CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Started by Joshua Jones · · 👁 29 views · 405 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Joshua JonesGary Watson4Betty Bennett10Casey Palmer5Amy Fox97Thomas Young4driftingwolf41Scott Allen10jadetinker85Rachel Walker56analogowl18swiftbison7Kevin White5Adam Rogers2Steven Collins38Mark Barrett95granitebadger25shadowgardener12dustyseal20Patrick MorrisAmy Hill55Aironnomad38Kate Wilson18 …
Jamie Martinez18 Jamie Martinez18 Member
11 messages
joined Jan 2004
#381 ·
Guys, help!

Dealing with IBS right now.
So I started digging around for info.
Just got my blood work back.
Only gonna list the stuff that looks off:

Sedimentation rate 2 (4-24)
leukocyte 9.8 (3.4-9.7)
red blood cell count 5.50 (3.86-5.08) 😱
hemoglobin 160 g/L (119-157)
Hematocrit: 0.471 (0.356-0.470)

Looked things up online and honestly? Just horror stories everywhere...
Do you guys think these numbers are actually a big deal or what?
placidjackal36 placidjackal36 Active Member
183 messages
joined Jan 2008
#382 ·
You've got a really prominent top-level thread going on this subforum.
Sam Hall15 Sam Hall15 Active Member
225 messages
joined May 2006
#383 ·
First, regarding this last one 😁
The results look mostly fine to me. Honestly, interpreting lab work is incredibly difficult—I wouldn't go so far as to say impossible—but you can't make sense of them without knowing the patient's full clinical picture. On their own, these numbers don't mean much unless they fit into the larger context of the person's overall health...
Sam Hall15 Sam Hall15 Active Member
225 messages
joined May 2006
#384 ·
-analogwalker11, you almost certainly have a urinary tract infection, most likely in the bladder. Depending on your specific symptoms and medical history, treatment could range from non-medicinal approaches to antibiotics. If medication is required, it would be ideal to get a urine culture before starting any empirical therapy.
-Megan Adams4, hepatitis is a possibility, or perhaps some other type of liver lesion. Looking at those initial results, alcohol is the first thing to consider; the findings don't suggest chronic alcoholism, but maybe you consumed a bit more over the last day or two. There’s no need to panic. There are many types of hepatitis—it might be Hep C, or it might not be hepatitis at all. Regardless, you should definitely get tested just for peace of mind. Once you either rule it out or confirm a specific type, you'll know exactly how to manage and treat it.
-Jose Thompson38, the CEA is barely doubled, which might seem high to some, but it really isn't significant. As far as I can see, the other markers are within the normal reference ranges. If that "CA" was referring to CA 19-9, those levels can rise simply because of the liver lesion itself. Ultimately, his doctor, who is familiar with his full medical history, should be the one to interpret these results properly.
Carol Parker Carol Parker Member
34 messages
joined Jan 2007
#385 ·
So, what can you actually tell from a CBC? Like, if we're looking at a viral vs. bacterial infection, what's the giveaway? Is it just a high leukocyte count?
Elizabeth Ross48 Elizabeth Ross48 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#386 ·
Jose Thompson38 said:Hi everyone!!!🙂
Look, my father is 55 years old,
he's been dealing with health issues for years now, specifically liver cirrhosis,
alcoholic hepatitis...
and doctors recently diagnosed him with osteoporosis as well...
Now I need some clarity on this: a few days ago he had
his tumor markers checked, and these were the results:
PSA 0.31
CEA 6.8
AFP 6.78
CA less than 2.
If anyone can explain what these numbers actually mean,
I would be incredibly grateful... because I have spent the last two days scouring
the internet and haven't found a single clear answer regarding whether these results
are normal or not.???
Also, one more thing I'm really concerned about—his doctor referred him
for a bone marrow biopsy. What exactly are they looking for, and why on earth would you perform a bone marrow biopsy?

..A single snapshot of tumor markers is essentially meaningless on its own because these tests are used for prognosis, not for making an initial diagnosis of various cancers. Once a malignant tumor is actually identified, doctors monitor the rise or fall of these markers to determine if a treatment or surgery was successful, or to catch the emergence of metastases. In this case, almost all of these values fall within the standard reference ranges, except for the CEA, which is slightly elevated (standard ref is up to 5); however, aside from certain malignancies (it’s most commonly used as a marker for colon cancer or metastases from other cancers), CEA levels can also spike in smokers or people with inflammatory bowel or lung diseases. If there is any suspicion of a malignant process, it is absolutely critical to repeat the test in a month or two to see if the value is trending upward; only then does it become useful for diagnostic purposes. As for the bone marrow biopsy, that is typically indicated when there is suspicion of hematological malignancies, such as various types of leukemia or lymphoma.
Liver cirrhosis is an extremely serious condition that can lead to the development of carcinomas, primarily liver cancer, so I am convinced all these tests are simply precautionary measures intended to monitor his current status.
Elizabeth Ross48 Elizabeth Ross48 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#387 ·
Megan Adams4 said:Hi everyone, I had my liver enzymes checked... back in May, the results looked like this:
alkaline phosphatase 47 ref. range 54-119
AST 41 ref. range 8-30
ALT 24 ref. range 10-36
GGT 11 ref. range 9-35

Then my OBGYN had me stop taking my birth control, Logest, and I just went back for more blood work, which showed this:

alkaline phosphatase 65 ref. range 54-119
AST 32 ref. range 8-30
ALT 41 ref. range 10-36
GGT 14 ref. range 9-35

My doctor basically gave me this "hmm, this isn't looking great" look and told me I need to go get tested for hepatitis!!! I nearly fainted right there... she even brought up mononucleosis, but I don't have any symptoms... my real issue is that since yesterday, I've been spiraling through everything I can read online about hepatitis, and now I'm terrified to actually go get the testing done... there is absolutely no way, I am literally shaking right now... I even read somewhere that if it were acute, my levels would be massive, whereas chronic hepatitis can present with totally normal or only slightly elevated enzyme levels... I'm only 24 years old.

Please, if you have any insight, let me know... thanks.

Look, I honestly think you have absolutely nothing to worry about. These numbers are nowhere near being dangerously high, and frankly, you should never obsess over those reference ranges because there is always a segment of the population that falls slightly outside those arbitrary lines. That said, you should go ahead and get the testing done simply because you aren't going to find any peace of mind until you have official confirmation that everything is fine. Even in a worst-case scenario where it turns out to be hepatitis—everything is treatable; Hepatitis B with strict rest and specific medication, and Hepatitis C with interferon therapy. Sure, the treatment can be long and grueling, but it works. It is also entirely possible that you're dealing with latent mononucleosis without any outward symptoms. There is no reason to panic, but do the tests for your own sanity, because the absolute worst thing is having someone plant a seed of doubt in your head.👍 By the way, I absolutely loathe doctors who act like they have no idea what they're looking at and immediately jump to conclusions about hepatitis or tumors the moment they see a slightly wonky lab result.😠
Elizabeth Ross48 Elizabeth Ross48 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#388 ·
Carol Parker said:So, looking at a standard blood panel, how can you actually tell if an inflammation is viral or bacterial, and which specific markers are supposed to be elevated—is it just the leukocytes?

Look, leukocytes spike during both viral and bacterial inflammations, so that alone isn't a smoking gun, but if you want a real differential diagnosis, you have to look at the lymphocytes, which climb during viral infections, versus the neutrophils, which surge when you're dealing with bacteria; furthermore, you absolutely need to factor in CRP and sedimentation rates, because those values skyrocket significantly more in the presence of bacterial infections.
Megan Adams4 Megan Adams4 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2008
#389 ·
Sam Hall15 said:--Megan Adams4, hepatitis is a possibility, or it could be some other kind of liver lesion. Looking at those initial labs, alcohol might be the culprit first. The results don't say you're a chronic alcoholic, but maybe you had a little more than usual over a day or two. You shouldn't panic; there are plenty of types of hepatitis. It might be Hep C, or it might not be any hepatitis at all. Generally, there's no need to spiral. Just get tested so you can have peace of mind. If you rule it out, great—if it turns out to be one of the types, then at least you know how to handle it and how to treat it.
-.

Thanks, but honestly, I am just too terrified to go get tested for Hep right now. I don't know why—actually, I do know. Everything my brain has soaked up from the internet makes it sound incurable, terrifying, and just plain awful. Then I started spiraling about my boyfriends, wondering if they passed anything to me, and... you know? And since my levels are only just a tiny bit above normal, I wasn't even worried at first. I mean, seeing people online posting about AST and ALT levels that are through the roof makes mine look fine. But this paranoia is eating me alive. Two days spent scrolling online and I haven't slept a wink... I have to check, because I feel like I'm going to die from the sheer anxiety of it all.

thanks
Megan Adams4 Megan Adams4 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2008
#390 ·
Elizabeth Ross48, thanks. Yeah, this bug in my ear just won't quit... it's getting louder by the second. I keep telling myself, "Okay, you idiot, maybe you picked this up through sex or something," but I really need to go. Honestly, I wasn't even worried about those slightly elevated numbers at first, but then the internet does its thing and suddenly I'm spiraling. I work out a ton—maybe that's part of it—and I eat pretty well. The only thing is I drink way too much coffee :-). Since I'm already oversharing and dissecting my own life, my stomach has been acting up constantly. No matter what I eat, even when I eat slowly or sometimes barely anything at all, there's this pressure and heaviness in my gut. It makes me feel like I need to burp, so I try to force it or tense my stomach to get it out, but then it just gets stuck halfway. It’s not even loud, don't worry, I'm not being rude, but it makes this weird little sound inside. I know I probably sound ridiculous typing all this out to you guys, but I've just been obsessing over my health and these possible illnesses for days now.
Megan Adams4 Megan Adams4 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2008
#391 ·
hmm... wow, I’m just now realizing my ALT levels have shot up from 24 to 41 in just five months...
Jose Thompson38 Jose Thompson38 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2008
#392 ·
Elizabeth Ross48 said:..A single round of tumor markers doesn't really mean much on its own—they’re used more for prognosis than actual diagnosis. Once a malignancy is identified, doctors track those markers to see if they go up or down to gauge how well surgery or treatment is working, or to spot potential metastasis. Most of these values are within the normal range here, except for the CEA which is slightly elevated (normal is up to 5). Aside from certain cancers—usually used for colon cancer or metastatic spread—CEA can also spike in smokers or people with inflammatory bowel or lung issues. If there's any suspicion of a malignant process, the key is to retest in a month or two to see if the levels are trending upward; that's when it becomes useful for diagnosis. A bone marrow biopsy is typically only indicated if there's suspicion of hematologic malignancies, like various leukemias or lymphomas.
Liver cirrhosis is a serious condition that can lead to cancer, primarily liver cancer, so I think all these tests are just precautionary measures to monitor the progression of the disease.

Thanks so much for the reply 🙂
You're actually the only one who responded out of all the different sites
where I posted this question....
Everything is finally starting to make sense now...
thanks...
Carol Parker Carol Parker Member
34 messages
joined Jan 2007
#393 ·
Is an IgE level of 9.5 for a little girl who's 3.5 years old considered low, or is it maybe just totally normal?
Elizabeth Ross48 Elizabeth Ross48 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#394 ·
Carol Parker said:Is an IgE level of 9.5 for a 3.5-year-old girl considered low, or is it just normal?

Look, you absolutely need to have the reference ranges and the specific units provided alongside the lab results. It’s common sense because those standard reference intervals fluctuate wildly depending entirely on the testing methodology used and the specific units measuring the analyte.
Noah Parker3 Noah Parker3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2008
#395 ·
Guys, I need some help here,
I went in for blood work this morning and my results are absolutely terrifying. My AST is sitting at 1000 (normally anything up to 0.58 is fine), my ALT is at 1078 (normal is under 0.74), and my GGT is way up at 1390 (standard range is up to 0.92). For context, I’m about 6'1" and weighing in at over 330 lbs, though I have been on a diet for almost a week now. Honestly, seeing these numbers freaked me out—does anyone know how I can get them down? I know, I know, everyone is going to tell me to just lose weight, but if it were that easy, I would've done it ages ago. Please, if anyone actually knows what's going on, let me know what kind of consequences we're looking at with levels like these? Oh, and I don't have my bilirubin levels back because my clueless doctor didn't think it was worth checking.😕
mistyhound2 mistyhound2 Active Member
89 messages
joined Feb 2004
#396 ·
Megan Adams4 said:hmm... damn, I just realized my ALT jumped from 24 to 41 in five months...

Look, if you were on birth control, we're talking about drug-induced spikes here. It’s really not the end of the world—tons of people deal with this without even realizing it. I honestly don't see why your OB-GYN is insisting on testing; those numbers are basically fine. People always forget this one thing: you don't treat liver enzymes, you treat the actual person and whatever's going on with them.🙂
mistyhound2 mistyhound2 Active Member
89 messages
joined Feb 2004
#397 ·
Sandra Lopez2 said:if anyone could just double-check this for me...

everything looks fine on my blood work except...

my cholesterol is 4.9 and the limit is 5
triglycerides are 1.76, recommended up to 1.70
ALT is 6, recommendation is 10-36

for coagulation, it shows oral therapy range at 1.0, whereas the recommendation is 2.0-3.5

I'm 25, I don't drink, I don't smoke, and I'm definitely not overweight...
any reason to be worried?

thanks🙏

Nah, you're fine. Honestly, you aren't going to fix your cholesterol just by "eating better," and for those triglycerides that are slightly up? You really just need to, I don't know, actually move around a bit. 😁 And for heaven's sake—always get your lipid panel done while fasting! Otherwise, you're just getting fake high numbers.
Ashley Ramirez Ashley Ramirez Newcomer
1 message
joined Sep 2007
#398 ·
What does it actually mean when your GGT is through the roof—say, hitting 100—but everything else like AST and ALT stays perfectly within the normal range? Could something like a bout of mononucleosis I had a decade ago have anything to do with this?🤷
Can I just expect things to settle back down by taking some Silymarin, for example?
casualheron80 casualheron80 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2008
#399 ·
Can someone help me make sense of these urine results? Protein is negative, but there's a lot of epithelial cells, 10-15 WBC, a little bit of bacteria, and 3-4 RBC. I've been trying to get pregnant for a while now, but my period is always late—including right now. Could a result like this happen right before my period starts? And what kind of lab work is most common for women when they're pregnant?

Thanks in advance!🙂🙂🙏😢
Robin White28 Robin White28 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2008
#400 ·
My 9-year-old daughter was hospitalized for eight days because her neck lymph nodes were so swollen. The doctors there were suspecting "cat scratch disease." We finally got the serology results back, and this is what it says:

Bartonella quintqna IgM borderline
Bartonella quintqna IgG borderline
Bartonella henselae IgM borderline
Bartonella henselae IgG borderline

I'm trying to figure out what "borderline" actually means in this context. Is this good news or bad news???

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads