CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Started by Morgan Williams · · 👁 1K views · 18K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Morgan WilliamsRachel Cooper3Joseph Clark37Keith Patel81darkseal9neonfalcon16urbanhawk17Amanda Evans2bluebison47brightpilot6Patrick MartinJoseph Fisher3steelharbor9Robin Fox2Maria AndersonAnthony Jackson2Jason Newmanruggedjackal46Michelle Palmer6Jeffrey Edwards76Jason Campbell70Anthony Barrett37graniteangler31Dennis Evans6 …
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#7181 ·
Morgan Williams said:That's it. 🤦

Did his car get wrecked? He could just sue the survivors if there are any left. :horvatincicstyle:

We’re all complicit—everyone’s openly screwing over the public while we just sit here and take it. Everyone does whatever they want; these laws only seem to apply to the poor folks without any political connections, while the well-connected can do whatever they please with zero consequences. That court ruling regarding the massive corruption scandal involving the big federal agencies—which basically contradicts itself—is probably the most unbelievable decision in a sea of shameful verdicts designed to protect criminals and graft. Even today, they haven't managed to convict a major figure after five years of trials—it's almost like they need to master quantum physics just to prove a basic felony.

I'm following this whole situation with the University protests right now, and honestly, I'm glad someone finally had the guts to stand up and show some teeth against this broken system. Regardless of whether their specific cause is valid or not, I'm just rooting for the resistance.
Morgan Williams Morgan Williams Active MemberOP
131 messages
joined Aug 2012
#7182 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:We’re all complicit—everyone’s openly screwing over the public while we just sit here and take it. Everyone does whatever they want; these laws only seem to apply to the poor folks without any political connections, while the well-connected can do whatever they please with zero consequences. That court ruling regarding the massive corruption scandal involving the big federal agencies—which basically contradicts itself—is probably the most unbelievable decision in a sea of shameful verdicts designed to protect criminals and graft. Even today, they haven't managed to convict a major figure after five years of trials—it's almost like they need to master quantum physics just to prove a basic felony.

I'm following this whole situation with the University protests right now, and honestly, I'm glad someone finally had the guts to stand up and show some teeth against this broken system. Regardless of whether their specific cause is valid or not, I'm just rooting for the resistance.

Regarding the former PM, it would be unfair to throw him in jail while letting the Republican party walk away scot-free. He’d just be the scapegoat. It would be like if we set a bucket of water over the door in my old elementary school classroom to prank the teacher (something like that), but then only the class president gets detention because apparently nobody else in the room saw a thing. He couldn't have pulled this off alone any more than just having Messi, Suarez, and Neymar on a team could carry them through the Champions League; you need a coordinated squad, a strategy, and meticulous planning. The rot goes way too deep into every single layer.

Yeah, a solid reaction from the University. 👍

Agreed. We share the blame, but most people shape the country they want. We could have been complaining eight years ago about being blindsided, but not anymore. Now, we’re living in the exact kind of disgusting circus we consciously chose.

Oh, and what they're pulling on CNN right now? Absolute genius. 🤣
Sandra Johnson58 Sandra Johnson58 Active Member
125 messages
joined Apr 2019
#7183 ·
Morgan Williams said:Regarding the former PM, it would be unfair to throw him in jail while letting the Republican party walk away scot-free. He’d just be the scapegoat. It would be like if we set a bucket of water over the door in my old elementary school classroom to prank the teacher (something like that), but then only the class president gets detention because apparently nobody else in the room saw a thing. He couldn't have pulled this off alone any more than just having Messi, Suarez, and Neymar on a team could carry them through the Champions League; you need a coordinated squad, a strategy, and meticulous planning. The rot goes way too deep into every single layer.

Yeah, a solid reaction from the University. 👍

Agreed. We share the blame, but most people shape the country they want. We could have been complaining eight years ago about being blindsided, but not anymore. Now, we’re living in the exact kind of disgusting circus we consciously chose.

Oh, and what they're pulling on CNN right now? Absolute genius. 🤣

I don't know why everyone's acting so shocked, though. I mean, every single administration does this kind of stuff.
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#7184 ·
Morgan Williams said:Regarding the former PM, it would be unfair to throw him in jail while letting the Republican party walk away scot-free. He’d just be the scapegoat. It would be like if we set a bucket of water over the door in my old elementary school classroom to prank the teacher (something like that), but then only the class president gets detention because apparently nobody else in the room saw a thing. He couldn't have pulled this off alone any more than just having Messi, Suarez, and Neymar on a team could carry them through the Champions League; you need a coordinated squad, a strategy, and meticulous planning. The rot goes way too deep into every single layer.

Yeah, a solid reaction from the University. 👍

Agreed. We share the blame, but most people shape the country they want. We could have been complaining eight years ago about being blindsided, but not anymore. Now, we’re living in the exact kind of disgusting circus we consciously chose.

Oh, and what they're pulling on CNN right now? Absolute genius. 🤣

True, but you can't convict Sanders without indicting the whole Republican Party.

I agree, we share the blame, but most people are essentially building the country they want. We could have complained eight years ago about being blindsided by this, but not anymore. Now we're just living in the exact kind of pathetic circus we consciously chose.

The question is who is actually choosing this? Nobody voted for some caricature to run the country. Listening to him sometimes feels like being in a parallel universe—if he weren't so tragic, he'd actually be a comedy.

I honestly think people will snap eventually and things will descend into chaos. This administration seems tailor-made to ignite the nation through sheer stupidity and their knee-jerk reactions to minor protests. But I fear it might be too late, and even if it happens, it'll be futile—we stopped making our own decisions a long time ago; now someone else out West handles that for us.

Sandra Johnson58 said:I don't know why everyone's acting so shocked, though. I mean, every single administration does this kind of stuff.

They do, but not in such an obvious, blatant way. This isn't some grand mission to "purge leftist influence" like they're trying to sell us—it's just basic political cronyism and installing loyalists. Just look at how they started pushing out veteran journalists in NYC just to appease certain radical factions. They aren't "loyal" enough. And then there was the Reform Party—they promised us the moon and stars, big changes we desperately needed. What did we get? They filled positions just as fast as the Democrats, backed out of local government reforms, abandoned cutting congressional perks "because nobody supports them 🙂," and grabbed every single privilege they claimed they were going to abolish. Unbelievable.

In the end, that one populist outlier was the only one showing any accountability to voters; everyone else just folded.
Peter Thompson4 Peter Thompson4 Regular
391 messages
joined Apr 2014
#7185 ·
Morgan Williams said:Another one dead. This piece of trash should consider ten years in prison a total gift. He deserves twenty, minimum—honestly, probably much more.


Like someone already pointed out, there's absolutely no way that's enough. There's this ridiculous legal loophole where if you're over the limit, the law somehow treats you differently—like it’s "easier" on you somehow—though I have no clue how that even applies when you're driving drunk and crushing someone under your car, and I guess it depends on your prior record. But apparently, it’s not viewed the same way whether you kill someone with zero alcohol in your system or if you're totally wasted at like two percent.

I'm sure the people hanging out on this sub know the legalities better than I do, but my best guess is maybe six years, then potentially parole after four if he plays nice. And let me tell you, the guy deserves a minimum of 25.

I can't stand that idiot; he's always been a complete moron. Just a total lowlife.
James Anderson5 James Anderson5 Regular
460 messages
joined Jan 2010
#7186 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:True, but you can't convict Sanders without indicting the whole Republican Party.

I agree, we share the blame, but most people are essentially building the country they want. We could have complained eight years ago about being blindsided by this, but not anymore. Now we're just living in the exact kind of pathetic circus we consciously chose.

The question is who is actually choosing this? Nobody voted for some caricature to run the country. Listening to him sometimes feels like being in a parallel universe—if he weren't so tragic, he'd actually be a comedy.

I honestly think people will snap eventually and things will descend into chaos. This administration seems tailor-made to ignite the nation through sheer stupidity and their knee-jerk reactions to minor protests. But I fear it might be too late, and even if it happens, it'll be futile—we stopped making our own decisions a long time ago; now someone else out West handles that for us.

They do, but not in such an obvious, blatant way. This isn't some grand mission to "purge leftist influence" like they're trying to sell us—it's just basic political cronyism and installing loyalists. Just look at how they started pushing out veteran journalists in NYC just to appease certain radical factions. They aren't "loyal" enough. And then there was the Reform Party—they promised us the moon and stars, big changes we desperately needed. What did we get? They filled positions just as fast as the Democrats, backed out of local government reforms, abandoned cutting congressional perks "because nobody supports them 🙂," and grabbed every single privilege they claimed they were going to abolish. Unbelievable.

In the end, that one populist outlier was the only one showing any accountability to voters; everyone else just folded.

The people who actually care are usually the ones moving to places like Ireland or Germany, while everyone else stays put because this mess works for them. The system is packed with people living off the taxpayer, praying that absolutely nothing ever changes...

I believe either a local analyst or a news pundit did a deep dive on this using actual data. Basically, when you combine the public sector, all those government contractors, and state-owned corporations, you're looking at about 70% of the workforce. Add in the massive amount of specialized government pensions and veteran benefits, and you have this huge group of people who want change, but only if it means keeping everything exactly the way it is right now...

That's why I think it's hard to see things getting better here. It feels like things can only go downhill, even though we had every single opportunity to become an incredible nation...
Morgan Williams Morgan Williams Active MemberOP
131 messages
joined Aug 2012
#7187 ·
Sandra Johnson58 said:I don't know why everyone's acting so shocked, though. I mean, every single administration does this kind of stuff.

I'm not talking about simple rigging here—I’m talking about blatant censorship of news programs. Honestly, looking at the polling data and what the military demographic leans toward after those rigged trials and the live coverage out of DC, I wouldn't be surprised if they pull the plug on shows like Jeopardy next. Anything that actually teaches people or forces them to use their brains is considered a threat. We have the nightly news where the anchor just lectures us on how the patriots are planning reforms that haven't even started yet, and then during the commercial break, they pivot to some religious programming or biographies of saints. Any other way of getting information is strictly off-limits.☕

Luckily, I don't own a TV, so at least those criminal parasites aren't getting my subscription money.

Anthony Jackson2 said:True, but you can't convict Sanders without indicting the whole Republican Party.

I agree, we share the blame, but most people are essentially building the country they want. We could have complained eight years ago about being blindsided by this, but not anymore. Now we're just living in the exact kind of pathetic circus we consciously chose.

The question is who is actually choosing this? Nobody voted for some caricature to run the country. Listening to him sometimes feels like being in a parallel universe—if he weren't so tragic, he'd actually be a comedy.

I honestly think people will snap eventually and things will descend into chaos. This administration seems tailor-made to ignite the nation through sheer stupidity and their knee-jerk reactions to minor protests. But I fear it might be too late, and even if it happens, it'll be futile—we stopped making our own decisions a long time ago; now someone else out West handles that for us.

They do, but not in such an obvious, blatant way. This isn't some grand mission to "purge leftist influence" like they're trying to sell us—it's just basic political cronyism and installing loyalists. Just look at how they started pushing out veteran journalists in NYC just to appease certain radical factions. They aren't "loyal" enough. And then there was the Reform Party—they promised us the moon and stars, big changes we desperately needed. What did we get? They filled positions just as fast as the Democrats, backed out of local government reforms, abandoned cutting congressional perks "because nobody supports them 🙂," and grabbed every single privilege they claimed they were going to abolish. Unbelievable.

In the end, that one populist outlier was the only one showing any accountability to voters; everyone else just folded.

Look, the guy deserved his prison sentence, but my point was that it won't change the power structure in this country. In a functional nation, by 2010, the GOP would only exist in history textbooks—noted as a party that played a role in winning the war while simultaneously gutting the country through corrupt privatizations, all while their loyal followers cheered them on. Now we have a ruling party that couldn't present a single economic policy on air or face a debate against the "worst administration in history." Their campaign speeches basically sounded like: "War war veterans war patriotism communists God war war reforms war reforms war war royalists communists God patriots war war war war war."

It’s inevitable that someone else will eventually take over this country. Geographically speaking, there's too much potential here for it to stay this way, and it's not the land's fault it's spent 25 years suffering under various flavors of idiots in charge.

Besides, according to the Constitution, we're a secular nation.🤣
ambertinker41 ambertinker41 Regular
273 messages
joined Jun 2012
#7188 ·
Matthew Anderson4 ☕
urbanhawk17 urbanhawk17 Regular
575 messages
joined Mar 2020
#7189 ·
ambertinker41 said:Matthew Anderson4 ☕

Even newer
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#7190 ·
urbanhawk17 said:Even newer

🤣🤣🤣
Gregory Chavez Gregory Chavez Member
46 messages
joined Jul 2009
#7191 ·
urbanhawk17 said:Even newer

🤣🤣🤣
ambertinker41 ambertinker41 Regular
273 messages
joined Jun 2012
#7192 ·
http://slither.io/

My high score is sitting at 38k.
Robin Fox2 Robin Fox2 Regular
523 messages
joined Apr 2016
#7193 ·
Is there any way to pause this and pick up where I left off... 🤣
Sandra Johnson58 Sandra Johnson58 Active Member
125 messages
joined Apr 2019
#7194 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:True, but you can't convict Sanders without indicting the whole Republican Party.

I agree, we share the blame, but most people are essentially building the country they want. We could have complained eight years ago about being blindsided by this, but not anymore. Now we're just living in the exact kind of pathetic circus we consciously chose.

The question is who is actually choosing this? Nobody voted for some caricature to run the country. Listening to him sometimes feels like being in a parallel universe—if he weren't so tragic, he'd actually be a comedy.

I honestly think people will snap eventually and things will descend into chaos. This administration seems tailor-made to ignite the nation through sheer stupidity and their knee-jerk reactions to minor protests. But I fear it might be too late, and even if it happens, it'll be futile—we stopped making our own decisions a long time ago; now someone else out West handles that for us.

They do, but not in such an obvious, blatant way. This isn't some grand mission to "purge leftist influence" like they're trying to sell us—it's just basic political cronyism and installing loyalists. Just look at how they started pushing out veteran journalists in NYC just to appease certain radical factions. They aren't "loyal" enough. And then there was the Reform Party—they promised us the moon and stars, big changes we desperately needed. What did we get? They filled positions just as fast as the Democrats, backed out of local government reforms, abandoned cutting congressional perks "because nobody supports them 🙂," and grabbed every single privilege they claimed they were going to abolish. Unbelievable.

In the end, that one populist outlier was the only one showing any accountability to voters; everyone else just folded.

Man, it's been like, what, 25 years since there were any actual die-hard party loyalists left? And their talent pool is even thinner than that. I honestly don't know if there were even any true-blue hardline communists on PBS back in the old days. Most of the people there were just in it for the perks and the sweet benefits, not because they actually believed in the ideology. I mean, if I'm being totally honest, most of them probably didn't even care about the whole communist thing—but hey, you don't bite the hand that feeds you, right? And when it comes to shuffling staff around... well, the Democrats pull the exact same moves. They basically operate on the same playbook, even going as far as changing the laws governing public broadcasting just to suit them. It seems like every time there’s a change in administration, the *modus operandi* is always the same: just a massive revolving door for cronies and political appointees. The Democrats are just way better at it, though. Their public image is definitely more polished than the Republicans'. They're much better at hiding their dirty laundry, and honestly, they probably have less of it to hide anyway. To put it bluntly? The Democrats will wrap a pile of crap in fancy gold foil two hundred times so you don't realize what it is until you unwrap it. Meanwhile, the Republicans just hand you a turd wrapped in a greasy paper bag from a local bakery.😁.
I don't know, I find it kind of hilarious watching people lose their minds because MOST decided to ditch the Democrats and team up with the Republicans instead. Like, honestly? It would’ve been way better if they had just gone with some other party entirely—then things actually might have gone smoothly for once.🤣I mean, look, Democrats might be slightly better than Republicans, but let’s be real—they both suck. In any actual, functioning country, they’d just be a tiny footnote in history. They wouldn't be hogging all these seats in Congress just because their fan clubs refuse to let anyone else take the wheel.
I mean, I’ve actually had the privilege of working as a contractor for some big government agencies, and honestly? When it comes to cronyism and hiring their buddies, there isn't much of a difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. I don't even need some "expert" analyst to tell me that. I've seen enough firsthand—just listening to those hacks from both sides mock each other while simultaneously giving these long-winded speeches about why they'd "never" work for such low wages. It's all the same.
Honestly, I don't even have the energy to write about this. I totally messed up big time, and I guess I'm pretty late to the party with this response too.

Anthony Jackson2 said:True, but you can't convict Sanders without indicting the whole Republican Party.

I agree, we share the blame, but most people are essentially building the country they want. We could have complained eight years ago about being blindsided by this, but not anymore. Now we're just living in the exact kind of pathetic circus we consciously chose.

The question is who is actually choosing this? Nobody voted for some caricature to run the country. Listening to him sometimes feels like being in a parallel universe—if he weren't so tragic, he'd actually be a comedy.

I honestly think people will snap eventually and things will descend into chaos. This administration seems tailor-made to ignite the nation through sheer stupidity and their knee-jerk reactions to minor protests. But I fear it might be too late, and even if it happens, it'll be futile—we stopped making our own decisions a long time ago; now someone else out West handles that for us.

They do, but not in such an obvious, blatant way. This isn't some grand mission to "purge leftist influence" like they're trying to sell us—it's just basic political cronyism and installing loyalists. Just look at how they started pushing out veteran journalists in NYC just to appease certain radical factions. They aren't "loyal" enough. And then there was the Reform Party—they promised us the moon and stars, big changes we desperately needed. What did we get? They filled positions just as fast as the Democrats, backed out of local government reforms, abandoned cutting congressional perks "because nobody supports them 🙂," and grabbed every single privilege they claimed they were going to abolish. Unbelievable.

In the end, that one populist outlier was the only one showing any accountability to voters; everyone else just folded.

🤣 I mean, is this some kind of new thing where everyone just loses their minds? Because honestly, it feels like this has been the standard since the dawn of time here in America.
James Anderson5 James Anderson5 Regular
460 messages
joined Jan 2010
#7195 ·
I'll just sign off on everything Sandra Johnson58 wrote, no point in wasting my quotes... recession is ☕
James Anderson5 James Anderson5 Regular
460 messages
joined Jan 2010
#7196 ·
I'm not sure if there are any fans of LOTR or GOT in here, if there are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAAp...ature=youtu.be
🤣
Paul Sanders5 Paul Sanders5 Regular
571 messages
joined Apr 2019
#7197 ·
Forum hacker in the building, y'all better watch your backs and keep those passwords locked down tight.
Walter Grant5 Walter Grant5 Regular
459 messages
joined Oct 2012
#7198 ·
Look, regarding this idea about topping up base salaries with whatever extra they pull from session attendance for those legislative roles... am I reading this right? Are these representatives actually claiming it's impossible to track who shows up to a meeting and who doesn't? How is that even possible, you absolute morons? What a total joke.
Matthew Young35 Matthew Young35 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jan 2018
#7199 ·
Absence from Congress can simply be a tactical move in the opposition's parliamentary struggle.
The best recent example occurred when the opposition boycotted a session, leaving the ruling Republicans without a quorum to pass some piece of nonsense. It is a perfectly legal maneuver within our legislative system.

Would you really want the opposition to face financial penalties just for engaging in political maneuvering?
Walter Grant5 Walter Grant5 Regular
459 messages
joined Oct 2012
#7200 ·
It’s "legal" just because they say it is. If it wasn't, they wouldn't claim it was. That kind of logic is a joke—just a way to stall and kill any actual progress.

Sure, maybe. Fine, let’s pretend skipping work is somehow "constructive" in this scenario. But what about the dozens of other times when it isn't? Like when the whole Senate is basically an empty room most of the time? You can't honestly tell me all that is just opposition "rhetoric."

Third off, where is the actual logic in claiming it's impossible to track who showed up and who didn't? What kind of idiot actually argues that you can't control attendance?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads