Anthony Kim18
Active Member
238 messages
joined Apr 2006
If you define voyeurism that way, then every intellectual pursuit is just voyeurism.
Since people pick up books for the exact same reasons they sit down to watch a movie,
and I’m not just talking about fiction here,
but even non-fiction, because anyone reading a textbook is essentially "peeping" into an author's mind—their thoughts, their logic, and their conclusions.
By that logic, science itself is pure voyeurism.
We want to know how long it takes a car to get from New York to Los Angeles at a certain speed over a specific distance.
We study evolutionary biology to track the history of a species, which is basically invading their "privacy."
Even botany and zoology spend their time spying on their "subjects" from birth until death.
Then there's astronomy, spying on stars and planets and their "private" lives... where they move, what they do, what they are...
Meteorologists spy on whether folks in Chicago are going to get soaked by rain or if they'll be freezing on the streets and needing to crank up the heat...
And economics? It peeps right into people's wallets—what they buy, what they splurge on, and how much they're willing to pay for stuff... etc., etc.
So, movies aren't anything special; they're just as voyeuristic as everything else mentioned.
They aren't more or less than any other art form, and art isn't more or less than science itself...