#21 ·
When you're looking at British cinema, don't go forgetting the Monty Python films. They’re far from being disposable
Started by Anthony Kim18 · · 👁 8 views · 93 replies
Samuel Smith5 said:When you're looking at British cinema, don't go forgetting the Monty Python films. They’re far from being disposable
Joseph Lee3 said:I suppose I’m just a bit unconventional in my tastes. To me, they aren't exactly the pinnacle of cinematic achievement. It feels like almost every comedic trope they utilize can be traced back to something that came before them, so while they certainly carved out a specific, eclectic niche and built a massive cult following, I wouldn't go so far as to call them truly groundbreaking. That isn't to say they aren't entertaining, though... 🙂
Samuel Smith5 said:Come on, there’s no need to get worked up about it. Our tastes in cinema are just worlds apart. Honestly, anything older than I am feels completely uninteresting to me. I know, I know—it sounds sacrilegious, but that’s just how it is. I gravitate toward newer films. From what I can gather, you think color is the absolute worst thing to ever happen to movies 😁 (just kidding)
Joseph Lee3 said:Heh, it isn't even the color. It's the sound. There's just something about the audio that doesn't sit right with me. 😉
brightcobra91 said:Ummm... what happened to Italy? Japan? Spain? Sweden? (And I’m talking about their cinema, not just geography 😁). Seriously, I could go on forever—this poll is totally incomplete and honestly, it's a mistake to even bother voting.
David Price5 said:Just mute the player and turn the contrast down to zero, and you're all set.
Joseph Lee3 said:It doesn't really matter; at the end of the day, this is your poll. 🙂 You set the rules however you think is best. I was just jumping into the conversation... honestly, I love it when people debate national cinemas like this, even without a formal poll.
Personally, my heart belongs to France. My top three directors are all French—Jean Renoir, Henri-Georges Cluzot, and Jacques Tati—so I'm happy to cast my vote there. 😬 In my view, French cinema has managed to stay at the "top" longer than most when you weigh quality against quantity; they’ve produced more original movements and directors than almost anyone else. They were somewhat of a late bloomer compared to, say, German cinema, but while the German-speaking world essentially scattered across the globe (think Lubitch, Lang, Emmerich, Murnau, Wilder...), the French tend to stay pretty true to their own roots. That said, I’ve struggled to sit through much French film over the last 30 years or so. A Jean-Pierre Jeunet film? Honestly, it was a struggle... though I suppose it's "auteur" driven, which is probably what matters most.
Someone mentioned how similar American and British cinema can feel: 🙂
Historically, the British have fought a bloody battle against American dominance, made even harder by the fact that they share a language. In reality, Americans indirectly cut them down at the root back in the 1920s. Panicked about their domestic industry being completely wiped out, the British passed the Film Law (around 1927) which mandated a certain quota of British films in theaters across the UK. It turned out to be a double-edged sword; in a rush to meet those quotas, studios started churning out absolute garbage. These were the infamous "quota quickies," which the British are still pretty embarrassed about today. Since then, they've been cutting at the heels of American film, though there is a school of thought that thinks it’s great when British movies are made to mimic Hollywood perfectly—like "Weddings and a Funeral" and stuff like that. Though everyone admits that’s basically the only way they turn a real profit.
Regardless, I think the British have a few cinematic gems they can actually brag about: that specific brand of British comedy rooted in vaudeville—back in the 1930s, they were making films that haven't been matched since (just look at "Oh Mr. Porter!")—and that wave of social realism from the late 50s and 60s. That era gave us legends like Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. And I can't forget the unmatched duo of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, or the entire horror institution built by Hammer... the British definitely have things to show for themselves. 😍
Joseph Lee3 said:Forget the poll itself. Just tell us which one you actually dig and walk us through your reasoning; we're all ears...
Daniel Moore35 said:A Canadian, Anthony Kim18? ☕
Joseph Lee3 said:It doesn't really matter; at the end of the day, this is your poll. 🙂 You set the rules however you think is best. I was just jumping into the conversation... honestly, I love it when people debate national cinemas like this, even without a formal poll.
Personally, my heart belongs to France. My top three directors are all French—Jean Renoir, Henri-Georges Cluzot, and Jacques Tati—so I'm happy to cast my vote there. 😬 In my view, French cinema has managed to stay at the "top" longer than most when you weigh quality against quantity; they’ve produced more original movements and directors than almost anyone else. They were somewhat of a late bloomer compared to, say, German cinema, but while the German-speaking world essentially scattered across the globe (think Lubitch, Lang, Emmerich, Murnau, Wilder...), the French tend to stay pretty true to their own roots. That said, I’ve struggled to sit through much French film over the last 30 years or so. A Jean-Pierre Jeunet film? Honestly, it was a struggle... though I suppose it's "auteur" driven, which is probably what matters most.
Someone mentioned how similar American and British cinema can feel: 🙂
Historically, the British have fought a bloody battle against American dominance, made even harder by the fact that they share a language. In reality, Americans indirectly cut them down at the root back in the 1920s. Panicked about their domestic industry being completely wiped out, the British passed the Film Law (around 1927) which mandated a certain quota of British films in theaters across the UK. It turned out to be a double-edged sword; in a rush to meet those quotas, studios started churning out absolute garbage. These were the infamous "quota quickies," which the British are still pretty embarrassed about today. Since then, they've been cutting at the heels of American film, though there is a school of thought that thinks it’s great when British movies are made to mimic Hollywood perfectly—like "Weddings and a Funeral" and stuff like that. Though everyone admits that’s basically the only way they turn a real profit.
Regardless, I think the British have a few cinematic gems they can actually brag about: that specific brand of British comedy rooted in vaudeville—back in the 1930s, they were making films that haven't been matched since (just look at "Oh Mr. Porter!")—and that wave of social realism from the late 50s and 60s. That era gave us legends like Mike Leigh and Ken Loach. And I can't forget the unmatched duo of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, or the entire horror institution built by Hammer... the British definitely have things to show for themselves. 😍
brightcobra91 said:Ummm... what happened to Italy? Japan? Spain? Sweden? (And I’m talking about their cinema, not just geography 😁). Seriously, I could go on forever—this poll is totally incomplete and honestly, it's a mistake to even bother voting.
Anthony Kim18 said:Fine, have it your way.
But honestly, we’d never agree on a poll like this.
If you include Sweden, you've gotta include Finland, and don't even get me started on Norway.
If you throw Japan in there, you need China, maybe Hong Kong, probably Vietnam, and definitely India.
Kind of weird nobody called me out for leaving out Russia, too.