CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Formula 1 › F1: Then vs. Now

F1: Then vs. Now

Started by Amy Brooks · · 👁 20 views · 264 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Amy Brooksurbanowl96Jason Campbell70gentlebear47silvercobra68Frank Collins85Amanda Kellystormyviper11ruggedfox28mistybear87Michael Diaz4Jonathan Booth5Rebecca Fox4placidsurfer9Terry Lewis24redheron12Rachel Gray58cosmiccyclist8wearyraven41jadeseal7graniteharbor502darkmarlin16George Ramos15William Bennett53 …
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#201 ·
Basically, the issue is that every single attempt at a gutsy overtake gets slapped with a penalty. Whether the move was actually clean or just a complete momentary lapse in judgment, the result is pretty much the same...
Under the guise of "safety," they’re overregulating everything, which has basically killed off any actual racing. It’s not about making the cars safer; it's about rules that kill the spirit of competition in the name of safety, forcing drivers to either dive down the pit lane or wait for the DRS zone just to get past someone...

As for cars flying off track, that’s an easy fix.😁
If a driver goes wide, the team should just get an automatic software command that limits their fuel flow to 25/50/75% for the next few seconds, or maybe forces them to run at 90% fuel flow for the entire following lap.🤣
Since they already have the tech to mess with them using all these different software schemes, why not use it to hand out penalties?😁
electricmaker40 electricmaker40 Member
22 messages
joined Mar 2015
#202 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:They were being loud as hell even before this—you could barely hear anything over the engines

Look, Formula 1 existed way before 2014 too


If that’s how they’re actually driving... then how on earth can you say they aren't living on the edge?
Is he even driving with any guts?
:/

Jason Campbell70 said:Five years ago, they could. Now, all of a sudden, they can't. Why the change?

Just think back to the '96 Spanish GP.
Or maybe both Monaco races in the same year?

Belgium, '98.
The 2007 Japanese GP.

With today’s mindless rules, would we even be holding these races anymore?

ruggedhawk20 explained. ☕


I can still see all those races playing back in my head... and honestly, the one thing that truly sets them apart is just how much water is sitting on the track. It doesn't actually matter how hard it's pouring if:
There isn't a stream crossing over the track.
It looks like we've got two cars out there absolutely shredding their tires—just constant sliding all over the track.

They just aren't willing to take those kinds of risks like they did back at Spa in '98—not if it means dealing with those massive pile-ups again.

Let’s be honest—the rubber our current supplier is putting on the table right now? It’s absolute garbage. I think we can all pretty much agree on that, can't we?

And let’s not forget how they used to handle those cars back when traction control was still a thing—it's a completely different world now. They just don't drive like that anymore. These modern cars? They aren't forgiving. Not even close. Back in the day, the older machinery gave you a bit of a grace period, but today, if you make one tiny mistake, the car will punish you instantly. No second chances.

Throw it all into a blender, and you get exactly what we’re looking at right now. Honestly, I feel like we're still just sitting around waiting for that one rainy race—you know, the kind where traction control is off the table and they actually have to deal with a massive surge of torque. It’ll be interesting to see who holds it together and who ends up looking absolutely ridiculous out there when things get messy.

darkmarlin16 said:Honestly, the asphalt zones even end up rewarding mistakes sometimes. Just look at La Source, or how they messed up at Blanchimont, though I guess you could forgive them there since it's such an insanely fast part of the track.

We need a middle ground here.

They should put about 5 meters of gravel around the track, and then after that, they can pave it.

Basically, just surround the circuit with a minimum 5-meter ring of gravel.


A few millimeters of low pressure doesn't actually mean much in this context... honestly, if you could get the surface to feel more like what we see at a track like Sonoma, that would be the sweet spot. You’d probably end up flying right off the asphalt, but hey, is that really what you're looking for?
☕

stormybadger8 said:Basically, the issue is that every single attempt at a gutsy overtake gets slapped with a penalty. Whether the move was actually clean or just a complete momentary lapse in judgment, the result is pretty much the same...
Under the guise of "safety," they’re overregulating everything, which has basically killed off any actual racing. It’s not about making the cars safer; it's about rules that kill the spirit of competition in the name of safety, forcing drivers to either dive down the pit lane or wait for the DRS zone just to get past someone...

As for cars flying off track, that’s an easy fix.😁
If a driver goes wide, the team should just get an automatic software command that limits their fuel flow to 25/50/75% for the next few seconds, or maybe forces them to run at 90% fuel flow for the entire following lap.🤣
Since they already have the tech to mess with them using all these different software schemes, why not use it to hand out penalties?😁


I have to disagree there... just look at what happened with MS and those excursions through Rascasse a few years back... or those times we saw them going wide at the Hairpin...
And remember, just a few years ago, we only ever saw people going off at St. Devote or right as they were exiting the Tunnel...
And all of this happens on a track that offers almost zero chance for overtaking! I honestly think some people have become a bit spoiled—you don't seem to realize what it actually means to overtake when you're driving modern F1 cars that are essentially identical in performance...
☕

Sent from my iPhone.
Jason Campbell70 Jason Campbell70 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2017
#203 ·
One guy is rambling about sand runoff zones, while the other is lecturing us on track limits and F1 racing back in the late 90s.

God, what a bunch of experts! :es:es:es
neonpuma7 neonpuma7 Member
10 messages
joined Apr 2015
#204 ·
darkmarlin16 said:Or better yet, let's just have a rule where if all four wheels leave the track, they get an automatic disqualification. Boom. Done.🙏

I like this; that German Barbika would have been a DNF in Canada🤣

I suppose Nico is clever; he seems to have a hyperactive brain when it comes to making such smart conclusions in a split second. I guess his Finnish mother balances out that German side.
graniteharbor502 graniteharbor502 Regular
443 messages
joined Apr 2016
#205 ·
darkmarlin16 said:I'm pretty sure it was gravel, not sand.☕

I am like 101% certain about that.

It isn't necessarily a disaster, really; one might simply say that a dog has had an accident in the yard...
cosmiccyclist8 cosmiccyclist8 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2023
#206 ·
image

image
cosmiccyclist8 cosmiccyclist8 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2023
#207 ·
Rebecca Fox4 said:Regarding those qualifying formats, I personally preferred the previous setup where everyone just gets one clean lap and that's that, though if I'm being honest, I liked the one from two seasons ago even better...

When it comes to the old days, there isn't much to say about the competitive aspect. There were far more direct head-to-head battles between the elite drivers back then, and having a top-tier driver on your team meant everything—honestly, anyone would have walked away with the championship last year if they had been driving that Brawn GP car...
Driver safety was abysmal, particularly during the early 80s; you’d have a car slammed into a wall, the safety car would pull out onto the track, yet everyone else would just keep racing right through it, and don't even get me started on the pit lane protocols...

Even though we saw plenty of intense rivalries between the greats, they really functioned as a tight-knit community, stepping up to help one another whenever necessary, especially if someone had suffered a nasty wreck on the circuit.

A few classic battles, including this last one which remains the single most brilliant move I have ever witnessed in my life...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zznJjSncGCE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Guj2nSkBVZo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWCXZgQ3YB4

Senna’s totally wrong assessment is what makes this pursuit look so intense; it makes Ferrari under Mansell's control look like a space shuttle compared to McLaren—even though, let's face it, Ferrari couldn't touch McLaren that season.😁

You’re focusing on that vibrant red car in the clip, but when you actually watch what Senna is doing... it's not like Mansell did anything spectacular there. I think we can all agree on that.😁
cosmichawk12 cosmichawk12 Member
38 messages
joined Jun 2011
#208 ·
What was Mansell's greatest move?

That double-slap to Piquet at Silverstone—or maybe that door-to-door madness with Senna at 200mph in Barcelona... though honestly, it’s probably the most legendary overtake in the history of F1
.

The Ronaldinho of motorsport ☕
graniteharbor502 graniteharbor502 Regular
443 messages
joined Apr 2016
#209 ·
cosmichawk12 said:What was Mansell's greatest move?

That double-slap to Piquet at Silverstone—or maybe that door-to-door madness with Senna at 200mph in Barcelona... though honestly, it’s probably the most legendary overtake in the history of F1
.

The Ronaldinho of motorsport ☕

If you ask me, this takes the prize for Mansell's finest moment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYyq4lTvJNE
cosmiccyclist8 cosmiccyclist8 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2023
#210 ·
stormybadger8 said:Lotus switching to Mercedes engines 😳

Man, what a mess this whole squad has become—going from being the Renault outfit, rebranding as Lotus, only to end up as just another team running Mercedes power...

At first, I thought this was just more mindless journalistic clickbait, but since Autosport actually broke the news, I guess it’s the real deal...

And that's already set for 2015! Honestly, pretty great news, tbh 🙏

By the way, who would've guessed that we'd go from the shaky foundations of a rotting Ilmor to an era where teams are actually fighting over engine deals? 🙏
ruggedhawk20 ruggedhawk20 Regular
509 messages
joined Sep 2014
#211 ·
Trashy Ilmor??? Give me a break. Ilmor is basically synonymous with engineering perfection. Mario Illien is one of the greatest engineers in F1 history—he’s the reason beryllium was even used as a material before they banned it. But back in the late 90s and early 2000s? Those Ilmor engines were absolute peak performance.

If you wanted to say trashy Mugen or trashy Judd—fine, whatever—but calling Ilmor trash? Good grief.
ruggedhawk20 ruggedhawk20 Regular
509 messages
joined Sep 2014
#212 ·
You know who’s actually trash? MotoriModeran—not sure if you caught this, but that Italian outfit was supplying engines to Minardi back in '85 and '86. They're the ones who are rotten, not Ilmor.
electricmaker40 electricmaker40 Member
22 messages
joined Mar 2015
#213 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:Trashy Ilmor??? Give me a break. Ilmor is basically synonymous with engineering perfection. Mario Illien is one of the greatest engineers in F1 history—he’s the reason beryllium was even used as a material before they banned it. But back in the late 90s and early 2000s? Those Ilmor engines were absolute peak performance.

If you wanted to say trashy Mugen or trashy Judd—fine, whatever—but calling Ilmor trash? Good grief.


I wouldn't go that far with Mugen or Judd, though... those engines have proven themselves plenty of times in endurance racing! 😉

Sent from my iPhone.
cosmiccyclist8 cosmiccyclist8 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2023
#214 ·
Mugen? We're talking about 16 podium finishes and 4 wins over 9 seasons.

And what did the teams actually pull off during those 5 seasons running Ilmor engines? 🤷 A handful of fourth and fifth-place finishes, at best. 🤷
cosmiccyclist8 cosmiccyclist8 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2023
#215 ·
electricmaker40 said:I wouldn't go that far with Mugen or Judd, though... those engines have proven themselves plenty of times in endurance racing! 😉

Sent from my iPhone.

honestly, Mugen is just a name on paper

meanwhile, Frentzen's championship win was basically a hair's breadth away thanks to their engine
ruggedhawk20 ruggedhawk20 Regular
509 messages
joined Sep 2014
#216 ·
cosmiccyclist8 said:Mugen? We're talking about 16 podium finishes and 4 wins over 9 seasons.

And what did the teams actually pull off during those 5 seasons running Ilmor engines? 🤷 A handful of fourth and fifth-place finishes, at best. 🤷

Hakkinen 1998 and 1999 driver titles. McLaren 1998 constructors title.

You seriously still think Frentzen's run with Mugen was actually worth mentioning?
ruggedhawk20 ruggedhawk20 Regular
509 messages
joined Sep 2014
#217 ·
electricmaker40 said:I wouldn't go that far with Mugen or Judd, though... those engines have proven themselves plenty of times in endurance racing! 😉

Sent from my iPhone.

Yeah, right—they totally smoked Audi and Peugeot—not to mention that Judd disaster in IndyCar 2012.

At this rate, I'll be reading this thread forever.
electricmaker40 electricmaker40 Member
22 messages
joined Mar 2015
#218 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:Yeah, right—they totally smoked Audi and Peugeot—not to mention that Judd disaster in IndyCar 2012.

At this rate, I'll be reading this thread forever.

Since you clearly don't have a clue about what kind of engines we're actually talking about:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judd_(engine)

Also, it’s pretty obvious you haven't the slightest idea regarding the different classes in Le Mans racing—specifically GT racing—so here’s some light reading for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Mans_Prototype
And a list of the actual "champions":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...s.27_Champions
☕
ruggedhawk20 ruggedhawk20 Regular
509 messages
joined Sep 2014
#219 ·
Anthony, don't embarrass yourself
cosmiccyclist8 cosmiccyclist8 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2023
#220 ·
ruggedhawk20 said:Hakkinen 1998 and 1999 driver titles. McLaren 1998 constructors title.

You seriously still think Frentzen's run with Mugen was actually worth mentioning?

You're exaggerating a bit there, ruggedhawk20,

Ilmor was basically the firm tweaking Chevy engines for IndyCar, and then they jump into F1 in '91 with a brand new V10 Engine. But despite all that success on American tracks where they were stacking wins, they couldn't pull anything together on the F1 circuit—if you look at the stats, they barely scraped 20 points over five seasons.

Because of that love affair between Chevy and IndyCar, Chevy also held a stake in Ilmor. Now, here’s the pivot point: in '93, things go south between Ilmor—specifically Roger Penske, who headed up the American branch of Ilmor and Chevrolet—and the fact that Mercedes (well, their parent company Daimler) was stepping in to buy out Chevrolet's 25% stake in Ilmor. By '94, Mercedes' sports division buys Ilmor outright and rebrands them as Mercedes-Benz High Performance Engines.

It's true—before that, the folks at Mercedes didn't even know what an F1 engine looked like, so they just kept developing the Ilmor design... but damn, it wasn't the Brits calling the shots, it was the German management.

Plus, by '95, that long-term partnership with McLaren is born and the first real successes start rolling in... and those two titles you mentioned? They were won with Mercedes, not with damn Ilmor.👍

Alright, maybe I went a little overboard calling Ilmor "rotten," but man, in the context of F1, they achieved pretty much nothing. It's funny how the moment Mercedes bought them, everything started trending upward. Really interesting.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads