CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Law Abiding Citizen (2009)

Law Abiding Citizen (2009)

Started by Anthony Smith3 · · 👁 13 views · 172 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Smith3Angela Bennett23Gregory WardDavid Price5Alex Long8cosmicraven2goldenhound32Harold Howard7Raymond Palmer8lonelynx44Melissa Ross2amberfalcon48APeter Phillips32vividtrucker10stormystag43restlessranger30crimsontrucker4boldtiger7Nicole Joneswearydriver13Roger Wilson5Angela Martin20lonepilot2 …
crimsontrucker4 crimsontrucker4 Member
33 messages
joined Dec 2008
#21 ·
It’s a really solid thriller, but I guess the story could have been a bit punchier and more believable.
The ending was just stupid.
If you want to see how a great ending actually looks, check this out: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1197624/...nest/152643345
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#22 ·
amberfalcon48 said:Overall, I enjoyed the movie; while there are a few gripes, it’s an alright watch with a compelling plot.
The ending was the one thing that truly let me down.

From the moment they discover his hideout, everything moves way too fast. I spent the whole time rooting for Gerard Butler, so the conclusion was a massive disappointment—and honestly, I wish Nick (Jamie Foxx) hadn't survived!

I mean, how is Nick supposed to die when he's the good guy in an American movie?
boldtiger7 boldtiger7 Active Member
62 messages
joined Aug 2021
#23 ·
It’s an exceptionally well-crafted film with a compelling plot. Granted, there are a few minor logical inconsistencies, but then again, does any movie truly escape that?
If I’m being honest, I only wish the ending had taken a different turn. 😁
Nicole Jones Nicole Jones Member
12 messages
joined Nov 2017
#24 ·
Aside from the parts that actually worked... the ending is just stupid. "Evil" wins over good? Seriously? And who was even helping him at the end? I skipped a section and now I'm totally lost.
vividtrucker10 vividtrucker10 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Aug 2009
#25 ·
goldenhound32 said:I mean, how is Nick supposed to die when he's the good guy in an American movie?

I saw it differently. Nick was the villain.
wearydriver13 wearydriver13 Member
12 messages
joined Jul 2009
#26 ·
Anonymous said:I'm planning on catching it this Wednesday. That trailer totally blew me away! 👍

The feeling is definitely mutual! 😁
Alex Long8 Alex Long8 Member
21 messages
joined Aug 2007
#27 ·
I was really hoping he’d just mess with them—you know, make it look like the bomb wasn't actually real before the Mayor starts losing her mind at 3 PM.

Man, I was rooting for someone to just put a bullet right through that scrawny Nick’s daughter's head while she's finishing up her song, right alongside his wife and mother.
stormystag43 stormystag43 Member
15 messages
joined Nov 2009
#28 ·
Alex Long8 said:I was really hoping he’d just mess with them—you know, make it look like the bomb wasn't actually real before the Mayor starts losing her mind at 3 PM.

Man, I was rooting for someone to just put a bullet right through that scrawny Nick’s daughter's head while she's finishing up her song, right alongside his wife and mother.

Honestly, I was just waiting for Jamie Foxx to break out into a full-blown song at the end, you know? But nope.😢
Roger Wilson5 Roger Wilson5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Dec 2009
#29 ·
Nicole Jones said:Aside from the parts that actually worked... the ending is just stupid. "Evil" wins over good? Seriously? And who was even helping him at the end? I skipped a section and now I'm totally lost.

He didn't have an accomplice. He had a tunnel behind his cell and did the whole thing himself.

crimsontrucker4 said:This guy wrote an incredible ending: I can't believe I'm even looking at this again. Is it just me, or does this movie feel like a fever dream from a decade ago? Sometimes you revisit an old title thinking you'll find some hidden depth, only to realize you were just distracted by the lighting back then. Does anyone else get that feeling? Like you're watching a ghost of a movie you thought you loved? It’s a strange kind of disappointment.

I agree. An ending like that would have been a hell of a lot better.
Angela Martin20 Angela Martin20 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jan 2011
#30 ·
I’m honestly just so over these Hollywood "happy endings" where everything gets wrapped up in a neat little bow. I really thought directors were starting to take some actual risks lately, you know? But nope, it's all the same old formulaic garbage... and then there's Jamie Foxx, always playing the hero who has to swoop in and save the day. First it was him taking out Cruise in Collateral, and now he’s basically "taking out" Gerard Butler here. 😁
amberfalcon48 amberfalcon48 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jul 2010
#31 ·
vividtrucker10 said:I saw it differently. Nick was the villain.

I agree!
lonepilot2 lonepilot2 Member
43 messages
joined Sep 2009
#32 ·
Please refrain from dropping spoilers without a warning; some of us haven't seen the movie yet.
bluebison8 bluebison8 Active Member
131 messages
joined Apr 2008
#33 ·
While I was watching this unfold, I honestly thought we were looking at a future cult classic—something on par with "when the lamb falls silent." But man, that ending completely tanked it. They had all this potential for sharp social commentary, only to pivot at the last second into a generic story about stopping a "terrorist." They didn't explicitly use the word, but let’s be real: it was staring us right in the face. And of course, because it's Hollywood, it had to wrap up with a massive explosion... 😢
Alex Long8 Alex Long8 Member
21 messages
joined Aug 2007
#34 ·
goldenhound32 said:That lethal injection setup looks way too massive for a human; it’s built for a horse. Total fake.

Why on earth would that guy—the one who managed to slip away—start spraying bullets at the police from the roof and basically broadcast his exact location like that? It's fake.

And why would he suddenly forget he was out of ammo, especially after finding that out just five minutes earlier? Fake.

When they first showed up to arrest the butler... why did it take five police cruisers, a SWAT team, and a helicopter? He was just a suspect at that point. Fake.

If there are any tech geeks in here, please explain to me how a flip phone is supposed to be able to fire a shot? Fake.

How was the butler supposed to know they were delivering a steak with a bone sharp enough to kill someone?

You are losing it.
stormystag43 stormystag43 Member
15 messages
joined Nov 2009
#35 ·
goldenhound32 said:That lethal injection setup looks way too massive for a human; it’s built for a horse. Total fake.

Why on earth would that guy—the one who managed to slip away—start spraying bullets at the police from the roof and basically broadcast his exact location like that? It's fake.

And why would he suddenly forget he was out of ammo, especially after finding that out just five minutes earlier? Fake.

When they first showed up to arrest the butler... why did it take five police cruisers, a SWAT team, and a helicopter? He was just a suspect at that point. Fake.

If there are any tech geeks in here, please explain to me how a flip phone is supposed to be able to fire a shot? Fake.

How was the butler supposed to know they were delivering a steak with a bone sharp enough to kill someone?

The injections are a perfectly normal size for an execution.

He shot because he's an idiot.

Again, because he's an idiot.

Wait, where did they come for him at the beginning of the movie??? At the start, they murdered and raped his wife and daughter. They came for him later. Under US federal law 3456/6, that's allowed.

A flip phone can shoot because it was designed by Gerard Butler, who's clearly an engineer and an innovator. The movie makes that pretty clear. My high school teacher used to be an inventor in his spare time and built some really cool, clever little gadgets. He could have definitely built a phone that shoots. I believe in the man.

He didn't kill that cellmate with a bone; he used a plastic fork.
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#36 ·
stormystag43 said:The injections are a perfectly normal size for an execution.

He shot because he's an idiot.

Again, because he's an idiot.

Wait, where did they come for him at the beginning of the movie??? At the start, they murdered and raped his wife and daughter. They came for him later. Under US federal law 3456/6, that's allowed.

A flip phone can shoot because it was designed by Gerard Butler, who's clearly an engineer and an innovator. The movie makes that pretty clear. My high school teacher used to be an inventor in his spare time and built some really cool, clever little gadgets. He could have definitely built a phone that shoots. I believe in the man.

He didn't kill that cellmate with a bone; he used a plastic fork.

I misspoke earlier. I wasn't referring to the syringes themselves, but rather those clear tubes used to deliver the poison. They look far too large.

He shot because he was an idiot.

Once again, because he was an idiot.

He isn't quite that much of an idiot.

I have no idea where they even went to get him at the start of the movie. His daughter and child were assaulted and murdered right at the beginning. Later, they came for him. Apparently, Federal Law 3456/6 allows them to do that.

Like that part where he stripped down naked.

That flip phone can explode because it was designed by Gerard Butler, who is portrayed as an engineer and innovator. The film makes that point very clearly.

Hehe, well, he could probably invent a cure for stupidity too, but that doesn't mean I'm going to believe it. It's fake.

He didn't kill that cellmate with a bone; it was a plastic fork.

Lies.
stormystag43 stormystag43 Member
15 messages
joined Nov 2009
#37 ·
goldenhound32 said:I misspoke earlier. I wasn't referring to the syringes themselves, but rather those clear tubes used to deliver the poison. They look far too large.

He shot because he was an idiot.

Once again, because he was an idiot.

He isn't quite that much of an idiot.

I have no idea where they even went to get him at the start of the movie. His daughter and child were assaulted and murdered right at the beginning. Later, they came for him. Apparently, Federal Law 3456/6 allows them to do that.

Like that part where he stripped down naked.

That flip phone can explode because it was designed by Gerard Butler, who is portrayed as an engineer and innovator. The film makes that point very clearly.

Hehe, well, he could probably invent a cure for stupidity too, but that doesn't mean I'm going to believe it. It's fake.

He didn't kill that cellmate with a bone; it was a plastic fork.

Lies.


Look, those tubes are totally standard size. That specific dimension gets used in pretty much every movie out there.😁

Sadly, he's just too much of an idiot. I know plenty of people like him.

Like I said, they can get away with this stuff because of that domestic law passed by George W. Bush.

Believe me, even my professor—who's quite the innovator—could probably build something similar if I asked nicely.
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#38 ·
@stormystag43
He absolutely played the bone card.

Right, I completely overlooked this little detail... fast forward ten years and everyone looks identical, except for the daughters of Fox News.🙄
stormystag43 stormystag43 Member
15 messages
joined Nov 2009
#39 ·
goldenhound32 said:@stormystag43
He absolutely played the bone card.

Right, I completely overlooked this little detail... fast forward ten years and everyone looks identical, except for the daughters of Fox News.🙄

Actually, no, he was looking for a metal fork, they gave him a plastic one instead, and he ended up killing his cellmate with it.

I just find it completely impossible that someone could dig out that many tunnels right next to a prison.

Pa Butler aged a bit over those ten years, but Fox stayed exactly the same. Totally realistic, right?
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#40 ·
stormystag43 said:Actually, no, he was looking for a metal fork, they gave him a plastic one instead, and he ended up killing his cellmate with it.

I just find it completely impossible that someone could dig out that many tunnels right next to a prison.

Pa Butler aged a bit over those ten years, but Fox stayed exactly the same. Totally realistic, right?

If you have the movie, go watch it.

I find it completely unrealistic that anyone could dig out those massive tunnels right next to a prison.

Is that all? 🙂

And what about Chester—that blond kid? The guy is literally sending emails to his girlfriend after she’s already dead. Just... lol.

Furthermore, a bomb powerful enough to wipe out everyone on two floors of a building like that wouldn't leave the prison itself untouched. Fox News should be calling them out for that level of negligence.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads