CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Moderation is ruining the PDF policy

Moderation is ruining the PDF policy

Started by bluefalcon14 · · 👁 11 views · 87 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants bluefalcon14goldenorca11Mark Nguyen6Ryan Vaughn7Jose Fox4Nicholas Gomez27Casey Stewart17feraltrucker5Aaron White13slyhawk16Carl Long2Melissa Barnes3slybison8Nathan Bailey65Daniel Ward87granitefox16Sam Green73Casey Robinson2granitepilot282Adam Collins4
Nicholas Gomez27 Nicholas Gomez27 Member
15 messages
joined Aug 2009
#21 ·
I just want to point out that if there aren't any crosses on this forum—since "offenses" aren't cured through confession, but rather through bans
—then logically, there shouldn't be any in government agencies either (which, let's face it, will probably become private corporations pretty soon anyway). 😁
In those settings, misconduct is handled with terminations and fines rather than soul-searching. 😁
bluefalcon14 bluefalcon14 MemberOP
37 messages
joined Aug 2009
#22 ·
Ryan Vaughn7 said:I already explained why those posts were removed. I laid out the reasons and provided plenty of examples. Honestly, I have no intention of dragging this out with you given how subjective you're being.

As for the post you linked, you were banned after what felt like five warnings about discussing moderation on this specific sub-forum. Which, as it turns out, you eventually realized.

Take care.

Well, I had to address you directly... You practically invited this...

You’ve deleted my posts two or three times when I was merely quoting you—only you, and absolutely nothing else. Why is it that you delete a post containing your own quotes, yet leave your original rants untouched?

Looking right now at the thread regarding George W. Bush and the crosses, I see a significant number of posts from just a little while ago have also been wiped out. Go ahead then—explain to me why, for instance, a post where I cited an example of attitudes toward the cross in Canada was removed. We cite examples from all over Europe; why does an example from Canada suddenly become controversial?

If you didn't delete it, then let whoever did step forward... And let them explain themselves.
bluefalcon14 bluefalcon14 MemberOP
37 messages
joined Aug 2009
#23 ·
Nicholas Gomez27 said:I just want to point out that if there aren't any crosses on this forum—since "offenses" aren't cured through confession, but rather through bans
—then logically, there shouldn't be any in government agencies either (which, let's face it, will probably become private corporations pretty soon anyway). 😁
In those settings, misconduct is handled with terminations and fines rather than soul-searching. 😁

Thanks again for confirming my points...
Nicholas Gomez27 Nicholas Gomez27 Member
15 messages
joined Aug 2009
#24 ·
Alright, go ahead and beg for 85 Hail Marys, 40 apostolic creeds, 150 Hail Marys, and 90 Hail Marys if you want me to finally stop handing out those penalties.

image
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#25 ·
Ryan Vaughn7 said:Complaining?

It’s more like an epidemic spreading among the moderators—excluding the exceptions, of course—who have started treating this forum like their own private playground, and I suppose you are the most glaring example of that phenomenon.
Ryan Vaughn7 Ryan Vaughn7 Active Member
154 messages
joined Jul 2009
#26 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:It’s more like an epidemic spreading among the moderators—excluding the exceptions, of course—who have started treating this forum like their own private playground, and I suppose you are the most glaring example of that phenomenon.

Oh, that "voice of reason" routine has been hitting hard from the very start. What can you do? 🤷life is unfair.
Casey Stewart17 Casey Stewart17 Member
12 messages
joined Jan 2009
#27 ·
I haven't posted anything on this forum for a few weeks now because the harassment from Ryan Vaughn7 has become absolutely unbearable.
He’s constantly biased and hands out bans based on his own arbitrary rules. If you call someone a firebrand, a fanatic, or a stone-waller, nobody cares, but God forbid you refer to someone as a communist, a Bolshevik, or say anything against Bush, he takes it personally and puts you on a blacklist to be purged until you're gone.
That’s what happens when someone uses this forum to vent their own frustrations.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#28 ·
Ryan Vaughn7 said:Oh, that "voice of reason" routine has been hitting hard from the very start. What can you do? 🤷life is unfair.

Well, it wasn't quite like that back then—at least not in my memory. I seem to recall much more responsible days.
Nicholas Gomez27 Nicholas Gomez27 Member
15 messages
joined Aug 2009
#29 ·
Honestly, I probably shouldn't have to deal with you lot either 🙂

Look, just handle it via some fast-track procedure so everyone else can actually have a decent conversation. Plus, it’ll probably shut you guys up for a few days. 😁

Bravo, Ryan Vaughn7!! 😁 Man, I really am always on the winning side.
Ryan Vaughn7 Ryan Vaughn7 Active Member
154 messages
joined Jul 2009
#30 ·
Casey Stewart17 said:I haven't posted anything on this forum for a few weeks now because the harassment from Ryan Vaughn7 has become absolutely unbearable.
He’s constantly biased and hands out bans based on his own arbitrary rules. If you call someone a firebrand, a fanatic, or a stone-waller, nobody cares, but God forbid you refer to someone as a communist, a Bolshevik, or say anything against Bush, he takes it personally and puts you on a blacklist to be purged until you're gone.
That’s what happens when someone uses this forum to vent their own frustrations.


Coming from someone who hasn't even received a single warning during my entire forum career, 😁
kudos to you.🙏
Casey Stewart17 Casey Stewart17 Member
12 messages
joined Jan 2009
#31 ·
Ryan Vaughn7 said:Coming from someone who hasn't even received a single warning during my entire forum career, 😁
kudos to you.🙏

Once again, you're proving just how "professional" you are as a moderator by airing my private business in front of the whole community.
Deleting my posts is just your way of trying to flag me.
I’ve personally witnessed plenty of users getting banned for absolutely no reason. You dodge any topic you find inconvenient, threaten to delete threads about "presenting a defense at The Hague," or move discussions about the "bad pit" over to the mental asylum section, and so on.👍
Casey Stewart17 Casey Stewart17 Member
12 messages
joined Jan 2009
#32 ·
Nicholas Gomez27 said:Honestly, I probably shouldn't have to deal with you lot either 🙂

Look, just handle it via some fast-track procedure so everyone else can actually have a decent conversation. Plus, it’ll probably shut you guys up for a few days. 😁

Bravo, Ryan Vaughn7!! 😁 Man, I really am always on the winning side.

I can totally see it in your avatar !!!!
bluefalcon14 bluefalcon14 MemberOP
37 messages
joined Aug 2009
#33 ·
Nicholas Gomez27 said:Honestly, I probably shouldn't have to deal with you lot either 🙂

Look, just handle it via some fast-track procedure so everyone else can actually have a decent conversation. Plus, it’ll probably shut you guys up for a few days. 😁

Bravo, Ryan Vaughn7!! 😁 Man, I really am always on the winning side.

Ryan Vaughn7, tell this guy to stop defending you...😁

I see you've gone full fanatic now... Every single one of my posts from the last two or three hours has been wiped out...
Ryan Vaughn7 Ryan Vaughn7 Active Member
154 messages
joined Jul 2009
#34 ·
Casey Stewart17 said:Once again, you're proving just how "professional" you are as a moderator by airing my private business in front of the whole community.
Deleting my posts is just your way of trying to flag me.
I’ve personally witnessed plenty of users getting banned for absolutely no reason. You dodge any topic you find inconvenient, threaten to delete threads about "presenting a defense at The Hague," or move discussions about the "bad pit" over to the mental asylum section, and so on.👍

Everyone can see that. And trust me, it isn't. 😉
feraltrucker5 feraltrucker5 Active Member
117 messages
joined Oct 2012
#35 ·
Are we actually going to discuss something specific here, or is this just a thread for you people to sit around and mess with Ryan Vaughn7? 🤷 🙂
Casey Stewart17 Casey Stewart17 Member
12 messages
joined Jan 2009
#36 ·
Ryan Vaughn7 said:Everyone can see that. And trust me, it isn't. 😉

Funny how you only choose to answer half of my post, isn't it? ☕
bluefalcon14 bluefalcon14 MemberOP
37 messages
joined Aug 2009
#37 ·
feraltrucker5 said:Are we actually going to discuss something specific here, or is this just a thread for you people to sit around and mess with Ryan Vaughn7? 🤷 🙂

We are here to criticize his moderation, yet he always manages to do this... He pivots the topic toward whatever suits him best... Now, he’d clearly prefer if we treated this entire thing as nothing more than a joke... 😉
Aaron White13 Aaron White13 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Aug 2009
#38 ·
I actually find the whole idea of moderating this guy pretty interesting🙂

But honestly, once they told me who he was, everything just clicked.☕

He’s definitely the heavy hitter waiting in the wings.😁
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#39 ·
Aaron White13 said:I actually find the whole idea of moderating this guy pretty interesting🙂

But honestly, once they told me who he was, everything just clicked.☕

He’s definitely the heavy hitter waiting in the wings.😁

What did they tell you—who is he?
Ryan Vaughn7 Ryan Vaughn7 Active Member
154 messages
joined Jul 2009
#40 ·
I'm curious about this too.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads