lonemarlin40 said:How can you even put Star Wars: Return of the Jedi in the same breath as Star Wars: The Phantom Menace?
All the movies in the original trilogy are miles ahead of anything in the prequel trilogy. Not because of the CGI or all those flashy tricks, but because of the actual vibe and how much fun they are. In the new trilogy, you never really get that feeling that the main characters are an inseparable crew constantly getting themselves into hot water. Thatβs what happens all the time in the old films.
Fine, sure, the plot has its merits, but there's gotta be something else.
Besides, I actually dig the new trilogy too, just in a different way. π
Bottom line: watch the old trilogy first, then the new stuff. It's the only way to actually appreciate both trilogies for what they really are.
π
Actually, yeah, obviously you watch the old ones first. We all know that...π but the acting in Return of the Jedi is easily some of the worst in all of Star Wars. It basically kills the movie. Then you've got those dumb Ewoks right next to the Gungans and that idiot Jar Jar Binks. The acting in The Phantom Menace is ten times better than in Return of the Jedi.
Just a reminder: Ian McDiarmid, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Liam Neeson, Sofia Coppola...π
whereas in Return of the Jedi, Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher were totally off, and even Harrison Ford didn't seem like himself. Honestly, the only thing saving that whole movie is Ian McDiarmid being great as Emperor Palpatine and that final showdown between Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker. Why? Because Mark Hamill barely says a word...
Obviously, the plot is better in Return of the Jedi...
I don't even need to explain why Attack of the Clones beats Return of the Jedi, let alone Revenge of the Sith...