CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Jurassic Park

Jurassic Park

Started by Nathan Myers28 · · 👁 4 views · 58 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nathan Myers28Nancy Miller4Daniel Brooks78Carol King13redowl90Keith Kelly3Ronald Brooks75redpuma27Sophia Hughes8briskstag75Amanda Nguyen5Carol LewisRichard Wilson4quietdriver3ruggedfalcon28casualhound42Sam Lopez2Joseph Myers26mistyotter35Ethan Rivera53Joseph Chase29Jeremy Kim57Jessica GonzalezAndrew Roberts3 …
Nathan Myers28 Nathan Myers28 Active MemberOP
61 messages
joined Aug 2007
#1 ·
I just tried typing Jurassic Park and AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA into the search bar, and you know what? Absolutely nothing comes up. Seriously, what kind of country am I living in? It feels like I'm constantly being bombarded with all this Tarantino nonsense instead! Look, Jurassic Park is hands down my favorite movie of all time—and I’m sure I’m not alone in that feeling (even if I can't find any like-minded people on this specific forum). The film is a remake of Crichton's work, which won three Oscars, and honestly, the movie itself is pure perfection. The characters, the score—which shows John Williams at his absolute peak—the special effects... I mean, it’s from 1993, yet those effects still absolutely crush most of the CGI we see today. The story, everything! It was so impactful that after watching it, I actually started calling Sam Neill "Dr. Grant." Just a fair warning: please don't start any wars over this movie, or I'll end up sending you 75 private messages filled with various insults! And if anyone is planning to watch it, do yourselves a favor and read the books and the comics first—they are all masterpieces.
Nancy Miller4 Nancy Miller4 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Oct 2007
#2 ·
Absolute masterpiece. Even the second one isn't half bad, but man, that third installment is a total miss.
Daniel Brooks78 Daniel Brooks78 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Nov 2007
#3 ·
Man, it’s been 14 years already. I still remember those massive crowds hitting the theaters when it first dropped—it was absolutely insane. The casting was spot on, too—Ian Malcolm was just perfection!
Carol King13 Carol King13 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Dec 2007
#4 ·
Honestly, I was sitting there in the theater with my jaw on the floor the whole time.
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#5 ·
The first one is a masterpiece.
The second part - pretty good third
The third installment—a total masterpiece of trash cinema.

I have the complete trilogy at home. It looks fantastic, and there's a fourth bonus disc packed with a ton of interesting extras.
Keith Kelly3 Keith Kelly3 Member
49 messages
joined Nov 2007
#6 ·
Hey, I just recently fell down the rabbit hole after rewatching the first one. Does anyone actually know if or when a fourth installment is coming out? I saw some rumor floating around saying it might drop in 2008(?!)—which sounds totally bogus to me, especially since Spielberg is busy filming Indiana Jones...
Keith Kelly3 Keith Kelly3 Member
49 messages
joined Nov 2007
#7 ·
redowl90 said:The first one is a masterpiece.
The second part - pretty good third
The third installment—a total masterpiece of trash cinema.

I have the complete trilogy at home. It looks fantastic, and there's a fourth bonus disc packed with a ton of interesting extras.

So where did you snag that trilogy set with the bonus disc? All I've seen in stores are the single discs or they're sold separately...
Nathan Myers28 Nathan Myers28 Active MemberOP
61 messages
joined Aug 2007
#8 ·
Keith Kelly3 said:Hey, I just recently fell down the rabbit hole after rewatching the first one. Does anyone actually know if or when a fourth installment is coming out? I saw some rumor floating around saying it might drop in 2008(?!)—which sounds totally bogus to me, especially since Spielberg is busy filming Indiana Jones...

A fourth one is expected around 2008, though it won't be directed by Steven Spielberg in the same way the third one was. For Spielberg, the second part felt like the end of the line—the third one was actually helmed by Joe Johnston, and word on the street is he might be stepping back behind the camera for the fourth one too.
Keith Kelly3 Keith Kelly3 Member
49 messages
joined Nov 2007
#9 ·
Nathan Myers28 said:A fourth one is expected around 2008, though it won't be directed by Steven Spielberg in the same way the third one was. For Spielberg, the second part felt like the end of the line—the third one was actually helmed by Joe Johnston, and word on the street is he might be stepping back behind the camera for the fourth one too.

Man... if that happens, I'm low-key terrified it’ll turn into total trash. I read some rumor saying Spielberg mentioned wanting some kind of involvement in the fourth installment... maybe? Either way, I'm dying to see it, though I haven't seen anything solid regarding the production schedule yet.🤷
Nathan Myers28 Nathan Myers28 Active MemberOP
61 messages
joined Aug 2007
#10 ·
Keith Kelly3 said:Man... if that happens, I'm low-key terrified it’ll turn into total trash. I read some rumor saying Spielberg mentioned wanting some kind of involvement in the fourth installment... maybe? Either way, I'm dying to see it, though I haven't seen anything solid regarding the production schedule yet.🤷

Steven Spielberg is set to produce, and there's been chatter about some sort of outbreak hitting the island—basically a mission to rescue the dinosaurs. There's also talk involving Biosyn—which plays a massive role in the books, whereas in the first movie, you had Dodgson, that guy who assigned Nedry to steal the dinosaur embryos, being part of Biosyn. Anyway, for me personally, only the first one and the second part really count, mostly because they stayed true to the books and were directed by Steven Spielberg. As for a fourth one? I don't really care either way, as long as it isn't a disaster like the third one was—that movie really gave the whole franchise a bad reputation.
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#11 ·
Keith Kelly3 said:So where did you snag that trilogy set with the bonus disc? All I've seen in stores are the single discs or they're sold separately...

I picked mine up about two years ago back when that specific edition was still around. You can't find it in the US anymore.
Ronald Brooks75 Ronald Brooks75 Member
48 messages
joined Jan 2012
#12 ·
I’m watching some flick where they hire a guy to track down the son of some wealthy socialite, only to find out the kid is stuck on an island full of dinosaurs...
I can't quite recall which installment it is.
Keith Kelly3 Keith Kelly3 Member
49 messages
joined Nov 2007
#13 ·
Ronald Brooks75 said:I’m watching some flick where they hire a guy to track down the son of some wealthy socialite, only to find out the kid is stuck on an island full of dinosaurs...
I can't quite recall which installment it is.

That's the third one. I saw the third part when it first came out—didn't know much about movies back then so I actually liked it! But the first and second are still the best... mostly because of Steven Spielberg.
Nathan Myers28 Nathan Myers28 Active MemberOP
61 messages
joined Aug 2007
#14 ·
Keith Kelly3 said:That's the third one. I saw the third part when it first came out—didn't know much about movies back then so I actually liked it! But the first and second are still the best... mostly because of Steven Spielberg.

I remember seeing it back in 2001 when it first came out, but I honestly hated it immediately because of the T-Rex😢 . Fast forward a few years, though—once I actually started getting into movies—and I realized the third one is just plain bad. The first one has everything a perfect remake should have, and while the acting in the second one is a bit weaker, the story remains fantastic—plus, you get way more action and intensity (like that brutal scene where two T-Rexes ambush Eddia, lifting him up by his legs and chest before tearing him apart!). As for the third one? It’s a whole different story. The plot is dull, the characters are incredibly grating—with the exception of Usbesky, who dies far too early—and the Jurassic Park film shouldn't lean so heavily on humor, yet this one tries way too hard. There are only three deaths that actually land, and there is simply way too much CGI. Don't get me wrong, CGI can look great, but if they're going to rely on it that heavily, they might as well make the whole thing in CGI like King Kong! Instead, it looks like someone just drew dinosaurs over a photo; almost every scene feels staged in a studio, giving it this totally artificial vibe.
redpuma27 redpuma27 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2007
#15 ·
I’m a massive fan of Jurassic Park; I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve sat through all three films. Everyone knows the consensus is the same: the first one is the absolute best, the second part is okay, and the third is just alright.
Word on the street is that Steven Spielberg might actually step back into the director's chair for the fourth installment following the lukewarm reception of the third one—honestly, I’m crossing my fingers for that.
As for the plot, rumors are swirling that the fourth movie might ditch the island setting entirely and move the action onto the mainland.
We'll see if it actually happens.🙂
Sophia Hughes8 Sophia Hughes8 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2007
#16 ·
🙏 Jurassic Park 🙏
Nathan Myers28 Nathan Myers28 Active MemberOP
61 messages
joined Aug 2007
#17 ·
Sophia Hughes8 said:🙏 Jurassic Park 🙏

👍 It looks like I may have misjudged things—there is clearly a massive crowd of Jurassic Park fans hanging out here!
briskstag75 briskstag75 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jun 2007
#18 ·
I remember seeing the first one in theaters back when I was a kid—it absolutely blew my mind...
Amanda Nguyen5 Amanda Nguyen5 Active Member
134 messages
joined Dec 2007
#19 ·
It’s been ages since I sat down to watch these, and honestly, this is how they stuck with me. Though, I really should probably give them another spin through a more mature lens to see if my take changes:

Part 1 is a straight-up masterpiece.
Part 2? Total garbage.
Part 3 is actually decent.

I mean, back then I was just a kid, obsessed with stuff like >, >, and whatever else was playing at the theater...
Even though those classics still hold up, I definitely need to revisit the main topic again.
Carol Lewis Carol Lewis Active Member
222 messages
joined Oct 2008
#20 ·
It falls into the "believe it or not" category—I actually went to see the first installment in theaters no more and no less than four different times 🙂
...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads