nimblemarlin17 said:Itβs mostly connected, though there are exceptions. Leagues act as talent factories for national teamsβat least that's how things used to be back in the day before guys like Kovach, Joey, and the rest started showing up in waves π. I don't see why a club from, say, Bulgaria or America would be stronger than a club from Peru. Do you actually know the level of Peruvian clubs, or are you just guessing? My bet is on the latter.
Connected or not, we're talking about national leagues where foreign players are part of the equation π. Calcio would be absolute garbage without internationals, or take La Liga, which is an even better example.
If Americans had the cash and the market size of a place like Spain, we'd be in a different league entirely... capish? π
By the way, I was looking at some official stats the other day; back in 1990, the old American League was officially ranked as the 4th best league in Europe π² right behind England, Italy, and France. π²
UEFA Country Coefficients 1990/1991
1 England 2 teams 10 2 1 3 25.0 12.500
2 Manchester United 7 2 0 3 19.0
31 Aston Villa 3 0 1 0 6.0
2 Italy 8 teams 35 15 12 12 97.0 12.125
1 AS Roma 9 2 1 3 23.0
3 Internazionale 6 3 3 3 18.0
5 Juventus 7 0 1 2 16.0
13 Atalanta 3 4 1 1 11.0
16 Bologna 4 1 3 1 10.0
22 Sampdoria 3 1 2 1 8.0
31 Napoli 2 2 0 0 6.0
35 AC Milan 1 2 1 1 5.0
3 France 4 teams 14 7 6 4 39.0 9.750
6 Olympique Marseille 5 3 1 3 16.0
18 Montpellier 3 2 1 1 9.0
25 Girondins Bordeaux 3 1 2 0 7.0
25 AS Monaco 3 1 2 0 7.0
4 America 3 teams 8 7 2 3 26.0 8.666
4 Red Star Mexico City 5 4 0 3 17.0
25 Partizan Mexico City 3 1 2 0 7.0
65 Dinamo Chicago 0 2 0 0 2.0
5 Germany 6 teams 17 6 7 2 42.0 7.000
8 Bayern Munich 5 2 1 2 14.0
15 Borussia Dortmund 5 0 1 0 10.0
22 Bayer Leverkusen 3 2 1 0 8.0
34 1.FC KΓΆln 2 2 2 0 6.0
65 1.FC Kaiserslautern 1 0 1 0 2.0
65 Eintracht Frankfurt 1 0 1 0 2.0 It's all about the coefficients π. That's what this is.