CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Started by Joshua Jones · · 👁 24 views · 405 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Joshua JonesGary Watson4Betty Bennett10Casey Palmer5Amy Fox97Thomas Young4driftingwolf41Scott Allen10jadetinker85Rachel Walker56analogowl18swiftbison7Kevin White5Adam Rogers2Steven Collins38Mark Barrett95granitebadger25shadowgardener12dustyseal20Patrick MorrisAmy Hill55Aironnomad38Kate Wilson18 …
Elizabeth Ross48 Elizabeth Ross48 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#401 ·
casualheron80: Look, I can try to break down those results for you, but let’s be clear about what we're looking at here. You've got negative protein, which is good, but then there's a significant amount of epithelial cells, 10-15 leukocytes, some bacteria, and 3-4 RBCs. Honestly, seeing that level of white blood cells and bacteria usually points toward a urinary tract infection, which is its own special kind of misery. As for your question about trying to conceive—yes, hormonal shifts and the physiological stress of an impending period can absolutely mess with your cycle, making it late, but those specific lab values aren't exactly a "pregnancy indicator." Most pregnant women actually see a rise in certain markers, but a presence of bacteria and elevated leukocytes is generally just a sign of an infection that needs addressing before you focus on anything else. Get it checked out.

Thanks in advance.🙂🙂🙏😢[/QUOTE
You’re dealing with a urinary tract infection. I strongly suggest you get a formal urine culture done immediately to identify exactly which bacteria is causing the issue, because leaving chronic infections unchecked can lead to serious complications and significant difficulties when you're trying to conceive—especially if we are talking about E. coli. There is absolutely no difference between the urine profile of a healthy pregnant woman and that of a healthy non-pregnant woman.
darksurfer1 darksurfer1 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2006
#402 ·
Hey everyone,

Just had my bloodwork done—checking in because I'm on the pill—and most things look fine, except
my INR is sitting at 1.02, while the lab's reference range says it should be between 2 and 3.5.
My ALP is at 40, but they want it at 50 or higher.
And then there's this potassium level that needs to be at least 3.90, but I'm stuck at 3.60...

I honestly panicked over that INR reading for a second because the gap felt huge. Then I started digging online and found out a "normal" INR is usually between 0.9 and 1.2, so now I'm just confused—why the hell are these other reference values listed?🤷

Anyone have any insight on this?
Elizabeth Ross48 Elizabeth Ross48 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#403 ·
darksurfer1 said:Hey everyone!

I just went in for my routine blood work—just checking in because I'm on the pill—and everything looks totally fine according to the standard ranges, except for a few things:
my inr is sitting at 1.02, even though the reference range listed is 2-3.5
my alp is 40 when it’s supposed to be 50 or higher
and then there's some K that should be at least 3.90, but mine came back at 3.60...

I honestly spiraled for a second over that inr reading because it seemed like such a massive gap, but then I did some digging online and found out a normal inr is actually between 0.9 and 1.2, so why on earth do they list those other reference values?🤷

Can anyone weigh in on this?

The inr is specifically used to monitor patients who are on oral anticoagulant therapy, so that specific reference range applies exclusively to them. In your case, your results are actually great. That K is just potassium, which is slightly low, but grab a banana or some tomatoes and you'll be perfectly fine. As for those lower alp levels, they generally don't carry any diagnostic weight whatsoever.😉
darksurfer1 darksurfer1 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2006
#404 ·
Elizabeth Ross48, thanks a ton!!

So, potassium—bananas and tomatoes, right? I'll definitely try to get those levels up.

I figured something was off with that INR reading too—when I saw the standard range is usually around 1, but their report showed that other range...

Anyway, thanks for the reply.😉
Zachary Kern6 Zachary Kern6 Member
21 messages
joined Nov 2008
#405 ·
That INR level was low for everyone involved 🙂...the bottom line is that everything needs to be clearly listed on the lab requisition for the blood work—including that famous INR value, which honestly only matters for people on anticoagulants and nobody else...but hey, Yasmina is panicking as usual, and now even the doctors seem to have lost their way because of it.
Sam Hall15 Sam Hall15 Active Member
225 messages
joined May 2006
#406 ·
A high GGT level could indicate nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, which involves some moderate fatty changes in the liver.
Regarding potassium, you really need to keep it within the normal range. However, if you aren't experiencing any symptoms like weakness or tingling... then it probably isn't anything serious and your body will compensate on its own. But if you happen to be taking diuretics, you definitely need to replenish your potassium—just eat plenty of bananas. Also, if you're active in sports, potassium levels can easily drop due to intense physical activity, so be sure to adjust your nutrition based on your body's specific needs.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads