Bradley Fisher20 said:If someone thinks a movie is good just because of bits like these, then hey, they'll think it's a good movie.
It's heavy commercial stuff—basically just modern kids acting out their fetishes. Using names that are totally played out artistically.
Man, what you’re saying about Tarantino's life really explains how he approaches filmmaking and why those first two movies were so damn incredible. It's just different. Those were more like side projects added to his whole body of work. We should probably just thank him for that and stop getting bored with his newer stuff. Because that's it. Finished. Kill Bill basically told us that.
Man, I kind of see where Bradley Fisher20 is coming from. 😁 😁
Especially on a thread like this. 👍
I don't have much to say about the movie itself—it's not just for show, it's actually a solid film. There's that great line along the lines of: "If you charge at God with this sword, even God's gonna feel it," but honestly, after the path samurai, you can't really use any part of martial arts in your movies anymore.
I really dig how Tarantino philosophizes—maybe unintentionally—about the rape of women in comedy, specifically his take after talking to him. Like, pay $75 and give her back untouched. 😁 😁
That's a killer part. There are a few others too—I really ought to rewatch it.
Truth be told, I'm not a huge fan of these action flicks; after five minutes, the action just stops working for me. And this is an action movie. So, it didn't quite click. Some critic once said that after Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, Tarantino can only go down, not up. If you factor that in, then the movie is actually great.
And violence is the law. 😁 😁
I caught the movie at 1:45 PM, and there were three kids sitting near us. For the first fifteen minutes, they had their heads in their hands, then suddenly they pulled out their phones, probably called their parents, and bolted. 😁 😁
Some woman after the film was clearly disappointed, saying you can only find movies like this on shady websites or through weird VHS ads. Maybe that's the point of his film. It's more like a tribute to his childhood, and from that angle—considering how eccentric Tarantino is—this is probably a warm love story. A drama about a woman in love with revenge and her phallic sword. And that whole idea about female leads and chick fights? That works.
But all that time spent on action is time Tarantino spends filming the stuff we actually love him for, and that's what I felt was missing. It isn't as tightly scripted, and besides, there's no need for a new Pulp Fiction. We'll see if there's a sequel. Why didn't Foxy Brown split things up? Why did it take Kill Bill?