#1 ·
Alright, look, Susan Martin24, give it to me straight—just try to break this down for me in plain English:
When you're looking at a 70-year-old patient who—according to the stats—only has a 10% chance of making it through the year, is it actually better to go through with surgery, or should we just let nature take its course?
Maybe I’m being harsh, but honestly, I’m not even trying to make excuses here... what is the actual, tangible benefit of such an invasive procedure for the patient themselves?
And what about the people around them? How much does a surgery like that actually help their family or support system?
BTW, since you're a surgeon: when you're deciding whether to operate or not, does the family or the patient's home environment play any role in that call at all?
When you're looking at a 70-year-old patient who—according to the stats—only has a 10% chance of making it through the year, is it actually better to go through with surgery, or should we just let nature take its course?
Maybe I’m being harsh, but honestly, I’m not even trying to make excuses here... what is the actual, tangible benefit of such an invasive procedure for the patient themselves?
And what about the people around them? How much does a surgery like that actually help their family or support system?
BTW, since you're a surgeon: when you're deciding whether to operate or not, does the family or the patient's home environment play any role in that call at all?