CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Jack Nicholson Giveaway!!! (Oct 25 - 28)

Jack Nicholson Giveaway!!! (Oct 25 - 28)

Started by Anthony Smith3 · · 👁 7 views · 316 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Smith3quietdriver3ruggedfox28feralorca82briskhound2Jamie Nelson10Donna Gray4Christian Taylor3nimblecrane20Larry Harris8goldenhound32cosmiclynx57Austin Alvarez62Jason Jones2Andrew Roberts3Ronald Bishop3Jessica Gonzalezplacidmaker37Carl Flores28Jerry Grant3Walter Grant5James Hayes5casualsailorMatthew Anderson4 …
Richard Johnson42 Richard Johnson42 Member
20 messages
joined Jan 2015
#301 ·
It sounds absolutely insane—honestly, even a little bit idiotic—to suggest that this was rigged. I mean, seriously. There is just no logic to it whatsoever. No sense at all. 🤷
Anthony Smith3 Anthony Smith3 RegularOP
511 messages
joined May 2009
#302 ·
I don't want this to look like some kind of targeted attack on 593, because it isn't... it just caught my eye and shifted my focus there. I'm asking everyone to weigh in so I can figure out my next move.
Richard Johnson42 Richard Johnson42 Member
20 messages
joined Jan 2015
#303 ·
Anthony Smith3 said:I don't want this to look like some kind of targeted attack on 593, because it isn't... it just caught my eye and shifted my focus there. I'm asking everyone to weigh in so I can figure out my next move.

Just keep running the show if you've still got the energy! Honestly, I admire your drive—it's clear there's a whole crowd here that actually lives for these games. 👍Personally, I'd be playing way more if life allowed it; the missions are top-tier. My only gripe? I can't stand those ones with the difficulty spikes—total dealbreaker for me.😳😁
Lisa Ross65 Lisa Ross65 Active Member
108 messages
joined May 2009
#304 ·
Maybe you should consider implementing a cooldown period—say, thirty days—where award winners are barred from entering new sweepstakes. It would give others a fair shot at winning something instead of the same people sweeping the board every time.
feralorca82 feralorca82 Active Member
154 messages
joined Mar 2011
#305 ·
Anthony Smith3, don't even bother stressing over it. Honestly, I don't get it either—it makes zero sense (like you said) to host a giveaway at your own expense and then rig the whole thing 😂
. What's the actual point?! 🤣

If anyone has doubts, just speak up. Say what's on your mind or ask a question directly.
And no, Anthony Smith3 and I aren't old friends or anything. We've actually only crossed paths twice, both times during the prize handoffs for the first two giveaways. We haven't even managed to meet up for the third one yet because we've both been slammed with work
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#306 ·
Since I’ve been in the thick of all three rounds—and honestly, managed to scrape by for an honorable mention in two of them—I feel like I pretty much have to weigh in here...

When it comes to people whining about the rules, the only "valid" complaint could’ve come from our side—those of us who jumped the gun and replied before the deadline—but I don't see the point in even bringing that up (and I doubt anyone else does, either)... actually, I’m kind of just stoked with how things turned out 🙂 since I wasn't even planning on playing. What 593 did there was pure attention-seeking because—get this—someone expressed a tiny bit of doubt about whether the game was being played right. It doesn't matter who said it, what they said, or when... the point is, it got mentioned. And for what...? The game didn't fail; if anything, it sparked interest, brought people in, and—to put it lightly—brought everyone together for one really interesting conversation without any accusations or toxic vibes. Man, it's crazy that this needs to be torn apart now... after seeing someone announce, present, and follow through on everything promised—(I remember 593 being negative back then too, questioning if the winners would actually get their prizes from the first round)—all without creating any drama. Whether she was speaking for herself or others—if someone had a real issue, they should just grow some cojones and say it to their face. Anything else is just... pathetic.

Sorry, Anthony Smith3, I've been reading through the chaos and felt like I had to be blunt, so excuse me if I'm a little direct. To everyone else, I hope to see you at the next event, and let's hope it stays just as intense as this one. 👍
Joshua Smith5 Joshua Smith5 Active Member
68 messages
joined Jul 2010
#307 ·
Dragonrage, I’m jumping into the next giveaway too. Hopefully you'll leak me the answers ahead of time, just like you did for feralorca82. 😉

🤣 🙏
feralorca82 feralorca82 Active Member
154 messages
joined Mar 2011
#308 ·
Joshua Smith5 said:Dragonrage, I’m jumping into the next giveaway too. Hopefully you'll leak me the answers ahead of time, just like you did for feralorca82. 😉

🤣 🙏

Look, Dragon, just give me the straight answers. 😈
🤣
Chloe Young9 Chloe Young9 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2006
#309 ·
I’m not exactly an expert on how these gaming tournaments work, but if I’ve got this right, Dragonrage handles everything solo? Like, they're just pulling the prize pools out of their own pocket without any big corporate sponsors getting involved?
I actually know feralorca82 personally, and they’re definitely not someone you have to worry about—though maybe keep things professional, haha.
Honestly, it would be a real shame if you didn't go through with that final giveaway. Everything you've put together here deserves a massive amount of credit.
And I don't just mean the money side of things; the sheer organization required is impressive.

So, yeah, you have my vote. Don't let the trolls get to you.
Richard Johnson42 Richard Johnson42 Member
20 messages
joined Jan 2015
#310 ·
Chloe Young9 said:I’m not exactly an expert on how these gaming tournaments work, but if I’ve got this right, Dragonrage handles everything solo? Like, they're just pulling the prize pools out of their own pocket without any big corporate sponsors getting involved?
I actually know feralorca82 personally, and they’re definitely not someone you have to worry about—though maybe keep things professional, haha.
Honestly, it would be a real shame if you didn't go through with that final giveaway. Everything you've put together here deserves a massive amount of credit.
And I don't just mean the money side of things; the sheer organization required is impressive.

So, yeah, you have my vote. Don't let the trolls get to you.

Are you working with them too? Like, do you guys have some kind of official partnership going on?🤣🤣
feralorca82 feralorca82 Active Member
154 messages
joined Mar 2011
#311 ·
Chloe Young9 said:I’m not exactly an expert on how these gaming tournaments work, but if I’ve got this right, Dragonrage handles everything solo? Like, they're just pulling the prize pools out of their own pocket without any big corporate sponsors getting involved?
I actually know feralorca82 personally, and they’re definitely not someone you have to worry about—though maybe keep things professional, haha.
Honestly, it would be a real shame if you didn't go through with that final giveaway. Everything you've put together here deserves a massive amount of credit.
And I don't just mean the money side of things; the sheer organization required is impressive.

So, yeah, you have my vote. Don't let the trolls get to you.

You absolute menace! 😂🤣
ironbear6 ironbear6 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Oct 2010
#312 ·
The game was awesome (like I said, I would've joined sooner if I hadn't missed the sign-up 🙏).

Honestly, it makes zero sense that anyone would bother rigging a game where I’m the one footing the bill for prizes and doing all the heavy lifting for organization.
Negative comments are apparently inevitable, but I'm just ignoring them—everything was handled completely transparently and fairly.
Eric Jackson68 Eric Jackson68 Active Member
62 messages
joined Aug 2007
#313 ·
I am fully behind this game!
Christian Taylor3 Christian Taylor3 Active Member
213 messages
joined Jul 2010
#314 ·
I think he pretty much covered everything I was going to say. 😛

If anyone feels the need to lodge future complaints, throw out accusations, or engage in those little provocations—you know, the "he’s clearly cheating because he’s better than me" or "he’s just doing this for attention" types of things (which, let's be honest, are worlds apart from actual constructive discussion before or after a prize game)—there is a designated spot for all that: the Film Complaint and Suggestion PDF.

@Dragonrage

Keep up the good work. 🙂
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#315 ·
Me as well.
nimblecrane20 nimblecrane20 Member
32 messages
joined Dec 2006
#316 ·
I just skimmed through what was posted today, and I honestly can't believe this...
A guy comes up with a game, puts together some killer prizes, and people still have the nerve to question if it’s rigged?! What's next? Are we all supposed to post selfies holding our Blu-rays along with our Social Security numbers and bank info just to prove we aren't cheating?

🙏🙏🙏

What a load of nonsense, dragon. Honestly, I'd much rather play one of those themed games you run. The prizes are irrelevant anyway—the concept is great, and you always make them challenging enough to be fun without being impossible.👍

Btw, I am absolutely hammered right now; I'm actually impressed with myself for pulling off such a coherent post.🙂
Justin Fowler5 Justin Fowler5 Member
10 messages
joined Oct 2007
#317 ·
I’m all in on this. If you're just sitting on the sidelines, there's no point in even getting on the field—you aren't going to get worn out anyway. Can't wait to finally blow off some steam, haha.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads