Terry Ramos60 said:What do you mean by "their own sexuality"? Are you implying that critics write differently because they have a sex life or are sexual beings? Where on earth are you going to find a critic without sexuality in today's society of debauchery and immorality?
Just to save you from the suspense, what you’re calling "sexuality" is actually referred to as sexual orientation or preference. EVERYONE has "their own sexuality."
.
Honestly, you are unbelievable. You deliberately refuse to understand what people are trying to say, choosing instead to over-analyze every single detail just to somehow elevate yourself... or whatever it is you're doing.
You know perfectly well I was talking about the nature of her sexuality. I wasn't referring to "personal" sexuality, yours or mine. I had no idea people possessed sexual orientations—thanks ever so much for the enlightenment.🙄 Seriously, give it a rest. Stop acting either incredibly stupid or incredibly brilliant, whichever one this is. It happens with every single topic.
Back to the point: the movie was incredibly boring at times, way too drawn out, and frankly, quite tedious.