#81 ·
Anonymous said:I wouldn't say that... because you seem to take any post comparing things to the local stadium—basically pointing out similarities—as a personal insult to you and everyone else on this board. It's like some drunk guy at a tavern decided he was going to mess with you all...
Let's be real here and compare the timing of that "tavern agreement" to the unnecessary banning of users....
The "agreement," as you guys call it, happened on a public thread; anyone could have seen it. So what actually came of it? A couple of people just grabbed a bunch of Clinton supporters and had some fun?.. A conspiracy?.. Where?
How many of us were posting under our own handles? Maybe a few more than just those two or three....
Honestly, I couldn't care less about politics or your opinions... but out of pure solidarity, I jumped in and left a few comments on that thread too....
People using nicknames who are paranoid enough to see "conspiracies" and "unrest" being stirred up by fans from some PDF file seriously need to go see a doctor.... even the ones who think they "prevented" a conspiracy or unrest.... because none of that was ever actually happening....
And again, it's action equals reaction.... everything that went down happened because of biased moderation... and the way threads were twisted when they could have just easily closed them if they actually violated any of the forum rules....
Anyway, for those who used Clinton quotes, got banned, and then just kept posting under their original handles—do they actually deserve a permanent ban?