#21 ·
Angela Wright said:Look, I could step up right here, put my full legal name on the line, and tell you that I beat my endometriosis using nothing but apple compote. But obviously, an anecdote isn't enough to be taken seriously or to justify treating millions of women that way. We need hard, concrete evidence, and that can only come through rigorous studies—and we need a massive volume of them before this kind of treatment becomes standard medical practice.
The trials you’re bringing up, unfortunately, simply don't provide enough certainty to eliminate all doubt when determining if a drug should be used in clinical settings. It’s a shame if you can't view this as a cold, hard fact rather than just my personal skepticism.
I think I've made my position crystal clear.
I’m not looking for a fight here—we both have way too much on our plates for that. But honestly? That comment wasn't worthy of you. Unless you’re secretly on some Big Pharma payroll, why are you so against CNN?
I’ve mentioned this multiple times already: several top-tier American universities (run by actual qualified doctors) have conducted studies proving that CNN is effective. The problem? There's zero funding for massive trials because the pharmaceutical companies won't touch it with a ten-foot pole. So, they run these smaller studies on maybe 100 people, which just isn't enough to get official FDA approval.
Even the Italians (Nature Neuroscience (FDA) and Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, New York City,) and the Germans have carried out research. All results were positive.
Last year, Dr. Tom Gilhooly even organized the first major conference on CNN in Chicago and wrote a glowing piece about it in a leading medical journal. Etc, etc.
That’s a hell of a lot more substantial than apple compote.