most important thing is how you feel. Are you experiencing any specific symptoms or signs right now?

I guess... I had terrible headaches until recently, but they're fading now. These last few days have been okay. The only thing is, I feel pretty exhausted and my muscles ache.

But I wouldn't say I'm feeling absolutely awful right now, other than mentally. I'm a massive hypochondriac, so this has practically broken me...

I’ve been taking Helix... and quite a bit of Advil for the migraines.

I know autoimmune diseases are a huge pain in the ass with no cure, just ways to manage them, so... yeah.

Looking back, I often used to wake up with pains in my hands. I thought it was just because I sleep on them, but now I’m thinking maybe it wasn't. And I get tingling in my hands and feet too. I always assumed it was just poor circulation and inactivity, especially since my neck is a bit messed up. ☕

I remember about two years ago, I had a fever over 98.6 for more than two months, and the doctor told me it wasn't "anything serious."

Thinking back now, maybe all of that together was actually a sign... I don't know.

The worst part is waiting until Monday to see my doctor to find out what happens next. 🤷 I think I might lose my mind by then!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads