loneseal said:Give me a break. There are plenty of streets named after resistance fighters in any big US city, so you're talking nonsense. And trying to equate someone who used fascist tactics with actual anti-fascism? That's a disgusting insult to the whole movement.
Which is exactly what I have explicitly rejected. That figure was a far more complex individual than that.
What he did, he did, and if you ask me, I would have removed anyone responsible for even a fraction of those casualties. But to equate him and his movement with Nazi ideology, their specific methods, and their ultimate results? That is an insult to common sense. It seems there is a desperate modern desire to reduce both regimes to a mere category of
totalitarianism (rofl).
If nothing else, under his rule, you were in trouble if you opposed the regime—a situation where you actually had some agency to influence your own fate. Romani people or Jewish Americans didn't have that luxury, and sooner or later, we would have been next, even if just as low-level laborers. When I look at the sheer hatred directed toward him today, sixty or seventy years after these events transpired, the political choices available to him during those critical moments don't exactly seem abundant.
In short, given how primal our nature is, I am convinced we would have ended up slaughtering one another at the end of the war regardless of which side emerged victorious; once that outcome became inevitable, wasn't it perhaps better that his side won?
Ultimately, the square itself doesn't matter to me; what truly irritates me about this entire saga is yet another confirmation of the stupidity inherent in this nation, where people view such displays as patriotism while simultaneously handing favors to figures like a corrupt mayor in a city like Chicago. This pattern of keeping one hand on the heart and the other deep in someone's pocket has been the only constant in this dysfunctional country for decades.